Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: early morbidity, mortality, and functional results

Background. Esophagectomy for benign disease is performed infrequently. We reviewed the Mayo Clinic’s experience with patients who required esophageal reconstruction for benign esophageal disease. Methods. From March 1956 to October 1997, all patients who required resection and reconstruction for a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of thoracic surgery 2000-11, Vol.70 (5), p.1651-1655
Hauptverfasser: Young, Mary M, Deschamps, Claude, Trastek, Victor F, Allen, Mark S, Miller, Daniel L, Schleck, Cathy D, Pairolero, Peter C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1655
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1651
container_title The Annals of thoracic surgery
container_volume 70
creator Young, Mary M
Deschamps, Claude
Trastek, Victor F
Allen, Mark S
Miller, Daniel L
Schleck, Cathy D
Pairolero, Peter C
description Background. Esophagectomy for benign disease is performed infrequently. We reviewed the Mayo Clinic’s experience with patients who required esophageal reconstruction for benign esophageal disease. Methods. From March 1956 to October 1997, all patients who required resection and reconstruction for a benign condition of the esophagus were reviewed. Results. There were 255 patients (141 male, 114 female). Median age was 55 years (range, 2 to 100). The original diagnosis was an esophageal stricture in 108 patients (42%), primary motility disorder in 84 (33%), perforation in 36 (14%), hiatal hernia in 18 (7%), and other in 9 (4.0%). Reconstruction was with stomach in 168 patients (66%), colon in 70 (27%), and small bowel in 17 (7%). The anastomosis was intrathoracic in 144 patients (57%) and cervical in 111 (43%). There were 13 postoperative deaths (mortality 5%); 142 patients (56%) had at least one complication. Median hospitalization was 14 days (range, 6–95 days). Follow-up was complete in 226 patients (88.6%) for a median of 52 months (range, 1 month to 29 years). A total of 175 patients (77.4%) were improved. Functional results were classified as excellent in 72 patients (31.8%), good in 23 (10.2%), fair in 80 (35.4%), and poor in 51 (22.6%). Conclusions. Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease resulted in functional improvement in a majority of patients. It can be done with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Early morbidity is adversely affected by the diagnosis of perforation and the route through which the conduit is placed. Late functional outcome is adversely affected by the diagnosis of paraesophageal hernia and a cervical anastomosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01916-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71273893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003497500019160</els_id><sourcerecordid>71273893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-ecfd3a76df9a8672738c3f3795933e6f0f0943f01a320c2dc1cc09bd5db6ea433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gtIrUbB60vTDeCMy5gcMvFCvY5qczEjXzKQV9u9tu6GXXuWEPO97yEPIMYVLCjS_egEAFqe8yM4AzoFymsewQ8Y0y5I4TzK-S8a_yIgchPDZXZPueZ-MKAXOMkjH5H0W3OpDLlBWkUfl6tD4VjXW1ZFxPiqxtos60jagDHgTofTVOlo6X1ptm_VFPzayGkZZ68i09RAe2kJbNeGQ7BlZBTzanhPydj97nT7G8-eHp-ndPFZpzpoYldFMFrk2XF7nRVKwa8UMK3jGGcPcgAGeMgNUsgRUohVVCnipM13mKFPGJuR007vy7qvF0IilDQqrStbo2iAK2nfyHsw2oPIuBI9GrLxdSr8WFESvVgxqRe9NAIhBrYAud7Jd0JZL1H-prcsOuN0A2H3z26IXQVmsFWrbmW2EdvafFT_IT4pO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71273893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: early morbidity, mortality, and functional results</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Young, Mary M ; Deschamps, Claude ; Trastek, Victor F ; Allen, Mark S ; Miller, Daniel L ; Schleck, Cathy D ; Pairolero, Peter C</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, Mary M ; Deschamps, Claude ; Trastek, Victor F ; Allen, Mark S ; Miller, Daniel L ; Schleck, Cathy D ; Pairolero, Peter C</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Esophagectomy for benign disease is performed infrequently. We reviewed the Mayo Clinic’s experience with patients who required esophageal reconstruction for benign esophageal disease. Methods. From March 1956 to October 1997, all patients who required resection and reconstruction for a benign condition of the esophagus were reviewed. Results. There were 255 patients (141 male, 114 female). Median age was 55 years (range, 2 to 100). The original diagnosis was an esophageal stricture in 108 patients (42%), primary motility disorder in 84 (33%), perforation in 36 (14%), hiatal hernia in 18 (7%), and other in 9 (4.0%). Reconstruction was with stomach in 168 patients (66%), colon in 70 (27%), and small bowel in 17 (7%). The anastomosis was intrathoracic in 144 patients (57%) and cervical in 111 (43%). There were 13 postoperative deaths (mortality 5%); 142 patients (56%) had at least one complication. Median hospitalization was 14 days (range, 6–95 days). Follow-up was complete in 226 patients (88.6%) for a median of 52 months (range, 1 month to 29 years). A total of 175 patients (77.4%) were improved. Functional results were classified as excellent in 72 patients (31.8%), good in 23 (10.2%), fair in 80 (35.4%), and poor in 51 (22.6%). Conclusions. Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease resulted in functional improvement in a majority of patients. It can be done with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Early morbidity is adversely affected by the diagnosis of perforation and the route through which the conduit is placed. Late functional outcome is adversely affected by the diagnosis of paraesophageal hernia and a cervical anastomosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4975</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01916-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11093504</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Esophageal Diseases - physiopathology ; Esophageal Diseases - surgery ; Esophageal Motility Disorders - surgery ; Esophageal Perforation - surgery ; Esophageal Stenosis - surgery ; Esophagoplasty - methods ; Esophagoplasty - mortality ; Esophagus - physiopathology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hernia, Hiatal - surgery ; Humans ; Infant ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Reoperation ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2000-11, Vol.70 (5), p.1651-1655</ispartof><rights>2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-ecfd3a76df9a8672738c3f3795933e6f0f0943f01a320c2dc1cc09bd5db6ea433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-ecfd3a76df9a8672738c3f3795933e6f0f0943f01a320c2dc1cc09bd5db6ea433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01916-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093504$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, Mary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deschamps, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trastek, Victor F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Mark S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Daniel L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleck, Cathy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pairolero, Peter C</creatorcontrib><title>Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: early morbidity, mortality, and functional results</title><title>The Annals of thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><description>Background. Esophagectomy for benign disease is performed infrequently. We reviewed the Mayo Clinic’s experience with patients who required esophageal reconstruction for benign esophageal disease. Methods. From March 1956 to October 1997, all patients who required resection and reconstruction for a benign condition of the esophagus were reviewed. Results. There were 255 patients (141 male, 114 female). Median age was 55 years (range, 2 to 100). The original diagnosis was an esophageal stricture in 108 patients (42%), primary motility disorder in 84 (33%), perforation in 36 (14%), hiatal hernia in 18 (7%), and other in 9 (4.0%). Reconstruction was with stomach in 168 patients (66%), colon in 70 (27%), and small bowel in 17 (7%). The anastomosis was intrathoracic in 144 patients (57%) and cervical in 111 (43%). There were 13 postoperative deaths (mortality 5%); 142 patients (56%) had at least one complication. Median hospitalization was 14 days (range, 6–95 days). Follow-up was complete in 226 patients (88.6%) for a median of 52 months (range, 1 month to 29 years). A total of 175 patients (77.4%) were improved. Functional results were classified as excellent in 72 patients (31.8%), good in 23 (10.2%), fair in 80 (35.4%), and poor in 51 (22.6%). Conclusions. Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease resulted in functional improvement in a majority of patients. It can be done with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Early morbidity is adversely affected by the diagnosis of perforation and the route through which the conduit is placed. Late functional outcome is adversely affected by the diagnosis of paraesophageal hernia and a cervical anastomosis.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Esophageal Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Esophageal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal Motility Disorders - surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal Perforation - surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Esophagoplasty - mortality</subject><subject>Esophagus - physiopathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hernia, Hiatal - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0003-4975</issn><issn>1552-6259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gtIrUbB60vTDeCMy5gcMvFCvY5qczEjXzKQV9u9tu6GXXuWEPO97yEPIMYVLCjS_egEAFqe8yM4AzoFymsewQ8Y0y5I4TzK-S8a_yIgchPDZXZPueZ-MKAXOMkjH5H0W3OpDLlBWkUfl6tD4VjXW1ZFxPiqxtos60jagDHgTofTVOlo6X1ptm_VFPzayGkZZ68i09RAe2kJbNeGQ7BlZBTzanhPydj97nT7G8-eHp-ndPFZpzpoYldFMFrk2XF7nRVKwa8UMK3jGGcPcgAGeMgNUsgRUohVVCnipM13mKFPGJuR007vy7qvF0IilDQqrStbo2iAK2nfyHsw2oPIuBI9GrLxdSr8WFESvVgxqRe9NAIhBrYAud7Jd0JZL1H-prcsOuN0A2H3z26IXQVmsFWrbmW2EdvafFT_IT4pO</recordid><startdate>20001101</startdate><enddate>20001101</enddate><creator>Young, Mary M</creator><creator>Deschamps, Claude</creator><creator>Trastek, Victor F</creator><creator>Allen, Mark S</creator><creator>Miller, Daniel L</creator><creator>Schleck, Cathy D</creator><creator>Pairolero, Peter C</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001101</creationdate><title>Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: early morbidity, mortality, and functional results</title><author>Young, Mary M ; Deschamps, Claude ; Trastek, Victor F ; Allen, Mark S ; Miller, Daniel L ; Schleck, Cathy D ; Pairolero, Peter C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-ecfd3a76df9a8672738c3f3795933e6f0f0943f01a320c2dc1cc09bd5db6ea433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Esophageal Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Esophageal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal Motility Disorders - surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal Perforation - surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Esophagoplasty - mortality</topic><topic>Esophagus - physiopathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hernia, Hiatal - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Mary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deschamps, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trastek, Victor F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Mark S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Daniel L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleck, Cathy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pairolero, Peter C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Mary M</au><au>Deschamps, Claude</au><au>Trastek, Victor F</au><au>Allen, Mark S</au><au>Miller, Daniel L</au><au>Schleck, Cathy D</au><au>Pairolero, Peter C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: early morbidity, mortality, and functional results</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><date>2000-11-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1651</spage><epage>1655</epage><pages>1651-1655</pages><issn>0003-4975</issn><eissn>1552-6259</eissn><abstract>Background. Esophagectomy for benign disease is performed infrequently. We reviewed the Mayo Clinic’s experience with patients who required esophageal reconstruction for benign esophageal disease. Methods. From March 1956 to October 1997, all patients who required resection and reconstruction for a benign condition of the esophagus were reviewed. Results. There were 255 patients (141 male, 114 female). Median age was 55 years (range, 2 to 100). The original diagnosis was an esophageal stricture in 108 patients (42%), primary motility disorder in 84 (33%), perforation in 36 (14%), hiatal hernia in 18 (7%), and other in 9 (4.0%). Reconstruction was with stomach in 168 patients (66%), colon in 70 (27%), and small bowel in 17 (7%). The anastomosis was intrathoracic in 144 patients (57%) and cervical in 111 (43%). There were 13 postoperative deaths (mortality 5%); 142 patients (56%) had at least one complication. Median hospitalization was 14 days (range, 6–95 days). Follow-up was complete in 226 patients (88.6%) for a median of 52 months (range, 1 month to 29 years). A total of 175 patients (77.4%) were improved. Functional results were classified as excellent in 72 patients (31.8%), good in 23 (10.2%), fair in 80 (35.4%), and poor in 51 (22.6%). Conclusions. Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease resulted in functional improvement in a majority of patients. It can be done with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Early morbidity is adversely affected by the diagnosis of perforation and the route through which the conduit is placed. Late functional outcome is adversely affected by the diagnosis of paraesophageal hernia and a cervical anastomosis.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11093504</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01916-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4975
ispartof The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2000-11, Vol.70 (5), p.1651-1655
issn 0003-4975
1552-6259
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71273893
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Child
Child, Preschool
Esophageal Diseases - physiopathology
Esophageal Diseases - surgery
Esophageal Motility Disorders - surgery
Esophageal Perforation - surgery
Esophageal Stenosis - surgery
Esophagoplasty - methods
Esophagoplasty - mortality
Esophagus - physiopathology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hernia, Hiatal - surgery
Humans
Infant
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Reoperation
Treatment Outcome
title Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: early morbidity, mortality, and functional results
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T18%3A58%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Esophageal%20reconstruction%20for%20benign%20disease:%20early%20morbidity,%20mortality,%20and%20functional%20results&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=Young,%20Mary%20M&rft.date=2000-11-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1651&rft.epage=1655&rft.pages=1651-1655&rft.issn=0003-4975&rft.eissn=1552-6259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01916-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71273893%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71273893&rft_id=info:pmid/11093504&rft_els_id=S0003497500019160&rfr_iscdi=true