UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99

Objectives The UK General Medical Council’s Performance Procedures were introduced in 1997. This study aimed to assess the changing knowledge and attitudes about the procedures in British doctors at the time of their introduction and in the following 2 years. Methods Three questionnaire surveys, of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical education 2001-12, Vol.35 (s1), p.60-69
Hauptverfasser: McManus, I C, Winder, B C, Gordon, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue s1
container_start_page 60
container_title Medical education
container_volume 35
creator McManus, I C
Winder, B C
Gordon, D
description Objectives The UK General Medical Council’s Performance Procedures were introduced in 1997. This study aimed to assess the changing knowledge and attitudes about the procedures in British doctors at the time of their introduction and in the following 2 years. Methods Three questionnaire surveys, of separate representative samples of 800 UK doctors, were carried out in November of 1997, 1998 and 1999. The surveys assessed awareness of Good Medical Practice, attitudes to the Performance Procedures, agreement with Duties of a Doctor as a basis for disciplinary procedures, and attitudes to the Performance Procedures. Results Although awareness of the procedures increased over the period 1997–99, there was no concurrent increase in agreement with the core principles of the procedures, the Duties of a Doctor, which are spelled out in Good Medical Practice. Of 12 separate attitudes to the procedures, changes were found in eight over the time period, all but two of which were negative, and not in support of the procedures. Nevertheless many doctors were changing their practice as a result of the procedures, and that proportion increased during the period 1997–99. Conclusions Although doctors became more aware of the procedures, that increasing awareness was not accompanied by an increasing agreement with the procedures’ underlying principles or their wider implications.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00008.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71329421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>98035270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3758-51d25495344fd995a7fd8e3c6c3ccae74d3847fe228c1559a5a1a59380bda90b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1uEzEURi0EoqHlFZDFgm6YqX9n7AULFEqomrQVIsDOcuw7YsJkXOwZkb59nSYqEqvezb2Sz_fJOghhSkpKRHW2LimvZME04yUjhJYkjyq3z9Dk8eE5mhBOVEEoJUfoVUrrzNRSqJfoiFKlJZPVBH1fXmIf3BBiOsV2GNph9JDwEPDwC_AMeoi2wwvwrct7Gsbetd1pwjcQmxA3tneAb2Jw4McI6T2mWteF1ifoRWO7BK8P-xgtP59_m34p5tezi-nHeeF4LVUhqWdSaMmFaLzW0taNV8Bd5bhzFmrhuRJ1A4wpR6XUVlpqpeaKrLzVZMWP0bt9720Mf0ZIg9m0yUHX2R7CmExNOdOC0Qy-_Q9chzH2-W-GEaZ5paTIkNpDLoaUIjTmNrYbG-8MJWYn3qzNzq_Z-TU78eZBvNnm6JtD_7jagP8XPJjOwIc98Lft4O7JxWZx_mmZr5wv9vk2DbB9zNv421R1lml-XM3MvLoUPxVZmK_8Hs6rnc4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202936854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>McManus, I C ; Winder, B C ; Gordon, D</creator><creatorcontrib>McManus, I C ; Winder, B C ; Gordon, D</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The UK General Medical Council’s Performance Procedures were introduced in 1997. This study aimed to assess the changing knowledge and attitudes about the procedures in British doctors at the time of their introduction and in the following 2 years. Methods Three questionnaire surveys, of separate representative samples of 800 UK doctors, were carried out in November of 1997, 1998 and 1999. The surveys assessed awareness of Good Medical Practice, attitudes to the Performance Procedures, agreement with Duties of a Doctor as a basis for disciplinary procedures, and attitudes to the Performance Procedures. Results Although awareness of the procedures increased over the period 1997–99, there was no concurrent increase in agreement with the core principles of the procedures, the Duties of a Doctor, which are spelled out in Good Medical Practice. Of 12 separate attitudes to the procedures, changes were found in eight over the time period, all but two of which were negative, and not in support of the procedures. Nevertheless many doctors were changing their practice as a result of the procedures, and that proportion increased during the period 1997–99. Conclusions Although doctors became more aware of the procedures, that increasing awareness was not accompanied by an increasing agreement with the procedures’ underlying principles or their wider implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00008.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11895256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitudes ; Clinical Competence ; doctors ; General Medical Council ; Humans ; Information Services - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Information Services - supply &amp; distribution ; Licensure, Medical ; Medical Audit - methods ; Medical Audit - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medicine - standards ; Peer Review, Health Care - methods ; performance procedures ; Physicians - psychology ; Societies, Medical ; Specialization ; State Medicine - standards ; State Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 2001-12, Vol.35 (s1), p.60-69</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd. Dec 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2923.2001.00008.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2923.2001.00008.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11895256$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McManus, I C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winder, B C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, D</creatorcontrib><title>UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>Objectives The UK General Medical Council’s Performance Procedures were introduced in 1997. This study aimed to assess the changing knowledge and attitudes about the procedures in British doctors at the time of their introduction and in the following 2 years. Methods Three questionnaire surveys, of separate representative samples of 800 UK doctors, were carried out in November of 1997, 1998 and 1999. The surveys assessed awareness of Good Medical Practice, attitudes to the Performance Procedures, agreement with Duties of a Doctor as a basis for disciplinary procedures, and attitudes to the Performance Procedures. Results Although awareness of the procedures increased over the period 1997–99, there was no concurrent increase in agreement with the core principles of the procedures, the Duties of a Doctor, which are spelled out in Good Medical Practice. Of 12 separate attitudes to the procedures, changes were found in eight over the time period, all but two of which were negative, and not in support of the procedures. Nevertheless many doctors were changing their practice as a result of the procedures, and that proportion increased during the period 1997–99. Conclusions Although doctors became more aware of the procedures, that increasing awareness was not accompanied by an increasing agreement with the procedures’ underlying principles or their wider implications.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>doctors</subject><subject>General Medical Council</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Information Services - supply &amp; distribution</subject><subject>Licensure, Medical</subject><subject>Medical Audit - methods</subject><subject>Medical Audit - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Peer Review, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>performance procedures</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>Specialization</subject><subject>State Medicine - standards</subject><subject>State Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1uEzEURi0EoqHlFZDFgm6YqX9n7AULFEqomrQVIsDOcuw7YsJkXOwZkb59nSYqEqvezb2Sz_fJOghhSkpKRHW2LimvZME04yUjhJYkjyq3z9Dk8eE5mhBOVEEoJUfoVUrrzNRSqJfoiFKlJZPVBH1fXmIf3BBiOsV2GNph9JDwEPDwC_AMeoi2wwvwrct7Gsbetd1pwjcQmxA3tneAb2Jw4McI6T2mWteF1ifoRWO7BK8P-xgtP59_m34p5tezi-nHeeF4LVUhqWdSaMmFaLzW0taNV8Bd5bhzFmrhuRJ1A4wpR6XUVlpqpeaKrLzVZMWP0bt9720Mf0ZIg9m0yUHX2R7CmExNOdOC0Qy-_Q9chzH2-W-GEaZ5paTIkNpDLoaUIjTmNrYbG-8MJWYn3qzNzq_Z-TU78eZBvNnm6JtD_7jagP8XPJjOwIc98Lft4O7JxWZx_mmZr5wv9vk2DbB9zNv421R1lml-XM3MvLoUPxVZmK_8Hs6rnc4</recordid><startdate>200112</startdate><enddate>200112</enddate><creator>McManus, I C</creator><creator>Winder, B C</creator><creator>Gordon, D</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200112</creationdate><title>UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99</title><author>McManus, I C ; Winder, B C ; Gordon, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3758-51d25495344fd995a7fd8e3c6c3ccae74d3847fe228c1559a5a1a59380bda90b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>doctors</topic><topic>General Medical Council</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Information Services - supply &amp; distribution</topic><topic>Licensure, Medical</topic><topic>Medical Audit - methods</topic><topic>Medical Audit - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Peer Review, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>performance procedures</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>Specialization</topic><topic>State Medicine - standards</topic><topic>State Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McManus, I C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winder, B C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McManus, I C</au><au>Winder, B C</au><au>Gordon, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>2001-12</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>s1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>60-69</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>Objectives The UK General Medical Council’s Performance Procedures were introduced in 1997. This study aimed to assess the changing knowledge and attitudes about the procedures in British doctors at the time of their introduction and in the following 2 years. Methods Three questionnaire surveys, of separate representative samples of 800 UK doctors, were carried out in November of 1997, 1998 and 1999. The surveys assessed awareness of Good Medical Practice, attitudes to the Performance Procedures, agreement with Duties of a Doctor as a basis for disciplinary procedures, and attitudes to the Performance Procedures. Results Although awareness of the procedures increased over the period 1997–99, there was no concurrent increase in agreement with the core principles of the procedures, the Duties of a Doctor, which are spelled out in Good Medical Practice. Of 12 separate attitudes to the procedures, changes were found in eight over the time period, all but two of which were negative, and not in support of the procedures. Nevertheless many doctors were changing their practice as a result of the procedures, and that proportion increased during the period 1997–99. Conclusions Although doctors became more aware of the procedures, that increasing awareness was not accompanied by an increasing agreement with the procedures’ underlying principles or their wider implications.</abstract><cop>Oxford UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>11895256</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00008.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-0110
ispartof Medical education, 2001-12, Vol.35 (s1), p.60-69
issn 0308-0110
1365-2923
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71329421
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Education Source
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Attitudes
Clinical Competence
doctors
General Medical Council
Humans
Information Services - statistics & numerical data
Information Services - supply & distribution
Licensure, Medical
Medical Audit - methods
Medical Audit - statistics & numerical data
Medicine - standards
Peer Review, Health Care - methods
performance procedures
Physicians - psychology
Societies, Medical
Specialization
State Medicine - standards
State Medicine - statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
United Kingdom
title UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A09%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=UK%20doctors'%20attitudes%20to%20the%20General%20Medical%20Council's%20Performance%20Procedures,%201997-99&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=McManus,%20I%20C&rft.date=2001-12&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=s1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=60-69&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00008.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E98035270%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202936854&rft_id=info:pmid/11895256&rfr_iscdi=true