Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method
Sources of brain activity, e.g. epileptic foci, can be localized with Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurements by recording the magnetic field outside the head. For a successful surgery a very high localization accuracy is needed. The most often used conductor model in the source localization is an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 2003-11, Vol.72 (3), p.209-222 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 222 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 209 |
container_title | Computer methods and programs in biomedicine |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Tissari, Satu Rahola, Jussi |
description | Sources of brain activity, e.g. epileptic foci, can be localized with Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurements by recording the magnetic field outside the head. For a successful surgery a very high localization accuracy is needed. The most often used conductor model in the source localization is an analytic sphere, which is not always adequate, and thus a realistically shaped conductor model is needed. In this paper we examine a Galerkin method with linear basis functions to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method. Its accuracy is compared to the collocation method with constant and linear basis functions. The accuracies are determined for a unit sphere for which analytic solutions are available. The Galerkin method gives a clear improvement in the accuracy of the forward problem especially for the tangential component of the magnetic field. At realistic MEG measurement distances from the brain the Galerkin method reaches a given accuracy with lower computational costs than the collocation methods starting from a few hundreds of unknowns. With larger meshes the difference for the Galerkin method increases significantly. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0169-2607(02)00144-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71268841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016926070200144X</els_id><sourcerecordid>19213665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-17be12cb49735cf7906f628a3e818c972fec4ce57b399fc9dd072dede5249af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtvFSEUAGBiNPZa_QkaNja6mAoMj2FlTHO9mtR0YRfdEQYOFp0ZKsy06b-X3juxy25gwXcO54HQW0pOKaHy08966IZJoj4Q9pEQynlz9QxtaKdYo4QUz9HmPzlCr0r5TQhhQsiX6IhyIThtxQbFbc4pYzvZ4b7EglPAFu_sAPlPnPAI83XyeE64pOEW8HwNOKR8Z7PHNzn1A4y4sh_bHV5KnH7tQZ-Wydt8j6E-wzSvWV6jF8EOBd6s9zG6_Lq9PPvWnF_svp99OW8c77q5oaoHylzPtWqFC0oTGSTrbAsd7ZxWLIDjDoTqW62D094TxTx4EIxrG9pjdHJIW-v7u0CZzRiLg2GwE6SlGEWZ7Lra_FOQakZbKUWF4gBdTqVkCOYmx7E2aCgxD7sw-12Yh0Ebwsx-F-aqxr1bP1j6Efxj1Dr8Ct6vwBZnh5Dt5GJ5dIIqpriu7vPBQR3bbYRsioswOfAxg5uNT_GJUv4BCGumsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19213665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Tissari, Satu ; Rahola, Jussi</creator><creatorcontrib>Tissari, Satu ; Rahola, Jussi</creatorcontrib><description>Sources of brain activity, e.g. epileptic foci, can be localized with Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurements by recording the magnetic field outside the head. For a successful surgery a very high localization accuracy is needed. The most often used conductor model in the source localization is an analytic sphere, which is not always adequate, and thus a realistically shaped conductor model is needed. In this paper we examine a Galerkin method with linear basis functions to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method. Its accuracy is compared to the collocation method with constant and linear basis functions. The accuracies are determined for a unit sphere for which analytic solutions are available. The Galerkin method gives a clear improvement in the accuracy of the forward problem especially for the tangential component of the magnetic field. At realistic MEG measurement distances from the brain the Galerkin method reaches a given accuracy with lower computational costs than the collocation methods starting from a few hundreds of unknowns. With larger meshes the difference for the Galerkin method increases significantly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-2607</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2607(02)00144-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14554135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Boundary element method ; Collocation method ; Forward problem ; Galerkin method ; Humans ; Magnetoencephalography ; Magnetoencephalography - methods ; Medical sciences ; Models, Theoretical ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2003-11, Vol.72 (3), p.209-222</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-17be12cb49735cf7906f628a3e818c972fec4ce57b399fc9dd072dede5249af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-17be12cb49735cf7906f628a3e818c972fec4ce57b399fc9dd072dede5249af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016926070200144X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15172749$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14554135$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tissari, Satu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahola, Jussi</creatorcontrib><title>Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method</title><title>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</title><addtitle>Comput Methods Programs Biomed</addtitle><description>Sources of brain activity, e.g. epileptic foci, can be localized with Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurements by recording the magnetic field outside the head. For a successful surgery a very high localization accuracy is needed. The most often used conductor model in the source localization is an analytic sphere, which is not always adequate, and thus a realistically shaped conductor model is needed. In this paper we examine a Galerkin method with linear basis functions to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method. Its accuracy is compared to the collocation method with constant and linear basis functions. The accuracies are determined for a unit sphere for which analytic solutions are available. The Galerkin method gives a clear improvement in the accuracy of the forward problem especially for the tangential component of the magnetic field. At realistic MEG measurement distances from the brain the Galerkin method reaches a given accuracy with lower computational costs than the collocation methods starting from a few hundreds of unknowns. With larger meshes the difference for the Galerkin method increases significantly.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Boundary element method</subject><subject>Collocation method</subject><subject>Forward problem</subject><subject>Galerkin method</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetoencephalography</subject><subject>Magnetoencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</subject><issn>0169-2607</issn><issn>1872-7565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtvFSEUAGBiNPZa_QkaNja6mAoMj2FlTHO9mtR0YRfdEQYOFp0ZKsy06b-X3juxy25gwXcO54HQW0pOKaHy08966IZJoj4Q9pEQynlz9QxtaKdYo4QUz9HmPzlCr0r5TQhhQsiX6IhyIThtxQbFbc4pYzvZ4b7EglPAFu_sAPlPnPAI83XyeE64pOEW8HwNOKR8Z7PHNzn1A4y4sh_bHV5KnH7tQZ-Wydt8j6E-wzSvWV6jF8EOBd6s9zG6_Lq9PPvWnF_svp99OW8c77q5oaoHylzPtWqFC0oTGSTrbAsd7ZxWLIDjDoTqW62D094TxTx4EIxrG9pjdHJIW-v7u0CZzRiLg2GwE6SlGEWZ7Lra_FOQakZbKUWF4gBdTqVkCOYmx7E2aCgxD7sw-12Yh0Ebwsx-F-aqxr1bP1j6Efxj1Dr8Ct6vwBZnh5Dt5GJ5dIIqpriu7vPBQR3bbYRsioswOfAxg5uNT_GJUv4BCGumsg</recordid><startdate>20031101</startdate><enddate>20031101</enddate><creator>Tissari, Satu</creator><creator>Rahola, Jussi</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031101</creationdate><title>Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method</title><author>Tissari, Satu ; Rahola, Jussi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-17be12cb49735cf7906f628a3e818c972fec4ce57b399fc9dd072dede5249af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Boundary element method</topic><topic>Collocation method</topic><topic>Forward problem</topic><topic>Galerkin method</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetoencephalography</topic><topic>Magnetoencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tissari, Satu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahola, Jussi</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tissari, Satu</au><au>Rahola, Jussi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method</atitle><jtitle>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Methods Programs Biomed</addtitle><date>2003-11-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>209-222</pages><issn>0169-2607</issn><eissn>1872-7565</eissn><abstract>Sources of brain activity, e.g. epileptic foci, can be localized with Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurements by recording the magnetic field outside the head. For a successful surgery a very high localization accuracy is needed. The most often used conductor model in the source localization is an analytic sphere, which is not always adequate, and thus a realistically shaped conductor model is needed. In this paper we examine a Galerkin method with linear basis functions to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method. Its accuracy is compared to the collocation method with constant and linear basis functions. The accuracies are determined for a unit sphere for which analytic solutions are available. The Galerkin method gives a clear improvement in the accuracy of the forward problem especially for the tangential component of the magnetic field. At realistic MEG measurement distances from the brain the Galerkin method reaches a given accuracy with lower computational costs than the collocation methods starting from a few hundreds of unknowns. With larger meshes the difference for the Galerkin method increases significantly.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>14554135</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0169-2607(02)00144-X</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-2607 |
ispartof | Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2003-11, Vol.72 (3), p.209-222 |
issn | 0169-2607 1872-7565 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71268841 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Boundary element method Collocation method Forward problem Galerkin method Humans Magnetoencephalography Magnetoencephalography - methods Medical sciences Models, Theoretical Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation |
title | Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T22%3A12%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Error%20analysis%20of%20a%20Galerkin%20method%20to%20solve%20the%20forward%20problem%20in%20MEG%20using%20the%20boundary%20element%20method&rft.jtitle=Computer%20methods%20and%20programs%20in%20biomedicine&rft.au=Tissari,%20Satu&rft.date=2003-11-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=209-222&rft.issn=0169-2607&rft.eissn=1872-7565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0169-2607(02)00144-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19213665%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19213665&rft_id=info:pmid/14554135&rft_els_id=S016926070200144X&rfr_iscdi=true |