Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour
Objective: To identify risk factors at caesarean section (CS), related to failure of a trial of labour (TOL) in subsequent pregnancy. Study design: Hospital records (1988–1999) of the index pregnancy were reviewed at caesarean delivery for oxytocine use, indication for caesarean, dilatation of cervi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2002-01, Vol.100 (2), p.163-166 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 166 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 163 |
container_title | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Spaans, Wilbert A Sluijs, Myrthe B van Roosmalen, Jos Bleker, Otto P |
description | Objective: To identify risk factors at caesarean section (CS), related to failure of a trial of labour (TOL) in subsequent pregnancy. Study design: Hospital records (1988–1999) of the index pregnancy were reviewed at caesarean delivery for oxytocine use, indication for caesarean, dilatation of cervix, speed of dilatation, duration of contractions and birth weight. The records of the subsequent pregnancy were reviewed for successful vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC), maternal and neonatal outcome. Data were tested for statistical significance with a Mantel–Haenszel equation for odds ratios (OR, with 95% confidence interval (CI)), a Fisher exact test or a Student’s ‘t’-test. Results: From 214 women with a previous caesarean section, 68.7% underwent a TOL, which was successful in 71.4%. A labour pattern during the index pregnancy characterised by oxytocine use (OR=3.1; 95% CI=1.4–7.1), contractions for more than 12h (OR=3.0; 95% CI=1.3–7.0) and cervical dilatation less than 1cm/h (OR=5.6; 95% CI=1.1–39.4) increased the risk of a failed TOL at subsequent labour significantly. Conclusion: Women who attempt VBAC may be informed that a labour pattern of their index pregnancy characterised by oxytocine use, contractions for more than 12h and slow dilatation is associated with a reduced chance of success. A partograph obtained during first labour can be a managerial tool for subsequent labour. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00464-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71347875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030121150100464X</els_id><sourcerecordid>71347875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-d22be283db45a38e2893f9672c6d243d32174105dedd2e8fb9075ae069b981843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtr3TAQRkVpaG6S_oQWbxqShRONHpa9KiXkRQKBtIW7E7I0BrW-dqqxA_n30X3QLKPNiOHMzMdh7AvwM-BQnf_kkkMpAPQJh1POVaXK5Qe2gNqI0lRafWSL_8g-OyD6w_OTsvnE9gGM5o02C3b3GOlv0Tk_jYkKNxXeIbmEbigI_RTHoXBDyEDs54TF2BU0t4T_ZhymYkrR9ete79pxTkdsr3M94eddPWS_ry5_XdyU9w_Xtxc_7ksvG5jKIESLopahVdrJOn8b2TWVEb4KQskgBRgFXAcMQWDdtQ032iGvmrapoVbykB1v9z6lMQehya4ieex7N-A4kzUglamNzqDegj6NRAk7-5TiyqUXC9yuLdqNRbtWZHPdWLTLPPd1d2BuVxjepnbaMvBtBzjyru-SG3ykN04qUEKvk37fcph1PEdMlnzEwWOIKdu1YYzvRHkFR3aNtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71347875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Spaans, Wilbert A ; Sluijs, Myrthe B ; van Roosmalen, Jos ; Bleker, Otto P</creator><creatorcontrib>Spaans, Wilbert A ; Sluijs, Myrthe B ; van Roosmalen, Jos ; Bleker, Otto P</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To identify risk factors at caesarean section (CS), related to failure of a trial of labour (TOL) in subsequent pregnancy. Study design: Hospital records (1988–1999) of the index pregnancy were reviewed at caesarean delivery for oxytocine use, indication for caesarean, dilatation of cervix, speed of dilatation, duration of contractions and birth weight. The records of the subsequent pregnancy were reviewed for successful vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC), maternal and neonatal outcome. Data were tested for statistical significance with a Mantel–Haenszel equation for odds ratios (OR, with 95% confidence interval (CI)), a Fisher exact test or a Student’s ‘t’-test. Results: From 214 women with a previous caesarean section, 68.7% underwent a TOL, which was successful in 71.4%. A labour pattern during the index pregnancy characterised by oxytocine use (OR=3.1; 95% CI=1.4–7.1), contractions for more than 12h (OR=3.0; 95% CI=1.3–7.0) and cervical dilatation less than 1cm/h (OR=5.6; 95% CI=1.1–39.4) increased the risk of a failed TOL at subsequent labour significantly. Conclusion: Women who attempt VBAC may be informed that a labour pattern of their index pregnancy characterised by oxytocine use, contractions for more than 12h and slow dilatation is associated with a reduced chance of success. A partograph obtained during first labour can be a managerial tool for subsequent labour.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00464-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11750957</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EOGRAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth Weight ; Cervix Uteri - physiology ; Cesarean Section ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Labor Stage, First ; Labour pattern ; Medical sciences ; Obstetrical techniques ; Odds Ratio ; Oxytocin - administration & dosage ; Partograph ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Previous caesarean section ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Trial of Labor ; Trial of labour ; Uterine Contraction ; Vaginal Birth after Cesarean</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2002-01, Vol.100 (2), p.163-166</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-d22be283db45a38e2893f9672c6d243d32174105dedd2e8fb9075ae069b981843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-d22be283db45a38e2893f9672c6d243d32174105dedd2e8fb9075ae069b981843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030121150100464X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13414254$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11750957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spaans, Wilbert A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sluijs, Myrthe B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Roosmalen, Jos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleker, Otto P</creatorcontrib><title>Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour</title><title>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>Objective: To identify risk factors at caesarean section (CS), related to failure of a trial of labour (TOL) in subsequent pregnancy. Study design: Hospital records (1988–1999) of the index pregnancy were reviewed at caesarean delivery for oxytocine use, indication for caesarean, dilatation of cervix, speed of dilatation, duration of contractions and birth weight. The records of the subsequent pregnancy were reviewed for successful vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC), maternal and neonatal outcome. Data were tested for statistical significance with a Mantel–Haenszel equation for odds ratios (OR, with 95% confidence interval (CI)), a Fisher exact test or a Student’s ‘t’-test. Results: From 214 women with a previous caesarean section, 68.7% underwent a TOL, which was successful in 71.4%. A labour pattern during the index pregnancy characterised by oxytocine use (OR=3.1; 95% CI=1.4–7.1), contractions for more than 12h (OR=3.0; 95% CI=1.3–7.0) and cervical dilatation less than 1cm/h (OR=5.6; 95% CI=1.1–39.4) increased the risk of a failed TOL at subsequent labour significantly. Conclusion: Women who attempt VBAC may be informed that a labour pattern of their index pregnancy characterised by oxytocine use, contractions for more than 12h and slow dilatation is associated with a reduced chance of success. A partograph obtained during first labour can be a managerial tool for subsequent labour.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>Cervix Uteri - physiology</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor Stage, First</subject><subject>Labour pattern</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Obstetrical techniques</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Oxytocin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Partograph</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Previous caesarean section</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Trial of Labor</subject><subject>Trial of labour</subject><subject>Uterine Contraction</subject><subject>Vaginal Birth after Cesarean</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtr3TAQRkVpaG6S_oQWbxqShRONHpa9KiXkRQKBtIW7E7I0BrW-dqqxA_n30X3QLKPNiOHMzMdh7AvwM-BQnf_kkkMpAPQJh1POVaXK5Qe2gNqI0lRafWSL_8g-OyD6w_OTsvnE9gGM5o02C3b3GOlv0Tk_jYkKNxXeIbmEbigI_RTHoXBDyEDs54TF2BU0t4T_ZhymYkrR9ete79pxTkdsr3M94eddPWS_ry5_XdyU9w_Xtxc_7ksvG5jKIESLopahVdrJOn8b2TWVEb4KQskgBRgFXAcMQWDdtQ032iGvmrapoVbykB1v9z6lMQehya4ieex7N-A4kzUglamNzqDegj6NRAk7-5TiyqUXC9yuLdqNRbtWZHPdWLTLPPd1d2BuVxjepnbaMvBtBzjyru-SG3ykN04qUEKvk37fcph1PEdMlnzEwWOIKdu1YYzvRHkFR3aNtQ</recordid><startdate>20020110</startdate><enddate>20020110</enddate><creator>Spaans, Wilbert A</creator><creator>Sluijs, Myrthe B</creator><creator>van Roosmalen, Jos</creator><creator>Bleker, Otto P</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020110</creationdate><title>Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour</title><author>Spaans, Wilbert A ; Sluijs, Myrthe B ; van Roosmalen, Jos ; Bleker, Otto P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-d22be283db45a38e2893f9672c6d243d32174105dedd2e8fb9075ae069b981843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>Cervix Uteri - physiology</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor Stage, First</topic><topic>Labour pattern</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Obstetrical techniques</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Oxytocin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Partograph</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Previous caesarean section</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Trial of Labor</topic><topic>Trial of labour</topic><topic>Uterine Contraction</topic><topic>Vaginal Birth after Cesarean</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spaans, Wilbert A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sluijs, Myrthe B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Roosmalen, Jos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleker, Otto P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spaans, Wilbert A</au><au>Sluijs, Myrthe B</au><au>van Roosmalen, Jos</au><au>Bleker, Otto P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2002-01-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>163-166</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><coden>EOGRAL</coden><abstract>Objective: To identify risk factors at caesarean section (CS), related to failure of a trial of labour (TOL) in subsequent pregnancy. Study design: Hospital records (1988–1999) of the index pregnancy were reviewed at caesarean delivery for oxytocine use, indication for caesarean, dilatation of cervix, speed of dilatation, duration of contractions and birth weight. The records of the subsequent pregnancy were reviewed for successful vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC), maternal and neonatal outcome. Data were tested for statistical significance with a Mantel–Haenszel equation for odds ratios (OR, with 95% confidence interval (CI)), a Fisher exact test or a Student’s ‘t’-test. Results: From 214 women with a previous caesarean section, 68.7% underwent a TOL, which was successful in 71.4%. A labour pattern during the index pregnancy characterised by oxytocine use (OR=3.1; 95% CI=1.4–7.1), contractions for more than 12h (OR=3.0; 95% CI=1.3–7.0) and cervical dilatation less than 1cm/h (OR=5.6; 95% CI=1.1–39.4) increased the risk of a failed TOL at subsequent labour significantly. Conclusion: Women who attempt VBAC may be informed that a labour pattern of their index pregnancy characterised by oxytocine use, contractions for more than 12h and slow dilatation is associated with a reduced chance of success. A partograph obtained during first labour can be a managerial tool for subsequent labour.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>11750957</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00464-X</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-2115 |
ispartof | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2002-01, Vol.100 (2), p.163-166 |
issn | 0301-2115 1872-7654 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71347875 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Birth Weight Cervix Uteri - physiology Cesarean Section Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Labor Stage, First Labour pattern Medical sciences Obstetrical techniques Odds Ratio Oxytocin - administration & dosage Partograph Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Previous caesarean section Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Time Factors Trial of Labor Trial of labour Uterine Contraction Vaginal Birth after Cesarean |
title | Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A51%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20factors%20at%20caesarean%20section%20and%20failure%20of%20subsequent%20trial%20of%20labour&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Spaans,%20Wilbert%20A&rft.date=2002-01-10&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=163-166&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft.coden=EOGRAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00464-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71347875%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71347875&rft_id=info:pmid/11750957&rft_els_id=S030121150100464X&rfr_iscdi=true |