Opposite effects of antimicrotubule agents on c- myc oncogene expression depending on the cell lines used

We investigated the expression of c- myc in HT29-D4, HBL100 and Caco-2 cells treated with microtubule stabilising (paclitaxel) or depolymerising agents (vinblastine, nocodazole). After induction by epidermal growth factor (EGF), c- myc expression decreased in HT29-D4 cells treated with all the antim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer (1990) 2000-05, Vol.36 (8), p.1043-1049
Hauptverfasser: Bourgarel-Rey, V, El Khyari, S, Rimet, O, Bordas, B, Guigal, N, Braguer, D, Seree, E, Barra, Y, Briand, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1049
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1043
container_title European journal of cancer (1990)
container_volume 36
creator Bourgarel-Rey, V
El Khyari, S
Rimet, O
Bordas, B
Guigal, N
Braguer, D
Seree, E
Barra, Y
Briand, C
description We investigated the expression of c- myc in HT29-D4, HBL100 and Caco-2 cells treated with microtubule stabilising (paclitaxel) or depolymerising agents (vinblastine, nocodazole). After induction by epidermal growth factor (EGF), c- myc expression decreased in HT29-D4 cells treated with all the antimicrotubule agents. In HBL100 and Caco-2, when microtubules were stabilised with paclitaxel, c- myc expression also decreased. In contrast, its expression increased after treatment with depolymerising agents. In both cell lines, we also observed that depolymerising agents alone induced c- myc expression whilst paclitaxel had no effect. This mRNA induction was confirmed at the protein level. In HT29-D4, no variation of c- myc expression was observed. Then, we showed that the increase of mRNA level was due to activation of gene transcription. These results indicate that modulation of c- myc expression varied depending on the cell lines used and the type of antimicrotubule agents. This work provides a potential link between the microtubular network and c- myc gene expression.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00042-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71233672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959804900000423</els_id><sourcerecordid>71233672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6bdd3ab7fc6289d78fc379b02a483122638c2d206246e04fff008f4c3eda6cf13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpaDab_oQGnUpzcDqSbFk6lRKaDwjsIc1Z2NIoVfFXLTt0_33k3SXkticNmuedGd6XkC8Mrhgw-f0RdKEzBbn-BnAJADnPxAeyYqrUGaiCfySrN-SUnMX4N0GlyuETOWWgVCEZrEjYDEMfw4QUvUc7Rdp7WnVTaIMd-2mu5wZp9Yzd0umozWi7tamyffpLov_DiDGG1HI4YOdC97xw0x-kFpuGNqHDSOeI7pyc-KqJ-PnwrsnTza_f13fZw-b2_vrnQ2aF5lMma-dEVZfeSq60K5W3otQ18CpXgnEuhbLccZA8lwi59x5A-dwKdJW0nok1-bqfO4z9vxnjZNoQl1uqDvs5mpJxIWTJj4KsLITWuUhgsQeTIzGO6M0whrYat4aBWcIwuzDM4rQBMLswzKK7OCyY6xbdO9Xe_QT82AOY_HgJOJpoA3YWXRhTFsb14ciKVyIbmk0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17539943</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opposite effects of antimicrotubule agents on c- myc oncogene expression depending on the cell lines used</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bourgarel-Rey, V ; El Khyari, S ; Rimet, O ; Bordas, B ; Guigal, N ; Braguer, D ; Seree, E ; Barra, Y ; Briand, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Bourgarel-Rey, V ; El Khyari, S ; Rimet, O ; Bordas, B ; Guigal, N ; Braguer, D ; Seree, E ; Barra, Y ; Briand, C</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the expression of c- myc in HT29-D4, HBL100 and Caco-2 cells treated with microtubule stabilising (paclitaxel) or depolymerising agents (vinblastine, nocodazole). After induction by epidermal growth factor (EGF), c- myc expression decreased in HT29-D4 cells treated with all the antimicrotubule agents. In HBL100 and Caco-2, when microtubules were stabilised with paclitaxel, c- myc expression also decreased. In contrast, its expression increased after treatment with depolymerising agents. In both cell lines, we also observed that depolymerising agents alone induced c- myc expression whilst paclitaxel had no effect. This mRNA induction was confirmed at the protein level. In HT29-D4, no variation of c- myc expression was observed. Then, we showed that the increase of mRNA level was due to activation of gene transcription. These results indicate that modulation of c- myc expression varied depending on the cell lines used and the type of antimicrotubule agents. This work provides a potential link between the microtubular network and c- myc gene expression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00042-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10885610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy ; Antimicrotubule agents ; Blotting, Western ; c- myc ; c-myc gene ; Caco-2 Cells - metabolism ; Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Flow Cytometry ; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic - drug effects ; Genes, myc - genetics ; HT29 Cells - metabolism ; Humans ; Microtubules - drug effects ; nocodazole ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - metabolism ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; RNA, Messenger - metabolism ; Transcription activation</subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer (1990), 2000-05, Vol.36 (8), p.1043-1049</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6bdd3ab7fc6289d78fc379b02a483122638c2d206246e04fff008f4c3eda6cf13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6bdd3ab7fc6289d78fc379b02a483122638c2d206246e04fff008f4c3eda6cf13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804900000423$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10885610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bourgarel-Rey, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Khyari, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimet, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordas, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guigal, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braguer, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seree, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barra, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briand, C</creatorcontrib><title>Opposite effects of antimicrotubule agents on c- myc oncogene expression depending on the cell lines used</title><title>European journal of cancer (1990)</title><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><description>We investigated the expression of c- myc in HT29-D4, HBL100 and Caco-2 cells treated with microtubule stabilising (paclitaxel) or depolymerising agents (vinblastine, nocodazole). After induction by epidermal growth factor (EGF), c- myc expression decreased in HT29-D4 cells treated with all the antimicrotubule agents. In HBL100 and Caco-2, when microtubules were stabilised with paclitaxel, c- myc expression also decreased. In contrast, its expression increased after treatment with depolymerising agents. In both cell lines, we also observed that depolymerising agents alone induced c- myc expression whilst paclitaxel had no effect. This mRNA induction was confirmed at the protein level. In HT29-D4, no variation of c- myc expression was observed. Then, we showed that the increase of mRNA level was due to activation of gene transcription. These results indicate that modulation of c- myc expression varied depending on the cell lines used and the type of antimicrotubule agents. This work provides a potential link between the microtubular network and c- myc gene expression.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Antimicrotubule agents</subject><subject>Blotting, Western</subject><subject>c- myc</subject><subject>c-myc gene</subject><subject>Caco-2 Cells - metabolism</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic - drug effects</subject><subject>Genes, myc - genetics</subject><subject>HT29 Cells - metabolism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microtubules - drug effects</subject><subject>nocodazole</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - metabolism</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>RNA, Messenger - metabolism</subject><subject>Transcription activation</subject><issn>0959-8049</issn><issn>1879-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpaDab_oQGnUpzcDqSbFk6lRKaDwjsIc1Z2NIoVfFXLTt0_33k3SXkticNmuedGd6XkC8Mrhgw-f0RdKEzBbn-BnAJADnPxAeyYqrUGaiCfySrN-SUnMX4N0GlyuETOWWgVCEZrEjYDEMfw4QUvUc7Rdp7WnVTaIMd-2mu5wZp9Yzd0umozWi7tamyffpLov_DiDGG1HI4YOdC97xw0x-kFpuGNqHDSOeI7pyc-KqJ-PnwrsnTza_f13fZw-b2_vrnQ2aF5lMma-dEVZfeSq60K5W3otQ18CpXgnEuhbLccZA8lwi59x5A-dwKdJW0nok1-bqfO4z9vxnjZNoQl1uqDvs5mpJxIWTJj4KsLITWuUhgsQeTIzGO6M0whrYat4aBWcIwuzDM4rQBMLswzKK7OCyY6xbdO9Xe_QT82AOY_HgJOJpoA3YWXRhTFsb14ciKVyIbmk0</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Bourgarel-Rey, V</creator><creator>El Khyari, S</creator><creator>Rimet, O</creator><creator>Bordas, B</creator><creator>Guigal, N</creator><creator>Braguer, D</creator><creator>Seree, E</creator><creator>Barra, Y</creator><creator>Briand, C</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>Opposite effects of antimicrotubule agents on c- myc oncogene expression depending on the cell lines used</title><author>Bourgarel-Rey, V ; El Khyari, S ; Rimet, O ; Bordas, B ; Guigal, N ; Braguer, D ; Seree, E ; Barra, Y ; Briand, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6bdd3ab7fc6289d78fc379b02a483122638c2d206246e04fff008f4c3eda6cf13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Antimicrotubule agents</topic><topic>Blotting, Western</topic><topic>c- myc</topic><topic>c-myc gene</topic><topic>Caco-2 Cells - metabolism</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic - drug effects</topic><topic>Genes, myc - genetics</topic><topic>HT29 Cells - metabolism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microtubules - drug effects</topic><topic>nocodazole</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - metabolism</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>RNA, Messenger - metabolism</topic><topic>Transcription activation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bourgarel-Rey, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Khyari, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimet, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordas, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guigal, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braguer, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seree, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barra, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briand, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bourgarel-Rey, V</au><au>El Khyari, S</au><au>Rimet, O</au><au>Bordas, B</au><au>Guigal, N</au><au>Braguer, D</au><au>Seree, E</au><au>Barra, Y</au><au>Briand, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opposite effects of antimicrotubule agents on c- myc oncogene expression depending on the cell lines used</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1043</spage><epage>1049</epage><pages>1043-1049</pages><issn>0959-8049</issn><eissn>1879-0852</eissn><abstract>We investigated the expression of c- myc in HT29-D4, HBL100 and Caco-2 cells treated with microtubule stabilising (paclitaxel) or depolymerising agents (vinblastine, nocodazole). After induction by epidermal growth factor (EGF), c- myc expression decreased in HT29-D4 cells treated with all the antimicrotubule agents. In HBL100 and Caco-2, when microtubules were stabilised with paclitaxel, c- myc expression also decreased. In contrast, its expression increased after treatment with depolymerising agents. In both cell lines, we also observed that depolymerising agents alone induced c- myc expression whilst paclitaxel had no effect. This mRNA induction was confirmed at the protein level. In HT29-D4, no variation of c- myc expression was observed. Then, we showed that the increase of mRNA level was due to activation of gene transcription. These results indicate that modulation of c- myc expression varied depending on the cell lines used and the type of antimicrotubule agents. This work provides a potential link between the microtubular network and c- myc gene expression.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>10885610</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00042-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8049
ispartof European journal of cancer (1990), 2000-05, Vol.36 (8), p.1043-1049
issn 0959-8049
1879-0852
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71233672
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy
Antimicrotubule agents
Blotting, Western
c- myc
c-myc gene
Caco-2 Cells - metabolism
Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy
Flow Cytometry
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic - drug effects
Genes, myc - genetics
HT29 Cells - metabolism
Humans
Microtubules - drug effects
nocodazole
Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - metabolism
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
RNA, Messenger - metabolism
Transcription activation
title Opposite effects of antimicrotubule agents on c- myc oncogene expression depending on the cell lines used
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T23%3A17%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opposite%20effects%20of%20antimicrotubule%20agents%20on%20c-%20myc%20oncogene%20expression%20depending%20on%20the%20cell%20lines%20used&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20(1990)&rft.au=Bourgarel-Rey,%20V&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1043&rft.epage=1049&rft.pages=1043-1049&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00042-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71233672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17539943&rft_id=info:pmid/10885610&rft_els_id=S0959804900000423&rfr_iscdi=true