How Accurately Does the Medical Record Capture Maternal History of Cancer?
We sought to assess the reliability of information regarding the maternal history of cancer by comparing the medical records of 214 women with breast cancer, ages 26–59 years and diagnosed in 1974–1995, and of their controls with the medical records of their mothers. Subjects were members of Kaiser...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2000-07, Vol.9 (7), p.765-768 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We sought to assess the reliability of information regarding the
maternal history of cancer by comparing the medical records of 214
women with breast cancer, ages 26–59 years and diagnosed in
1974–1995, and of their controls with the medical records of their
mothers. Subjects were members of Kaiser Permanente, Northern
California, selected for a study of early-life predictors of breast
cancer. For any type of cancer identified in the mother’s medical
record, the proportion noted in the daughter’s medical record at least
6 months before the daughter’s diagnosis or reference date was 56%
among cases and 32% among controls. The odds ratio for the association
of maternal cancer history with breast cancer risk was 2.1 using the
maternal record and 3.5 using the subject’s record. For a maternal
history of breast cancer, the proportion noted in the subject’s record
was 79% among cases and 57% among controls, and the odds ratios were
4.0 and 6.5, respectively. We believe that the case-control difference
in missing information was attributable to higher utilization of breast
cancer screening among cases. This study illustrates the need to assess
the impact of screening differences on the ascertainment of information
from the medical records. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1055-9965 1538-7755 |