Post-ERCP pancreatitis: reduction by routine antibiotics
Cholangitis and pancreatitis are severe complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Antibiotics have been considered important in preventing cholangitis, especially in those with jaundice. Some have suggested that bacteria may play a role in the induction of post-ERCP pan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2001-07, Vol.5 (4), p.339-345 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 345 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 339 |
container_title | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Räty, Sari Sand, Fubani Pulkkinen, Markku Matikainen, Marti Nordback, Isto |
description | Cholangitis and pancreatitis are severe complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Antibiotics have been considered important in preventing cholangitis, especially in those with jaundice. Some have suggested that bacteria may play a role in the induction of post-ERCP pancreatitis. It is not clear, however, whether the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis could be reduced by antibiotic prophylaxis, as is the case with septic complications. In this prospective study, a total of 321 consecutive patients were randomized to the following two groups: (1) a prophylaxis group (n = 161) that was given 2 g of cephtazidime intravenously 30 minutes before ERCP, and (2) a control group (n = 160) that received no antibiotics. All patients admitted to the hospital for ERCP who had not taken any antibiotics during the preceding week were included. Patients who were allergic to cephalosporins, patients with immune deficiency or any other condition requiring antibiotic prophylaxis, patients with clinical jaundice, and pregnant patients were excluded. In the final analysis six patients were excluded because of a diagnosis of bile duct obstruction but with unsuccessful biliary drainage that required immediate antibiotic treatment. The diagnosis of cholangitis was based on a rising fever, an increase in the C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and increases in leukocyte count and liver function values, which were associated with bacteremia in some. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was based on clinical findings, and increases in the serum amylase level (>900 IU/L), CRP level, and leukocyte count with no increase in liver chemical values. The control group had significantly more patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis (15 of 160 in the prophylaxis group vs. 4 of 155 in the control group;
P = 0.009) and cholangitis (7 of 160 vs. 0 of 155;
P = 0.009) compared to the prophylaxis group. Nine patients in the prophylaxis group (6%) and 15 patients in the control group (9%) had remarkably increased serum amylase levels (>900 IU/L) after ERCP, but clinical signs of acute pancreatitis with leukocytosis, CRP reaction, and pain developed in four of nine patients in the prophylaxis group compared to 15 of 15 patients with hyperamylasemia in the control group (
P = 0.003). In a multivariate analysis, the lack of antibiotic prophylaxis (odds ratio 6.63,
P = 0.03) and sphincterotomy (odds ratio 5.60,
P = 0.05) were independent risk factors for the development of post-ER |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80059-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71347112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1091255X01800597</els_id><sourcerecordid>71347112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-3c7c7e22f2130a7a919ee5672e2cbd5a53915892820a71624eb5186ee07a41003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNtKAzEQhoMoVquPoCwIohermexms_FGpNQDFCwewLuQzU4hpd3UJCv07d0eRPDGqxmY758ZPkJOgF4BheL6FaiElHH-cUHhsqSUy1TskAMoRZbmBSt2u_4H6ZHDEKaUgqBQ7pMegCy5FOyAlGMXYjp8GYyThW6MRx1ttOEm8Vi3JlrXJNUy8a6NtsFEN9FW1kVrwhHZm-hZwONt7ZP3--Hb4DEdPT88De5GqeFUxDQzwghkbMIgo1poCRKRF4IhM1XNNc8k8FKyknVTKFiOFYeyQKRC50Bp1ifnm70L7z5bDFHNbTA4m-kGXRuUgCwXAKwDz_6AU9f6pvtNwWoucpbLjuIbyngXgseJWng7136pgKqVWLUWq1bWFAW1FqtElzvdbm-rOda_qa3JDrjdANjJ-LLoVTAWG4O19Wiiqp3958Q3LIuFsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1112374249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Post-ERCP pancreatitis: reduction by routine antibiotics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Räty, Sari ; Sand, Fubani ; Pulkkinen, Markku ; Matikainen, Marti ; Nordback, Isto</creator><creatorcontrib>Räty, Sari ; Sand, Fubani ; Pulkkinen, Markku ; Matikainen, Marti ; Nordback, Isto</creatorcontrib><description>Cholangitis and pancreatitis are severe complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Antibiotics have been considered important in preventing cholangitis, especially in those with jaundice. Some have suggested that bacteria may play a role in the induction of post-ERCP pancreatitis. It is not clear, however, whether the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis could be reduced by antibiotic prophylaxis, as is the case with septic complications. In this prospective study, a total of 321 consecutive patients were randomized to the following two groups: (1) a prophylaxis group (n = 161) that was given 2 g of cephtazidime intravenously 30 minutes before ERCP, and (2) a control group (n = 160) that received no antibiotics. All patients admitted to the hospital for ERCP who had not taken any antibiotics during the preceding week were included. Patients who were allergic to cephalosporins, patients with immune deficiency or any other condition requiring antibiotic prophylaxis, patients with clinical jaundice, and pregnant patients were excluded. In the final analysis six patients were excluded because of a diagnosis of bile duct obstruction but with unsuccessful biliary drainage that required immediate antibiotic treatment. The diagnosis of cholangitis was based on a rising fever, an increase in the C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and increases in leukocyte count and liver function values, which were associated with bacteremia in some. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was based on clinical findings, and increases in the serum amylase level (>900 IU/L), CRP level, and leukocyte count with no increase in liver chemical values. The control group had significantly more patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis (15 of 160 in the prophylaxis group vs. 4 of 155 in the control group;
P = 0.009) and cholangitis (7 of 160 vs. 0 of 155;
P = 0.009) compared to the prophylaxis group. Nine patients in the prophylaxis group (6%) and 15 patients in the control group (9%) had remarkably increased serum amylase levels (>900 IU/L) after ERCP, but clinical signs of acute pancreatitis with leukocytosis, CRP reaction, and pain developed in four of nine patients in the prophylaxis group compared to 15 of 15 patients with hyperamylasemia in the control group (
P = 0.003). In a multivariate analysis, the lack of antibiotic prophylaxis (odds ratio 6.63,
P = 0.03) and sphincterotomy (odds ratio 5.60,
P = 0.05) were independent risk factors for the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis. We conclude that antibiotic prophylaxis effectively decreases the risk of pancreatitis, in addition to cholangitis after ERCP, and can thus be routinely recommended prior to ERCP. These results suggest that bacteria could play a role in the pathogenesis of post-ERCP pancreatitis</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80059-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11985972</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Amylases - blood ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Antibiotics ; Ceftazidime - therapeutic use ; Cephalosporins - therapeutic use ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects ; Cholangitis - etiology ; Cholangitis - prevention & control ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate analysis ; Pancreas ; Pancreatitis - etiology ; Pancreatitis - prevention & control ; Post-ERCP pancreatitis ; prophylaxis ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2001-07, Vol.5 (4), p.339-345</ispartof><rights>2001</rights><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Inc. 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-3c7c7e22f2130a7a919ee5672e2cbd5a53915892820a71624eb5186ee07a41003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-3c7c7e22f2130a7a919ee5672e2cbd5a53915892820a71624eb5186ee07a41003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11985972$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Räty, Sari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sand, Fubani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulkkinen, Markku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matikainen, Marti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordback, Isto</creatorcontrib><title>Post-ERCP pancreatitis: reduction by routine antibiotics</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>Cholangitis and pancreatitis are severe complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Antibiotics have been considered important in preventing cholangitis, especially in those with jaundice. Some have suggested that bacteria may play a role in the induction of post-ERCP pancreatitis. It is not clear, however, whether the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis could be reduced by antibiotic prophylaxis, as is the case with septic complications. In this prospective study, a total of 321 consecutive patients were randomized to the following two groups: (1) a prophylaxis group (n = 161) that was given 2 g of cephtazidime intravenously 30 minutes before ERCP, and (2) a control group (n = 160) that received no antibiotics. All patients admitted to the hospital for ERCP who had not taken any antibiotics during the preceding week were included. Patients who were allergic to cephalosporins, patients with immune deficiency or any other condition requiring antibiotic prophylaxis, patients with clinical jaundice, and pregnant patients were excluded. In the final analysis six patients were excluded because of a diagnosis of bile duct obstruction but with unsuccessful biliary drainage that required immediate antibiotic treatment. The diagnosis of cholangitis was based on a rising fever, an increase in the C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and increases in leukocyte count and liver function values, which were associated with bacteremia in some. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was based on clinical findings, and increases in the serum amylase level (>900 IU/L), CRP level, and leukocyte count with no increase in liver chemical values. The control group had significantly more patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis (15 of 160 in the prophylaxis group vs. 4 of 155 in the control group;
P = 0.009) and cholangitis (7 of 160 vs. 0 of 155;
P = 0.009) compared to the prophylaxis group. Nine patients in the prophylaxis group (6%) and 15 patients in the control group (9%) had remarkably increased serum amylase levels (>900 IU/L) after ERCP, but clinical signs of acute pancreatitis with leukocytosis, CRP reaction, and pain developed in four of nine patients in the prophylaxis group compared to 15 of 15 patients with hyperamylasemia in the control group (
P = 0.003). In a multivariate analysis, the lack of antibiotic prophylaxis (odds ratio 6.63,
P = 0.03) and sphincterotomy (odds ratio 5.60,
P = 0.05) were independent risk factors for the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis. We conclude that antibiotic prophylaxis effectively decreases the risk of pancreatitis, in addition to cholangitis after ERCP, and can thus be routinely recommended prior to ERCP. These results suggest that bacteria could play a role in the pathogenesis of post-ERCP pancreatitis</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Amylases - blood</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Ceftazidime - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cephalosporins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cholangitis - etiology</subject><subject>Cholangitis - prevention & control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - etiology</subject><subject>Pancreatitis - prevention & control</subject><subject>Post-ERCP pancreatitis</subject><subject>prophylaxis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkNtKAzEQhoMoVquPoCwIohermexms_FGpNQDFCwewLuQzU4hpd3UJCv07d0eRPDGqxmY758ZPkJOgF4BheL6FaiElHH-cUHhsqSUy1TskAMoRZbmBSt2u_4H6ZHDEKaUgqBQ7pMegCy5FOyAlGMXYjp8GYyThW6MRx1ttOEm8Vi3JlrXJNUy8a6NtsFEN9FW1kVrwhHZm-hZwONt7ZP3--Hb4DEdPT88De5GqeFUxDQzwghkbMIgo1poCRKRF4IhM1XNNc8k8FKyknVTKFiOFYeyQKRC50Bp1ifnm70L7z5bDFHNbTA4m-kGXRuUgCwXAKwDz_6AU9f6pvtNwWoucpbLjuIbyngXgseJWng7136pgKqVWLUWq1bWFAW1FqtElzvdbm-rOda_qa3JDrjdANjJ-LLoVTAWG4O19Wiiqp3958Q3LIuFsg</recordid><startdate>20010701</startdate><enddate>20010701</enddate><creator>Räty, Sari</creator><creator>Sand, Fubani</creator><creator>Pulkkinen, Markku</creator><creator>Matikainen, Marti</creator><creator>Nordback, Isto</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010701</creationdate><title>Post-ERCP pancreatitis: reduction by routine antibiotics</title><author>Räty, Sari ; Sand, Fubani ; Pulkkinen, Markku ; Matikainen, Marti ; Nordback, Isto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-3c7c7e22f2130a7a919ee5672e2cbd5a53915892820a71624eb5186ee07a41003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Amylases - blood</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Ceftazidime - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cephalosporins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cholangitis - etiology</topic><topic>Cholangitis - prevention & control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - etiology</topic><topic>Pancreatitis - prevention & control</topic><topic>Post-ERCP pancreatitis</topic><topic>prophylaxis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Räty, Sari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sand, Fubani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulkkinen, Markku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matikainen, Marti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordback, Isto</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Räty, Sari</au><au>Sand, Fubani</au><au>Pulkkinen, Markku</au><au>Matikainen, Marti</au><au>Nordback, Isto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Post-ERCP pancreatitis: reduction by routine antibiotics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2001-07-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>345</epage><pages>339-345</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>Cholangitis and pancreatitis are severe complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Antibiotics have been considered important in preventing cholangitis, especially in those with jaundice. Some have suggested that bacteria may play a role in the induction of post-ERCP pancreatitis. It is not clear, however, whether the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis could be reduced by antibiotic prophylaxis, as is the case with septic complications. In this prospective study, a total of 321 consecutive patients were randomized to the following two groups: (1) a prophylaxis group (n = 161) that was given 2 g of cephtazidime intravenously 30 minutes before ERCP, and (2) a control group (n = 160) that received no antibiotics. All patients admitted to the hospital for ERCP who had not taken any antibiotics during the preceding week were included. Patients who were allergic to cephalosporins, patients with immune deficiency or any other condition requiring antibiotic prophylaxis, patients with clinical jaundice, and pregnant patients were excluded. In the final analysis six patients were excluded because of a diagnosis of bile duct obstruction but with unsuccessful biliary drainage that required immediate antibiotic treatment. The diagnosis of cholangitis was based on a rising fever, an increase in the C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and increases in leukocyte count and liver function values, which were associated with bacteremia in some. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was based on clinical findings, and increases in the serum amylase level (>900 IU/L), CRP level, and leukocyte count with no increase in liver chemical values. The control group had significantly more patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis (15 of 160 in the prophylaxis group vs. 4 of 155 in the control group;
P = 0.009) and cholangitis (7 of 160 vs. 0 of 155;
P = 0.009) compared to the prophylaxis group. Nine patients in the prophylaxis group (6%) and 15 patients in the control group (9%) had remarkably increased serum amylase levels (>900 IU/L) after ERCP, but clinical signs of acute pancreatitis with leukocytosis, CRP reaction, and pain developed in four of nine patients in the prophylaxis group compared to 15 of 15 patients with hyperamylasemia in the control group (
P = 0.003). In a multivariate analysis, the lack of antibiotic prophylaxis (odds ratio 6.63,
P = 0.03) and sphincterotomy (odds ratio 5.60,
P = 0.05) were independent risk factors for the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis. We conclude that antibiotic prophylaxis effectively decreases the risk of pancreatitis, in addition to cholangitis after ERCP, and can thus be routinely recommended prior to ERCP. These results suggest that bacteria could play a role in the pathogenesis of post-ERCP pancreatitis</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11985972</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80059-7</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1091-255X |
ispartof | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2001-07, Vol.5 (4), p.339-345 |
issn | 1091-255X 1873-4626 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71347112 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acute Disease Amylases - blood Antibiotic Prophylaxis Antibiotics Ceftazidime - therapeutic use Cephalosporins - therapeutic use Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects Cholangitis - etiology Cholangitis - prevention & control Female Humans Male Middle Aged Multivariate analysis Pancreas Pancreatitis - etiology Pancreatitis - prevention & control Post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis Prospective Studies Risk Factors |
title | Post-ERCP pancreatitis: reduction by routine antibiotics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A58%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Post-ERCP%20pancreatitis:%20reduction%20by%20routine%20antibiotics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=R%C3%A4ty,%20Sari&rft.date=2001-07-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=345&rft.pages=339-345&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80059-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71347112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1112374249&rft_id=info:pmid/11985972&rft_els_id=S1091255X01800597&rfr_iscdi=true |