All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome
A group of 98 patients who had primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented, posterior-stabilized knee implants for osteoarthritis were matched for age, diagnosis, weight, body mass index, and presence of comorbid conditions. The patients were followed up with clinical, radiographi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2003-10, Vol.18 (7 Suppl 1), p.9-15 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 15 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Najibi, Soheil Iorio, Richard Surdam, Jonathan W Whang, William Appleby, David Healy, William L |
description | A group of 98 patients who had primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented, posterior-stabilized knee implants for osteoarthritis were matched for age, diagnosis, weight, body mass index, and presence of comorbid conditions. The patients were followed up with clinical, radiographic, and outcome measures including SF-36 scales and patient outcome questionnaires. Forty-nine patients had all-polyethylene tibial implants (APT), and 49 patents had metal backed tibial implants (MBT) with similar knee implant design and articular geometry. There is no difference among these patient cohorts in the clinical performance or functional outcome of TKA using APT or MBT components in primary TKA at intermediate term follow-up. In consideration of concerns about polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and cost associated with MBT components, these findings may present an opportunity for quality improvement and cost savings with increased utilization of APT in TKA operations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00304-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71270016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540303003048</els_id><sourcerecordid>71270016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ad553185c25217bf6ece1a04c971126aa4804cadacca4d8979c535d1e278a4a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFrFDEYhoModlv9CUpOooexySSZmfUipVgVCj1Uz-Hb5Bs2NpOMSUaYQ_-7WXfRoxAICc_7fnwPIa84e88Z7y7v2TCIRkkm3jLxjjHBZDM8IRuuRNsMknVPyeYvckbOc_7BGOdKyefkjEvVMcnkhjxeed_M0a9Y9qvHgBSCpRMW8M0OzANaWtzOgacmTnMMGEqmLtASK0EfAtZAKvsUZw-5rB8o0AmK2dfcDC7VNvBrdpnGkY5LMMXF-kPjUmofviDPRvAZX57uC_L95tO36y_N7d3nr9dXt40RHS8NWKUEH5RpVcv73dihQQ5Mmm3PedsByKE-wIIxIO2w7bdGCWU5tv0AEoS4IG-OvXOKPxfMRU8uG_QeAsYl6563fbXTVVAdQZNizglHPSc3QVo1Z_rgXf_xrg9S9eEcvOuh5l6fBiy7Ce2_1El0BT4eAaxr_nKYdDYOg0HrEpqibXT_GfEbJfSUjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71270016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Najibi, Soheil ; Iorio, Richard ; Surdam, Jonathan W ; Whang, William ; Appleby, David ; Healy, William L</creator><creatorcontrib>Najibi, Soheil ; Iorio, Richard ; Surdam, Jonathan W ; Whang, William ; Appleby, David ; Healy, William L</creatorcontrib><description>A group of 98 patients who had primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented, posterior-stabilized knee implants for osteoarthritis were matched for age, diagnosis, weight, body mass index, and presence of comorbid conditions. The patients were followed up with clinical, radiographic, and outcome measures including SF-36 scales and patient outcome questionnaires. Forty-nine patients had all-polyethylene tibial implants (APT), and 49 patents had metal backed tibial implants (MBT) with similar knee implant design and articular geometry. There is no difference among these patient cohorts in the clinical performance or functional outcome of TKA using APT or MBT components in primary TKA at intermediate term follow-up. In consideration of concerns about polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and cost associated with MBT components, these findings may present an opportunity for quality improvement and cost savings with increased utilization of APT in TKA operations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00304-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14560404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; all-polyethylene tibial component ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Cost Savings ; Humans ; Knee Prosthesis ; Matched-Pair Analysis ; Metals ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Polyethylene ; Prosthesis Design ; total knee arthroplasty ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2003-10, Vol.18 (7 Suppl 1), p.9-15</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ad553185c25217bf6ece1a04c971126aa4804cadacca4d8979c535d1e278a4a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ad553185c25217bf6ece1a04c971126aa4804cadacca4d8979c535d1e278a4a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00304-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14560404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Najibi, Soheil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorio, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surdam, Jonathan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whang, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appleby, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, William L</creatorcontrib><title>All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>A group of 98 patients who had primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented, posterior-stabilized knee implants for osteoarthritis were matched for age, diagnosis, weight, body mass index, and presence of comorbid conditions. The patients were followed up with clinical, radiographic, and outcome measures including SF-36 scales and patient outcome questionnaires. Forty-nine patients had all-polyethylene tibial implants (APT), and 49 patents had metal backed tibial implants (MBT) with similar knee implant design and articular geometry. There is no difference among these patient cohorts in the clinical performance or functional outcome of TKA using APT or MBT components in primary TKA at intermediate term follow-up. In consideration of concerns about polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and cost associated with MBT components, these findings may present an opportunity for quality improvement and cost savings with increased utilization of APT in TKA operations.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>all-polyethylene tibial component</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</subject><subject>Cost Savings</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Matched-Pair Analysis</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>total knee arthroplasty</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFrFDEYhoModlv9CUpOooexySSZmfUipVgVCj1Uz-Hb5Bs2NpOMSUaYQ_-7WXfRoxAICc_7fnwPIa84e88Z7y7v2TCIRkkm3jLxjjHBZDM8IRuuRNsMknVPyeYvckbOc_7BGOdKyefkjEvVMcnkhjxeed_M0a9Y9qvHgBSCpRMW8M0OzANaWtzOgacmTnMMGEqmLtASK0EfAtZAKvsUZw-5rB8o0AmK2dfcDC7VNvBrdpnGkY5LMMXF-kPjUmofviDPRvAZX57uC_L95tO36y_N7d3nr9dXt40RHS8NWKUEH5RpVcv73dihQQ5Mmm3PedsByKE-wIIxIO2w7bdGCWU5tv0AEoS4IG-OvXOKPxfMRU8uG_QeAsYl6563fbXTVVAdQZNizglHPSc3QVo1Z_rgXf_xrg9S9eEcvOuh5l6fBiy7Ce2_1El0BT4eAaxr_nKYdDYOg0HrEpqibXT_GfEbJfSUjg</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>Najibi, Soheil</creator><creator>Iorio, Richard</creator><creator>Surdam, Jonathan W</creator><creator>Whang, William</creator><creator>Appleby, David</creator><creator>Healy, William L</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome</title><author>Najibi, Soheil ; Iorio, Richard ; Surdam, Jonathan W ; Whang, William ; Appleby, David ; Healy, William L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ad553185c25217bf6ece1a04c971126aa4804cadacca4d8979c535d1e278a4a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>all-polyethylene tibial component</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</topic><topic>Cost Savings</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Matched-Pair Analysis</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>total knee arthroplasty</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Najibi, Soheil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorio, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surdam, Jonathan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whang, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appleby, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, William L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Najibi, Soheil</au><au>Iorio, Richard</au><au>Surdam, Jonathan W</au><au>Whang, William</au><au>Appleby, David</au><au>Healy, William L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>7 Suppl 1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>9-15</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>A group of 98 patients who had primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented, posterior-stabilized knee implants for osteoarthritis were matched for age, diagnosis, weight, body mass index, and presence of comorbid conditions. The patients were followed up with clinical, radiographic, and outcome measures including SF-36 scales and patient outcome questionnaires. Forty-nine patients had all-polyethylene tibial implants (APT), and 49 patents had metal backed tibial implants (MBT) with similar knee implant design and articular geometry. There is no difference among these patient cohorts in the clinical performance or functional outcome of TKA using APT or MBT components in primary TKA at intermediate term follow-up. In consideration of concerns about polyethylene wear, osteolysis, and cost associated with MBT components, these findings may present an opportunity for quality improvement and cost savings with increased utilization of APT in TKA operations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>14560404</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00304-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-5403 |
ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 2003-10, Vol.18 (7 Suppl 1), p.9-15 |
issn | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71270016 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Aged all-polyethylene tibial component Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Cost Savings Humans Knee Prosthesis Matched-Pair Analysis Metals Middle Aged Pain Measurement Polyethylene Prosthesis Design total knee arthroplasty Treatment Outcome |
title | All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A00%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=All-polyethylene%20and%20metal-backed%20tibial%20components%20in%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty:%20a%20matched%20pair%20analysis%20of%20functional%20outcome&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Najibi,%20Soheil&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7%20Suppl%201&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=9-15&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00304-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71270016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71270016&rft_id=info:pmid/14560404&rft_els_id=S0883540303003048&rfr_iscdi=true |