UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99
Objectives The UK General Medical Council’s Performance Procedures were introduced in 1997. This study aimed to assess the changing knowledge and attitudes about the procedures in British doctors at the time of their introduction and in the following 2 years. Methods Three questionnaire surveys, of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical education 2001-12, Vol.35 (s1), p.60-69 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 69 |
---|---|
container_issue | s1 |
container_start_page | 60 |
container_title | Medical education |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | McManus, I C Winder, B C Gordon, D |
description | Objectives
The UK General Medical Council’s Performance Procedures were introduced in 1997. This study aimed to assess the changing knowledge and attitudes about the procedures in British doctors at the time of their introduction and in the following 2 years.
Methods
Three questionnaire surveys, of separate representative samples of 800 UK doctors, were carried out in November of 1997, 1998 and 1999. The surveys assessed awareness of Good Medical Practice, attitudes to the Performance Procedures, agreement with Duties of a Doctor as a basis for disciplinary procedures, and attitudes to the Performance Procedures.
Results
Although awareness of the procedures increased over the period 1997–99, there was no concurrent increase in agreement with the core principles of the procedures, the Duties of a Doctor, which are spelled out in Good Medical Practice. Of 12 separate attitudes to the procedures, changes were found in eight over the time period, all but two of which were negative, and not in support of the procedures. Nevertheless many doctors were changing their practice as a result of the procedures, and that proportion increased during the period 1997–99.
Conclusions
Although doctors became more aware of the procedures, that increasing awareness was not accompanied by an increasing agreement with the procedures’ underlying principles or their wider implications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00008.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71329421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>98035270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3758-51d25495344fd995a7fd8e3c6c3ccae74d3847fe228c1559a5a1a59380bda90b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1uEzEURi0EoqHlFZDFgm6YqX9n7AULFEqomrQVIsDOcuw7YsJkXOwZkb59nSYqEqvezb2Sz_fJOghhSkpKRHW2LimvZME04yUjhJYkjyq3z9Dk8eE5mhBOVEEoJUfoVUrrzNRSqJfoiFKlJZPVBH1fXmIf3BBiOsV2GNph9JDwEPDwC_AMeoi2wwvwrct7Gsbetd1pwjcQmxA3tneAb2Jw4McI6T2mWteF1ifoRWO7BK8P-xgtP59_m34p5tezi-nHeeF4LVUhqWdSaMmFaLzW0taNV8Bd5bhzFmrhuRJ1A4wpR6XUVlpqpeaKrLzVZMWP0bt9720Mf0ZIg9m0yUHX2R7CmExNOdOC0Qy-_Q9chzH2-W-GEaZ5paTIkNpDLoaUIjTmNrYbG-8MJWYn3qzNzq_Z-TU78eZBvNnm6JtD_7jagP8XPJjOwIc98Lft4O7JxWZx_mmZr5wv9vk2DbB9zNv421R1lml-XM3MvLoUPxVZmK_8Hs6rnc4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202936854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>McManus, I C ; Winder, B C ; Gordon, D</creator><creatorcontrib>McManus, I C ; Winder, B C ; Gordon, D</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
The UK General Medical Council’s Performance Procedures were introduced in 1997. This study aimed to assess the changing knowledge and attitudes about the procedures in British doctors at the time of their introduction and in the following 2 years.
Methods
Three questionnaire surveys, of separate representative samples of 800 UK doctors, were carried out in November of 1997, 1998 and 1999. The surveys assessed awareness of Good Medical Practice, attitudes to the Performance Procedures, agreement with Duties of a Doctor as a basis for disciplinary procedures, and attitudes to the Performance Procedures.
Results
Although awareness of the procedures increased over the period 1997–99, there was no concurrent increase in agreement with the core principles of the procedures, the Duties of a Doctor, which are spelled out in Good Medical Practice. Of 12 separate attitudes to the procedures, changes were found in eight over the time period, all but two of which were negative, and not in support of the procedures. Nevertheless many doctors were changing their practice as a result of the procedures, and that proportion increased during the period 1997–99.
Conclusions
Although doctors became more aware of the procedures, that increasing awareness was not accompanied by an increasing agreement with the procedures’ underlying principles or their wider implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00008.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11895256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitudes ; Clinical Competence ; doctors ; General Medical Council ; Humans ; Information Services - statistics & numerical data ; Information Services - supply & distribution ; Licensure, Medical ; Medical Audit - methods ; Medical Audit - statistics & numerical data ; Medicine - standards ; Peer Review, Health Care - methods ; performance procedures ; Physicians - psychology ; Societies, Medical ; Specialization ; State Medicine - standards ; State Medicine - statistics & numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 2001-12, Vol.35 (s1), p.60-69</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd. Dec 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2923.2001.00008.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2923.2001.00008.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11895256$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McManus, I C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winder, B C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, D</creatorcontrib><title>UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>Objectives
The UK General Medical Council’s Performance Procedures were introduced in 1997. This study aimed to assess the changing knowledge and attitudes about the procedures in British doctors at the time of their introduction and in the following 2 years.
Methods
Three questionnaire surveys, of separate representative samples of 800 UK doctors, were carried out in November of 1997, 1998 and 1999. The surveys assessed awareness of Good Medical Practice, attitudes to the Performance Procedures, agreement with Duties of a Doctor as a basis for disciplinary procedures, and attitudes to the Performance Procedures.
Results
Although awareness of the procedures increased over the period 1997–99, there was no concurrent increase in agreement with the core principles of the procedures, the Duties of a Doctor, which are spelled out in Good Medical Practice. Of 12 separate attitudes to the procedures, changes were found in eight over the time period, all but two of which were negative, and not in support of the procedures. Nevertheless many doctors were changing their practice as a result of the procedures, and that proportion increased during the period 1997–99.
Conclusions
Although doctors became more aware of the procedures, that increasing awareness was not accompanied by an increasing agreement with the procedures’ underlying principles or their wider implications.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>doctors</subject><subject>General Medical Council</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Services - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Information Services - supply & distribution</subject><subject>Licensure, Medical</subject><subject>Medical Audit - methods</subject><subject>Medical Audit - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Peer Review, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>performance procedures</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>Specialization</subject><subject>State Medicine - standards</subject><subject>State Medicine - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1uEzEURi0EoqHlFZDFgm6YqX9n7AULFEqomrQVIsDOcuw7YsJkXOwZkb59nSYqEqvezb2Sz_fJOghhSkpKRHW2LimvZME04yUjhJYkjyq3z9Dk8eE5mhBOVEEoJUfoVUrrzNRSqJfoiFKlJZPVBH1fXmIf3BBiOsV2GNph9JDwEPDwC_AMeoi2wwvwrct7Gsbetd1pwjcQmxA3tneAb2Jw4McI6T2mWteF1ifoRWO7BK8P-xgtP59_m34p5tezi-nHeeF4LVUhqWdSaMmFaLzW0taNV8Bd5bhzFmrhuRJ1A4wpR6XUVlpqpeaKrLzVZMWP0bt9720Mf0ZIg9m0yUHX2R7CmExNOdOC0Qy-_Q9chzH2-W-GEaZ5paTIkNpDLoaUIjTmNrYbG-8MJWYn3qzNzq_Z-TU78eZBvNnm6JtD_7jagP8XPJjOwIc98Lft4O7JxWZx_mmZr5wv9vk2DbB9zNv421R1lml-XM3MvLoUPxVZmK_8Hs6rnc4</recordid><startdate>200112</startdate><enddate>200112</enddate><creator>McManus, I C</creator><creator>Winder, B C</creator><creator>Gordon, D</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200112</creationdate><title>UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99</title><author>McManus, I C ; Winder, B C ; Gordon, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3758-51d25495344fd995a7fd8e3c6c3ccae74d3847fe228c1559a5a1a59380bda90b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>doctors</topic><topic>General Medical Council</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Services - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Information Services - supply & distribution</topic><topic>Licensure, Medical</topic><topic>Medical Audit - methods</topic><topic>Medical Audit - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Peer Review, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>performance procedures</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>Specialization</topic><topic>State Medicine - standards</topic><topic>State Medicine - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McManus, I C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winder, B C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McManus, I C</au><au>Winder, B C</au><au>Gordon, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>2001-12</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>s1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>60-69</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>Objectives
The UK General Medical Council’s Performance Procedures were introduced in 1997. This study aimed to assess the changing knowledge and attitudes about the procedures in British doctors at the time of their introduction and in the following 2 years.
Methods
Three questionnaire surveys, of separate representative samples of 800 UK doctors, were carried out in November of 1997, 1998 and 1999. The surveys assessed awareness of Good Medical Practice, attitudes to the Performance Procedures, agreement with Duties of a Doctor as a basis for disciplinary procedures, and attitudes to the Performance Procedures.
Results
Although awareness of the procedures increased over the period 1997–99, there was no concurrent increase in agreement with the core principles of the procedures, the Duties of a Doctor, which are spelled out in Good Medical Practice. Of 12 separate attitudes to the procedures, changes were found in eight over the time period, all but two of which were negative, and not in support of the procedures. Nevertheless many doctors were changing their practice as a result of the procedures, and that proportion increased during the period 1997–99.
Conclusions
Although doctors became more aware of the procedures, that increasing awareness was not accompanied by an increasing agreement with the procedures’ underlying principles or their wider implications.</abstract><cop>Oxford UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>11895256</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00008.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-0110 |
ispartof | Medical education, 2001-12, Vol.35 (s1), p.60-69 |
issn | 0308-0110 1365-2923 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71329421 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Education Source |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Attitudes Clinical Competence doctors General Medical Council Humans Information Services - statistics & numerical data Information Services - supply & distribution Licensure, Medical Medical Audit - methods Medical Audit - statistics & numerical data Medicine - standards Peer Review, Health Care - methods performance procedures Physicians - psychology Societies, Medical Specialization State Medicine - standards State Medicine - statistics & numerical data Surveys and Questionnaires United Kingdom |
title | UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A09%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=UK%20doctors'%20attitudes%20to%20the%20General%20Medical%20Council's%20Performance%20Procedures,%201997-99&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=McManus,%20I%20C&rft.date=2001-12&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=s1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=60-69&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00008.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E98035270%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202936854&rft_id=info:pmid/11895256&rfr_iscdi=true |