Abdominal multidetector row computed tomography: Reduction of cost and contrast material dose Using saline flush

To evaluate the potential of a saline solution flush after the contrast material bolus in abdominal multidetector row CT (MDCT) in contrast material dose and cost reduction. Abdominal MDCT was performed in 78 patients who were assigned randomly to 2 groups receiving 120 mL nonionic contrast material...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of computer assisted tomography 2003-11, Vol.27 (6), p.847-853
Hauptverfasser: SCHOELLNAST, Helmut, TILLICH, Manfred, DEUTSCHMANN, Hannes A, DEUTSCHMANN, Michael J, FRITZ, Gerald A, STESSEL, Uwe, SCHAFFLER, Gottfried J, UGGOWITZER, Martin M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 853
container_issue 6
container_start_page 847
container_title Journal of computer assisted tomography
container_volume 27
creator SCHOELLNAST, Helmut
TILLICH, Manfred
DEUTSCHMANN, Hannes A
DEUTSCHMANN, Michael J
FRITZ, Gerald A
STESSEL, Uwe
SCHAFFLER, Gottfried J
UGGOWITZER, Martin M
description To evaluate the potential of a saline solution flush after the contrast material bolus in abdominal multidetector row CT (MDCT) in contrast material dose and cost reduction. Abdominal MDCT was performed in 78 patients who were assigned randomly to 2 groups receiving 120 mL nonionic contrast material (300 mgI/mL) alone or 100 mL of the same contrast material pushed with 40 mL of saline solution. Mean attenuation values for both groups were measured in the liver, the spleen, the pancreas, the portal vein, the inferior vena cava, and the abdominal aorta. Cost analyses were performed for both groups. There was no significant difference in parenchymal and vascular enhancement between both groups. The difference of the enhancement was 2 HU for the liver (P = 0.11), 2 HU for the spleen (P = 0.44), 3 HU for the pancreas (P = 0.38), 9 HU for the portal vein (P = 0.11), 3 HU for the inferior vena cava (P = 0.55), and 10 HU for the aorta (P = 0.06). Taking the costs of contrast material, saline solution, and disposal material into account, 7.30 dollars was saved by the patient using a saline solution flush. Using a saline flush after the contrast material bolus in abdominal MDCT allows an iodine dose reduction of approximately 6 g, or 17%, without impairing mean parenchymal and vascular enhancement and a cost reduction of 7.30 dollars per patient.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00004728-200311000-00002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71347519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71347519</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-5ad444824454c2a5172f75b17bdaa54a154b9b16700663952ffec91f174108343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctO3TAQhq2qVTnQvkLlDd0FPL7ESXcI0YKEVKkq62jiC7hK4tR2hHj7-pTTsmQ2c9E3_4z0E0KBnQHr9TmrITXvGs6YAKhdsx_xN2QHSvBGgFRvyY6JVjSdBnVEjnP-xRhoIeR7cgSyrQKy25H1YrRxDgtOdN6mEqwrzpSYaIqP1MR53YqztMQ53idcH56-0B_ObqaEuNDoK5ELxcXWYikJazNjcSlUORuzo3c5LPc04xQWR_205YcP5J3HKbuPh3xC7r5e_by8bm6_f7u5vLhtjABdGoVW1ge5lEoajgo091qNoEeLqCSCkmM_QqsZa1vRK-69Mz140BJYJ6Q4IZ-fddcUf28ul2EO2bhpwsXFLQ8ahNQK-ldBzlSrW6Eq2D2DJsWck_PDmsKM6WkANuxtGf7ZMvy35e-I19VPhxvbODv7snjwoQKnBwCzwcknXEzIL5ziXRVW4g83B5Ut</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20567635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abdominal multidetector row computed tomography: Reduction of cost and contrast material dose Using saline flush</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>SCHOELLNAST, Helmut ; TILLICH, Manfred ; DEUTSCHMANN, Hannes A ; DEUTSCHMANN, Michael J ; FRITZ, Gerald A ; STESSEL, Uwe ; SCHAFFLER, Gottfried J ; UGGOWITZER, Martin M</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHOELLNAST, Helmut ; TILLICH, Manfred ; DEUTSCHMANN, Hannes A ; DEUTSCHMANN, Michael J ; FRITZ, Gerald A ; STESSEL, Uwe ; SCHAFFLER, Gottfried J ; UGGOWITZER, Martin M</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the potential of a saline solution flush after the contrast material bolus in abdominal multidetector row CT (MDCT) in contrast material dose and cost reduction. Abdominal MDCT was performed in 78 patients who were assigned randomly to 2 groups receiving 120 mL nonionic contrast material (300 mgI/mL) alone or 100 mL of the same contrast material pushed with 40 mL of saline solution. Mean attenuation values for both groups were measured in the liver, the spleen, the pancreas, the portal vein, the inferior vena cava, and the abdominal aorta. Cost analyses were performed for both groups. There was no significant difference in parenchymal and vascular enhancement between both groups. The difference of the enhancement was 2 HU for the liver (P = 0.11), 2 HU for the spleen (P = 0.44), 3 HU for the pancreas (P = 0.38), 9 HU for the portal vein (P = 0.11), 3 HU for the inferior vena cava (P = 0.55), and 10 HU for the aorta (P = 0.06). Taking the costs of contrast material, saline solution, and disposal material into account, 7.30 dollars was saved by the patient using a saline solution flush. Using a saline flush after the contrast material bolus in abdominal MDCT allows an iodine dose reduction of approximately 6 g, or 17%, without impairing mean parenchymal and vascular enhancement and a cost reduction of 7.30 dollars per patient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-8715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200311000-00002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14600448</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCATD5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage ; Cost Control ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous. Technology ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Radiography, Abdominal - economics ; Radiography, Abdominal - methods ; Sodium Chloride - administration &amp; dosage ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - economics ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of computer assisted tomography, 2003-11, Vol.27 (6), p.847-853</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-5ad444824454c2a5172f75b17bdaa54a154b9b16700663952ffec91f174108343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15284725$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14600448$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHOELLNAST, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TILLICH, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEUTSCHMANN, Hannes A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEUTSCHMANN, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRITZ, Gerald A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STESSEL, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHAFFLER, Gottfried J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UGGOWITZER, Martin M</creatorcontrib><title>Abdominal multidetector row computed tomography: Reduction of cost and contrast material dose Using saline flush</title><title>Journal of computer assisted tomography</title><addtitle>J Comput Assist Tomogr</addtitle><description>To evaluate the potential of a saline solution flush after the contrast material bolus in abdominal multidetector row CT (MDCT) in contrast material dose and cost reduction. Abdominal MDCT was performed in 78 patients who were assigned randomly to 2 groups receiving 120 mL nonionic contrast material (300 mgI/mL) alone or 100 mL of the same contrast material pushed with 40 mL of saline solution. Mean attenuation values for both groups were measured in the liver, the spleen, the pancreas, the portal vein, the inferior vena cava, and the abdominal aorta. Cost analyses were performed for both groups. There was no significant difference in parenchymal and vascular enhancement between both groups. The difference of the enhancement was 2 HU for the liver (P = 0.11), 2 HU for the spleen (P = 0.44), 3 HU for the pancreas (P = 0.38), 9 HU for the portal vein (P = 0.11), 3 HU for the inferior vena cava (P = 0.55), and 10 HU for the aorta (P = 0.06). Taking the costs of contrast material, saline solution, and disposal material into account, 7.30 dollars was saved by the patient using a saline solution flush. Using a saline flush after the contrast material bolus in abdominal MDCT allows an iodine dose reduction of approximately 6 g, or 17%, without impairing mean parenchymal and vascular enhancement and a cost reduction of 7.30 dollars per patient.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Cost Control</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous. Technology</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Radiography, Abdominal - economics</subject><subject>Radiography, Abdominal - methods</subject><subject>Sodium Chloride - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - economics</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0363-8715</issn><issn>1532-3145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctO3TAQhq2qVTnQvkLlDd0FPL7ESXcI0YKEVKkq62jiC7hK4tR2hHj7-pTTsmQ2c9E3_4z0E0KBnQHr9TmrITXvGs6YAKhdsx_xN2QHSvBGgFRvyY6JVjSdBnVEjnP-xRhoIeR7cgSyrQKy25H1YrRxDgtOdN6mEqwrzpSYaIqP1MR53YqztMQ53idcH56-0B_ObqaEuNDoK5ELxcXWYikJazNjcSlUORuzo3c5LPc04xQWR_205YcP5J3HKbuPh3xC7r5e_by8bm6_f7u5vLhtjABdGoVW1ge5lEoajgo091qNoEeLqCSCkmM_QqsZa1vRK-69Mz140BJYJ6Q4IZ-fddcUf28ul2EO2bhpwsXFLQ8ahNQK-ldBzlSrW6Eq2D2DJsWck_PDmsKM6WkANuxtGf7ZMvy35e-I19VPhxvbODv7snjwoQKnBwCzwcknXEzIL5ziXRVW4g83B5Ut</recordid><startdate>20031101</startdate><enddate>20031101</enddate><creator>SCHOELLNAST, Helmut</creator><creator>TILLICH, Manfred</creator><creator>DEUTSCHMANN, Hannes A</creator><creator>DEUTSCHMANN, Michael J</creator><creator>FRITZ, Gerald A</creator><creator>STESSEL, Uwe</creator><creator>SCHAFFLER, Gottfried J</creator><creator>UGGOWITZER, Martin M</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031101</creationdate><title>Abdominal multidetector row computed tomography: Reduction of cost and contrast material dose Using saline flush</title><author>SCHOELLNAST, Helmut ; TILLICH, Manfred ; DEUTSCHMANN, Hannes A ; DEUTSCHMANN, Michael J ; FRITZ, Gerald A ; STESSEL, Uwe ; SCHAFFLER, Gottfried J ; UGGOWITZER, Martin M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-5ad444824454c2a5172f75b17bdaa54a154b9b16700663952ffec91f174108343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Cost Control</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous. Technology</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Radiography, Abdominal - economics</topic><topic>Radiography, Abdominal - methods</topic><topic>Sodium Chloride - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - economics</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHOELLNAST, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TILLICH, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEUTSCHMANN, Hannes A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEUTSCHMANN, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRITZ, Gerald A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STESSEL, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHAFFLER, Gottfried J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UGGOWITZER, Martin M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of computer assisted tomography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHOELLNAST, Helmut</au><au>TILLICH, Manfred</au><au>DEUTSCHMANN, Hannes A</au><au>DEUTSCHMANN, Michael J</au><au>FRITZ, Gerald A</au><au>STESSEL, Uwe</au><au>SCHAFFLER, Gottfried J</au><au>UGGOWITZER, Martin M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abdominal multidetector row computed tomography: Reduction of cost and contrast material dose Using saline flush</atitle><jtitle>Journal of computer assisted tomography</jtitle><addtitle>J Comput Assist Tomogr</addtitle><date>2003-11-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>847</spage><epage>853</epage><pages>847-853</pages><issn>0363-8715</issn><eissn>1532-3145</eissn><coden>JCATD5</coden><abstract>To evaluate the potential of a saline solution flush after the contrast material bolus in abdominal multidetector row CT (MDCT) in contrast material dose and cost reduction. Abdominal MDCT was performed in 78 patients who were assigned randomly to 2 groups receiving 120 mL nonionic contrast material (300 mgI/mL) alone or 100 mL of the same contrast material pushed with 40 mL of saline solution. Mean attenuation values for both groups were measured in the liver, the spleen, the pancreas, the portal vein, the inferior vena cava, and the abdominal aorta. Cost analyses were performed for both groups. There was no significant difference in parenchymal and vascular enhancement between both groups. The difference of the enhancement was 2 HU for the liver (P = 0.11), 2 HU for the spleen (P = 0.44), 3 HU for the pancreas (P = 0.38), 9 HU for the portal vein (P = 0.11), 3 HU for the inferior vena cava (P = 0.55), and 10 HU for the aorta (P = 0.06). Taking the costs of contrast material, saline solution, and disposal material into account, 7.30 dollars was saved by the patient using a saline solution flush. Using a saline flush after the contrast material bolus in abdominal MDCT allows an iodine dose reduction of approximately 6 g, or 17%, without impairing mean parenchymal and vascular enhancement and a cost reduction of 7.30 dollars per patient.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>14600448</pmid><doi>10.1097/00004728-200311000-00002</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-8715
ispartof Journal of computer assisted tomography, 2003-11, Vol.27 (6), p.847-853
issn 0363-8715
1532-3145
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71347519
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Contrast Media - administration & dosage
Cost Control
Costs and Cost Analysis
Female
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous. Technology
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Radiography, Abdominal - economics
Radiography, Abdominal - methods
Sodium Chloride - administration & dosage
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - economics
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Abdominal multidetector row computed tomography: Reduction of cost and contrast material dose Using saline flush
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T21%3A00%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abdominal%20multidetector%20row%20computed%20tomography:%20Reduction%20of%20cost%20and%20contrast%20material%20dose%20Using%20saline%20flush&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20computer%20assisted%20tomography&rft.au=SCHOELLNAST,%20Helmut&rft.date=2003-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=847&rft.epage=853&rft.pages=847-853&rft.issn=0363-8715&rft.eissn=1532-3145&rft.coden=JCATD5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00004728-200311000-00002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71347519%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20567635&rft_id=info:pmid/14600448&rfr_iscdi=true