Survey of the use of thromboprophylaxis in laparoscopic surgery in Denmark
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the current use of thromboprophylaxis for laparoscopic surgery in Denmark. Methods: Postal questionnaires were sent to all Danish surgical departments that performed laparoscopic surgery according to the National Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Databas...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of surgery 2001-10, Vol.88 (10), p.1413-1416 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1416 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1413 |
| container_title | British journal of surgery |
| container_volume | 88 |
| creator | Filtenborg Tvedskov, T. Rasmussen, M. S. Wille-Jørgensen, P. |
| description | Background:
The aim of this study was to determine the current use of thromboprophylaxis for laparoscopic surgery in Denmark.
Methods:
Postal questionnaires were sent to all Danish surgical departments that performed laparoscopic surgery according to the National Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Database.
Results:
There was a written protocol for thromboprophylaxis in 93 per cent of the responding departments. In 37 per cent thromboprophylaxis was used for all patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery; only 7 per cent used thromboprophylaxis sporadically. All departments used low molecular weight heparin, 74 per cent in combination with graduated compression stockings. The criteria for using thromboprophylaxis varied greatly; in many departments conversion of the procedure to an open operation was not considered a criterion. Some 20 per cent of the departments reported previous thromboembolic complications following laparoscopic surgery.
Conclusion:
Despite the widespread use of thromboprophylaxis, symptomatic thromboembolic complications were reported from several departments. Further studies are needed to determine whether laparoscopic surgery should be considered a high‐risk procedure. © 2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01856.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71209250</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71209250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4324-22e1d07f3edb8ea67f217e2b6a9db2977f58c6d386dbf18a6e6fba25287998eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkV1PwjAYhRujEUT_gtmN3m32Y2u7eOUnSlAT0JB403TbOxkONlum7N-7CcLV27x9TnN6DkIOwR7BPr-YeRhj4RJGmUcxJh4mMuDeag91CeOBSwmX-6i7hTroyNpZAzIc0EPUISQQkmHaRYNxZb6hdorUWU7BqSysj6aYR0VpinJa53qVWSdbOLkutSlsXJRZ7NjKfICp2_0tLObafB6jg1TnFk42s4fe7u9ebx7c4Uv_8eZq6MY-o75LKZAEi5RBEknQXKSUCKAR12ES0VCINJAxT5jkSZQSqTnwNNI0oFKEoYSI9dD5-t3G3lcFdqnmmY0hz_UCisoqQSgOaYAb8HQDVtEcElWarPFZq__fN8DZBtA21nlq9CLO7I7zMQ-pLxvucs39ZDnUu3us2jbUTLVBqzZo1bah_tpQK3U9GEu_UbtrdWaXsNqqm8QUF0wEavLcV6P3ye2YjYh6Yr9oh4w6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71209250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey of the use of thromboprophylaxis in laparoscopic surgery in Denmark</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Filtenborg Tvedskov, T. ; Rasmussen, M. S. ; Wille-Jørgensen, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Filtenborg Tvedskov, T. ; Rasmussen, M. S. ; Wille-Jørgensen, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
The aim of this study was to determine the current use of thromboprophylaxis for laparoscopic surgery in Denmark.
Methods:
Postal questionnaires were sent to all Danish surgical departments that performed laparoscopic surgery according to the National Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Database.
Results:
There was a written protocol for thromboprophylaxis in 93 per cent of the responding departments. In 37 per cent thromboprophylaxis was used for all patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery; only 7 per cent used thromboprophylaxis sporadically. All departments used low molecular weight heparin, 74 per cent in combination with graduated compression stockings. The criteria for using thromboprophylaxis varied greatly; in many departments conversion of the procedure to an open operation was not considered a criterion. Some 20 per cent of the departments reported previous thromboembolic complications following laparoscopic surgery.
Conclusion:
Despite the widespread use of thromboprophylaxis, symptomatic thromboembolic complications were reported from several departments. Further studies are needed to determine whether laparoscopic surgery should be considered a high‐risk procedure. © 2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01856.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11578302</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSUAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use ; Bandages ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods ; Denmark ; Health Surveys ; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Medical sciences ; Professional Practice ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments ; Thromboembolism - prevention & control ; Thrombosis - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>British journal of surgery, 2001-10, Vol.88 (10), p.1413-1416</ispartof><rights>2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4324-22e1d07f3edb8ea67f217e2b6a9db2977f58c6d386dbf18a6e6fba25287998eb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.0007-1323.2001.01856.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.0007-1323.2001.01856.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14069248$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11578302$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Filtenborg Tvedskov, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wille-Jørgensen, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Survey of the use of thromboprophylaxis in laparoscopic surgery in Denmark</title><title>British journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><description>Background:
The aim of this study was to determine the current use of thromboprophylaxis for laparoscopic surgery in Denmark.
Methods:
Postal questionnaires were sent to all Danish surgical departments that performed laparoscopic surgery according to the National Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Database.
Results:
There was a written protocol for thromboprophylaxis in 93 per cent of the responding departments. In 37 per cent thromboprophylaxis was used for all patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery; only 7 per cent used thromboprophylaxis sporadically. All departments used low molecular weight heparin, 74 per cent in combination with graduated compression stockings. The criteria for using thromboprophylaxis varied greatly; in many departments conversion of the procedure to an open operation was not considered a criterion. Some 20 per cent of the departments reported previous thromboembolic complications following laparoscopic surgery.
Conclusion:
Despite the widespread use of thromboprophylaxis, symptomatic thromboembolic complications were reported from several departments. Further studies are needed to determine whether laparoscopic surgery should be considered a high‐risk procedure. © 2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd</description><subject>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bandages</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Professional Practice</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</subject><subject>Thromboembolism - prevention & control</subject><subject>Thrombosis - prevention & control</subject><issn>0007-1323</issn><issn>1365-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkV1PwjAYhRujEUT_gtmN3m32Y2u7eOUnSlAT0JB403TbOxkONlum7N-7CcLV27x9TnN6DkIOwR7BPr-YeRhj4RJGmUcxJh4mMuDeag91CeOBSwmX-6i7hTroyNpZAzIc0EPUISQQkmHaRYNxZb6hdorUWU7BqSysj6aYR0VpinJa53qVWSdbOLkutSlsXJRZ7NjKfICp2_0tLObafB6jg1TnFk42s4fe7u9ebx7c4Uv_8eZq6MY-o75LKZAEi5RBEknQXKSUCKAR12ES0VCINJAxT5jkSZQSqTnwNNI0oFKEoYSI9dD5-t3G3lcFdqnmmY0hz_UCisoqQSgOaYAb8HQDVtEcElWarPFZq__fN8DZBtA21nlq9CLO7I7zMQ-pLxvucs39ZDnUu3us2jbUTLVBqzZo1bah_tpQK3U9GEu_UbtrdWaXsNqqm8QUF0wEavLcV6P3ye2YjYh6Yr9oh4w6</recordid><startdate>200110</startdate><enddate>200110</enddate><creator>Filtenborg Tvedskov, T.</creator><creator>Rasmussen, M. S.</creator><creator>Wille-Jørgensen, P.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200110</creationdate><title>Survey of the use of thromboprophylaxis in laparoscopic surgery in Denmark</title><author>Filtenborg Tvedskov, T. ; Rasmussen, M. S. ; Wille-Jørgensen, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4324-22e1d07f3edb8ea67f217e2b6a9db2977f58c6d386dbf18a6e6fba25287998eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bandages</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Professional Practice</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</topic><topic>Thromboembolism - prevention & control</topic><topic>Thrombosis - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Filtenborg Tvedskov, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wille-Jørgensen, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Filtenborg Tvedskov, T.</au><au>Rasmussen, M. S.</au><au>Wille-Jørgensen, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey of the use of thromboprophylaxis in laparoscopic surgery in Denmark</atitle><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><date>2001-10</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1413</spage><epage>1416</epage><pages>1413-1416</pages><issn>0007-1323</issn><eissn>1365-2168</eissn><coden>BJSUAM</coden><abstract>Background:
The aim of this study was to determine the current use of thromboprophylaxis for laparoscopic surgery in Denmark.
Methods:
Postal questionnaires were sent to all Danish surgical departments that performed laparoscopic surgery according to the National Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Database.
Results:
There was a written protocol for thromboprophylaxis in 93 per cent of the responding departments. In 37 per cent thromboprophylaxis was used for all patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery; only 7 per cent used thromboprophylaxis sporadically. All departments used low molecular weight heparin, 74 per cent in combination with graduated compression stockings. The criteria for using thromboprophylaxis varied greatly; in many departments conversion of the procedure to an open operation was not considered a criterion. Some 20 per cent of the departments reported previous thromboembolic complications following laparoscopic surgery.
Conclusion:
Despite the widespread use of thromboprophylaxis, symptomatic thromboembolic complications were reported from several departments. Further studies are needed to determine whether laparoscopic surgery should be considered a high‐risk procedure. © 2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>11578302</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01856.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-1323 |
| ispartof | British journal of surgery, 2001-10, Vol.88 (10), p.1413-1416 |
| issn | 0007-1323 1365-2168 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71209250 |
| source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Anticoagulants - therapeutic use Bandages Biological and medical sciences Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods Denmark Health Surveys Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight - therapeutic use Humans Length of Stay Medical sciences Professional Practice Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments Thromboembolism - prevention & control Thrombosis - prevention & control |
| title | Survey of the use of thromboprophylaxis in laparoscopic surgery in Denmark |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T10%3A13%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20of%20the%20use%20of%20thromboprophylaxis%20in%20laparoscopic%20surgery%20in%20Denmark&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Filtenborg%20Tvedskov,%20T.&rft.date=2001-10&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1413&rft.epage=1416&rft.pages=1413-1416&rft.issn=0007-1323&rft.eissn=1365-2168&rft.coden=BJSUAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01856.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71209250%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71209250&rft_id=info:pmid/11578302&rfr_iscdi=true |