Neurobehavioural outcomes of penetrating and tangential gunshot wounds to the head

Objective : The objective of this study was to compare penetrating and tangential gunshot wounds to the head with regards to demographic, neurobehavioural and clinical outcome measures. Methods : Twenty-nine patients with penetrating gunshot wounds (P-GSW) and 11 patients with tangenital gunshot wou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain injury 2000-07, Vol.14 (7), p.649-657
Hauptverfasser: HOTZ, G. A, STEWART, K. J, PETRIN, D, VILLANUEVA, P. A, COHN, S. M, NEDD, K. J, PUENTES, G, DUNCAN, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective : The objective of this study was to compare penetrating and tangential gunshot wounds to the head with regards to demographic, neurobehavioural and clinical outcome measures. Methods : Twenty-nine patients with penetrating gunshot wounds (P-GSW) and 11 patients with tangenital gunshot wound (T-GSW) to the head admitted to an acute neurotrauma service were compared using standardized neurobehavioural and clinical outcome measures. Results : The mean GCS was 10.5+/-0.79 for the P-GSW group and 13.4+/-0.72 for the T-GSW group. The mean AIS-CNS for the P-GSW group was 5.00+/-0 and for the T-GSW group was 3.7+/-0.27. Significance was found on Digit Span (p < 0.05) and Block Design ( p < 0.009) subtests. Outcomes between the two groups were similar, except for significant differences were found for acute length of stay (LOS) (P-GSW was 47.72+/-13.2 and T-GSW group was 13.0+/- 1.3, p = 0.005) and for acute care charges (P-GSW group was $150533+/-23834 and T-GSW group was $70712+/-16587, p = 0.05). Conclusions : Initially, a penetrating gunshot wound is a more severe and costly injury than a tangential gunshort wound to the head, however T-GSW possess significant deficits and, if the patient survives past the acute phase of recovery, the two groups have similar functional outcomes. Future prospective trials should be conducted utilizing standard classification, neuropsychological, and clinical outcome measures.
ISSN:0269-9052
1362-301X
DOI:10.1080/02699050050044006