Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? implications for treatment after a positive sentinel node biopsy

Purpose: To estimate the possible efficacy of axillary radiation therapy (AXRT) following a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB), we evaluated the risk of regional nodal failure (RNF) for patients with clinical Stage I or II, clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer treated with either no diss...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2000-08, Vol.48 (1), p.125-132
Hauptverfasser: Galper, Sharon, Recht, Abram, Silver, Barbara, Bernardo, M.V.Patricia, Gelman, Rebecca, Wong, Julia, Schnitt, Stuart J, Connolly, James L, Harris, Jay R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 132
container_issue 1
container_start_page 125
container_title International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
container_volume 48
creator Galper, Sharon
Recht, Abram
Silver, Barbara
Bernardo, M.V.Patricia
Gelman, Rebecca
Wong, Julia
Schnitt, Stuart J
Connolly, James L
Harris, Jay R
description Purpose: To estimate the possible efficacy of axillary radiation therapy (AXRT) following a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB), we evaluated the risk of regional nodal failure (RNF) for patients with clinical Stage I or II, clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer treated with either no dissection or a limited dissection (LD) defined as removal of 5 nodes or less followed by AXRT. Materials and Methods: From 1978 to 1987, 292 patients underwent AXRT in the absence of axillary dissection; 126 underwent AXRT following LD. The median dose to the axilla was 46 Gy. The median dose to the supraclavicular fossa was 45 Gy. Among patients found to have positive nodes on LD, adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen were administered to 81% and 7% of subjects, respectively. All patients had potential 8-year follow-up. Results: Six of the 418 patients (1.4%) developed RNF as a first site of failure within 8 years. Among these 6 patients (1.4%) with RNF as the first site of failure, 4 had simultaneous distant and regional recurrences; and 2 had isolated axillary failures. Three of the 292 patients (1%) with no axillary dissection, none of 84 patients with pathologically negative nodes and 3 of 42 patients (7%) with pathologically involved nodes had RNF as a first site of failure. Radiation pneumonitis developed in 5 patients (1.2%), brachial plexopathy in 5 (1.2%) and arm edema in 4 (1.2%). In all cases, radiation pneumonitis and brachial plexopathy were transient. Conclusion: These results imply that AXRT may be an effective and safe alternative to completion dissection for treatment of the axilla following a positive SNB. Further studies comparing these two options in specific patient subgroups are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00631-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71264846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360301600006313</els_id><sourcerecordid>71264846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f212c9ddcb69aa0e4b1fb1dfc0780cf38fa8a7af2c434aa1739d364a3315ca233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQhSMEopfCI4C8QKgsAuPY-VtVqCpQqRILQGJnTewxNUri1HYK9214VHx_RNmxsuX5zhnPnKJ4zuENB968_QyigVLk6xnAa4BG8FI8KDa8a_tS1PW3h8XmL3JSPInxBwBw3srHxQmHvpJ9xzfF76vIAhqHyfmZ4ehnYmjodsVELAXCNNGcWPIs3eTKLzeOyKwPbMmKXInsp0s3bHSTS2SOQNiyuIbvFLbnzE3L6PTePu6F96ZoEwWGbPHRJXdHLOZXN9PIZm-IDc4vcfu0eGRxjPTseJ4WX99ffrn4WF5_-nB18e661KKHVNqKV7o3Rg9NjwgkB24HbqyGtgNtRWexwxZtpaWQiLwVvRGNRCF4rbES4rR4dfBdgr9dKSY1uagpTzOTX6NqedXITjYZrA-gDj7GQFYtwU15ZsVB7aJR-2jUbu8KQO2jUbsGL44N1mEi84_qkEUGXh4BjBpHG3DWLt5zsoZKVhk7P2CUt3HnKKiocxKajAukkzLe_ecnfwCl2q-G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71264846</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? implications for treatment after a positive sentinel node biopsy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Galper, Sharon ; Recht, Abram ; Silver, Barbara ; Bernardo, M.V.Patricia ; Gelman, Rebecca ; Wong, Julia ; Schnitt, Stuart J ; Connolly, James L ; Harris, Jay R</creator><creatorcontrib>Galper, Sharon ; Recht, Abram ; Silver, Barbara ; Bernardo, M.V.Patricia ; Gelman, Rebecca ; Wong, Julia ; Schnitt, Stuart J ; Connolly, James L ; Harris, Jay R</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To estimate the possible efficacy of axillary radiation therapy (AXRT) following a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB), we evaluated the risk of regional nodal failure (RNF) for patients with clinical Stage I or II, clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer treated with either no dissection or a limited dissection (LD) defined as removal of 5 nodes or less followed by AXRT. Materials and Methods: From 1978 to 1987, 292 patients underwent AXRT in the absence of axillary dissection; 126 underwent AXRT following LD. The median dose to the axilla was 46 Gy. The median dose to the supraclavicular fossa was 45 Gy. Among patients found to have positive nodes on LD, adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen were administered to 81% and 7% of subjects, respectively. All patients had potential 8-year follow-up. Results: Six of the 418 patients (1.4%) developed RNF as a first site of failure within 8 years. Among these 6 patients (1.4%) with RNF as the first site of failure, 4 had simultaneous distant and regional recurrences; and 2 had isolated axillary failures. Three of the 292 patients (1%) with no axillary dissection, none of 84 patients with pathologically negative nodes and 3 of 42 patients (7%) with pathologically involved nodes had RNF as a first site of failure. Radiation pneumonitis developed in 5 patients (1.2%), brachial plexopathy in 5 (1.2%) and arm edema in 4 (1.2%). In all cases, radiation pneumonitis and brachial plexopathy were transient. Conclusion: These results imply that AXRT may be an effective and safe alternative to completion dissection for treatment of the axilla following a positive SNB. Further studies comparing these two options in specific patient subgroups are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00631-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10924981</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOBPD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Axilla ; Axillary radiation therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Irradiation ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Sentinel node biopsy ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2000-08, Vol.48 (1), p.125-132</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f212c9ddcb69aa0e4b1fb1dfc0780cf38fa8a7af2c434aa1739d364a3315ca233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f212c9ddcb69aa0e4b1fb1dfc0780cf38fa8a7af2c434aa1739d364a3315ca233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301600006313$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1450242$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10924981$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galper, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recht, Abram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silver, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardo, M.V.Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelman, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnitt, Stuart J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, James L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Jay R</creatorcontrib><title>Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? implications for treatment after a positive sentinel node biopsy</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: To estimate the possible efficacy of axillary radiation therapy (AXRT) following a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB), we evaluated the risk of regional nodal failure (RNF) for patients with clinical Stage I or II, clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer treated with either no dissection or a limited dissection (LD) defined as removal of 5 nodes or less followed by AXRT. Materials and Methods: From 1978 to 1987, 292 patients underwent AXRT in the absence of axillary dissection; 126 underwent AXRT following LD. The median dose to the axilla was 46 Gy. The median dose to the supraclavicular fossa was 45 Gy. Among patients found to have positive nodes on LD, adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen were administered to 81% and 7% of subjects, respectively. All patients had potential 8-year follow-up. Results: Six of the 418 patients (1.4%) developed RNF as a first site of failure within 8 years. Among these 6 patients (1.4%) with RNF as the first site of failure, 4 had simultaneous distant and regional recurrences; and 2 had isolated axillary failures. Three of the 292 patients (1%) with no axillary dissection, none of 84 patients with pathologically negative nodes and 3 of 42 patients (7%) with pathologically involved nodes had RNF as a first site of failure. Radiation pneumonitis developed in 5 patients (1.2%), brachial plexopathy in 5 (1.2%) and arm edema in 4 (1.2%). In all cases, radiation pneumonitis and brachial plexopathy were transient. Conclusion: These results imply that AXRT may be an effective and safe alternative to completion dissection for treatment of the axilla following a positive SNB. Further studies comparing these two options in specific patient subgroups are needed.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Axillary radiation therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Irradiation</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Sentinel node biopsy</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQhSMEopfCI4C8QKgsAuPY-VtVqCpQqRILQGJnTewxNUri1HYK9214VHx_RNmxsuX5zhnPnKJ4zuENB968_QyigVLk6xnAa4BG8FI8KDa8a_tS1PW3h8XmL3JSPInxBwBw3srHxQmHvpJ9xzfF76vIAhqHyfmZ4ehnYmjodsVELAXCNNGcWPIs3eTKLzeOyKwPbMmKXInsp0s3bHSTS2SOQNiyuIbvFLbnzE3L6PTePu6F96ZoEwWGbPHRJXdHLOZXN9PIZm-IDc4vcfu0eGRxjPTseJ4WX99ffrn4WF5_-nB18e661KKHVNqKV7o3Rg9NjwgkB24HbqyGtgNtRWexwxZtpaWQiLwVvRGNRCF4rbES4rR4dfBdgr9dKSY1uagpTzOTX6NqedXITjYZrA-gDj7GQFYtwU15ZsVB7aJR-2jUbu8KQO2jUbsGL44N1mEi84_qkEUGXh4BjBpHG3DWLt5zsoZKVhk7P2CUt3HnKKiocxKajAukkzLe_ecnfwCl2q-G</recordid><startdate>20000801</startdate><enddate>20000801</enddate><creator>Galper, Sharon</creator><creator>Recht, Abram</creator><creator>Silver, Barbara</creator><creator>Bernardo, M.V.Patricia</creator><creator>Gelman, Rebecca</creator><creator>Wong, Julia</creator><creator>Schnitt, Stuart J</creator><creator>Connolly, James L</creator><creator>Harris, Jay R</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000801</creationdate><title>Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? implications for treatment after a positive sentinel node biopsy</title><author>Galper, Sharon ; Recht, Abram ; Silver, Barbara ; Bernardo, M.V.Patricia ; Gelman, Rebecca ; Wong, Julia ; Schnitt, Stuart J ; Connolly, James L ; Harris, Jay R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f212c9ddcb69aa0e4b1fb1dfc0780cf38fa8a7af2c434aa1739d364a3315ca233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Axillary radiation therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Irradiation</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Sentinel node biopsy</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galper, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recht, Abram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silver, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardo, M.V.Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelman, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnitt, Stuart J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, James L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Jay R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galper, Sharon</au><au>Recht, Abram</au><au>Silver, Barbara</au><au>Bernardo, M.V.Patricia</au><au>Gelman, Rebecca</au><au>Wong, Julia</au><au>Schnitt, Stuart J</au><au>Connolly, James L</au><au>Harris, Jay R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? implications for treatment after a positive sentinel node biopsy</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2000-08-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>125-132</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><coden>IOBPD3</coden><abstract>Purpose: To estimate the possible efficacy of axillary radiation therapy (AXRT) following a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB), we evaluated the risk of regional nodal failure (RNF) for patients with clinical Stage I or II, clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer treated with either no dissection or a limited dissection (LD) defined as removal of 5 nodes or less followed by AXRT. Materials and Methods: From 1978 to 1987, 292 patients underwent AXRT in the absence of axillary dissection; 126 underwent AXRT following LD. The median dose to the axilla was 46 Gy. The median dose to the supraclavicular fossa was 45 Gy. Among patients found to have positive nodes on LD, adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen were administered to 81% and 7% of subjects, respectively. All patients had potential 8-year follow-up. Results: Six of the 418 patients (1.4%) developed RNF as a first site of failure within 8 years. Among these 6 patients (1.4%) with RNF as the first site of failure, 4 had simultaneous distant and regional recurrences; and 2 had isolated axillary failures. Three of the 292 patients (1%) with no axillary dissection, none of 84 patients with pathologically negative nodes and 3 of 42 patients (7%) with pathologically involved nodes had RNF as a first site of failure. Radiation pneumonitis developed in 5 patients (1.2%), brachial plexopathy in 5 (1.2%) and arm edema in 4 (1.2%). In all cases, radiation pneumonitis and brachial plexopathy were transient. Conclusion: These results imply that AXRT may be an effective and safe alternative to completion dissection for treatment of the axilla following a positive SNB. Further studies comparing these two options in specific patient subgroups are needed.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10924981</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00631-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-3016
ispartof International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2000-08, Vol.48 (1), p.125-132
issn 0360-3016
1879-355X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71264846
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Axilla
Axillary radiation therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Genital system. Mammary gland
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymphatic Irradiation
Lymphatic Metastasis
Mammary gland diseases
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Sentinel node biopsy
Tumors
title Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? implications for treatment after a positive sentinel node biopsy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A00%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20radiation%20alone%20adequate%20treatment%20to%20the%20axilla%20for%20patients%20with%20limited%20axillary%20surgery?%20implications%20for%20treatment%20after%20a%20positive%20sentinel%20node%20biopsy&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Galper,%20Sharon&rft.date=2000-08-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=125-132&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.coden=IOBPD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00631-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71264846%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71264846&rft_id=info:pmid/10924981&rft_els_id=S0360301600006313&rfr_iscdi=true