Are Self-Enhancing Cognitions Associated With Healthy or Unhealthy Biological Profiles?
Self-enhancement is variously portrayed as a positive illusion that can foster health and longevity or as defensive neuroticism that can have physiological-neuroendocrine costs. In a laboratory stress-challenge paradigm, the authors found that high self-enhancers had lower cardiovascular responses t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 2003-10, Vol.85 (4), p.605-615 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 615 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 605 |
container_title | Journal of personality and social psychology |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Taylor, Shelley E Lerner, Jennifer S Sherman, David K Sage, Rebecca M McDowell, Nina K |
description | Self-enhancement is variously portrayed as a positive illusion that can foster health and longevity or as defensive neuroticism that can have physiological-neuroendocrine costs. In a laboratory stress-challenge paradigm, the authors found that high self-enhancers had lower cardiovascular responses to stress, more rapid cardiovascular recovery, and lower baseline cortisol levels, consistent with the positive illusions predictions and counter to the predictions of the defensive neuroticism position. A second set of analyses, replicating the "illusory mental health paradigm" (
J. Shedler, M. Mayman, & M. Manis, 1993
), also did not support the defensive neuroticism hypothesis. The association between self-enhancement and cortisol was mediated by psychological resources; analyses of the cardiovascular results provided no definitive mediational pathway. Discussion centers on the potential stress-buffering effects of self-enhancing beliefs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.605 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71286534</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614420770</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a479t-1d355b006bc7b55cbccd323c6699cc14ee12261101f56b398e9c29fe9b851ffd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c-L1DAUB_Agijs7-g94kCKuF-mYl19tTjIOqyssKOiyx5Cm6UyWTtJN2sP892aY4qqInkLC570k74vQC8ArwLR6hzEhJeXAVjVfsZXA_BFagKSyBAr8MVr8BGfoPKU7jDHjhDxFZ8C4AAC-QLfraItvtu_KS7_T3ji_LTZh693ogk_FOqVgnB5tW9y6cVdcWd2Pu0MRYnHjd_Pmgwt92Dqj--JrDJ3rbXr_DD3pdJ_s83ldopuPl983V-X1l0-fN-vrUrNKjiW0lPMGY9GYquHcNMa0lFAjhJTGALMWCMlPxdBx0VBZW2mI7Kxsag5d19IlenPqO8RwP9k0qr1Lxva99jZMSVVAasEp-y-kNacVkZDhqz_gXZiiz59QAhgjuKrwvxDBsgZcCZoROSETQ0rRdmqIbq_jQQFWxwTVMSB1DEjVXDGVE8xFL-fOU7O37UPJHFkGFzPQKY-8i8fU0oPjIGqSZ7hEb09OD1oN6WB0HJ3J2ZgpRuvHfDb8eu3rv-vf2Q-UPb1b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614420770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Self-Enhancing Cognitions Associated With Healthy or Unhealthy Biological Profiles?</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Taylor, Shelley E ; Lerner, Jennifer S ; Sherman, David K ; Sage, Rebecca M ; McDowell, Nina K</creator><contributor>Devine, Patricia G ; Harmon-Jones, Eddie ; Devine, Patricia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Shelley E ; Lerner, Jennifer S ; Sherman, David K ; Sage, Rebecca M ; McDowell, Nina K ; Devine, Patricia G ; Harmon-Jones, Eddie ; Devine, Patricia</creatorcontrib><description>Self-enhancement is variously portrayed as a positive illusion that can foster health and longevity or as defensive neuroticism that can have physiological-neuroendocrine costs. In a laboratory stress-challenge paradigm, the authors found that high self-enhancers had lower cardiovascular responses to stress, more rapid cardiovascular recovery, and lower baseline cortisol levels, consistent with the positive illusions predictions and counter to the predictions of the defensive neuroticism position. A second set of analyses, replicating the "illusory mental health paradigm" (
J. Shedler, M. Mayman, & M. Manis, 1993
), also did not support the defensive neuroticism hypothesis. The association between self-enhancement and cortisol was mediated by psychological resources; analyses of the cardiovascular results provided no definitive mediational pathway. Discussion centers on the potential stress-buffering effects of self-enhancing beliefs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.605</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14561115</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attitude to Health ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitions ; Defense Mechanisms ; Drug therapy ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Health Behavior ; Health Status ; Heart Rate - physiology ; Human ; Humans ; Hydrocortisone - analysis ; Hydrocortisone - metabolism ; Male ; Mental Health ; Miscellaneous ; Neuroendocrinology ; Neurology ; Neuroses ; Neurotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Neuroticism ; Psychological Stress ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychophysiology ; Saliva - chemistry ; Self Concept ; Self-evaluation ; Self-perception ; Social psychology ; Steroids ; Stress ; Stress Reactions ; Stress, Psychological - metabolism ; Stress, Psychological - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Well-being</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 2003-10, Vol.85 (4), p.605-615</ispartof><rights>2003 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 2003</rights><rights>2003, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a479t-1d355b006bc7b55cbccd323c6699cc14ee12261101f56b398e9c29fe9b851ffd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a479t-1d355b006bc7b55cbccd323c6699cc14ee12261101f56b398e9c29fe9b851ffd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,33751</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15168232$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14561115$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Devine, Patricia G</contributor><contributor>Harmon-Jones, Eddie</contributor><contributor>Devine, Patricia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Shelley E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerner, Jennifer S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, David K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sage, Rebecca M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDowell, Nina K</creatorcontrib><title>Are Self-Enhancing Cognitions Associated With Healthy or Unhealthy Biological Profiles?</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>Self-enhancement is variously portrayed as a positive illusion that can foster health and longevity or as defensive neuroticism that can have physiological-neuroendocrine costs. In a laboratory stress-challenge paradigm, the authors found that high self-enhancers had lower cardiovascular responses to stress, more rapid cardiovascular recovery, and lower baseline cortisol levels, consistent with the positive illusions predictions and counter to the predictions of the defensive neuroticism position. A second set of analyses, replicating the "illusory mental health paradigm" (
J. Shedler, M. Mayman, & M. Manis, 1993
), also did not support the defensive neuroticism hypothesis. The association between self-enhancement and cortisol was mediated by psychological resources; analyses of the cardiovascular results provided no definitive mediational pathway. Discussion centers on the potential stress-buffering effects of self-enhancing beliefs.</description><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitions</subject><subject>Defense Mechanisms</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Heart Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrocortisone - analysis</subject><subject>Hydrocortisone - metabolism</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neuroendocrinology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuroses</subject><subject>Neurotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neuroticism</subject><subject>Psychological Stress</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Saliva - chemistry</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Self-evaluation</subject><subject>Self-perception</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress Reactions</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - metabolism</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Well-being</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c-L1DAUB_Agijs7-g94kCKuF-mYl19tTjIOqyssKOiyx5Cm6UyWTtJN2sP892aY4qqInkLC570k74vQC8ArwLR6hzEhJeXAVjVfsZXA_BFagKSyBAr8MVr8BGfoPKU7jDHjhDxFZ8C4AAC-QLfraItvtu_KS7_T3ji_LTZh693ogk_FOqVgnB5tW9y6cVdcWd2Pu0MRYnHjd_Pmgwt92Dqj--JrDJ3rbXr_DD3pdJ_s83ldopuPl983V-X1l0-fN-vrUrNKjiW0lPMGY9GYquHcNMa0lFAjhJTGALMWCMlPxdBx0VBZW2mI7Kxsag5d19IlenPqO8RwP9k0qr1Lxva99jZMSVVAasEp-y-kNacVkZDhqz_gXZiiz59QAhgjuKrwvxDBsgZcCZoROSETQ0rRdmqIbq_jQQFWxwTVMSB1DEjVXDGVE8xFL-fOU7O37UPJHFkGFzPQKY-8i8fU0oPjIGqSZ7hEb09OD1oN6WB0HJ3J2ZgpRuvHfDb8eu3rv-vf2Q-UPb1b</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>Taylor, Shelley E</creator><creator>Lerner, Jennifer S</creator><creator>Sherman, David K</creator><creator>Sage, Rebecca M</creator><creator>McDowell, Nina K</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>Are Self-Enhancing Cognitions Associated With Healthy or Unhealthy Biological Profiles?</title><author>Taylor, Shelley E ; Lerner, Jennifer S ; Sherman, David K ; Sage, Rebecca M ; McDowell, Nina K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a479t-1d355b006bc7b55cbccd323c6699cc14ee12261101f56b398e9c29fe9b851ffd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitions</topic><topic>Defense Mechanisms</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Heart Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrocortisone - analysis</topic><topic>Hydrocortisone - metabolism</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neuroendocrinology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuroses</topic><topic>Neurotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neuroticism</topic><topic>Psychological Stress</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Saliva - chemistry</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Self-evaluation</topic><topic>Self-perception</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress Reactions</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - metabolism</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Well-being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Shelley E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerner, Jennifer S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, David K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sage, Rebecca M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDowell, Nina K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taylor, Shelley E</au><au>Lerner, Jennifer S</au><au>Sherman, David K</au><au>Sage, Rebecca M</au><au>McDowell, Nina K</au><au>Devine, Patricia G</au><au>Harmon-Jones, Eddie</au><au>Devine, Patricia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Self-Enhancing Cognitions Associated With Healthy or Unhealthy Biological Profiles?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>605</spage><epage>615</epage><pages>605-615</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>Self-enhancement is variously portrayed as a positive illusion that can foster health and longevity or as defensive neuroticism that can have physiological-neuroendocrine costs. In a laboratory stress-challenge paradigm, the authors found that high self-enhancers had lower cardiovascular responses to stress, more rapid cardiovascular recovery, and lower baseline cortisol levels, consistent with the positive illusions predictions and counter to the predictions of the defensive neuroticism position. A second set of analyses, replicating the "illusory mental health paradigm" (
J. Shedler, M. Mayman, & M. Manis, 1993
), also did not support the defensive neuroticism hypothesis. The association between self-enhancement and cortisol was mediated by psychological resources; analyses of the cardiovascular results provided no definitive mediational pathway. Discussion centers on the potential stress-buffering effects of self-enhancing beliefs.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>14561115</pmid><doi>10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.605</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3514 |
ispartof | Journal of personality and social psychology, 2003-10, Vol.85 (4), p.605-615 |
issn | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71286534 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Attitude to Health Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cognitions Defense Mechanisms Drug therapy Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Health Behavior Health Status Heart Rate - physiology Human Humans Hydrocortisone - analysis Hydrocortisone - metabolism Male Mental Health Miscellaneous Neuroendocrinology Neurology Neuroses Neurotic Disorders - diagnosis Neuroticism Psychological Stress Psychological Theory Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychophysiology Saliva - chemistry Self Concept Self-evaluation Self-perception Social psychology Steroids Stress Stress Reactions Stress, Psychological - metabolism Stress, Psychological - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires Well-being |
title | Are Self-Enhancing Cognitions Associated With Healthy or Unhealthy Biological Profiles? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T06%3A35%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Self-Enhancing%20Cognitions%20Associated%20With%20Healthy%20or%20Unhealthy%20Biological%20Profiles?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Taylor,%20Shelley%20E&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=605&rft.epage=615&rft.pages=605-615&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614420770%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614420770&rft_id=info:pmid/14561115&rfr_iscdi=true |