Perireceptor and Receptor Events in Olfaction. Comparison of Concentration and Flux Detectors: a Modeling Study
Transduction in chemosensory cells begins with the association of ligand molecules to receptor proteins borne by the cell membrane. The receptor–ligand complexes formed act as signaling compounds that trigger a G-protein cascade. This receptor–ligand interaction, described here by a single-step or d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemical senses 2000-06, Vol.25 (3), p.293-311 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 311 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 293 |
container_title | Chemical senses |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Rospars, Jean-Pierre Křivan, Vlastimil Lánský, Petr |
description | Transduction in chemosensory cells begins with the association of ligand molecules to receptor proteins borne by the cell membrane. The receptor–ligand complexes formed act as signaling compounds that trigger a G-protein cascade. This receptor–ligand interaction, described here by a single-step or double-step reaction, depends on factors controlling the access of the ligand molecules to the cell membrane. Two basic mechanisms can be distinguished: concentration detectors (CD), in which the ligand can freely diffuse to the membrane, and flux detectors (FD), in which it accumulates irreversibly in a distinct perireceptor space where it is chemically deactivated. These two systems, plus their generalization, are investigated and compared. The transient and steady-state numbers of complexes are studied as a function of the external ligand concentration. The biological significance of the results is shown in a well-studied example of FD, the insect sex-pheromone olfactory receptor neuron. How the number of complexes can code for the intensity of stimulation is analyzed using the size, dynamic range and sensitivity of the steady-state responses, and the time needed to reach a predefined level of the transient responses. It is shown that the FD design affords a large increase in sensitivity (a shift of the threshold response towards low concentration) with respect to the CD design, which is paid for by a lesser ability to follow fast changes in stimulus intensity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/chemse/25.3.293 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71206796</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71206796</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-d3097d0a5de1e8c194f4c44793011a51e57182ac5052005361954c9b2d52303b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0ctv1DAQB2ALgehSOHNDFkLcsut3bG5o6QOpUFQKWvVieZ0JpCT2Yieo_e9xyfIQJ2s034ys-SH0lJIlJYav_FcYMqyYXPIlM_weWlChRMWl5PfRgvDaVFqJzQF6lPM1IVRwph-iA0q0UkbrBYofIHUJPOzGmLALDb74XRz9gDBm3AV83rfOj10MS7yOw86lLseAY1uq4AtK7q75a_q4n27wGxjBlxX5FXb4XWyg78IX_HGcmtvH6EHr-gxP9u8h-nR8dLk-rc7OT96uX59VXhgxVg0npm6Ikw1Q0J4a0QovRG04odRJCrKmmjkviWSESK6okcKbLWsk44Rv-SF6Oe_dpfh9gjzaocse-t4FiFO2NWVE1UYV-Pw_eB2nFMrfLDWGKUoJK2g1I59izglau0vd4NKtpcTeBWHnICyTltsSRJl4tl87bQdo_vHz5Qt4sQcue9e3yQXf5b9OaK0YLayaWZdHuPnTdumbVTWvpT3dXNn3m4sTdfn5ynL-EzsToFc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199261102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perireceptor and Receptor Events in Olfaction. Comparison of Concentration and Flux Detectors: a Modeling Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Rospars, Jean-Pierre ; Křivan, Vlastimil ; Lánský, Petr</creator><creatorcontrib>Rospars, Jean-Pierre ; Křivan, Vlastimil ; Lánský, Petr</creatorcontrib><description>Transduction in chemosensory cells begins with the association of ligand molecules to receptor proteins borne by the cell membrane. The receptor–ligand complexes formed act as signaling compounds that trigger a G-protein cascade. This receptor–ligand interaction, described here by a single-step or double-step reaction, depends on factors controlling the access of the ligand molecules to the cell membrane. Two basic mechanisms can be distinguished: concentration detectors (CD), in which the ligand can freely diffuse to the membrane, and flux detectors (FD), in which it accumulates irreversibly in a distinct perireceptor space where it is chemically deactivated. These two systems, plus their generalization, are investigated and compared. The transient and steady-state numbers of complexes are studied as a function of the external ligand concentration. The biological significance of the results is shown in a well-studied example of FD, the insect sex-pheromone olfactory receptor neuron. How the number of complexes can code for the intensity of stimulation is analyzed using the size, dynamic range and sensitivity of the steady-state responses, and the time needed to reach a predefined level of the transient responses. It is shown that the FD design affords a large increase in sensitivity (a shift of the threshold response towards low concentration) with respect to the CD design, which is paid for by a lesser ability to follow fast changes in stimulus intensity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0379-864X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3553</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/chemse/25.3.293</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10866988</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHSED8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Kinetics ; Models, Biological ; Odorants ; Olfaction. Taste ; Olfactory Pathways - physiology ; Perception ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Smell - physiology</subject><ispartof>Chemical senses, 2000-06, Vol.25 (3), p.293-311</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Jun 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-d3097d0a5de1e8c194f4c44793011a51e57182ac5052005361954c9b2d52303b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-d3097d0a5de1e8c194f4c44793011a51e57182ac5052005361954c9b2d52303b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1488621$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10866988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rospars, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Křivan, Vlastimil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lánský, Petr</creatorcontrib><title>Perireceptor and Receptor Events in Olfaction. Comparison of Concentration and Flux Detectors: a Modeling Study</title><title>Chemical senses</title><addtitle>Chem. Senses</addtitle><description>Transduction in chemosensory cells begins with the association of ligand molecules to receptor proteins borne by the cell membrane. The receptor–ligand complexes formed act as signaling compounds that trigger a G-protein cascade. This receptor–ligand interaction, described here by a single-step or double-step reaction, depends on factors controlling the access of the ligand molecules to the cell membrane. Two basic mechanisms can be distinguished: concentration detectors (CD), in which the ligand can freely diffuse to the membrane, and flux detectors (FD), in which it accumulates irreversibly in a distinct perireceptor space where it is chemically deactivated. These two systems, plus their generalization, are investigated and compared. The transient and steady-state numbers of complexes are studied as a function of the external ligand concentration. The biological significance of the results is shown in a well-studied example of FD, the insect sex-pheromone olfactory receptor neuron. How the number of complexes can code for the intensity of stimulation is analyzed using the size, dynamic range and sensitivity of the steady-state responses, and the time needed to reach a predefined level of the transient responses. It is shown that the FD design affords a large increase in sensitivity (a shift of the threshold response towards low concentration) with respect to the CD design, which is paid for by a lesser ability to follow fast changes in stimulus intensity.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Odorants</subject><subject>Olfaction. Taste</subject><subject>Olfactory Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Smell - physiology</subject><issn>0379-864X</issn><issn>1464-3553</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0ctv1DAQB2ALgehSOHNDFkLcsut3bG5o6QOpUFQKWvVieZ0JpCT2Yieo_e9xyfIQJ2s034ys-SH0lJIlJYav_FcYMqyYXPIlM_weWlChRMWl5PfRgvDaVFqJzQF6lPM1IVRwph-iA0q0UkbrBYofIHUJPOzGmLALDb74XRz9gDBm3AV83rfOj10MS7yOw86lLseAY1uq4AtK7q75a_q4n27wGxjBlxX5FXb4XWyg78IX_HGcmtvH6EHr-gxP9u8h-nR8dLk-rc7OT96uX59VXhgxVg0npm6Ikw1Q0J4a0QovRG04odRJCrKmmjkviWSESK6okcKbLWsk44Rv-SF6Oe_dpfh9gjzaocse-t4FiFO2NWVE1UYV-Pw_eB2nFMrfLDWGKUoJK2g1I59izglau0vd4NKtpcTeBWHnICyTltsSRJl4tl87bQdo_vHz5Qt4sQcue9e3yQXf5b9OaK0YLayaWZdHuPnTdumbVTWvpT3dXNn3m4sTdfn5ynL-EzsToFc</recordid><startdate>20000601</startdate><enddate>20000601</enddate><creator>Rospars, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Křivan, Vlastimil</creator><creator>Lánský, Petr</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000601</creationdate><title>Perireceptor and Receptor Events in Olfaction. Comparison of Concentration and Flux Detectors: a Modeling Study</title><author>Rospars, Jean-Pierre ; Křivan, Vlastimil ; Lánský, Petr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-d3097d0a5de1e8c194f4c44793011a51e57182ac5052005361954c9b2d52303b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Odorants</topic><topic>Olfaction. Taste</topic><topic>Olfactory Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Smell - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rospars, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Křivan, Vlastimil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lánský, Petr</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chemical senses</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rospars, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Křivan, Vlastimil</au><au>Lánský, Petr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perireceptor and Receptor Events in Olfaction. Comparison of Concentration and Flux Detectors: a Modeling Study</atitle><jtitle>Chemical senses</jtitle><addtitle>Chem. Senses</addtitle><date>2000-06-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>293-311</pages><issn>0379-864X</issn><eissn>1464-3553</eissn><coden>CHSED8</coden><abstract>Transduction in chemosensory cells begins with the association of ligand molecules to receptor proteins borne by the cell membrane. The receptor–ligand complexes formed act as signaling compounds that trigger a G-protein cascade. This receptor–ligand interaction, described here by a single-step or double-step reaction, depends on factors controlling the access of the ligand molecules to the cell membrane. Two basic mechanisms can be distinguished: concentration detectors (CD), in which the ligand can freely diffuse to the membrane, and flux detectors (FD), in which it accumulates irreversibly in a distinct perireceptor space where it is chemically deactivated. These two systems, plus their generalization, are investigated and compared. The transient and steady-state numbers of complexes are studied as a function of the external ligand concentration. The biological significance of the results is shown in a well-studied example of FD, the insect sex-pheromone olfactory receptor neuron. How the number of complexes can code for the intensity of stimulation is analyzed using the size, dynamic range and sensitivity of the steady-state responses, and the time needed to reach a predefined level of the transient responses. It is shown that the FD design affords a large increase in sensitivity (a shift of the threshold response towards low concentration) with respect to the CD design, which is paid for by a lesser ability to follow fast changes in stimulus intensity.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>10866988</pmid><doi>10.1093/chemse/25.3.293</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0379-864X |
ispartof | Chemical senses, 2000-06, Vol.25 (3), p.293-311 |
issn | 0379-864X 1464-3553 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71206796 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Kinetics Models, Biological Odorants Olfaction. Taste Olfactory Pathways - physiology Perception Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Smell - physiology |
title | Perireceptor and Receptor Events in Olfaction. Comparison of Concentration and Flux Detectors: a Modeling Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A18%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perireceptor%20and%20Receptor%20Events%20in%20Olfaction.%20Comparison%20of%20Concentration%20and%20Flux%20Detectors:%20a%20Modeling%20Study&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20senses&rft.au=Rospars,%20Jean-Pierre&rft.date=2000-06-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=293-311&rft.issn=0379-864X&rft.eissn=1464-3553&rft.coden=CHSED8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/chemse/25.3.293&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71206796%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199261102&rft_id=info:pmid/10866988&rfr_iscdi=true |