All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome

A group of 98 patients who had primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented, posterior-stabilized knee implants for osteoarthritis were matched for age, diagnosis, weight, body mass index, and presence of comorbid conditions. The patients were followed up with clinical, radiographi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2003-10, Vol.18 (7 Suppl 1), p.9-15
Hauptverfasser: Najibi, Soheil, Iorio, Richard, Surdam, Jonathan W, Whang, William, Appleby, David, Healy, William L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 15
container_issue 7 Suppl 1
container_start_page 9
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 18
creator Najibi, Soheil
Iorio, Richard
Surdam, Jonathan W
Whang, William
Appleby, David
Healy, William L
description A group of 98 patients who had primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented, posterior-stabilized knee implants for osteoarthritis were matched for age, diagnosis, weight, body mass index, and presence of comorbid conditions. The patients were followed up with clinical, radiographic, and outcome measures including SF-36 scales and patient outcome questionnaires. Forty-nine patients had all-polyethylene tibial implants (APT), and 49 patents had metal backed tibial implants (MBT) with similar knee implant design and articular geometry. There is no difference among these patient cohorts in the clinical performance or functional outcome of TKA using APT or MBT components in primary TKA at intermediate term follow-up. In consideration of concerns about polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and cost associated with MBT components, these findings may present an opportunity for quality improvement and cost savings with increased utilization of APT in TKA operations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00304-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71270016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540303003048</els_id><sourcerecordid>71270016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ad553185c25217bf6ece1a04c971126aa4804cadacca4d8979c535d1e278a4a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFrFDEYhoModlv9CUpOooexySSZmfUipVgVCj1Uz-Hb5Bs2NpOMSUaYQ_-7WXfRoxAICc_7fnwPIa84e88Z7y7v2TCIRkkm3jLxjjHBZDM8IRuuRNsMknVPyeYvckbOc_7BGOdKyefkjEvVMcnkhjxeed_M0a9Y9qvHgBSCpRMW8M0OzANaWtzOgacmTnMMGEqmLtASK0EfAtZAKvsUZw-5rB8o0AmK2dfcDC7VNvBrdpnGkY5LMMXF-kPjUmofviDPRvAZX57uC_L95tO36y_N7d3nr9dXt40RHS8NWKUEH5RpVcv73dihQQ5Mmm3PedsByKE-wIIxIO2w7bdGCWU5tv0AEoS4IG-OvXOKPxfMRU8uG_QeAsYl6563fbXTVVAdQZNizglHPSc3QVo1Z_rgXf_xrg9S9eEcvOuh5l6fBiy7Ce2_1El0BT4eAaxr_nKYdDYOg0HrEpqibXT_GfEbJfSUjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71270016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Najibi, Soheil ; Iorio, Richard ; Surdam, Jonathan W ; Whang, William ; Appleby, David ; Healy, William L</creator><creatorcontrib>Najibi, Soheil ; Iorio, Richard ; Surdam, Jonathan W ; Whang, William ; Appleby, David ; Healy, William L</creatorcontrib><description>A group of 98 patients who had primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented, posterior-stabilized knee implants for osteoarthritis were matched for age, diagnosis, weight, body mass index, and presence of comorbid conditions. The patients were followed up with clinical, radiographic, and outcome measures including SF-36 scales and patient outcome questionnaires. Forty-nine patients had all-polyethylene tibial implants (APT), and 49 patents had metal backed tibial implants (MBT) with similar knee implant design and articular geometry. There is no difference among these patient cohorts in the clinical performance or functional outcome of TKA using APT or MBT components in primary TKA at intermediate term follow-up. In consideration of concerns about polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and cost associated with MBT components, these findings may present an opportunity for quality improvement and cost savings with increased utilization of APT in TKA operations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00304-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14560404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; all-polyethylene tibial component ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Cost Savings ; Humans ; Knee Prosthesis ; Matched-Pair Analysis ; Metals ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Polyethylene ; Prosthesis Design ; total knee arthroplasty ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2003-10, Vol.18 (7 Suppl 1), p.9-15</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ad553185c25217bf6ece1a04c971126aa4804cadacca4d8979c535d1e278a4a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ad553185c25217bf6ece1a04c971126aa4804cadacca4d8979c535d1e278a4a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00304-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14560404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Najibi, Soheil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorio, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surdam, Jonathan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whang, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appleby, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, William L</creatorcontrib><title>All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>A group of 98 patients who had primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented, posterior-stabilized knee implants for osteoarthritis were matched for age, diagnosis, weight, body mass index, and presence of comorbid conditions. The patients were followed up with clinical, radiographic, and outcome measures including SF-36 scales and patient outcome questionnaires. Forty-nine patients had all-polyethylene tibial implants (APT), and 49 patents had metal backed tibial implants (MBT) with similar knee implant design and articular geometry. There is no difference among these patient cohorts in the clinical performance or functional outcome of TKA using APT or MBT components in primary TKA at intermediate term follow-up. In consideration of concerns about polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and cost associated with MBT components, these findings may present an opportunity for quality improvement and cost savings with increased utilization of APT in TKA operations.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>all-polyethylene tibial component</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</subject><subject>Cost Savings</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Matched-Pair Analysis</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>total knee arthroplasty</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFrFDEYhoModlv9CUpOooexySSZmfUipVgVCj1Uz-Hb5Bs2NpOMSUaYQ_-7WXfRoxAICc_7fnwPIa84e88Z7y7v2TCIRkkm3jLxjjHBZDM8IRuuRNsMknVPyeYvckbOc_7BGOdKyefkjEvVMcnkhjxeed_M0a9Y9qvHgBSCpRMW8M0OzANaWtzOgacmTnMMGEqmLtASK0EfAtZAKvsUZw-5rB8o0AmK2dfcDC7VNvBrdpnGkY5LMMXF-kPjUmofviDPRvAZX57uC_L95tO36y_N7d3nr9dXt40RHS8NWKUEH5RpVcv73dihQQ5Mmm3PedsByKE-wIIxIO2w7bdGCWU5tv0AEoS4IG-OvXOKPxfMRU8uG_QeAsYl6563fbXTVVAdQZNizglHPSc3QVo1Z_rgXf_xrg9S9eEcvOuh5l6fBiy7Ce2_1El0BT4eAaxr_nKYdDYOg0HrEpqibXT_GfEbJfSUjg</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>Najibi, Soheil</creator><creator>Iorio, Richard</creator><creator>Surdam, Jonathan W</creator><creator>Whang, William</creator><creator>Appleby, David</creator><creator>Healy, William L</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome</title><author>Najibi, Soheil ; Iorio, Richard ; Surdam, Jonathan W ; Whang, William ; Appleby, David ; Healy, William L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ad553185c25217bf6ece1a04c971126aa4804cadacca4d8979c535d1e278a4a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>all-polyethylene tibial component</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</topic><topic>Cost Savings</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Matched-Pair Analysis</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>total knee arthroplasty</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Najibi, Soheil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorio, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surdam, Jonathan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whang, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appleby, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, William L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Najibi, Soheil</au><au>Iorio, Richard</au><au>Surdam, Jonathan W</au><au>Whang, William</au><au>Appleby, David</au><au>Healy, William L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>7 Suppl 1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>9-15</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>A group of 98 patients who had primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented, posterior-stabilized knee implants for osteoarthritis were matched for age, diagnosis, weight, body mass index, and presence of comorbid conditions. The patients were followed up with clinical, radiographic, and outcome measures including SF-36 scales and patient outcome questionnaires. Forty-nine patients had all-polyethylene tibial implants (APT), and 49 patents had metal backed tibial implants (MBT) with similar knee implant design and articular geometry. There is no difference among these patient cohorts in the clinical performance or functional outcome of TKA using APT or MBT components in primary TKA at intermediate term follow-up. In consideration of concerns about polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and cost associated with MBT components, these findings may present an opportunity for quality improvement and cost savings with increased utilization of APT in TKA operations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>14560404</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00304-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2003-10, Vol.18 (7 Suppl 1), p.9-15
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71270016
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aged
all-polyethylene tibial component
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Cost Savings
Humans
Knee Prosthesis
Matched-Pair Analysis
Metals
Middle Aged
Pain Measurement
Polyethylene
Prosthesis Design
total knee arthroplasty
Treatment Outcome
title All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A00%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=All-polyethylene%20and%20metal-backed%20tibial%20components%20in%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty:%20a%20matched%20pair%20analysis%20of%20functional%20outcome&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Najibi,%20Soheil&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7%20Suppl%201&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=9-15&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00304-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71270016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71270016&rft_id=info:pmid/14560404&rft_els_id=S0883540303003048&rfr_iscdi=true