Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method

Sources of brain activity, e.g. epileptic foci, can be localized with Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurements by recording the magnetic field outside the head. For a successful surgery a very high localization accuracy is needed. The most often used conductor model in the source localization is an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 2003-11, Vol.72 (3), p.209-222
Hauptverfasser: Tissari, Satu, Rahola, Jussi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 222
container_issue 3
container_start_page 209
container_title Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
container_volume 72
creator Tissari, Satu
Rahola, Jussi
description Sources of brain activity, e.g. epileptic foci, can be localized with Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurements by recording the magnetic field outside the head. For a successful surgery a very high localization accuracy is needed. The most often used conductor model in the source localization is an analytic sphere, which is not always adequate, and thus a realistically shaped conductor model is needed. In this paper we examine a Galerkin method with linear basis functions to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method. Its accuracy is compared to the collocation method with constant and linear basis functions. The accuracies are determined for a unit sphere for which analytic solutions are available. The Galerkin method gives a clear improvement in the accuracy of the forward problem especially for the tangential component of the magnetic field. At realistic MEG measurement distances from the brain the Galerkin method reaches a given accuracy with lower computational costs than the collocation methods starting from a few hundreds of unknowns. With larger meshes the difference for the Galerkin method increases significantly.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0169-2607(02)00144-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71268841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016926070200144X</els_id><sourcerecordid>19213665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-17be12cb49735cf7906f628a3e818c972fec4ce57b399fc9dd072dede5249af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtvFSEUAGBiNPZa_QkaNja6mAoMj2FlTHO9mtR0YRfdEQYOFp0ZKsy06b-X3juxy25gwXcO54HQW0pOKaHy08966IZJoj4Q9pEQynlz9QxtaKdYo4QUz9HmPzlCr0r5TQhhQsiX6IhyIThtxQbFbc4pYzvZ4b7EglPAFu_sAPlPnPAI83XyeE64pOEW8HwNOKR8Z7PHNzn1A4y4sh_bHV5KnH7tQZ-Wydt8j6E-wzSvWV6jF8EOBd6s9zG6_Lq9PPvWnF_svp99OW8c77q5oaoHylzPtWqFC0oTGSTrbAsd7ZxWLIDjDoTqW62D094TxTx4EIxrG9pjdHJIW-v7u0CZzRiLg2GwE6SlGEWZ7Lra_FOQakZbKUWF4gBdTqVkCOYmx7E2aCgxD7sw-12Yh0Ebwsx-F-aqxr1bP1j6Efxj1Dr8Ct6vwBZnh5Dt5GJ5dIIqpriu7vPBQR3bbYRsioswOfAxg5uNT_GJUv4BCGumsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19213665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Tissari, Satu ; Rahola, Jussi</creator><creatorcontrib>Tissari, Satu ; Rahola, Jussi</creatorcontrib><description>Sources of brain activity, e.g. epileptic foci, can be localized with Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurements by recording the magnetic field outside the head. For a successful surgery a very high localization accuracy is needed. The most often used conductor model in the source localization is an analytic sphere, which is not always adequate, and thus a realistically shaped conductor model is needed. In this paper we examine a Galerkin method with linear basis functions to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method. Its accuracy is compared to the collocation method with constant and linear basis functions. The accuracies are determined for a unit sphere for which analytic solutions are available. The Galerkin method gives a clear improvement in the accuracy of the forward problem especially for the tangential component of the magnetic field. At realistic MEG measurement distances from the brain the Galerkin method reaches a given accuracy with lower computational costs than the collocation methods starting from a few hundreds of unknowns. With larger meshes the difference for the Galerkin method increases significantly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-2607</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2607(02)00144-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14554135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Boundary element method ; Collocation method ; Forward problem ; Galerkin method ; Humans ; Magnetoencephalography ; Magnetoencephalography - methods ; Medical sciences ; Models, Theoretical ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2003-11, Vol.72 (3), p.209-222</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-17be12cb49735cf7906f628a3e818c972fec4ce57b399fc9dd072dede5249af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-17be12cb49735cf7906f628a3e818c972fec4ce57b399fc9dd072dede5249af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016926070200144X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15172749$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14554135$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tissari, Satu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahola, Jussi</creatorcontrib><title>Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method</title><title>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</title><addtitle>Comput Methods Programs Biomed</addtitle><description>Sources of brain activity, e.g. epileptic foci, can be localized with Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurements by recording the magnetic field outside the head. For a successful surgery a very high localization accuracy is needed. The most often used conductor model in the source localization is an analytic sphere, which is not always adequate, and thus a realistically shaped conductor model is needed. In this paper we examine a Galerkin method with linear basis functions to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method. Its accuracy is compared to the collocation method with constant and linear basis functions. The accuracies are determined for a unit sphere for which analytic solutions are available. The Galerkin method gives a clear improvement in the accuracy of the forward problem especially for the tangential component of the magnetic field. At realistic MEG measurement distances from the brain the Galerkin method reaches a given accuracy with lower computational costs than the collocation methods starting from a few hundreds of unknowns. With larger meshes the difference for the Galerkin method increases significantly.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Boundary element method</subject><subject>Collocation method</subject><subject>Forward problem</subject><subject>Galerkin method</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetoencephalography</subject><subject>Magnetoencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</subject><issn>0169-2607</issn><issn>1872-7565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtvFSEUAGBiNPZa_QkaNja6mAoMj2FlTHO9mtR0YRfdEQYOFp0ZKsy06b-X3juxy25gwXcO54HQW0pOKaHy08966IZJoj4Q9pEQynlz9QxtaKdYo4QUz9HmPzlCr0r5TQhhQsiX6IhyIThtxQbFbc4pYzvZ4b7EglPAFu_sAPlPnPAI83XyeE64pOEW8HwNOKR8Z7PHNzn1A4y4sh_bHV5KnH7tQZ-Wydt8j6E-wzSvWV6jF8EOBd6s9zG6_Lq9PPvWnF_svp99OW8c77q5oaoHylzPtWqFC0oTGSTrbAsd7ZxWLIDjDoTqW62D094TxTx4EIxrG9pjdHJIW-v7u0CZzRiLg2GwE6SlGEWZ7Lra_FOQakZbKUWF4gBdTqVkCOYmx7E2aCgxD7sw-12Yh0Ebwsx-F-aqxr1bP1j6Efxj1Dr8Ct6vwBZnh5Dt5GJ5dIIqpriu7vPBQR3bbYRsioswOfAxg5uNT_GJUv4BCGumsg</recordid><startdate>20031101</startdate><enddate>20031101</enddate><creator>Tissari, Satu</creator><creator>Rahola, Jussi</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031101</creationdate><title>Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method</title><author>Tissari, Satu ; Rahola, Jussi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-17be12cb49735cf7906f628a3e818c972fec4ce57b399fc9dd072dede5249af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Boundary element method</topic><topic>Collocation method</topic><topic>Forward problem</topic><topic>Galerkin method</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetoencephalography</topic><topic>Magnetoencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tissari, Satu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahola, Jussi</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tissari, Satu</au><au>Rahola, Jussi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method</atitle><jtitle>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Methods Programs Biomed</addtitle><date>2003-11-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>209-222</pages><issn>0169-2607</issn><eissn>1872-7565</eissn><abstract>Sources of brain activity, e.g. epileptic foci, can be localized with Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurements by recording the magnetic field outside the head. For a successful surgery a very high localization accuracy is needed. The most often used conductor model in the source localization is an analytic sphere, which is not always adequate, and thus a realistically shaped conductor model is needed. In this paper we examine a Galerkin method with linear basis functions to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method. Its accuracy is compared to the collocation method with constant and linear basis functions. The accuracies are determined for a unit sphere for which analytic solutions are available. The Galerkin method gives a clear improvement in the accuracy of the forward problem especially for the tangential component of the magnetic field. At realistic MEG measurement distances from the brain the Galerkin method reaches a given accuracy with lower computational costs than the collocation methods starting from a few hundreds of unknowns. With larger meshes the difference for the Galerkin method increases significantly.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>14554135</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0169-2607(02)00144-X</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-2607
ispartof Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2003-11, Vol.72 (3), p.209-222
issn 0169-2607
1872-7565
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71268841
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Boundary element method
Collocation method
Forward problem
Galerkin method
Humans
Magnetoencephalography
Magnetoencephalography - methods
Medical sciences
Models, Theoretical
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation
title Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T22%3A12%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Error%20analysis%20of%20a%20Galerkin%20method%20to%20solve%20the%20forward%20problem%20in%20MEG%20using%20the%20boundary%20element%20method&rft.jtitle=Computer%20methods%20and%20programs%20in%20biomedicine&rft.au=Tissari,%20Satu&rft.date=2003-11-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=209-222&rft.issn=0169-2607&rft.eissn=1872-7565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0169-2607(02)00144-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19213665%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19213665&rft_id=info:pmid/14554135&rft_els_id=S016926070200144X&rfr_iscdi=true