Pressure recovery in pediatric aortic valve stenosis

This study was designed to evaluate the phenomenon of pressure recovery in pediatric patients with aortic stenosis and also to evaluate how observed differences between catheter and Doppler gradients can be predicted by Doppler echocardiography. Doppler measurements of aortic valve stenosis gradient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric cardiology 2003-09, Vol.24 (5), p.457-462
Hauptverfasser: Villavicencio, R E, Forbes, T J, Thomas, R L, Humes, R A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 462
container_issue 5
container_start_page 457
container_title Pediatric cardiology
container_volume 24
creator Villavicencio, R E
Forbes, T J
Thomas, R L
Humes, R A
description This study was designed to evaluate the phenomenon of pressure recovery in pediatric patients with aortic stenosis and also to evaluate how observed differences between catheter and Doppler gradients can be predicted by Doppler echocardiography. Doppler measurements of aortic valve stenosis gradients are known to overestimate observed gradients in the catheterization laboratory. Pressure recovery has been shown to be a contributing factor to this discrepancy. However, the clinical relevance of correcting Doppler gradients using the pressure recovery equation has not been evaluated in the pediatric population. Simultaneously obtained catheter and Doppler gradients were studied in 14 patients (range, 0.03-18 years; mean, 4.1 years) with aortic valve stenosis. A total of 23 data points were measured because 9 patients underwent balloon valvuloplasty and had both a pre- and a post-balloon valvuloplasty data point in the study. The catheter gradients were then compared to peak, mean, and pressure recovery corrected Doppler gradients. Pressure recovery was calculated using a previously validated equation. As expected, measured echocardiographic continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients overestimated the observed catheter gradients (range, 16-93 mmHg; mean, 43 mmHg). The continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients, mean, and pressure recovery adjusted gradients were equally as good in correlating the observed catheter gradients to those obtained by Doppler echocardiography (r = 0.92). However, pressure recovery corrected Doppler gradients were in better agreement with catheter gradients than echocardiographic mean or peak Doppler gradients (95% limit of agreement: -9 to 19 mmHg for pressure recovery corrected gradients, -30 to 11 mmHg for mean Doppler gradients, and 2-83 mmHg for peak Doppler gradients). Measured continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients consistently overestimated catheter gradients. The noted differences may be predicted using the pressure recovery equation. Pressure recovery is a significant factor in children with aortic valve stenosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00246-002-0361-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71387051</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71387051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-23c6cb3914baab02690f78ca7d4c07842acfb473ecd871ef46d4e24d72f9d1e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDtPwzAUhS0EoqXwA1hQJjbDvbabm4yo4iVVggFmy7FvpKC0KXYSqf-eVK3Ecs5wHsMnxC3CAwLQYwJQJpeTStA5SjoTczRaSSwJz8UckKYkN3omrlL6AYACiuWlmKHJFWnUc2E-I6c0RM4i-27kuM-abbbj0Lg-Nj5zXewnG107cpZ63napSdfionZt4puTL8T3y_PX6k2uP17fV09r6VVJvVTa577SJZrKuQpUXkJNhXcUjAcqjHK-rgxp9qEg5NrkwbAygVRdBmTQC3F__N3F7nfg1NtNkzy3rdtyNyRLqAuCJU5FPBZ97FKKXNtdbDYu7i2CPaCyR1R2UntAZWna3J3Oh2rD4X9xYqP_AHunZDo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71387051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pressure recovery in pediatric aortic valve stenosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Villavicencio, R E ; Forbes, T J ; Thomas, R L ; Humes, R A</creator><creatorcontrib>Villavicencio, R E ; Forbes, T J ; Thomas, R L ; Humes, R A</creatorcontrib><description>This study was designed to evaluate the phenomenon of pressure recovery in pediatric patients with aortic stenosis and also to evaluate how observed differences between catheter and Doppler gradients can be predicted by Doppler echocardiography. Doppler measurements of aortic valve stenosis gradients are known to overestimate observed gradients in the catheterization laboratory. Pressure recovery has been shown to be a contributing factor to this discrepancy. However, the clinical relevance of correcting Doppler gradients using the pressure recovery equation has not been evaluated in the pediatric population. Simultaneously obtained catheter and Doppler gradients were studied in 14 patients (range, 0.03-18 years; mean, 4.1 years) with aortic valve stenosis. A total of 23 data points were measured because 9 patients underwent balloon valvuloplasty and had both a pre- and a post-balloon valvuloplasty data point in the study. The catheter gradients were then compared to peak, mean, and pressure recovery corrected Doppler gradients. Pressure recovery was calculated using a previously validated equation. As expected, measured echocardiographic continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients overestimated the observed catheter gradients (range, 16-93 mmHg; mean, 43 mmHg). The continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients, mean, and pressure recovery adjusted gradients were equally as good in correlating the observed catheter gradients to those obtained by Doppler echocardiography (r = 0.92). However, pressure recovery corrected Doppler gradients were in better agreement with catheter gradients than echocardiographic mean or peak Doppler gradients (95% limit of agreement: -9 to 19 mmHg for pressure recovery corrected gradients, -30 to 11 mmHg for mean Doppler gradients, and 2-83 mmHg for peak Doppler gradients). Measured continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients consistently overestimated catheter gradients. The noted differences may be predicted using the pressure recovery equation. Pressure recovery is a significant factor in children with aortic valve stenosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0172-0643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00246-002-0361-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14627313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology ; Blood Pressure ; Cardiac Catheterization ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Echocardiography, Doppler ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male</subject><ispartof>Pediatric cardiology, 2003-09, Vol.24 (5), p.457-462</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-23c6cb3914baab02690f78ca7d4c07842acfb473ecd871ef46d4e24d72f9d1e03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14627313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Villavicencio, R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbes, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, R L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humes, R A</creatorcontrib><title>Pressure recovery in pediatric aortic valve stenosis</title><title>Pediatric cardiology</title><addtitle>Pediatr Cardiol</addtitle><description>This study was designed to evaluate the phenomenon of pressure recovery in pediatric patients with aortic stenosis and also to evaluate how observed differences between catheter and Doppler gradients can be predicted by Doppler echocardiography. Doppler measurements of aortic valve stenosis gradients are known to overestimate observed gradients in the catheterization laboratory. Pressure recovery has been shown to be a contributing factor to this discrepancy. However, the clinical relevance of correcting Doppler gradients using the pressure recovery equation has not been evaluated in the pediatric population. Simultaneously obtained catheter and Doppler gradients were studied in 14 patients (range, 0.03-18 years; mean, 4.1 years) with aortic valve stenosis. A total of 23 data points were measured because 9 patients underwent balloon valvuloplasty and had both a pre- and a post-balloon valvuloplasty data point in the study. The catheter gradients were then compared to peak, mean, and pressure recovery corrected Doppler gradients. Pressure recovery was calculated using a previously validated equation. As expected, measured echocardiographic continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients overestimated the observed catheter gradients (range, 16-93 mmHg; mean, 43 mmHg). The continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients, mean, and pressure recovery adjusted gradients were equally as good in correlating the observed catheter gradients to those obtained by Doppler echocardiography (r = 0.92). However, pressure recovery corrected Doppler gradients were in better agreement with catheter gradients than echocardiographic mean or peak Doppler gradients (95% limit of agreement: -9 to 19 mmHg for pressure recovery corrected gradients, -30 to 11 mmHg for mean Doppler gradients, and 2-83 mmHg for peak Doppler gradients). Measured continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients consistently overestimated catheter gradients. The noted differences may be predicted using the pressure recovery equation. Pressure recovery is a significant factor in children with aortic valve stenosis.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Doppler</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><issn>0172-0643</issn><issn>1432-1971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkDtPwzAUhS0EoqXwA1hQJjbDvbabm4yo4iVVggFmy7FvpKC0KXYSqf-eVK3Ecs5wHsMnxC3CAwLQYwJQJpeTStA5SjoTczRaSSwJz8UckKYkN3omrlL6AYACiuWlmKHJFWnUc2E-I6c0RM4i-27kuM-abbbj0Lg-Nj5zXewnG107cpZ63napSdfionZt4puTL8T3y_PX6k2uP17fV09r6VVJvVTa577SJZrKuQpUXkJNhXcUjAcqjHK-rgxp9qEg5NrkwbAygVRdBmTQC3F__N3F7nfg1NtNkzy3rdtyNyRLqAuCJU5FPBZ97FKKXNtdbDYu7i2CPaCyR1R2UntAZWna3J3Oh2rD4X9xYqP_AHunZDo</recordid><startdate>200309</startdate><enddate>200309</enddate><creator>Villavicencio, R E</creator><creator>Forbes, T J</creator><creator>Thomas, R L</creator><creator>Humes, R A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200309</creationdate><title>Pressure recovery in pediatric aortic valve stenosis</title><author>Villavicencio, R E ; Forbes, T J ; Thomas, R L ; Humes, R A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-23c6cb3914baab02690f78ca7d4c07842acfb473ecd871ef46d4e24d72f9d1e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Doppler</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Villavicencio, R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbes, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, R L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humes, R A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Villavicencio, R E</au><au>Forbes, T J</au><au>Thomas, R L</au><au>Humes, R A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pressure recovery in pediatric aortic valve stenosis</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Cardiol</addtitle><date>2003-09</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>457</spage><epage>462</epage><pages>457-462</pages><issn>0172-0643</issn><eissn>1432-1971</eissn><abstract>This study was designed to evaluate the phenomenon of pressure recovery in pediatric patients with aortic stenosis and also to evaluate how observed differences between catheter and Doppler gradients can be predicted by Doppler echocardiography. Doppler measurements of aortic valve stenosis gradients are known to overestimate observed gradients in the catheterization laboratory. Pressure recovery has been shown to be a contributing factor to this discrepancy. However, the clinical relevance of correcting Doppler gradients using the pressure recovery equation has not been evaluated in the pediatric population. Simultaneously obtained catheter and Doppler gradients were studied in 14 patients (range, 0.03-18 years; mean, 4.1 years) with aortic valve stenosis. A total of 23 data points were measured because 9 patients underwent balloon valvuloplasty and had both a pre- and a post-balloon valvuloplasty data point in the study. The catheter gradients were then compared to peak, mean, and pressure recovery corrected Doppler gradients. Pressure recovery was calculated using a previously validated equation. As expected, measured echocardiographic continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients overestimated the observed catheter gradients (range, 16-93 mmHg; mean, 43 mmHg). The continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients, mean, and pressure recovery adjusted gradients were equally as good in correlating the observed catheter gradients to those obtained by Doppler echocardiography (r = 0.92). However, pressure recovery corrected Doppler gradients were in better agreement with catheter gradients than echocardiographic mean or peak Doppler gradients (95% limit of agreement: -9 to 19 mmHg for pressure recovery corrected gradients, -30 to 11 mmHg for mean Doppler gradients, and 2-83 mmHg for peak Doppler gradients). Measured continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients consistently overestimated catheter gradients. The noted differences may be predicted using the pressure recovery equation. Pressure recovery is a significant factor in children with aortic valve stenosis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>14627313</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00246-002-0361-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0172-0643
ispartof Pediatric cardiology, 2003-09, Vol.24 (5), p.457-462
issn 0172-0643
1432-1971
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71387051
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adolescent
Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology
Blood Pressure
Cardiac Catheterization
Child
Child, Preschool
Echocardiography, Doppler
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
title Pressure recovery in pediatric aortic valve stenosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A06%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pressure%20recovery%20in%20pediatric%20aortic%20valve%20stenosis&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20cardiology&rft.au=Villavicencio,%20R%20E&rft.date=2003-09&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=457&rft.epage=462&rft.pages=457-462&rft.issn=0172-0643&rft.eissn=1432-1971&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00246-002-0361-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71387051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71387051&rft_id=info:pmid/14627313&rfr_iscdi=true