Treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus with local anaesthesia: a randomized trial of closed compared with open technique
Objective To compare open with closed treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus. Patients and methods From 1993 to 1996, 100 patients were submitted to excision of chronic pilonidal sinus, with local anaesthesia and were randomized in two groups: group A in which open treatment and group B in which direc...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Colorectal disease 2001-11, Vol.3 (6), p.427-430 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 430 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 427 |
| container_title | Colorectal disease |
| container_volume | 3 |
| creator | Testini, M. Piccinni, G. Miniello, S. Di Venere, B. Lissidini, G. Nicolardi, V. Bonomo, G. M. |
| description | Objective
To compare open with closed treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus.
Patients and methods
From 1993 to 1996, 100 patients were submitted to excision of chronic pilonidal sinus, with local anaesthesia and were randomized in two groups: group A in which open treatment and group B in which direct suture were performed. The follow‐up, ranging from 37 to 89 months, was performed by outpatient visits or by phone.
Results
Short‐term results showed 6 (12.0%) post‐operative complications in group A vs 10 (20.0%) in group B. Long‐term results showed 9 (18.0%) complications in group A vs 7 (14.0%) in group B. Mean wound healing was 58 days (range: 29–93) in group A vs 12 (range: 9–61) in group B. The return to normal activity was 25.7 (range: 11–77) vs 10.4 (range: 5–32). Wound healing and the return to normal activity were the only statistically significant differences.
Conclusions
Regarding morbidity neither technique has particular advantages over the other. The closed technique produced quicker wound healing and a quicker return to normal activity. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00278.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71392774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71392774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3188-c869fb584fa1f5d1e313a0b6f84050841c95ed36ae0b7569484b8e64b02c6ea73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9P3DAQxa2qVaG0X6HyqbcEO3ZsB4lDtfwpYlUuVBwtx5lovU3i1M7CwqfH2V3BtacZz7zfG_khhCnJKeHidJ1TLlhGGVV5QQjNCSmkyrcf0PHb4uOuLzJVUXKEvsS4TkIhqfqMjmghK1Jxdowe7wOYqYdhwr7FdhX84CweXZdqYzoc3bCJ-MlNK9x5mwZmMBCnFURnzrDBwQyN790LNHgKLu1nl87H9La-H01IzY72Iwx4Arsa3L8NfEWfWtNF-HaoJ-jP1eX94le2vLu-WfxcZjb9QGVWiaqtS8VbQ9uyocAoM6QWreKkJIpTW5XQMGGA1LIUFVe8ViB4TQorwEh2gn7sfcfg09k46d5FC11nBvCbqCVlVSElT0K1F9rgYwzQ6jG43oRnTYmeM9drPUer52j1nLneZa63Cf1-uLGpe2jewUPISXC-Fzy5Dp7_21gv7i5uUpf4bM-7OMH2jTfhrxaSyVI__L7WV0v5IGR5qyV7BQvWoJE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71392774</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus with local anaesthesia: a randomized trial of closed compared with open technique</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Testini, M. ; Piccinni, G. ; Miniello, S. ; Di Venere, B. ; Lissidini, G. ; Nicolardi, V. ; Bonomo, G. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Testini, M. ; Piccinni, G. ; Miniello, S. ; Di Venere, B. ; Lissidini, G. ; Nicolardi, V. ; Bonomo, G. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To compare open with closed treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus.
Patients and methods
From 1993 to 1996, 100 patients were submitted to excision of chronic pilonidal sinus, with local anaesthesia and were randomized in two groups: group A in which open treatment and group B in which direct suture were performed. The follow‐up, ranging from 37 to 89 months, was performed by outpatient visits or by phone.
Results
Short‐term results showed 6 (12.0%) post‐operative complications in group A vs 10 (20.0%) in group B. Long‐term results showed 9 (18.0%) complications in group A vs 7 (14.0%) in group B. Mean wound healing was 58 days (range: 29–93) in group A vs 12 (range: 9–61) in group B. The return to normal activity was 25.7 (range: 11–77) vs 10.4 (range: 5–32). Wound healing and the return to normal activity were the only statistically significant differences.
Conclusions
Regarding morbidity neither technique has particular advantages over the other. The closed technique produced quicker wound healing and a quicker return to normal activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-8910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-1318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00278.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12790943</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>open packing ; Pilonidal sinus ; primary closure ; randomization</subject><ispartof>Colorectal disease, 2001-11, Vol.3 (6), p.427-430</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3188-c869fb584fa1f5d1e313a0b6f84050841c95ed36ae0b7569484b8e64b02c6ea73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3188-c869fb584fa1f5d1e313a0b6f84050841c95ed36ae0b7569484b8e64b02c6ea73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1463-1318.2001.00278.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1463-1318.2001.00278.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12790943$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Testini, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccinni, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miniello, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Venere, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissidini, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolardi, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, G. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus with local anaesthesia: a randomized trial of closed compared with open technique</title><title>Colorectal disease</title><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><description>Objective
To compare open with closed treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus.
Patients and methods
From 1993 to 1996, 100 patients were submitted to excision of chronic pilonidal sinus, with local anaesthesia and were randomized in two groups: group A in which open treatment and group B in which direct suture were performed. The follow‐up, ranging from 37 to 89 months, was performed by outpatient visits or by phone.
Results
Short‐term results showed 6 (12.0%) post‐operative complications in group A vs 10 (20.0%) in group B. Long‐term results showed 9 (18.0%) complications in group A vs 7 (14.0%) in group B. Mean wound healing was 58 days (range: 29–93) in group A vs 12 (range: 9–61) in group B. The return to normal activity was 25.7 (range: 11–77) vs 10.4 (range: 5–32). Wound healing and the return to normal activity were the only statistically significant differences.
Conclusions
Regarding morbidity neither technique has particular advantages over the other. The closed technique produced quicker wound healing and a quicker return to normal activity.</description><subject>open packing</subject><subject>Pilonidal sinus</subject><subject>primary closure</subject><subject>randomization</subject><issn>1462-8910</issn><issn>1463-1318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9P3DAQxa2qVaG0X6HyqbcEO3ZsB4lDtfwpYlUuVBwtx5lovU3i1M7CwqfH2V3BtacZz7zfG_khhCnJKeHidJ1TLlhGGVV5QQjNCSmkyrcf0PHb4uOuLzJVUXKEvsS4TkIhqfqMjmghK1Jxdowe7wOYqYdhwr7FdhX84CweXZdqYzoc3bCJ-MlNK9x5mwZmMBCnFURnzrDBwQyN790LNHgKLu1nl87H9La-H01IzY72Iwx4Arsa3L8NfEWfWtNF-HaoJ-jP1eX94le2vLu-WfxcZjb9QGVWiaqtS8VbQ9uyocAoM6QWreKkJIpTW5XQMGGA1LIUFVe8ViB4TQorwEh2gn7sfcfg09k46d5FC11nBvCbqCVlVSElT0K1F9rgYwzQ6jG43oRnTYmeM9drPUer52j1nLneZa63Cf1-uLGpe2jewUPISXC-Fzy5Dp7_21gv7i5uUpf4bM-7OMH2jTfhrxaSyVI__L7WV0v5IGR5qyV7BQvWoJE</recordid><startdate>200111</startdate><enddate>200111</enddate><creator>Testini, M.</creator><creator>Piccinni, G.</creator><creator>Miniello, S.</creator><creator>Di Venere, B.</creator><creator>Lissidini, G.</creator><creator>Nicolardi, V.</creator><creator>Bonomo, G. M.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200111</creationdate><title>Treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus with local anaesthesia: a randomized trial of closed compared with open technique</title><author>Testini, M. ; Piccinni, G. ; Miniello, S. ; Di Venere, B. ; Lissidini, G. ; Nicolardi, V. ; Bonomo, G. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3188-c869fb584fa1f5d1e313a0b6f84050841c95ed36ae0b7569484b8e64b02c6ea73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>open packing</topic><topic>Pilonidal sinus</topic><topic>primary closure</topic><topic>randomization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Testini, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccinni, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miniello, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Venere, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissidini, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolardi, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, G. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Testini, M.</au><au>Piccinni, G.</au><au>Miniello, S.</au><au>Di Venere, B.</au><au>Lissidini, G.</au><au>Nicolardi, V.</au><au>Bonomo, G. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus with local anaesthesia: a randomized trial of closed compared with open technique</atitle><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><date>2001-11</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>430</epage><pages>427-430</pages><issn>1462-8910</issn><eissn>1463-1318</eissn><abstract>Objective
To compare open with closed treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus.
Patients and methods
From 1993 to 1996, 100 patients were submitted to excision of chronic pilonidal sinus, with local anaesthesia and were randomized in two groups: group A in which open treatment and group B in which direct suture were performed. The follow‐up, ranging from 37 to 89 months, was performed by outpatient visits or by phone.
Results
Short‐term results showed 6 (12.0%) post‐operative complications in group A vs 10 (20.0%) in group B. Long‐term results showed 9 (18.0%) complications in group A vs 7 (14.0%) in group B. Mean wound healing was 58 days (range: 29–93) in group A vs 12 (range: 9–61) in group B. The return to normal activity was 25.7 (range: 11–77) vs 10.4 (range: 5–32). Wound healing and the return to normal activity were the only statistically significant differences.
Conclusions
Regarding morbidity neither technique has particular advantages over the other. The closed technique produced quicker wound healing and a quicker return to normal activity.</abstract><cop>Oxford UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>12790943</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00278.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1462-8910 |
| ispartof | Colorectal disease, 2001-11, Vol.3 (6), p.427-430 |
| issn | 1462-8910 1463-1318 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71392774 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | open packing Pilonidal sinus primary closure randomization |
| title | Treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus with local anaesthesia: a randomized trial of closed compared with open technique |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A56%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20chronic%20pilonidal%20sinus%20with%20local%20anaesthesia:%20a%20randomized%20trial%20of%20closed%20compared%20with%20open%20technique&rft.jtitle=Colorectal%20disease&rft.au=Testini,%20M.&rft.date=2001-11&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=430&rft.pages=427-430&rft.issn=1462-8910&rft.eissn=1463-1318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00278.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71392774%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71392774&rft_id=info:pmid/12790943&rfr_iscdi=true |