The Nursing Outcomes Classification: Its Relevance to School Nursing
Two surveys were conducted to determine school nurses’ perceptions of the relevance of 190 outcomes developed by the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) research team to school nursing practice. First, a national random survey of members of the National Association of School Nurses was conducted....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of school nursing 2001-08, Vol.17 (4), p.189-197 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 197 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 189 |
container_title | The Journal of school nursing |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Cavendish, Roberta Lunney, Margaret Luise, Barbara Kraynyak Richardson, Kathryn |
description | Two surveys were conducted to determine school nurses’ perceptions of the relevance of 190 outcomes developed by the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) research team to school nursing practice. First, a national random survey of members of the National Association of School Nurses was conducted. Participants were asked to identify the percentage of children and families for whom school nurses affect health outcomes. Usable responses were returned from 227 school nurses (22% response rate). Ninety outcomes were perceived as relevant for 30% or more of children and families; 8 outcomes were perceived as relevant for 50% or more of children and families. A second survey—targeting state representatives attending a school nursing leadership meeting—was conducted using a revised version of the instrument. The legend was changed to degree of relevance to school nursing practice, with a response scale of 0 to 10. Usable responses were returned from 31 state representatives (41% response rate). The means of 172 of 190 outcomes were above 5 (median point on the 10-point scale of relevance). The findings of both surveys indicate that a large number of NOC outcomes are useful for documentation of the effectiveness of nursing interventions in school settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/10598405010170040401 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71311055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10598405010170040401</sage_id><sourcerecordid>71311055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-629163b699d8b6dca1b5885ecea761cf5204adfffe9a04d9e0af0770935fb0af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-A5GcvEVnkt1s4k3qXygWtJ7DZjPbpiTZmk0Ev71bWvEiMoeZw-895j3GzhGuEKW8RhBZykEAAkoA7gcP2BgFT8I0Tvihvz0SbpkRO3FuDRAh5_KYjRDTVMRRNGZ3ixUFL0PnqnYZzIde24ZcMK2Vc5WptOor294Ez70LXqmmT9VqCnobvOmVtfWP8JQdGVU7OtvvCXt_uF9Mn8LZ_PF5ejsLdZRAHyZRhklcJFlWpkVSaoWF8H-QJiUT1EZEwFVpjKFMAS8zAmVASshiYQp_xxN2ufPddPZjINfnTeU01bVqyQ4ulxijzyw8yHeg7qxzHZl801WN6r5yhHzbXv5Xe152sfcfiobKX9G-Lg_gDnBqSfnaDl3r8_5v-g0v3neX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71311055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Nursing Outcomes Classification: Its Relevance to School Nursing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Cavendish, Roberta ; Lunney, Margaret ; Luise, Barbara Kraynyak ; Richardson, Kathryn</creator><creatorcontrib>Cavendish, Roberta ; Lunney, Margaret ; Luise, Barbara Kraynyak ; Richardson, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><description>Two surveys were conducted to determine school nurses’ perceptions of the relevance of 190 outcomes developed by the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) research team to school nursing practice. First, a national random survey of members of the National Association of School Nurses was conducted. Participants were asked to identify the percentage of children and families for whom school nurses affect health outcomes. Usable responses were returned from 227 school nurses (22% response rate). Ninety outcomes were perceived as relevant for 30% or more of children and families; 8 outcomes were perceived as relevant for 50% or more of children and families. A second survey—targeting state representatives attending a school nursing leadership meeting—was conducted using a revised version of the instrument. The legend was changed to degree of relevance to school nursing practice, with a response scale of 0 to 10. Usable responses were returned from 31 state representatives (41% response rate). The means of 172 of 190 outcomes were above 5 (median point on the 10-point scale of relevance). The findings of both surveys indicate that a large number of NOC outcomes are useful for documentation of the effectiveness of nursing interventions in school settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-8405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-8364</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10598405010170040401</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11885322</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child Development ; Family ; Female ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Records Systems, Computerized ; Nursing ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Sample Size ; Sampling Studies ; School Nursing ; Societies, Nursing ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>The Journal of school nursing, 2001-08, Vol.17 (4), p.189-197</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-629163b699d8b6dca1b5885ecea761cf5204adfffe9a04d9e0af0770935fb0af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-629163b699d8b6dca1b5885ecea761cf5204adfffe9a04d9e0af0770935fb0af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10598405010170040401$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10598405010170040401$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11885322$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cavendish, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunney, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luise, Barbara Kraynyak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><title>The Nursing Outcomes Classification: Its Relevance to School Nursing</title><title>The Journal of school nursing</title><addtitle>J Sch Nurs</addtitle><description>Two surveys were conducted to determine school nurses’ perceptions of the relevance of 190 outcomes developed by the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) research team to school nursing practice. First, a national random survey of members of the National Association of School Nurses was conducted. Participants were asked to identify the percentage of children and families for whom school nurses affect health outcomes. Usable responses were returned from 227 school nurses (22% response rate). Ninety outcomes were perceived as relevant for 30% or more of children and families; 8 outcomes were perceived as relevant for 50% or more of children and families. A second survey—targeting state representatives attending a school nursing leadership meeting—was conducted using a revised version of the instrument. The legend was changed to degree of relevance to school nursing practice, with a response scale of 0 to 10. Usable responses were returned from 31 state representatives (41% response rate). The means of 172 of 190 outcomes were above 5 (median point on the 10-point scale of relevance). The findings of both surveys indicate that a large number of NOC outcomes are useful for documentation of the effectiveness of nursing interventions in school settings.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Sampling Studies</subject><subject>School Nursing</subject><subject>Societies, Nursing</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1059-8405</issn><issn>1546-8364</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-A5GcvEVnkt1s4k3qXygWtJ7DZjPbpiTZmk0Ev71bWvEiMoeZw-895j3GzhGuEKW8RhBZykEAAkoA7gcP2BgFT8I0Tvihvz0SbpkRO3FuDRAh5_KYjRDTVMRRNGZ3ixUFL0PnqnYZzIde24ZcMK2Vc5WptOor294Ez70LXqmmT9VqCnobvOmVtfWP8JQdGVU7OtvvCXt_uF9Mn8LZ_PF5ejsLdZRAHyZRhklcJFlWpkVSaoWF8H-QJiUT1EZEwFVpjKFMAS8zAmVASshiYQp_xxN2ufPddPZjINfnTeU01bVqyQ4ulxijzyw8yHeg7qxzHZl801WN6r5yhHzbXv5Xe152sfcfiobKX9G-Lg_gDnBqSfnaDl3r8_5v-g0v3neX</recordid><startdate>200108</startdate><enddate>200108</enddate><creator>Cavendish, Roberta</creator><creator>Lunney, Margaret</creator><creator>Luise, Barbara Kraynyak</creator><creator>Richardson, Kathryn</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200108</creationdate><title>The Nursing Outcomes Classification: Its Relevance to School Nursing</title><author>Cavendish, Roberta ; Lunney, Margaret ; Luise, Barbara Kraynyak ; Richardson, Kathryn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-629163b699d8b6dca1b5885ecea761cf5204adfffe9a04d9e0af0770935fb0af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Sampling Studies</topic><topic>School Nursing</topic><topic>Societies, Nursing</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cavendish, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunney, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luise, Barbara Kraynyak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of school nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cavendish, Roberta</au><au>Lunney, Margaret</au><au>Luise, Barbara Kraynyak</au><au>Richardson, Kathryn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Nursing Outcomes Classification: Its Relevance to School Nursing</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of school nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Sch Nurs</addtitle><date>2001-08</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>189-197</pages><issn>1059-8405</issn><eissn>1546-8364</eissn><abstract>Two surveys were conducted to determine school nurses’ perceptions of the relevance of 190 outcomes developed by the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) research team to school nursing practice. First, a national random survey of members of the National Association of School Nurses was conducted. Participants were asked to identify the percentage of children and families for whom school nurses affect health outcomes. Usable responses were returned from 227 school nurses (22% response rate). Ninety outcomes were perceived as relevant for 30% or more of children and families; 8 outcomes were perceived as relevant for 50% or more of children and families. A second survey—targeting state representatives attending a school nursing leadership meeting—was conducted using a revised version of the instrument. The legend was changed to degree of relevance to school nursing practice, with a response scale of 0 to 10. Usable responses were returned from 31 state representatives (41% response rate). The means of 172 of 190 outcomes were above 5 (median point on the 10-point scale of relevance). The findings of both surveys indicate that a large number of NOC outcomes are useful for documentation of the effectiveness of nursing interventions in school settings.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>11885322</pmid><doi>10.1177/10598405010170040401</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1059-8405 |
ispartof | The Journal of school nursing, 2001-08, Vol.17 (4), p.189-197 |
issn | 1059-8405 1546-8364 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71311055 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Child Child Development Family Female Health Care Surveys Humans Male Medical Records Systems, Computerized Nursing Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Sample Size Sampling Studies School Nursing Societies, Nursing Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | The Nursing Outcomes Classification: Its Relevance to School Nursing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T14%3A11%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Nursing%20Outcomes%20Classification:%20Its%20Relevance%20to%20School%20Nursing&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20school%20nursing&rft.au=Cavendish,%20Roberta&rft.date=2001-08&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=189-197&rft.issn=1059-8405&rft.eissn=1546-8364&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10598405010170040401&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71311055%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71311055&rft_id=info:pmid/11885322&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10598405010170040401&rfr_iscdi=true |