Mechanism-based protein design: Attempted "nucleation-condensation" approach to a possible minimal helix-bundle protein

In an intended mechanism‐based de novo approach, a 22‐mer peptide was so designed as to make it both a stereochemically nucleatable and hydrophobically condensable minimal globular protein. Framework‐like nucleation of a triple‐helix bundle was targeted by employing as folding nucleators composite β...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biopolymers 2003-10, Vol.70 (3), p.355-363
Hauptverfasser: Mohanraja, K., Dhanasekaran, M., Kundu, B., Durani, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 363
container_issue 3
container_start_page 355
container_title Biopolymers
container_volume 70
creator Mohanraja, K.
Dhanasekaran, M.
Kundu, B.
Durani, S.
description In an intended mechanism‐based de novo approach, a 22‐mer peptide was so designed as to make it both a stereochemically nucleatable and hydrophobically condensable minimal globular protein. Framework‐like nucleation of a triple‐helix bundle was targeted by employing as folding nucleators composite β‐turns that could both nucleate helices and place them in close juxtaposition for possible interhelical interaction. To promote the targeted triple‐helix bundle to condense as a globular protein, an amphipathic sequence pattern was adopted for possible hydrophobic interhelical interaction. A predominantly helicogenic 22‐mer amphipathic peptide was thus designed, punctuating it with composite type II′–III and type II–Asx type β‐turns as the helix nucleators cum chain reversal elements. The peptide made by solid‐phase synthesis was shown by NMR and CD to be a nascent and distorted triple‐helix bundle in a trifluoroethanol (TFE)–water mixture, but more or less a random coil in water. A fold nucleation effect is evident in the TFE–water mixture, but apparently the hydrophobic effect cannot sustain the peptide conformational order in water. A lack of synergy between folding nucleation and hydrophobic condensation of the peptide is possible. Indeed, a mismatch between the sequential H,P pattern of the peptide and its nascent‐type globular fold in a TFE–water mixture is evident based on a simulated annealing study guided by NMR. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 70: 355–363, 2003
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bip.10465
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71307030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19135351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3905-b272c6cf4b9c4287c20b324e7fdf48cf6879642ab29deb129e46c4a982ffc4173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCgS-Aoh6QOJiO_8UJt7KiS6UCPYBAXCzbmbCGxEnjRG2_fU13gRPiNB77995o_Ah5xuAVA-AnLoz5IEv1gKwY1JoCr_hDsgKAkgrF1QE5TOkHgJSCwWNywKTStYBqRa7fo9_aGFJPnU3YFOM0zBhi0WAK3-Pr4nSesR_n_HIcF9-hncMQqR9igzHdN8eFHbPK-m0xD4UtxiGl4Dos-hBDb7tii124oW6JTb7c-z8hj1rbJXy6r0fk89nbT-t39OLj5nx9ekG9qEFRxzX3pW-lq73klfYcnOASddu0svJtWem6lNw6XjfoGK9Rll7auuJt6yXT4oi82PnmuVcLptn0IXnsOhtxWJLRTIAGAf8FWc2EEopl8OUO9FNedMLWjFNec7o1DMyvOEyOw9zHkdnne9PF9dj8Jff_n4GTHXAdOrz9t5N5c37525LuFCHNePNHYaefptRCK_Plw8bAt43S68sz81XcAQtPpM0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19135351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanism-based protein design: Attempted "nucleation-condensation" approach to a possible minimal helix-bundle protein</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mohanraja, K. ; Dhanasekaran, M. ; Kundu, B. ; Durani, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohanraja, K. ; Dhanasekaran, M. ; Kundu, B. ; Durani, S.</creatorcontrib><description>In an intended mechanism‐based de novo approach, a 22‐mer peptide was so designed as to make it both a stereochemically nucleatable and hydrophobically condensable minimal globular protein. Framework‐like nucleation of a triple‐helix bundle was targeted by employing as folding nucleators composite β‐turns that could both nucleate helices and place them in close juxtaposition for possible interhelical interaction. To promote the targeted triple‐helix bundle to condense as a globular protein, an amphipathic sequence pattern was adopted for possible hydrophobic interhelical interaction. A predominantly helicogenic 22‐mer amphipathic peptide was thus designed, punctuating it with composite type II′–III and type II–Asx type β‐turns as the helix nucleators cum chain reversal elements. The peptide made by solid‐phase synthesis was shown by NMR and CD to be a nascent and distorted triple‐helix bundle in a trifluoroethanol (TFE)–water mixture, but more or less a random coil in water. A fold nucleation effect is evident in the TFE–water mixture, but apparently the hydrophobic effect cannot sustain the peptide conformational order in water. A lack of synergy between folding nucleation and hydrophobic condensation of the peptide is possible. Indeed, a mismatch between the sequential H,P pattern of the peptide and its nascent‐type globular fold in a TFE–water mixture is evident based on a simulated annealing study guided by NMR. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 70: 355–363, 2003</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3525</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bip.10465</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14579308</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Amino Acid Sequence ; Circular Dichroism ; conformation energy calculation ; D-chiral residue ; de novo design ; folding nucleation ; helix bundle ; helix-bundle protein ; Models, Molecular ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Peptides - chemistry ; Protein Folding ; Protein Structure, Secondary ; tertiary structure ; Thermodynamics ; β-turn</subject><ispartof>Biopolymers, 2003-10, Vol.70 (3), p.355-363</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3905-b272c6cf4b9c4287c20b324e7fdf48cf6879642ab29deb129e46c4a982ffc4173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3905-b272c6cf4b9c4287c20b324e7fdf48cf6879642ab29deb129e46c4a982ffc4173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbip.10465$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbip.10465$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14579308$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohanraja, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhanasekaran, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundu, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durani, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanism-based protein design: Attempted "nucleation-condensation" approach to a possible minimal helix-bundle protein</title><title>Biopolymers</title><addtitle>Biopolymers</addtitle><description>In an intended mechanism‐based de novo approach, a 22‐mer peptide was so designed as to make it both a stereochemically nucleatable and hydrophobically condensable minimal globular protein. Framework‐like nucleation of a triple‐helix bundle was targeted by employing as folding nucleators composite β‐turns that could both nucleate helices and place them in close juxtaposition for possible interhelical interaction. To promote the targeted triple‐helix bundle to condense as a globular protein, an amphipathic sequence pattern was adopted for possible hydrophobic interhelical interaction. A predominantly helicogenic 22‐mer amphipathic peptide was thus designed, punctuating it with composite type II′–III and type II–Asx type β‐turns as the helix nucleators cum chain reversal elements. The peptide made by solid‐phase synthesis was shown by NMR and CD to be a nascent and distorted triple‐helix bundle in a trifluoroethanol (TFE)–water mixture, but more or less a random coil in water. A fold nucleation effect is evident in the TFE–water mixture, but apparently the hydrophobic effect cannot sustain the peptide conformational order in water. A lack of synergy between folding nucleation and hydrophobic condensation of the peptide is possible. Indeed, a mismatch between the sequential H,P pattern of the peptide and its nascent‐type globular fold in a TFE–water mixture is evident based on a simulated annealing study guided by NMR. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 70: 355–363, 2003</description><subject>Amino Acid Sequence</subject><subject>Circular Dichroism</subject><subject>conformation energy calculation</subject><subject>D-chiral residue</subject><subject>de novo design</subject><subject>folding nucleation</subject><subject>helix bundle</subject><subject>helix-bundle protein</subject><subject>Models, Molecular</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Peptides - chemistry</subject><subject>Protein Folding</subject><subject>Protein Structure, Secondary</subject><subject>tertiary structure</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><subject>β-turn</subject><issn>0006-3525</issn><issn>1097-0282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCgS-Aoh6QOJiO_8UJt7KiS6UCPYBAXCzbmbCGxEnjRG2_fU13gRPiNB77995o_Ah5xuAVA-AnLoz5IEv1gKwY1JoCr_hDsgKAkgrF1QE5TOkHgJSCwWNywKTStYBqRa7fo9_aGFJPnU3YFOM0zBhi0WAK3-Pr4nSesR_n_HIcF9-hncMQqR9igzHdN8eFHbPK-m0xD4UtxiGl4Dos-hBDb7tii124oW6JTb7c-z8hj1rbJXy6r0fk89nbT-t39OLj5nx9ekG9qEFRxzX3pW-lq73klfYcnOASddu0svJtWem6lNw6XjfoGK9Rll7auuJt6yXT4oi82PnmuVcLptn0IXnsOhtxWJLRTIAGAf8FWc2EEopl8OUO9FNedMLWjFNec7o1DMyvOEyOw9zHkdnne9PF9dj8Jff_n4GTHXAdOrz9t5N5c37525LuFCHNePNHYaefptRCK_Plw8bAt43S68sz81XcAQtPpM0</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>Mohanraja, K.</creator><creator>Dhanasekaran, M.</creator><creator>Kundu, B.</creator><creator>Durani, S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>Mechanism-based protein design: Attempted "nucleation-condensation" approach to a possible minimal helix-bundle protein</title><author>Mohanraja, K. ; Dhanasekaran, M. ; Kundu, B. ; Durani, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3905-b272c6cf4b9c4287c20b324e7fdf48cf6879642ab29deb129e46c4a982ffc4173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Amino Acid Sequence</topic><topic>Circular Dichroism</topic><topic>conformation energy calculation</topic><topic>D-chiral residue</topic><topic>de novo design</topic><topic>folding nucleation</topic><topic>helix bundle</topic><topic>helix-bundle protein</topic><topic>Models, Molecular</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Peptides - chemistry</topic><topic>Protein Folding</topic><topic>Protein Structure, Secondary</topic><topic>tertiary structure</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><topic>β-turn</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohanraja, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhanasekaran, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundu, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durani, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biopolymers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohanraja, K.</au><au>Dhanasekaran, M.</au><au>Kundu, B.</au><au>Durani, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanism-based protein design: Attempted "nucleation-condensation" approach to a possible minimal helix-bundle protein</atitle><jtitle>Biopolymers</jtitle><addtitle>Biopolymers</addtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>363</epage><pages>355-363</pages><issn>0006-3525</issn><eissn>1097-0282</eissn><abstract>In an intended mechanism‐based de novo approach, a 22‐mer peptide was so designed as to make it both a stereochemically nucleatable and hydrophobically condensable minimal globular protein. Framework‐like nucleation of a triple‐helix bundle was targeted by employing as folding nucleators composite β‐turns that could both nucleate helices and place them in close juxtaposition for possible interhelical interaction. To promote the targeted triple‐helix bundle to condense as a globular protein, an amphipathic sequence pattern was adopted for possible hydrophobic interhelical interaction. A predominantly helicogenic 22‐mer amphipathic peptide was thus designed, punctuating it with composite type II′–III and type II–Asx type β‐turns as the helix nucleators cum chain reversal elements. The peptide made by solid‐phase synthesis was shown by NMR and CD to be a nascent and distorted triple‐helix bundle in a trifluoroethanol (TFE)–water mixture, but more or less a random coil in water. A fold nucleation effect is evident in the TFE–water mixture, but apparently the hydrophobic effect cannot sustain the peptide conformational order in water. A lack of synergy between folding nucleation and hydrophobic condensation of the peptide is possible. Indeed, a mismatch between the sequential H,P pattern of the peptide and its nascent‐type globular fold in a TFE–water mixture is evident based on a simulated annealing study guided by NMR. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 70: 355–363, 2003</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>14579308</pmid><doi>10.1002/bip.10465</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3525
ispartof Biopolymers, 2003-10, Vol.70 (3), p.355-363
issn 0006-3525
1097-0282
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71307030
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Amino Acid Sequence
Circular Dichroism
conformation energy calculation
D-chiral residue
de novo design
folding nucleation
helix bundle
helix-bundle protein
Models, Molecular
Molecular Sequence Data
Peptides - chemistry
Protein Folding
Protein Structure, Secondary
tertiary structure
Thermodynamics
β-turn
title Mechanism-based protein design: Attempted "nucleation-condensation" approach to a possible minimal helix-bundle protein
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A55%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanism-based%20protein%20design:%20Attempted%20%22nucleation-condensation%22%20approach%20to%20a%20possible%20minimal%20helix-bundle%20protein&rft.jtitle=Biopolymers&rft.au=Mohanraja,%20K.&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=363&rft.pages=355-363&rft.issn=0006-3525&rft.eissn=1097-0282&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bip.10465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19135351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19135351&rft_id=info:pmid/14579308&rfr_iscdi=true