The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway : A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients

The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is a new laryngeal mask device with a modified cuff to improve seal and a drainage tube to provide a channel for regurgitated fluid and gastric tube placement. In the present randomized, crossover study, the authors tested the hypothesis that ease of insertio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 2000-07, Vol.93 (1), p.104-109
Hauptverfasser: BRIMACOMBE, J, KELLER, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109
container_issue 1
container_start_page 104
container_title Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)
container_volume 93
creator BRIMACOMBE, J
KELLER, C
description The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is a new laryngeal mask device with a modified cuff to improve seal and a drainage tube to provide a channel for regurgitated fluid and gastric tube placement. In the present randomized, crossover study, the authors tested the hypothesis that ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure, and fiberoptic position differ between the PLMA and the standard laryngeal mask airway (LMA). For the PLMA, we also assess ease of gastric tube placement and the efficacy of an introducer tool. Sixty paralyzed, anesthetized adult patients were studied. Both devices (only size 4) were inserted into each patient in random order. Airway sealing pressure and fiberoptic position were determined during cuff inflation from 0 to 40 ml in 10-ml increments. Gastric tube insertion was attempted with the PLMA if there was no gas leak from the drainage tube. In 60 additional patients, ease of insertion for the PLMA was compared with and without an introducer. First-time success rates were higher (60 of 60 vs. 52 of 60; P = 0.003) and the effective airway time shorter (9 +/- 3 s vs20 +/- 18 s; P < 0.0001) for the LMA. There were no failed uses of either device within three attempts. Airway sealing pressure was 8-11 cm H2O higher for the PLMA at all cuff volumes (P < 0.00001) and was higher in females for both devices. Fiberoptic position was better with the LMA at all cuff volumes (P < 0.00001), but vocal cord visibility was similar (LMA, 59 of 60; PLMA, 56 of 60). For the PLMA, gastric tube placement was successful in 58 of 58 patients and took 9 +/- 5 s. First-time success rates were higher (59 of 60 vs53/60; P = 0.03) and the effective airway time shorter (15 +/- 13 s vs 23 +/- 18 s; P = 0.008) with the introducer. The PLMA is capable of achieving a more effective seal than the LMA and facilitates gastric tube placement, but it is more difficult to insert unless an introducer tool is used. When correctly positioned, the PLMA isolates the glottis from the upper esophagus with possible implications for airway protection.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00000542-200007000-00019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71226116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71226116</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6dc537f1d0c5a26fb103348264e129e6d4dd5d50eca89b0aa22fb4b3721b02ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kclOwzAQhi0EoqXwCsgHxImAlzgLt6pikyqBRDlHk9ihgSzFTqjKO_DOTNqyXLA09mj0ze9ZCKGcnXMWhxesP8oXnuidEM1D4_EOGXIlIo_zUO2SIcakJ5kQA3Lg3EuPKhntkwFnUcCRHJLP2dzQB9s8GihpCXZVP_deBe6VQmGXsKKXdEwt1Lqpig-jz2hmG-ead2Opazu9osuindMWZVyLFFj9j05R0wVYKFdrFaiNw6S218R4W5i6dYdkL4fSmaPtOyJP11ezya03vb-5m4ynXiYi1XqBzpQMc65ZpkAEecqZlH4kAt9wEZtA-1orrZjJIIpTBiBEnvqpDAVPmQAtR-R0o7uwzVuHhSRV4TJTllhV07kk5ELggAIEow24btqaPFnYosL2Es6SfhXJ9yqSn1Uk61Vg6vH2jy6tjP6TuJk9AidbAFwGZY4zzgr3y_kyjPH6AtDBkzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71226116</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway : A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>BRIMACOMBE, J ; KELLER, C</creator><creatorcontrib>BRIMACOMBE, J ; KELLER, C</creatorcontrib><description>The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is a new laryngeal mask device with a modified cuff to improve seal and a drainage tube to provide a channel for regurgitated fluid and gastric tube placement. In the present randomized, crossover study, the authors tested the hypothesis that ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure, and fiberoptic position differ between the PLMA and the standard laryngeal mask airway (LMA). For the PLMA, we also assess ease of gastric tube placement and the efficacy of an introducer tool. Sixty paralyzed, anesthetized adult patients were studied. Both devices (only size 4) were inserted into each patient in random order. Airway sealing pressure and fiberoptic position were determined during cuff inflation from 0 to 40 ml in 10-ml increments. Gastric tube insertion was attempted with the PLMA if there was no gas leak from the drainage tube. In 60 additional patients, ease of insertion for the PLMA was compared with and without an introducer. First-time success rates were higher (60 of 60 vs. 52 of 60; P = 0.003) and the effective airway time shorter (9 +/- 3 s vs20 +/- 18 s; P &lt; 0.0001) for the LMA. There were no failed uses of either device within three attempts. Airway sealing pressure was 8-11 cm H2O higher for the PLMA at all cuff volumes (P &lt; 0.00001) and was higher in females for both devices. Fiberoptic position was better with the LMA at all cuff volumes (P &lt; 0.00001), but vocal cord visibility was similar (LMA, 59 of 60; PLMA, 56 of 60). For the PLMA, gastric tube placement was successful in 58 of 58 patients and took 9 +/- 5 s. First-time success rates were higher (59 of 60 vs53/60; P = 0.03) and the effective airway time shorter (15 +/- 13 s vs 23 +/- 18 s; P = 0.008) with the introducer. The PLMA is capable of achieving a more effective seal than the LMA and facilitates gastric tube placement, but it is more difficult to insert unless an introducer tool is used. When correctly positioned, the PLMA isolates the glottis from the upper esophagus with possible implications for airway protection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200007000-00019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10861152</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANESAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, Intravenous ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthesia: equipment, devices ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cross-Over Studies ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Intubation, Gastrointestinal ; Laryngeal Masks ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neuromuscular Blockade ; Positive-Pressure Respiration</subject><ispartof>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2000-07, Vol.93 (1), p.104-109</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1437914$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10861152$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRIMACOMBE, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLER, C</creatorcontrib><title>The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway : A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients</title><title>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</title><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><description>The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is a new laryngeal mask device with a modified cuff to improve seal and a drainage tube to provide a channel for regurgitated fluid and gastric tube placement. In the present randomized, crossover study, the authors tested the hypothesis that ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure, and fiberoptic position differ between the PLMA and the standard laryngeal mask airway (LMA). For the PLMA, we also assess ease of gastric tube placement and the efficacy of an introducer tool. Sixty paralyzed, anesthetized adult patients were studied. Both devices (only size 4) were inserted into each patient in random order. Airway sealing pressure and fiberoptic position were determined during cuff inflation from 0 to 40 ml in 10-ml increments. Gastric tube insertion was attempted with the PLMA if there was no gas leak from the drainage tube. In 60 additional patients, ease of insertion for the PLMA was compared with and without an introducer. First-time success rates were higher (60 of 60 vs. 52 of 60; P = 0.003) and the effective airway time shorter (9 +/- 3 s vs20 +/- 18 s; P &lt; 0.0001) for the LMA. There were no failed uses of either device within three attempts. Airway sealing pressure was 8-11 cm H2O higher for the PLMA at all cuff volumes (P &lt; 0.00001) and was higher in females for both devices. Fiberoptic position was better with the LMA at all cuff volumes (P &lt; 0.00001), but vocal cord visibility was similar (LMA, 59 of 60; PLMA, 56 of 60). For the PLMA, gastric tube placement was successful in 58 of 58 patients and took 9 +/- 5 s. First-time success rates were higher (59 of 60 vs53/60; P = 0.03) and the effective airway time shorter (15 +/- 13 s vs 23 +/- 18 s; P = 0.008) with the introducer. The PLMA is capable of achieving a more effective seal than the LMA and facilitates gastric tube placement, but it is more difficult to insert unless an introducer tool is used. When correctly positioned, the PLMA isolates the glottis from the upper esophagus with possible implications for airway protection.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Intravenous</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesia: equipment, devices</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation, Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Laryngeal Masks</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuromuscular Blockade</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration</subject><issn>0003-3022</issn><issn>1528-1175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kclOwzAQhi0EoqXwCsgHxImAlzgLt6pikyqBRDlHk9ihgSzFTqjKO_DOTNqyXLA09mj0ze9ZCKGcnXMWhxesP8oXnuidEM1D4_EOGXIlIo_zUO2SIcakJ5kQA3Lg3EuPKhntkwFnUcCRHJLP2dzQB9s8GihpCXZVP_deBe6VQmGXsKKXdEwt1Lqpig-jz2hmG-ead2Opazu9osuindMWZVyLFFj9j05R0wVYKFdrFaiNw6S218R4W5i6dYdkL4fSmaPtOyJP11ezya03vb-5m4ynXiYi1XqBzpQMc65ZpkAEecqZlH4kAt9wEZtA-1orrZjJIIpTBiBEnvqpDAVPmQAtR-R0o7uwzVuHhSRV4TJTllhV07kk5ELggAIEow24btqaPFnYosL2Es6SfhXJ9yqSn1Uk61Vg6vH2jy6tjP6TuJk9AidbAFwGZY4zzgr3y_kyjPH6AtDBkzQ</recordid><startdate>20000701</startdate><enddate>20000701</enddate><creator>BRIMACOMBE, J</creator><creator>KELLER, C</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000701</creationdate><title>The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway : A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients</title><author>BRIMACOMBE, J ; KELLER, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6dc537f1d0c5a26fb103348264e129e6d4dd5d50eca89b0aa22fb4b3721b02ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Intravenous</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesia: equipment, devices</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation, Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Laryngeal Masks</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuromuscular Blockade</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRIMACOMBE, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLER, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRIMACOMBE, J</au><au>KELLER, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway : A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><date>2000-07-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>104-109</pages><issn>0003-3022</issn><eissn>1528-1175</eissn><coden>ANESAV</coden><abstract>The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is a new laryngeal mask device with a modified cuff to improve seal and a drainage tube to provide a channel for regurgitated fluid and gastric tube placement. In the present randomized, crossover study, the authors tested the hypothesis that ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure, and fiberoptic position differ between the PLMA and the standard laryngeal mask airway (LMA). For the PLMA, we also assess ease of gastric tube placement and the efficacy of an introducer tool. Sixty paralyzed, anesthetized adult patients were studied. Both devices (only size 4) were inserted into each patient in random order. Airway sealing pressure and fiberoptic position were determined during cuff inflation from 0 to 40 ml in 10-ml increments. Gastric tube insertion was attempted with the PLMA if there was no gas leak from the drainage tube. In 60 additional patients, ease of insertion for the PLMA was compared with and without an introducer. First-time success rates were higher (60 of 60 vs. 52 of 60; P = 0.003) and the effective airway time shorter (9 +/- 3 s vs20 +/- 18 s; P &lt; 0.0001) for the LMA. There were no failed uses of either device within three attempts. Airway sealing pressure was 8-11 cm H2O higher for the PLMA at all cuff volumes (P &lt; 0.00001) and was higher in females for both devices. Fiberoptic position was better with the LMA at all cuff volumes (P &lt; 0.00001), but vocal cord visibility was similar (LMA, 59 of 60; PLMA, 56 of 60). For the PLMA, gastric tube placement was successful in 58 of 58 patients and took 9 +/- 5 s. First-time success rates were higher (59 of 60 vs53/60; P = 0.03) and the effective airway time shorter (15 +/- 13 s vs 23 +/- 18 s; P = 0.008) with the introducer. The PLMA is capable of achieving a more effective seal than the LMA and facilitates gastric tube placement, but it is more difficult to insert unless an introducer tool is used. When correctly positioned, the PLMA isolates the glottis from the upper esophagus with possible implications for airway protection.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>10861152</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000542-200007000-00019</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3022
ispartof Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2000-07, Vol.93 (1), p.104-109
issn 0003-3022
1528-1175
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71226116
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesia
Anesthesia, Intravenous
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Anesthesia: equipment, devices
Biological and medical sciences
Cross-Over Studies
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Intubation, Gastrointestinal
Laryngeal Masks
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neuromuscular Blockade
Positive-Pressure Respiration
title The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway : A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A44%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20ProSeal%20laryngeal%20mask%20airway%20:%20A%20randomized,%20crossover%20study%20with%20the%20standard%20laryngeal%20mask%20airway%20in%20paralyzed,%20anesthetized%20patients&rft.jtitle=Anesthesiology%20(Philadelphia)&rft.au=BRIMACOMBE,%20J&rft.date=2000-07-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=104-109&rft.issn=0003-3022&rft.eissn=1528-1175&rft.coden=ANESAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000542-200007000-00019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71226116%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71226116&rft_id=info:pmid/10861152&rfr_iscdi=true