Personal Ultrasound Imager: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening

Background: Miniaturized ultrasonographic machines (2.5-MHz curved-array transducer connected to a compact 2.6-kg console), termed personal ultrasound imagers (PUIs), may enable detection of occult abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Objectives: Our goals were to determine whether a PUI is capable of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2000-07, Vol.13 (7), p.674-679
Hauptverfasser: Bruce, Charles J., Spittell, Peter C., Montgomery, Samantha C., Bailey, Kent R., Tajik, A.Jamil, Seward, James B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 679
container_issue 7
container_start_page 674
container_title Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
container_volume 13
creator Bruce, Charles J.
Spittell, Peter C.
Montgomery, Samantha C.
Bailey, Kent R.
Tajik, A.Jamil
Seward, James B.
description Background: Miniaturized ultrasonographic machines (2.5-MHz curved-array transducer connected to a compact 2.6-kg console), termed personal ultrasound imagers (PUIs), may enable detection of occult abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Objectives: Our goals were to determine whether a PUI is capable of screening for AAAs and to compare the results with an established screening examination with standard echocardiography (SE). Methods: One hundred twenty-five patients (aged >70 years) with hypertension who were referred for transthoracic echocardiography were enrolled. After SE, a focused screening with a PUI examination was performed by a blinded sonographer. An AAA was defined as a focal enlargement of the aorta >30 mm. Results and the length of time to image the aorta were compared for both tests. Results: We studied 64 men and 61 women (aged 76.8 ± 5 years; mean blood pressures: systolic 145.7 ± 18 and diastolic 78.6 ± 10; body surface area 1.9 ± 0.2 m2). The mean time for SE was 2.9 ± 1.5 minutes and for the PUI examination was 4.6 ± 2.3 minutes. By using SE as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the PUI were 91% and 96%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the PUI was 71%, and the negative predictive value was 99%. Conclusion: A PUI can be used to screen for occult AAAs as an extension of the physical examination. Results are comparable to an established screening strategy that uses more expensive, nonportable echocardiographic equipment. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000;674-9.)
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mje.2000.107797
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71245878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0894731700043546</els_id><sourcerecordid>71245878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bafea2d77f28c85a0409fd4b85b2c4bfced3b44ef558531a733558735ca5b4ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9PwyAUx4nRuDk9ezM9eauDFgb1YpbFH0uWaKI7E6CvC0tbJrQm---l6Q5ePPHgfd43jw9CtwQ_ELzg82YPDxnGw43zgp-hKcEFTxe8YOdoikVBU54TPkFXIewjxwTGl2hCsBA8Z9kUPX2AD65VdbKtO6-C69syWTdqB_4xWerSNXZoLp3vrEmWLfT-GJrk03iA1ra7a3RRqTrAzemcoe3L89fqLd28v65Xy01qKC66VKsKVFZyXmXCCKZwfK1KqgXTmaG6MlDmmlKoGBMsJ4rneaziikYxTbXKZ-h-zD14991D6GRjg4G6Vi24PkhOMhoHRATnI2i8C8FDJQ_eNsofJcFycCajMzk4k6OzOHF3iu51A-UffpQUgWIEIH7wx4KXwVho487Wg-lk6ey_4b-KvnsM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71245878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Personal Ultrasound Imager: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Bruce, Charles J. ; Spittell, Peter C. ; Montgomery, Samantha C. ; Bailey, Kent R. ; Tajik, A.Jamil ; Seward, James B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bruce, Charles J. ; Spittell, Peter C. ; Montgomery, Samantha C. ; Bailey, Kent R. ; Tajik, A.Jamil ; Seward, James B.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Miniaturized ultrasonographic machines (2.5-MHz curved-array transducer connected to a compact 2.6-kg console), termed personal ultrasound imagers (PUIs), may enable detection of occult abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Objectives: Our goals were to determine whether a PUI is capable of screening for AAAs and to compare the results with an established screening examination with standard echocardiography (SE). Methods: One hundred twenty-five patients (aged &gt;70 years) with hypertension who were referred for transthoracic echocardiography were enrolled. After SE, a focused screening with a PUI examination was performed by a blinded sonographer. An AAA was defined as a focal enlargement of the aorta &gt;30 mm. Results and the length of time to image the aorta were compared for both tests. Results: We studied 64 men and 61 women (aged 76.8 ± 5 years; mean blood pressures: systolic 145.7 ± 18 and diastolic 78.6 ± 10; body surface area 1.9 ± 0.2 m2). The mean time for SE was 2.9 ± 1.5 minutes and for the PUI examination was 4.6 ± 2.3 minutes. By using SE as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the PUI were 91% and 96%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the PUI was 71%, and the negative predictive value was 99%. Conclusion: A PUI can be used to screen for occult AAAs as an extension of the physical examination. Results are comparable to an established screening strategy that uses more expensive, nonportable echocardiographic equipment. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000;674-9.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-7317</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mje.2000.107797</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10887352</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Echocardiography - instrumentation ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2000-07, Vol.13 (7), p.674-679</ispartof><rights>2000 American Society of Echocardiography</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bafea2d77f28c85a0409fd4b85b2c4bfced3b44ef558531a733558735ca5b4ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bafea2d77f28c85a0409fd4b85b2c4bfced3b44ef558531a733558735ca5b4ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mje.2000.107797$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10887352$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bruce, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spittell, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Samantha C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Kent R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajik, A.Jamil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seward, James B.</creatorcontrib><title>Personal Ultrasound Imager: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening</title><title>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography</title><addtitle>J Am Soc Echocardiogr</addtitle><description>Background: Miniaturized ultrasonographic machines (2.5-MHz curved-array transducer connected to a compact 2.6-kg console), termed personal ultrasound imagers (PUIs), may enable detection of occult abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Objectives: Our goals were to determine whether a PUI is capable of screening for AAAs and to compare the results with an established screening examination with standard echocardiography (SE). Methods: One hundred twenty-five patients (aged &gt;70 years) with hypertension who were referred for transthoracic echocardiography were enrolled. After SE, a focused screening with a PUI examination was performed by a blinded sonographer. An AAA was defined as a focal enlargement of the aorta &gt;30 mm. Results and the length of time to image the aorta were compared for both tests. Results: We studied 64 men and 61 women (aged 76.8 ± 5 years; mean blood pressures: systolic 145.7 ± 18 and diastolic 78.6 ± 10; body surface area 1.9 ± 0.2 m2). The mean time for SE was 2.9 ± 1.5 minutes and for the PUI examination was 4.6 ± 2.3 minutes. By using SE as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the PUI were 91% and 96%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the PUI was 71%, and the negative predictive value was 99%. Conclusion: A PUI can be used to screen for occult AAAs as an extension of the physical examination. Results are comparable to an established screening strategy that uses more expensive, nonportable echocardiographic equipment. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000;674-9.)</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Echocardiography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0894-7317</issn><issn>1097-6795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9PwyAUx4nRuDk9ezM9eauDFgb1YpbFH0uWaKI7E6CvC0tbJrQm---l6Q5ePPHgfd43jw9CtwQ_ELzg82YPDxnGw43zgp-hKcEFTxe8YOdoikVBU54TPkFXIewjxwTGl2hCsBA8Z9kUPX2AD65VdbKtO6-C69syWTdqB_4xWerSNXZoLp3vrEmWLfT-GJrk03iA1ra7a3RRqTrAzemcoe3L89fqLd28v65Xy01qKC66VKsKVFZyXmXCCKZwfK1KqgXTmaG6MlDmmlKoGBMsJ4rneaziikYxTbXKZ-h-zD14991D6GRjg4G6Vi24PkhOMhoHRATnI2i8C8FDJQ_eNsofJcFycCajMzk4k6OzOHF3iu51A-UffpQUgWIEIH7wx4KXwVho487Wg-lk6ey_4b-KvnsM</recordid><startdate>20000701</startdate><enddate>20000701</enddate><creator>Bruce, Charles J.</creator><creator>Spittell, Peter C.</creator><creator>Montgomery, Samantha C.</creator><creator>Bailey, Kent R.</creator><creator>Tajik, A.Jamil</creator><creator>Seward, James B.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000701</creationdate><title>Personal Ultrasound Imager: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening</title><author>Bruce, Charles J. ; Spittell, Peter C. ; Montgomery, Samantha C. ; Bailey, Kent R. ; Tajik, A.Jamil ; Seward, James B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bafea2d77f28c85a0409fd4b85b2c4bfced3b44ef558531a733558735ca5b4ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Echocardiography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bruce, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spittell, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Samantha C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Kent R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajik, A.Jamil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seward, James B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bruce, Charles J.</au><au>Spittell, Peter C.</au><au>Montgomery, Samantha C.</au><au>Bailey, Kent R.</au><au>Tajik, A.Jamil</au><au>Seward, James B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Personal Ultrasound Imager: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Soc Echocardiogr</addtitle><date>2000-07-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>674</spage><epage>679</epage><pages>674-679</pages><issn>0894-7317</issn><eissn>1097-6795</eissn><abstract>Background: Miniaturized ultrasonographic machines (2.5-MHz curved-array transducer connected to a compact 2.6-kg console), termed personal ultrasound imagers (PUIs), may enable detection of occult abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Objectives: Our goals were to determine whether a PUI is capable of screening for AAAs and to compare the results with an established screening examination with standard echocardiography (SE). Methods: One hundred twenty-five patients (aged &gt;70 years) with hypertension who were referred for transthoracic echocardiography were enrolled. After SE, a focused screening with a PUI examination was performed by a blinded sonographer. An AAA was defined as a focal enlargement of the aorta &gt;30 mm. Results and the length of time to image the aorta were compared for both tests. Results: We studied 64 men and 61 women (aged 76.8 ± 5 years; mean blood pressures: systolic 145.7 ± 18 and diastolic 78.6 ± 10; body surface area 1.9 ± 0.2 m2). The mean time for SE was 2.9 ± 1.5 minutes and for the PUI examination was 4.6 ± 2.3 minutes. By using SE as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the PUI were 91% and 96%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the PUI was 71%, and the negative predictive value was 99%. Conclusion: A PUI can be used to screen for occult AAAs as an extension of the physical examination. Results are comparable to an established screening strategy that uses more expensive, nonportable echocardiographic equipment. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000;674-9.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>10887352</pmid><doi>10.1067/mje.2000.107797</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-7317
ispartof Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2000-07, Vol.13 (7), p.674-679
issn 0894-7317
1097-6795
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71245878
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aged
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging
Diagnosis, Differential
Echocardiography - instrumentation
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Male
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Personal Ultrasound Imager: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A27%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Personal%20Ultrasound%20Imager:%20Abdominal%20Aortic%20Aneurysm%20Screening&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Society%20of%20Echocardiography&rft.au=Bruce,%20Charles%20J.&rft.date=2000-07-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=674&rft.epage=679&rft.pages=674-679&rft.issn=0894-7317&rft.eissn=1097-6795&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mje.2000.107797&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71245878%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71245878&rft_id=info:pmid/10887352&rft_els_id=S0894731700043546&rfr_iscdi=true