Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? implications for treatment after a positive sentinel node biopsy
Purpose: To estimate the possible efficacy of axillary radiation therapy (AXRT) following a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB), we evaluated the risk of regional nodal failure (RNF) for patients with clinical Stage I or II, clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer treated with either no diss...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2000-08, Vol.48 (1), p.125-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 132 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 125 |
container_title | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Galper, Sharon Recht, Abram Silver, Barbara Bernardo, M.V.Patricia Gelman, Rebecca Wong, Julia Schnitt, Stuart J Connolly, James L Harris, Jay R |
description | Purpose: To estimate the possible efficacy of axillary radiation therapy (AXRT) following a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB), we evaluated the risk of regional nodal failure (RNF) for patients with clinical Stage I or II, clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer treated with either no dissection or a limited dissection (LD) defined as removal of 5 nodes or less followed by AXRT.
Materials and Methods: From 1978 to 1987, 292 patients underwent AXRT in the absence of axillary dissection; 126 underwent AXRT following LD. The median dose to the axilla was 46 Gy. The median dose to the supraclavicular fossa was 45 Gy. Among patients found to have positive nodes on LD, adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen were administered to 81% and 7% of subjects, respectively. All patients had potential 8-year follow-up.
Results: Six of the 418 patients (1.4%) developed RNF as a first site of failure within 8 years. Among these 6 patients (1.4%) with RNF as the first site of failure, 4 had simultaneous distant and regional recurrences; and 2 had isolated axillary failures. Three of the 292 patients (1%) with no axillary dissection, none of 84 patients with pathologically negative nodes and 3 of 42 patients (7%) with pathologically involved nodes had RNF as a first site of failure. Radiation pneumonitis developed in 5 patients (1.2%), brachial plexopathy in 5 (1.2%) and arm edema in 4 (1.2%). In all cases, radiation pneumonitis and brachial plexopathy were transient.
Conclusion: These results imply that AXRT may be an effective and safe alternative to completion dissection for treatment of the axilla following a positive SNB. Further studies comparing these two options in specific patient subgroups are needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00631-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71264846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360301600006313</els_id><sourcerecordid>71264846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f212c9ddcb69aa0e4b1fb1dfc0780cf38fa8a7af2c434aa1739d364a3315ca233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQhSMEopfCI4C8QKgsAuPY-VtVqCpQqRILQGJnTewxNUri1HYK9214VHx_RNmxsuX5zhnPnKJ4zuENB968_QyigVLk6xnAa4BG8FI8KDa8a_tS1PW3h8XmL3JSPInxBwBw3srHxQmHvpJ9xzfF76vIAhqHyfmZ4ehnYmjodsVELAXCNNGcWPIs3eTKLzeOyKwPbMmKXInsp0s3bHSTS2SOQNiyuIbvFLbnzE3L6PTePu6F96ZoEwWGbPHRJXdHLOZXN9PIZm-IDc4vcfu0eGRxjPTseJ4WX99ffrn4WF5_-nB18e661KKHVNqKV7o3Rg9NjwgkB24HbqyGtgNtRWexwxZtpaWQiLwVvRGNRCF4rbES4rR4dfBdgr9dKSY1uagpTzOTX6NqedXITjYZrA-gDj7GQFYtwU15ZsVB7aJR-2jUbu8KQO2jUbsGL44N1mEi84_qkEUGXh4BjBpHG3DWLt5zsoZKVhk7P2CUt3HnKKiocxKajAukkzLe_ecnfwCl2q-G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71264846</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? implications for treatment after a positive sentinel node biopsy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Galper, Sharon ; Recht, Abram ; Silver, Barbara ; Bernardo, M.V.Patricia ; Gelman, Rebecca ; Wong, Julia ; Schnitt, Stuart J ; Connolly, James L ; Harris, Jay R</creator><creatorcontrib>Galper, Sharon ; Recht, Abram ; Silver, Barbara ; Bernardo, M.V.Patricia ; Gelman, Rebecca ; Wong, Julia ; Schnitt, Stuart J ; Connolly, James L ; Harris, Jay R</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To estimate the possible efficacy of axillary radiation therapy (AXRT) following a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB), we evaluated the risk of regional nodal failure (RNF) for patients with clinical Stage I or II, clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer treated with either no dissection or a limited dissection (LD) defined as removal of 5 nodes or less followed by AXRT.
Materials and Methods: From 1978 to 1987, 292 patients underwent AXRT in the absence of axillary dissection; 126 underwent AXRT following LD. The median dose to the axilla was 46 Gy. The median dose to the supraclavicular fossa was 45 Gy. Among patients found to have positive nodes on LD, adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen were administered to 81% and 7% of subjects, respectively. All patients had potential 8-year follow-up.
Results: Six of the 418 patients (1.4%) developed RNF as a first site of failure within 8 years. Among these 6 patients (1.4%) with RNF as the first site of failure, 4 had simultaneous distant and regional recurrences; and 2 had isolated axillary failures. Three of the 292 patients (1%) with no axillary dissection, none of 84 patients with pathologically negative nodes and 3 of 42 patients (7%) with pathologically involved nodes had RNF as a first site of failure. Radiation pneumonitis developed in 5 patients (1.2%), brachial plexopathy in 5 (1.2%) and arm edema in 4 (1.2%). In all cases, radiation pneumonitis and brachial plexopathy were transient.
Conclusion: These results imply that AXRT may be an effective and safe alternative to completion dissection for treatment of the axilla following a positive SNB. Further studies comparing these two options in specific patient subgroups are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00631-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10924981</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOBPD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Axilla ; Axillary radiation therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Irradiation ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Sentinel node biopsy ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2000-08, Vol.48 (1), p.125-132</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f212c9ddcb69aa0e4b1fb1dfc0780cf38fa8a7af2c434aa1739d364a3315ca233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f212c9ddcb69aa0e4b1fb1dfc0780cf38fa8a7af2c434aa1739d364a3315ca233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301600006313$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1450242$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10924981$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galper, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recht, Abram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silver, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardo, M.V.Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelman, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnitt, Stuart J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, James L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Jay R</creatorcontrib><title>Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? implications for treatment after a positive sentinel node biopsy</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: To estimate the possible efficacy of axillary radiation therapy (AXRT) following a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB), we evaluated the risk of regional nodal failure (RNF) for patients with clinical Stage I or II, clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer treated with either no dissection or a limited dissection (LD) defined as removal of 5 nodes or less followed by AXRT.
Materials and Methods: From 1978 to 1987, 292 patients underwent AXRT in the absence of axillary dissection; 126 underwent AXRT following LD. The median dose to the axilla was 46 Gy. The median dose to the supraclavicular fossa was 45 Gy. Among patients found to have positive nodes on LD, adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen were administered to 81% and 7% of subjects, respectively. All patients had potential 8-year follow-up.
Results: Six of the 418 patients (1.4%) developed RNF as a first site of failure within 8 years. Among these 6 patients (1.4%) with RNF as the first site of failure, 4 had simultaneous distant and regional recurrences; and 2 had isolated axillary failures. Three of the 292 patients (1%) with no axillary dissection, none of 84 patients with pathologically negative nodes and 3 of 42 patients (7%) with pathologically involved nodes had RNF as a first site of failure. Radiation pneumonitis developed in 5 patients (1.2%), brachial plexopathy in 5 (1.2%) and arm edema in 4 (1.2%). In all cases, radiation pneumonitis and brachial plexopathy were transient.
Conclusion: These results imply that AXRT may be an effective and safe alternative to completion dissection for treatment of the axilla following a positive SNB. Further studies comparing these two options in specific patient subgroups are needed.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Axillary radiation therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Irradiation</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Sentinel node biopsy</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQhSMEopfCI4C8QKgsAuPY-VtVqCpQqRILQGJnTewxNUri1HYK9214VHx_RNmxsuX5zhnPnKJ4zuENB968_QyigVLk6xnAa4BG8FI8KDa8a_tS1PW3h8XmL3JSPInxBwBw3srHxQmHvpJ9xzfF76vIAhqHyfmZ4ehnYmjodsVELAXCNNGcWPIs3eTKLzeOyKwPbMmKXInsp0s3bHSTS2SOQNiyuIbvFLbnzE3L6PTePu6F96ZoEwWGbPHRJXdHLOZXN9PIZm-IDc4vcfu0eGRxjPTseJ4WX99ffrn4WF5_-nB18e661KKHVNqKV7o3Rg9NjwgkB24HbqyGtgNtRWexwxZtpaWQiLwVvRGNRCF4rbES4rR4dfBdgr9dKSY1uagpTzOTX6NqedXITjYZrA-gDj7GQFYtwU15ZsVB7aJR-2jUbu8KQO2jUbsGL44N1mEi84_qkEUGXh4BjBpHG3DWLt5zsoZKVhk7P2CUt3HnKKiocxKajAukkzLe_ecnfwCl2q-G</recordid><startdate>20000801</startdate><enddate>20000801</enddate><creator>Galper, Sharon</creator><creator>Recht, Abram</creator><creator>Silver, Barbara</creator><creator>Bernardo, M.V.Patricia</creator><creator>Gelman, Rebecca</creator><creator>Wong, Julia</creator><creator>Schnitt, Stuart J</creator><creator>Connolly, James L</creator><creator>Harris, Jay R</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000801</creationdate><title>Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? implications for treatment after a positive sentinel node biopsy</title><author>Galper, Sharon ; Recht, Abram ; Silver, Barbara ; Bernardo, M.V.Patricia ; Gelman, Rebecca ; Wong, Julia ; Schnitt, Stuart J ; Connolly, James L ; Harris, Jay R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f212c9ddcb69aa0e4b1fb1dfc0780cf38fa8a7af2c434aa1739d364a3315ca233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Axillary radiation therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Irradiation</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Sentinel node biopsy</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galper, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recht, Abram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silver, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardo, M.V.Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelman, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnitt, Stuart J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, James L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Jay R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galper, Sharon</au><au>Recht, Abram</au><au>Silver, Barbara</au><au>Bernardo, M.V.Patricia</au><au>Gelman, Rebecca</au><au>Wong, Julia</au><au>Schnitt, Stuart J</au><au>Connolly, James L</au><au>Harris, Jay R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? implications for treatment after a positive sentinel node biopsy</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2000-08-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>125-132</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><coden>IOBPD3</coden><abstract>Purpose: To estimate the possible efficacy of axillary radiation therapy (AXRT) following a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB), we evaluated the risk of regional nodal failure (RNF) for patients with clinical Stage I or II, clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer treated with either no dissection or a limited dissection (LD) defined as removal of 5 nodes or less followed by AXRT.
Materials and Methods: From 1978 to 1987, 292 patients underwent AXRT in the absence of axillary dissection; 126 underwent AXRT following LD. The median dose to the axilla was 46 Gy. The median dose to the supraclavicular fossa was 45 Gy. Among patients found to have positive nodes on LD, adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen were administered to 81% and 7% of subjects, respectively. All patients had potential 8-year follow-up.
Results: Six of the 418 patients (1.4%) developed RNF as a first site of failure within 8 years. Among these 6 patients (1.4%) with RNF as the first site of failure, 4 had simultaneous distant and regional recurrences; and 2 had isolated axillary failures. Three of the 292 patients (1%) with no axillary dissection, none of 84 patients with pathologically negative nodes and 3 of 42 patients (7%) with pathologically involved nodes had RNF as a first site of failure. Radiation pneumonitis developed in 5 patients (1.2%), brachial plexopathy in 5 (1.2%) and arm edema in 4 (1.2%). In all cases, radiation pneumonitis and brachial plexopathy were transient.
Conclusion: These results imply that AXRT may be an effective and safe alternative to completion dissection for treatment of the axilla following a positive SNB. Further studies comparing these two options in specific patient subgroups are needed.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10924981</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00631-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-3016 |
ispartof | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2000-08, Vol.48 (1), p.125-132 |
issn | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71264846 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Axilla Axillary radiation therapy Biological and medical sciences Biopsy Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy Female Follow-Up Studies Genital system. Mammary gland Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Lymph Node Excision Lymph Nodes - pathology Lymphatic Irradiation Lymphatic Metastasis Mammary gland diseases Medical sciences Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Sentinel node biopsy Tumors |
title | Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? implications for treatment after a positive sentinel node biopsy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A00%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20radiation%20alone%20adequate%20treatment%20to%20the%20axilla%20for%20patients%20with%20limited%20axillary%20surgery?%20implications%20for%20treatment%20after%20a%20positive%20sentinel%20node%20biopsy&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Galper,%20Sharon&rft.date=2000-08-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=125-132&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.coden=IOBPD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00631-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71264846%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71264846&rft_id=info:pmid/10924981&rft_els_id=S0360301600006313&rfr_iscdi=true |