Viability of the Antigen Determines Whether DNA or Urocanic Acid Act as Initiator Molecules for UV-induced Suppression of Delayed-type Hypersensitivity

UV radiation suppresses the immune response, and UV-induced immune suppression contributes to UV-induced photocarcinogenesis. For UV-induced immune suppression to occur, electromagnetic energy (i.e. UV radiation) must be converted to a biological signal. Two photoreceptors have been identified in th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Photochemistry and photobiology 2003-09, Vol.78 (3), p.228-234
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Tae-Hueng, Moodycliffe, Angus M., Yarosh, Daniel B., Norval, Mary, Kripke, Margaret L., Ullrich, Stephen E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 234
container_issue 3
container_start_page 228
container_title Photochemistry and photobiology
container_volume 78
creator Kim, Tae-Hueng
Moodycliffe, Angus M.
Yarosh, Daniel B.
Norval, Mary
Kripke, Margaret L.
Ullrich, Stephen E.
description UV radiation suppresses the immune response, and UV-induced immune suppression contributes to UV-induced photocarcinogenesis. For UV-induced immune suppression to occur, electromagnetic energy (i.e. UV radiation) must be converted to a biological signal. Two photoreceptors have been identified in the skin that serves this purpose, epidermal DNA and trans-urocanic acid (UCA). Although compelling evidence exists to support a role for each pathway (UV-induced DNA damage or photoisomerization of UCA) in UV-induced immune suppression, it is not clear what determines which photoreceptor pathway is activated. To address this question, we injected UV-irradiated mice with a monoclonal antibody with specificity for cis-UCA or applied liposomes containing DNA repair enzymes to the skin of UV-irradiated mice. The effect that each had on UV-induced suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity was measured. We asked whether the light source used (FS-40 sunlamps vs solar-simulated UV radiation) altered whichever pathway of immune suppression was activated. Different doses of UV radiation and the viability of the antigen were also considered. Neither the dose of UV nor the light source had any influence on determining which pathway was activated. Rather, we found that the viability of the antigen was the critical determinant. When live antigens were used, UV-induced immune suppression was blocked with monoclonal anti–cis-UCA but not with T4 endonuclease V–containing liposomes. The reverse was observed when formalin-fixed or killed antigens were used. Our findings indicate that antigen viability dictates which photoreceptor pathway predominates after UV exposure.
doi_str_mv 10.1562/0031-8655(2003)078<0228:VOTADW>2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71262619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>427706751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b391t-45986ea1e4846023e3790f24f88197eb1d70422f8f04f82902a94cacd30f4dda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkd9qFDEUh4Modrv6ChK8kHox2yTzJxMVYditbaHtXthuL0Nm5oxNmU2mSaawT-LrmmEXBW8Eb5KQ853fSfgQOqVkQfOCnRKS0qQs8vyExeNHwssvhLHy02Z9W63uv7IFWSzXn9kLNKM8pwklgr9Es99dR-jY-0dCaCY4fY2OaJbnRUrKGfq50arWvQ47bDscHgBXJugfYPAKAritNuDx_QPEisOrmwpbh--cbZTRDa4a3cYlYOXxpdFBqxDL17aHZuxjXzfBm0Sbdmygxd_HYXDgvbZmGraCXu2gTcJuAHwRF-fB-JjyHF_zBr3qVO_h7WGfo7tvZ7fLi-RqfX65rK6SOhU0JFkuygIUhazMCsJSSLkgHcu6sqSCQ01bTjLGurIj8Y4JwpTIGtW0KemytlXpHH3Y5w7OPo3gg9xq30DfKwN29JJTVrCCin-ClHMRh_IIvv8LfLSjM_ETkqWkKFJBaITO91DjrPcOOjk4vVVuJymRk3E5uZOTOzkZl9G4nIzLvXEZAblcx8Q5encYN9ZbaP_kHBRH4GwP1NpaA_896Bc6ar9L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230663901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Viability of the Antigen Determines Whether DNA or Urocanic Acid Act as Initiator Molecules for UV-induced Suppression of Delayed-type Hypersensitivity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Kim, Tae-Hueng ; Moodycliffe, Angus M. ; Yarosh, Daniel B. ; Norval, Mary ; Kripke, Margaret L. ; Ullrich, Stephen E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae-Hueng ; Moodycliffe, Angus M. ; Yarosh, Daniel B. ; Norval, Mary ; Kripke, Margaret L. ; Ullrich, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><description>UV radiation suppresses the immune response, and UV-induced immune suppression contributes to UV-induced photocarcinogenesis. For UV-induced immune suppression to occur, electromagnetic energy (i.e. UV radiation) must be converted to a biological signal. Two photoreceptors have been identified in the skin that serves this purpose, epidermal DNA and trans-urocanic acid (UCA). Although compelling evidence exists to support a role for each pathway (UV-induced DNA damage or photoisomerization of UCA) in UV-induced immune suppression, it is not clear what determines which photoreceptor pathway is activated. To address this question, we injected UV-irradiated mice with a monoclonal antibody with specificity for cis-UCA or applied liposomes containing DNA repair enzymes to the skin of UV-irradiated mice. The effect that each had on UV-induced suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity was measured. We asked whether the light source used (FS-40 sunlamps vs solar-simulated UV radiation) altered whichever pathway of immune suppression was activated. Different doses of UV radiation and the viability of the antigen were also considered. Neither the dose of UV nor the light source had any influence on determining which pathway was activated. Rather, we found that the viability of the antigen was the critical determinant. When live antigens were used, UV-induced immune suppression was blocked with monoclonal anti–cis-UCA but not with T4 endonuclease V–containing liposomes. The reverse was observed when formalin-fixed or killed antigens were used. Our findings indicate that antigen viability dictates which photoreceptor pathway predominates after UV exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-1097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1562/0031-8655(2003)078&lt;0228:VOTADW&gt;2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14556308</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHCBAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; DNA - physiology ; ENVIRONMENTAL PHOTOBIOLOGY AND UVR EFFECTS ; Female ; Hypersensitivity, Delayed ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Ultraviolet Rays ; Urocanic Acid - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Photochemistry and photobiology, 2003-09, Vol.78 (3), p.228-234</ispartof><rights>American Society for Photobiology</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Photobiology Sep 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b391t-45986ea1e4846023e3790f24f88197eb1d70422f8f04f82902a94cacd30f4dda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1562/0031-8655(2003)078&lt;0228:VOTADW&gt;2.0.CO;2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,26978,27924,27925,52363</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14556308$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae-Hueng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moodycliffe, Angus M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarosh, Daniel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norval, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kripke, Margaret L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ullrich, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><title>Viability of the Antigen Determines Whether DNA or Urocanic Acid Act as Initiator Molecules for UV-induced Suppression of Delayed-type Hypersensitivity</title><title>Photochemistry and photobiology</title><addtitle>Photochem Photobiol</addtitle><description>UV radiation suppresses the immune response, and UV-induced immune suppression contributes to UV-induced photocarcinogenesis. For UV-induced immune suppression to occur, electromagnetic energy (i.e. UV radiation) must be converted to a biological signal. Two photoreceptors have been identified in the skin that serves this purpose, epidermal DNA and trans-urocanic acid (UCA). Although compelling evidence exists to support a role for each pathway (UV-induced DNA damage or photoisomerization of UCA) in UV-induced immune suppression, it is not clear what determines which photoreceptor pathway is activated. To address this question, we injected UV-irradiated mice with a monoclonal antibody with specificity for cis-UCA or applied liposomes containing DNA repair enzymes to the skin of UV-irradiated mice. The effect that each had on UV-induced suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity was measured. We asked whether the light source used (FS-40 sunlamps vs solar-simulated UV radiation) altered whichever pathway of immune suppression was activated. Different doses of UV radiation and the viability of the antigen were also considered. Neither the dose of UV nor the light source had any influence on determining which pathway was activated. Rather, we found that the viability of the antigen was the critical determinant. When live antigens were used, UV-induced immune suppression was blocked with monoclonal anti–cis-UCA but not with T4 endonuclease V–containing liposomes. The reverse was observed when formalin-fixed or killed antigens were used. Our findings indicate that antigen viability dictates which photoreceptor pathway predominates after UV exposure.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>DNA - physiology</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL PHOTOBIOLOGY AND UVR EFFECTS</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity, Delayed</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred BALB C</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays</subject><subject>Urocanic Acid - metabolism</subject><issn>0031-8655</issn><issn>1751-1097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkd9qFDEUh4Modrv6ChK8kHox2yTzJxMVYditbaHtXthuL0Nm5oxNmU2mSaawT-LrmmEXBW8Eb5KQ853fSfgQOqVkQfOCnRKS0qQs8vyExeNHwssvhLHy02Z9W63uv7IFWSzXn9kLNKM8pwklgr9Es99dR-jY-0dCaCY4fY2OaJbnRUrKGfq50arWvQ47bDscHgBXJugfYPAKAritNuDx_QPEisOrmwpbh--cbZTRDa4a3cYlYOXxpdFBqxDL17aHZuxjXzfBm0Sbdmygxd_HYXDgvbZmGraCXu2gTcJuAHwRF-fB-JjyHF_zBr3qVO_h7WGfo7tvZ7fLi-RqfX65rK6SOhU0JFkuygIUhazMCsJSSLkgHcu6sqSCQ01bTjLGurIj8Y4JwpTIGtW0KemytlXpHH3Y5w7OPo3gg9xq30DfKwN29JJTVrCCin-ClHMRh_IIvv8LfLSjM_ETkqWkKFJBaITO91DjrPcOOjk4vVVuJymRk3E5uZOTOzkZl9G4nIzLvXEZAblcx8Q5encYN9ZbaP_kHBRH4GwP1NpaA_896Bc6ar9L</recordid><startdate>20030901</startdate><enddate>20030901</enddate><creator>Kim, Tae-Hueng</creator><creator>Moodycliffe, Angus M.</creator><creator>Yarosh, Daniel B.</creator><creator>Norval, Mary</creator><creator>Kripke, Margaret L.</creator><creator>Ullrich, Stephen E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030901</creationdate><title>Viability of the Antigen Determines Whether DNA or Urocanic Acid Act as Initiator Molecules for UV-induced Suppression of Delayed-type Hypersensitivity</title><author>Kim, Tae-Hueng ; Moodycliffe, Angus M. ; Yarosh, Daniel B. ; Norval, Mary ; Kripke, Margaret L. ; Ullrich, Stephen E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b391t-45986ea1e4846023e3790f24f88197eb1d70422f8f04f82902a94cacd30f4dda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>DNA - physiology</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL PHOTOBIOLOGY AND UVR EFFECTS</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity, Delayed</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred BALB C</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays</topic><topic>Urocanic Acid - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae-Hueng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moodycliffe, Angus M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarosh, Daniel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norval, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kripke, Margaret L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ullrich, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Photochemistry and photobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Tae-Hueng</au><au>Moodycliffe, Angus M.</au><au>Yarosh, Daniel B.</au><au>Norval, Mary</au><au>Kripke, Margaret L.</au><au>Ullrich, Stephen E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Viability of the Antigen Determines Whether DNA or Urocanic Acid Act as Initiator Molecules for UV-induced Suppression of Delayed-type Hypersensitivity</atitle><jtitle>Photochemistry and photobiology</jtitle><addtitle>Photochem Photobiol</addtitle><date>2003-09-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>228</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>228-234</pages><issn>0031-8655</issn><eissn>1751-1097</eissn><coden>PHCBAP</coden><abstract>UV radiation suppresses the immune response, and UV-induced immune suppression contributes to UV-induced photocarcinogenesis. For UV-induced immune suppression to occur, electromagnetic energy (i.e. UV radiation) must be converted to a biological signal. Two photoreceptors have been identified in the skin that serves this purpose, epidermal DNA and trans-urocanic acid (UCA). Although compelling evidence exists to support a role for each pathway (UV-induced DNA damage or photoisomerization of UCA) in UV-induced immune suppression, it is not clear what determines which photoreceptor pathway is activated. To address this question, we injected UV-irradiated mice with a monoclonal antibody with specificity for cis-UCA or applied liposomes containing DNA repair enzymes to the skin of UV-irradiated mice. The effect that each had on UV-induced suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity was measured. We asked whether the light source used (FS-40 sunlamps vs solar-simulated UV radiation) altered whichever pathway of immune suppression was activated. Different doses of UV radiation and the viability of the antigen were also considered. Neither the dose of UV nor the light source had any influence on determining which pathway was activated. Rather, we found that the viability of the antigen was the critical determinant. When live antigens were used, UV-induced immune suppression was blocked with monoclonal anti–cis-UCA but not with T4 endonuclease V–containing liposomes. The reverse was observed when formalin-fixed or killed antigens were used. Our findings indicate that antigen viability dictates which photoreceptor pathway predominates after UV exposure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>14556308</pmid><doi>10.1562/0031-8655(2003)078&lt;0228:VOTADW&gt;2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-8655
ispartof Photochemistry and photobiology, 2003-09, Vol.78 (3), p.228-234
issn 0031-8655
1751-1097
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71262619
source MEDLINE; BioOne Complete; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Animals
DNA - physiology
ENVIRONMENTAL PHOTOBIOLOGY AND UVR EFFECTS
Female
Hypersensitivity, Delayed
Mice
Mice, Inbred BALB C
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Ultraviolet Rays
Urocanic Acid - metabolism
title Viability of the Antigen Determines Whether DNA or Urocanic Acid Act as Initiator Molecules for UV-induced Suppression of Delayed-type Hypersensitivity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T19%3A05%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Viability%20of%20the%20Antigen%20Determines%20Whether%20DNA%20or%20Urocanic%20Acid%20Act%20as%20Initiator%20Molecules%20for%20UV-induced%20Suppression%20of%20Delayed-type%20Hypersensitivity&rft.jtitle=Photochemistry%20and%20photobiology&rft.au=Kim,%20Tae-Hueng&rft.date=2003-09-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=228&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=228-234&rft.issn=0031-8655&rft.eissn=1751-1097&rft.coden=PHCBAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1562/0031-8655(2003)078%3C0228:VOTADW%3E2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E427706751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230663901&rft_id=info:pmid/14556308&rfr_iscdi=true