Incomplete knowledge: ethnography and the crisis of context in studies of media, science and technology
This article examines strands of an intellectual history in Media and Cultural Studies and Science and Technology Studies in both of which researchers were prompted to take up ethnography. Three historical phases of this process are identified. The move between phases was the result of particular di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | History of the human sciences 2001-02, Vol.14 (1), p.69-87 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 87 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | History of the human sciences |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Schlecker, Markus Hirsch, Eric |
description | This article examines strands of an intellectual history in Media and Cultural Studies and Science and Technology Studies in both of which researchers were prompted to take up ethnography. Three historical phases of this process are identified. The move between phases was the result of particular displacements and contestations of perspective in the research procedures within each discipline. Thus concerns about appropriate contextualization led to the eventual embrace of anthropological ethnographic methods. The article traces the subsequent emergence of a ‘crisis of context’ in the deployment of ethnography within these disciplines. The analysis of these historical changes is informed by a particular depiction of Euro-American knowledge conventions. The article suggests that the limits currently perceived for ethnography are a specific instance of the more general limits now recognized for these knowledge conventions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/095269510101400104 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71405721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_095269510101400104</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1036555510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-100eae89e2cb440853ef3efc5ae2a9a822861ab93ea995bc0d7b1dcf28e04e1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoMo7jj6B7yQ4IV4Yd1z8tl4J4sfCwveKHhX0vS007XTjE2Lzr834wwoik4SzoHwvG_g5GXsMcJLRGsvwWlhnEbIW0Gu6g5boTJYWAGf77LVASgOxAV7kNItAChQeJ9doHXGaKtXrLseQ9zuBpqJfxnjt4Gajl5xmjdj7Ca_2-y5Hxs-b4iHqU994rHlIY4zfZ95P_I0L01PP2-31PT-BU-hpzHQUUYh-wyx2z9k91o_JHp06mv26e2bj1fvi5sP766vXt8UwUA5FwhAnkpHItRKQakltfkE7Ul450shSoO-dpK8c7oO0Ngam9CKkkARtnLNnh19d1P8ulCaq22fAg2DHykuqbJ5UtoKPAsaUFIIsGdBba2xBt1ZUJZCAgqTwef_BRGk0XnlvmZP_0Bv4zKNeYIVOuUkSicyJI5QmGJKE7XVbuq3ftpnp-qQlOrvpGTRk5PzUuef-yU5RSMDl0cg-Y5-e_bflj8AwmvFRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194931392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incomplete knowledge: ethnography and the crisis of context in studies of media, science and technology</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Schlecker, Markus ; Hirsch, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Schlecker, Markus ; Hirsch, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines strands of an intellectual history in Media and Cultural Studies and Science and Technology Studies in both of which researchers were prompted to take up ethnography. Three historical phases of this process are identified. The move between phases was the result of particular displacements and contestations of perspective in the research procedures within each discipline. Thus concerns about appropriate contextualization led to the eventual embrace of anthropological ethnographic methods. The article traces the subsequent emergence of a ‘crisis of context’ in the deployment of ethnography within these disciplines. The analysis of these historical changes is informed by a particular depiction of Euro-American knowledge conventions. The article suggests that the limits currently perceived for ethnography are a specific instance of the more general limits now recognized for these knowledge conventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-6951</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-720X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/095269510101400104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17966575</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HHSCEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Academic discipline ; Anthropology ; Anthropology, Cultural - history ; Communication Research ; Community Participation - history ; Community Participation - psychology ; Context ; Contextual analysis ; Crisis ; Cultural Characteristics ; Cultural Diversity ; Epistemology ; Ethnography ; Ethnology ; History ; History of medicine ; History of sociology ; History, 20th Century ; Knowledge ; Mass media ; Mass Media - history ; Media ; Methodological Problems ; Relativism ; Research methods ; Researchers ; Science ; Science - history ; Science and Technology ; Scientific Knowledge ; Societies - history ; Sociology of Culture ; Sociology of knowledge ; Sociology of Science ; Studies ; Technology ; Technology - history</subject><ispartof>History of the human sciences, 2001-02, Vol.14 (1), p.69-87</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Feb 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-100eae89e2cb440853ef3efc5ae2a9a822861ab93ea995bc0d7b1dcf28e04e1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-100eae89e2cb440853ef3efc5ae2a9a822861ab93ea995bc0d7b1dcf28e04e1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/095269510101400104$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095269510101400104$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,31000,33774,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17966575$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schlecker, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Incomplete knowledge: ethnography and the crisis of context in studies of media, science and technology</title><title>History of the human sciences</title><addtitle>Hist Human Sci</addtitle><description>This article examines strands of an intellectual history in Media and Cultural Studies and Science and Technology Studies in both of which researchers were prompted to take up ethnography. Three historical phases of this process are identified. The move between phases was the result of particular displacements and contestations of perspective in the research procedures within each discipline. Thus concerns about appropriate contextualization led to the eventual embrace of anthropological ethnographic methods. The article traces the subsequent emergence of a ‘crisis of context’ in the deployment of ethnography within these disciplines. The analysis of these historical changes is informed by a particular depiction of Euro-American knowledge conventions. The article suggests that the limits currently perceived for ethnography are a specific instance of the more general limits now recognized for these knowledge conventions.</description><subject>Academic discipline</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Anthropology, Cultural - history</subject><subject>Communication Research</subject><subject>Community Participation - history</subject><subject>Community Participation - psychology</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Contextual analysis</subject><subject>Crisis</subject><subject>Cultural Characteristics</subject><subject>Cultural Diversity</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Ethnology</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>History of medicine</subject><subject>History of sociology</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Mass Media - history</subject><subject>Media</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Relativism</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science - history</subject><subject>Science and Technology</subject><subject>Scientific Knowledge</subject><subject>Societies - history</subject><subject>Sociology of Culture</subject><subject>Sociology of knowledge</subject><subject>Sociology of Science</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology - history</subject><issn>0952-6951</issn><issn>1461-720X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoMo7jj6B7yQ4IV4Yd1z8tl4J4sfCwveKHhX0vS007XTjE2Lzr834wwoik4SzoHwvG_g5GXsMcJLRGsvwWlhnEbIW0Gu6g5boTJYWAGf77LVASgOxAV7kNItAChQeJ9doHXGaKtXrLseQ9zuBpqJfxnjt4Gajl5xmjdj7Ca_2-y5Hxs-b4iHqU994rHlIY4zfZ95P_I0L01PP2-31PT-BU-hpzHQUUYh-wyx2z9k91o_JHp06mv26e2bj1fvi5sP766vXt8UwUA5FwhAnkpHItRKQakltfkE7Ul450shSoO-dpK8c7oO0Ngam9CKkkARtnLNnh19d1P8ulCaq22fAg2DHykuqbJ5UtoKPAsaUFIIsGdBba2xBt1ZUJZCAgqTwef_BRGk0XnlvmZP_0Bv4zKNeYIVOuUkSicyJI5QmGJKE7XVbuq3ftpnp-qQlOrvpGTRk5PzUuef-yU5RSMDl0cg-Y5-e_bflj8AwmvFRw</recordid><startdate>20010201</startdate><enddate>20010201</enddate><creator>Schlecker, Markus</creator><creator>Hirsch, Eric</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010201</creationdate><title>Incomplete knowledge: ethnography and the crisis of context in studies of media, science and technology</title><author>Schlecker, Markus ; Hirsch, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-100eae89e2cb440853ef3efc5ae2a9a822861ab93ea995bc0d7b1dcf28e04e1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Academic discipline</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Anthropology, Cultural - history</topic><topic>Communication Research</topic><topic>Community Participation - history</topic><topic>Community Participation - psychology</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Contextual analysis</topic><topic>Crisis</topic><topic>Cultural Characteristics</topic><topic>Cultural Diversity</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Ethnology</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>History of medicine</topic><topic>History of sociology</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Mass Media - history</topic><topic>Media</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Relativism</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science - history</topic><topic>Science and Technology</topic><topic>Scientific Knowledge</topic><topic>Societies - history</topic><topic>Sociology of Culture</topic><topic>Sociology of knowledge</topic><topic>Sociology of Science</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology - history</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schlecker, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>History of the human sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schlecker, Markus</au><au>Hirsch, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incomplete knowledge: ethnography and the crisis of context in studies of media, science and technology</atitle><jtitle>History of the human sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Hist Human Sci</addtitle><date>2001-02-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>69-87</pages><issn>0952-6951</issn><eissn>1461-720X</eissn><coden>HHSCEO</coden><abstract>This article examines strands of an intellectual history in Media and Cultural Studies and Science and Technology Studies in both of which researchers were prompted to take up ethnography. Three historical phases of this process are identified. The move between phases was the result of particular displacements and contestations of perspective in the research procedures within each discipline. Thus concerns about appropriate contextualization led to the eventual embrace of anthropological ethnographic methods. The article traces the subsequent emergence of a ‘crisis of context’ in the deployment of ethnography within these disciplines. The analysis of these historical changes is informed by a particular depiction of Euro-American knowledge conventions. The article suggests that the limits currently perceived for ethnography are a specific instance of the more general limits now recognized for these knowledge conventions.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><pmid>17966575</pmid><doi>10.1177/095269510101400104</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0952-6951 |
ispartof | History of the human sciences, 2001-02, Vol.14 (1), p.69-87 |
issn | 0952-6951 1461-720X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71405721 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Academic discipline Anthropology Anthropology, Cultural - history Communication Research Community Participation - history Community Participation - psychology Context Contextual analysis Crisis Cultural Characteristics Cultural Diversity Epistemology Ethnography Ethnology History History of medicine History of sociology History, 20th Century Knowledge Mass media Mass Media - history Media Methodological Problems Relativism Research methods Researchers Science Science - history Science and Technology Scientific Knowledge Societies - history Sociology of Culture Sociology of knowledge Sociology of Science Studies Technology Technology - history |
title | Incomplete knowledge: ethnography and the crisis of context in studies of media, science and technology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A17%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incomplete%20knowledge:%20ethnography%20and%20the%20crisis%20of%20context%20in%20studies%20of%20media,%20science%20and%20technology&rft.jtitle=History%20of%20the%20human%20sciences&rft.au=Schlecker,%20Markus&rft.date=2001-02-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=69-87&rft.issn=0952-6951&rft.eissn=1461-720X&rft.coden=HHSCEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/095269510101400104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1036555510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194931392&rft_id=info:pmid/17966575&rft_sage_id=10.1177_095269510101400104&rfr_iscdi=true |