Outcomes of the gross and developmental anatomy teaching assistant experience
During the first‐year Gross and Developmental Anatomy Course at Mayo Medical School, third‐year medical students volunteer as teaching assistants (TAs). Their responsibilities include preparing for dissection, instructing students during dissection, writing examination questions, and giving a lectur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2003-11, Vol.16 (6), p.526-530 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 530 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 526 |
container_title | Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Ocel, Joseph J. Palmer, Brian A. Wittich, Christopher M. Carmichael, Stephen W. Pawlina, Wojciech |
description | During the first‐year Gross and Developmental Anatomy Course at Mayo Medical School, third‐year medical students volunteer as teaching assistants (TAs). Their responsibilities include preparing for dissection, instructing students during dissection, writing examination questions, and giving a lecture. To evaluate the academic and professional impact of this experience on former TAs, a survey instrument was developed, and was sent to former TAs from the past 17 years. Seventy‐two percent of the surveys were returned. Most respondents (84%) indicated that the TA experience was beneficial during their third‐year surgical rotation. Over 60% identified benefits during Neurology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Internal Medicine rotations. The majority (62%) indicated they regularly use the knowledge gained from the TA experience. Communication was the most highly ranked area of skill development, with 86% of respondents indicating gains in lecture effectiveness and 97% in one‐on‐one teaching. Among respondents, 32% entered surgical or radiological fields, roughly paralleling the non‐TA medical student population. All respondents indicated that they would repeat the experience and recommend it to other medical students. Although benefits for long‐term career development have not yet been established, the Gross and Developmental Anatomy TA experience had perceived short‐term benefits with respect to clinical rotations and teaching skill development. Clin. Anat. 16:526–530, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ca.10193 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71282374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71282374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3553-dedde29b3b80efa357ebb3a683468b159d73892b0b48a3cf974627df3cac7d163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AURgdRbK2Cv0CyEjfRmblJZrIs9VGhtaAVl8Nk5qaN5lEzqbb_3tRWXbn64HI4cA8hp4xeMkr5ldHtshj2SJfRWPocQtgnXSpj4YOkUYccOfdKKWOBkIekw4IwimLKu2Q8WTamKtB5Veo1c_RmdeWcp0vrWfzAvFoUWDY6by-6qYq116A286ycedq5zDW6bDxcLbDOsDR4TA5SnTs82W2PPN_eTAdDfzS5ux_0R76BMATforXI4wQSSTHVEApMEtCRhCCSCQtjK0DGPKFJIDWYNBZBxIVNwWgjLIugR8633kVdvS_RNarInME81yVWS6cE45KDCFrwYguazVs1pmpRZ4Wu14pRtUmnjFbf6Vr0bOdcJgXaP3DXqgX8LfCZ5bj-V6QG_R_hjm8z4eqX1_WbigSIUL083Ckurse306eheoQvzXKG7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71282374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of the gross and developmental anatomy teaching assistant experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ocel, Joseph J. ; Palmer, Brian A. ; Wittich, Christopher M. ; Carmichael, Stephen W. ; Pawlina, Wojciech</creator><creatorcontrib>Ocel, Joseph J. ; Palmer, Brian A. ; Wittich, Christopher M. ; Carmichael, Stephen W. ; Pawlina, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><description>During the first‐year Gross and Developmental Anatomy Course at Mayo Medical School, third‐year medical students volunteer as teaching assistants (TAs). Their responsibilities include preparing for dissection, instructing students during dissection, writing examination questions, and giving a lecture. To evaluate the academic and professional impact of this experience on former TAs, a survey instrument was developed, and was sent to former TAs from the past 17 years. Seventy‐two percent of the surveys were returned. Most respondents (84%) indicated that the TA experience was beneficial during their third‐year surgical rotation. Over 60% identified benefits during Neurology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Internal Medicine rotations. The majority (62%) indicated they regularly use the knowledge gained from the TA experience. Communication was the most highly ranked area of skill development, with 86% of respondents indicating gains in lecture effectiveness and 97% in one‐on‐one teaching. Among respondents, 32% entered surgical or radiological fields, roughly paralleling the non‐TA medical student population. All respondents indicated that they would repeat the experience and recommend it to other medical students. Although benefits for long‐term career development have not yet been established, the Gross and Developmental Anatomy TA experience had perceived short‐term benefits with respect to clinical rotations and teaching skill development. Clin. Anat. 16:526–530, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-3806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2353</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ca.10193</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14566902</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anatomy - education ; Clinical Competence ; Education, Medical - manpower ; Education, Medical - methods ; Female ; gross anatomy ; Humans ; Male ; medical education ; Middle Aged ; Minnesota ; Peer Group ; peer teaching ; Students, Medical ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching - manpower ; Teaching - methods ; tutoring</subject><ispartof>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2003-11, Vol.16 (6), p.526-530</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3553-dedde29b3b80efa357ebb3a683468b159d73892b0b48a3cf974627df3cac7d163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3553-dedde29b3b80efa357ebb3a683468b159d73892b0b48a3cf974627df3cac7d163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fca.10193$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fca.10193$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14566902$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ocel, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Brian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittich, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmichael, Stephen W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawlina, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of the gross and developmental anatomy teaching assistant experience</title><title>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Clin. Anat</addtitle><description>During the first‐year Gross and Developmental Anatomy Course at Mayo Medical School, third‐year medical students volunteer as teaching assistants (TAs). Their responsibilities include preparing for dissection, instructing students during dissection, writing examination questions, and giving a lecture. To evaluate the academic and professional impact of this experience on former TAs, a survey instrument was developed, and was sent to former TAs from the past 17 years. Seventy‐two percent of the surveys were returned. Most respondents (84%) indicated that the TA experience was beneficial during their third‐year surgical rotation. Over 60% identified benefits during Neurology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Internal Medicine rotations. The majority (62%) indicated they regularly use the knowledge gained from the TA experience. Communication was the most highly ranked area of skill development, with 86% of respondents indicating gains in lecture effectiveness and 97% in one‐on‐one teaching. Among respondents, 32% entered surgical or radiological fields, roughly paralleling the non‐TA medical student population. All respondents indicated that they would repeat the experience and recommend it to other medical students. Although benefits for long‐term career development have not yet been established, the Gross and Developmental Anatomy TA experience had perceived short‐term benefits with respect to clinical rotations and teaching skill development. Clin. Anat. 16:526–530, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anatomy - education</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Education, Medical - manpower</subject><subject>Education, Medical - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gross anatomy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>medical education</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>peer teaching</subject><subject>Students, Medical</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching - manpower</subject><subject>Teaching - methods</subject><subject>tutoring</subject><issn>0897-3806</issn><issn>1098-2353</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AURgdRbK2Cv0CyEjfRmblJZrIs9VGhtaAVl8Nk5qaN5lEzqbb_3tRWXbn64HI4cA8hp4xeMkr5ldHtshj2SJfRWPocQtgnXSpj4YOkUYccOfdKKWOBkIekw4IwimLKu2Q8WTamKtB5Veo1c_RmdeWcp0vrWfzAvFoUWDY6by-6qYq116A286ycedq5zDW6bDxcLbDOsDR4TA5SnTs82W2PPN_eTAdDfzS5ux_0R76BMATforXI4wQSSTHVEApMEtCRhCCSCQtjK0DGPKFJIDWYNBZBxIVNwWgjLIugR8633kVdvS_RNarInME81yVWS6cE45KDCFrwYguazVs1pmpRZ4Wu14pRtUmnjFbf6Vr0bOdcJgXaP3DXqgX8LfCZ5bj-V6QG_R_hjm8z4eqX1_WbigSIUL083Ckurse306eheoQvzXKG7w</recordid><startdate>200311</startdate><enddate>200311</enddate><creator>Ocel, Joseph J.</creator><creator>Palmer, Brian A.</creator><creator>Wittich, Christopher M.</creator><creator>Carmichael, Stephen W.</creator><creator>Pawlina, Wojciech</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200311</creationdate><title>Outcomes of the gross and developmental anatomy teaching assistant experience</title><author>Ocel, Joseph J. ; Palmer, Brian A. ; Wittich, Christopher M. ; Carmichael, Stephen W. ; Pawlina, Wojciech</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3553-dedde29b3b80efa357ebb3a683468b159d73892b0b48a3cf974627df3cac7d163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anatomy - education</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Education, Medical - manpower</topic><topic>Education, Medical - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gross anatomy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>medical education</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>peer teaching</topic><topic>Students, Medical</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching - manpower</topic><topic>Teaching - methods</topic><topic>tutoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ocel, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Brian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittich, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmichael, Stephen W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawlina, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ocel, Joseph J.</au><au>Palmer, Brian A.</au><au>Wittich, Christopher M.</au><au>Carmichael, Stephen W.</au><au>Pawlina, Wojciech</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of the gross and developmental anatomy teaching assistant experience</atitle><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin. Anat</addtitle><date>2003-11</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>526</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>526-530</pages><issn>0897-3806</issn><eissn>1098-2353</eissn><abstract>During the first‐year Gross and Developmental Anatomy Course at Mayo Medical School, third‐year medical students volunteer as teaching assistants (TAs). Their responsibilities include preparing for dissection, instructing students during dissection, writing examination questions, and giving a lecture. To evaluate the academic and professional impact of this experience on former TAs, a survey instrument was developed, and was sent to former TAs from the past 17 years. Seventy‐two percent of the surveys were returned. Most respondents (84%) indicated that the TA experience was beneficial during their third‐year surgical rotation. Over 60% identified benefits during Neurology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Internal Medicine rotations. The majority (62%) indicated they regularly use the knowledge gained from the TA experience. Communication was the most highly ranked area of skill development, with 86% of respondents indicating gains in lecture effectiveness and 97% in one‐on‐one teaching. Among respondents, 32% entered surgical or radiological fields, roughly paralleling the non‐TA medical student population. All respondents indicated that they would repeat the experience and recommend it to other medical students. Although benefits for long‐term career development have not yet been established, the Gross and Developmental Anatomy TA experience had perceived short‐term benefits with respect to clinical rotations and teaching skill development. Clin. Anat. 16:526–530, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>14566902</pmid><doi>10.1002/ca.10193</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0897-3806 |
ispartof | Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2003-11, Vol.16 (6), p.526-530 |
issn | 0897-3806 1098-2353 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71282374 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Anatomy - education Clinical Competence Education, Medical - manpower Education, Medical - methods Female gross anatomy Humans Male medical education Middle Aged Minnesota Peer Group peer teaching Students, Medical Surveys and Questionnaires Teaching - manpower Teaching - methods tutoring |
title | Outcomes of the gross and developmental anatomy teaching assistant experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A07%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20the%20gross%20and%20developmental%20anatomy%20teaching%20assistant%20experience&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20anatomy%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Ocel,%20Joseph%20J.&rft.date=2003-11&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=526&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=526-530&rft.issn=0897-3806&rft.eissn=1098-2353&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ca.10193&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71282374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71282374&rft_id=info:pmid/14566902&rfr_iscdi=true |