Safety of sublingual immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid in adults: multicenter post-marketing surveillance study
Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) appears to be acceptably safe in clinical trials, but post-marketing data are needed to provide essential information. This study specifically evaluated the safety of commercial SLIT in adult patients in a post-marketing phase. A total of 198 patients (83 male, 115 fe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Allergy (Copenhagen) 2001-10, Vol.56 (10), p.989-992 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 992 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 989 |
container_title | Allergy (Copenhagen) |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | LOMBARDI, C GARGIONI, S MELCHIORRE, A TIRI, A FALAGIANI, P CANONICA, G. W PASSALACQUA, G |
description | Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) appears to be acceptably safe in clinical trials, but post-marketing data are needed to provide essential information. This study specifically evaluated the safety of commercial SLIT in adult patients in a post-marketing phase.
A total of 198 patients (83 male, 115 female, mean age 24.4 years) receiving SLIT for respiratory allergy were followed up for 3 years by a specific questionnaire for side-effects. SLIT (LAIS, Lofarma SpA, Milan, Italy), a monomeric allergoid in tablets, was administered, in association with drug therapy, pre- or pre-coseasonally for pollen and continuously for mites. The average duration was 12-36 months, and the total of doses was about 32 800. Side-effects were grouped as ocular, gastrointestinal, rhinitis, asthma, urticaria, edema of tongue/lips, and anaphylaxis. The severity was graded as low (no need for treatment or dose adjusting, no interference with activities), moderate (interference with activities/need for drugs/SLIT discontinuation), and severe (life-threatening/hospitalization/emergency care).
Seventeen events corresponding to 7.5% of patients and 0.52 per 1000 doses were reported. Seven episodes of rhinitis (two in two patients), three of oral itching, and one of abdominal pain were self-limiting. Two cases of urticaria and two of abdominal pain/nausea were controlled by a temporary dose-adjustment, and one case of urticaria and conjunctivitis required oral antihistamines. Medical intervention was needed in six patients only during a 3-year period.
The results of this study, performed in a real situation of clinical practice, confirm the satisfactory safety profile of SLIT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.00181.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71205997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18207237</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p268t-508e7e612caff5666adcb8db7747d7fc3975657400ac9b720e6815f0bb0317603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhT2AoBT-AvICW8J1EscxG0K8pEoMwFw5zk3r4jywHaD_HiOKGBmuzvLp0z2HEMogZZAXF5uU5bJKpJQ8zQBYGq9i6ecemQEDnhQ8rw7JkfcbABCZhANyyBgXJQg5I-FJtRi2dGipn2pr-tWkLDVdN_VDWKNT45Z-mLCm3dAPHTqjqbIW3WowDTU9Vc1kg7-kXQyjsQ_o6Dj4kHTKvWKIvuh172isVb1G6sPUbI_Jfqusx5NdzsnL7c3z9X2yeLx7uL5aJGNWViHhUKHAkmVatS0vy1I1uq6aWohCNKLVuRS85KIAUFrWIgMsK8ZbqGvIWeyXz8n5j3d0w9uEPiw74zV-v4LD5JeCZcClFP-CrMridPk3eLoDp7rDZjk6E4tul7-DRuBsByivlW1dbG38H1ewrBBM5F8cDYdE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18207237</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of sublingual immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid in adults: multicenter post-marketing surveillance study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>LOMBARDI, C ; GARGIONI, S ; MELCHIORRE, A ; TIRI, A ; FALAGIANI, P ; CANONICA, G. W ; PASSALACQUA, G</creator><creatorcontrib>LOMBARDI, C ; GARGIONI, S ; MELCHIORRE, A ; TIRI, A ; FALAGIANI, P ; CANONICA, G. W ; PASSALACQUA, G</creatorcontrib><description>Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) appears to be acceptably safe in clinical trials, but post-marketing data are needed to provide essential information. This study specifically evaluated the safety of commercial SLIT in adult patients in a post-marketing phase.
A total of 198 patients (83 male, 115 female, mean age 24.4 years) receiving SLIT for respiratory allergy were followed up for 3 years by a specific questionnaire for side-effects. SLIT (LAIS, Lofarma SpA, Milan, Italy), a monomeric allergoid in tablets, was administered, in association with drug therapy, pre- or pre-coseasonally for pollen and continuously for mites. The average duration was 12-36 months, and the total of doses was about 32 800. Side-effects were grouped as ocular, gastrointestinal, rhinitis, asthma, urticaria, edema of tongue/lips, and anaphylaxis. The severity was graded as low (no need for treatment or dose adjusting, no interference with activities), moderate (interference with activities/need for drugs/SLIT discontinuation), and severe (life-threatening/hospitalization/emergency care).
Seventeen events corresponding to 7.5% of patients and 0.52 per 1000 doses were reported. Seven episodes of rhinitis (two in two patients), three of oral itching, and one of abdominal pain were self-limiting. Two cases of urticaria and two of abdominal pain/nausea were controlled by a temporary dose-adjustment, and one case of urticaria and conjunctivitis required oral antihistamines. Medical intervention was needed in six patients only during a 3-year period.
The results of this study, performed in a real situation of clinical practice, confirm the satisfactory safety profile of SLIT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0105-4538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.00181.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11576079</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LLRGDY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell</publisher><subject>Administration, Sublingual ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Allergens - administration & dosage ; Allergens - adverse effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; clinical trials ; Desensitization, Immunologic - adverse effects ; Desensitization, Immunologic - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Immunopathology ; Immunotherapy (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Plant Extracts - administration & dosage ; Plant Extracts - adverse effects ; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing ; Respiratory Hypersensitivity - drug therapy ; sublingual immunotherapy ; Tablets ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Allergy (Copenhagen), 2001-10, Vol.56 (10), p.989-992</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14124717$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11576079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LOMBARDI, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GARGIONI, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MELCHIORRE, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIRI, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FALAGIANI, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CANONICA, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PASSALACQUA, G</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of sublingual immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid in adults: multicenter post-marketing surveillance study</title><title>Allergy (Copenhagen)</title><addtitle>Allergy</addtitle><description>Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) appears to be acceptably safe in clinical trials, but post-marketing data are needed to provide essential information. This study specifically evaluated the safety of commercial SLIT in adult patients in a post-marketing phase.
A total of 198 patients (83 male, 115 female, mean age 24.4 years) receiving SLIT for respiratory allergy were followed up for 3 years by a specific questionnaire for side-effects. SLIT (LAIS, Lofarma SpA, Milan, Italy), a monomeric allergoid in tablets, was administered, in association with drug therapy, pre- or pre-coseasonally for pollen and continuously for mites. The average duration was 12-36 months, and the total of doses was about 32 800. Side-effects were grouped as ocular, gastrointestinal, rhinitis, asthma, urticaria, edema of tongue/lips, and anaphylaxis. The severity was graded as low (no need for treatment or dose adjusting, no interference with activities), moderate (interference with activities/need for drugs/SLIT discontinuation), and severe (life-threatening/hospitalization/emergency care).
Seventeen events corresponding to 7.5% of patients and 0.52 per 1000 doses were reported. Seven episodes of rhinitis (two in two patients), three of oral itching, and one of abdominal pain were self-limiting. Two cases of urticaria and two of abdominal pain/nausea were controlled by a temporary dose-adjustment, and one case of urticaria and conjunctivitis required oral antihistamines. Medical intervention was needed in six patients only during a 3-year period.
The results of this study, performed in a real situation of clinical practice, confirm the satisfactory safety profile of SLIT.</description><subject>Administration, Sublingual</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Allergens - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Allergens - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>clinical trials</subject><subject>Desensitization, Immunologic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Desensitization, Immunologic - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunopathology</subject><subject>Immunotherapy (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Plant Extracts - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Plant Extracts - adverse effects</subject><subject>Product Surveillance, Postmarketing</subject><subject>Respiratory Hypersensitivity - drug therapy</subject><subject>sublingual immunotherapy</subject><subject>Tablets</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0105-4538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhT2AoBT-AvICW8J1EscxG0K8pEoMwFw5zk3r4jywHaD_HiOKGBmuzvLp0z2HEMogZZAXF5uU5bJKpJQ8zQBYGq9i6ecemQEDnhQ8rw7JkfcbABCZhANyyBgXJQg5I-FJtRi2dGipn2pr-tWkLDVdN_VDWKNT45Z-mLCm3dAPHTqjqbIW3WowDTU9Vc1kg7-kXQyjsQ_o6Dj4kHTKvWKIvuh172isVb1G6sPUbI_Jfqusx5NdzsnL7c3z9X2yeLx7uL5aJGNWViHhUKHAkmVatS0vy1I1uq6aWohCNKLVuRS85KIAUFrWIgMsK8ZbqGvIWeyXz8n5j3d0w9uEPiw74zV-v4LD5JeCZcClFP-CrMridPk3eLoDp7rDZjk6E4tul7-DRuBsByivlW1dbG38H1ewrBBM5F8cDYdE</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>LOMBARDI, C</creator><creator>GARGIONI, S</creator><creator>MELCHIORRE, A</creator><creator>TIRI, A</creator><creator>FALAGIANI, P</creator><creator>CANONICA, G. W</creator><creator>PASSALACQUA, G</creator><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Safety of sublingual immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid in adults: multicenter post-marketing surveillance study</title><author>LOMBARDI, C ; GARGIONI, S ; MELCHIORRE, A ; TIRI, A ; FALAGIANI, P ; CANONICA, G. W ; PASSALACQUA, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p268t-508e7e612caff5666adcb8db7747d7fc3975657400ac9b720e6815f0bb0317603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Administration, Sublingual</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Allergens - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Allergens - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>clinical trials</topic><topic>Desensitization, Immunologic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Desensitization, Immunologic - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunopathology</topic><topic>Immunotherapy (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Plant Extracts - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Plant Extracts - adverse effects</topic><topic>Product Surveillance, Postmarketing</topic><topic>Respiratory Hypersensitivity - drug therapy</topic><topic>sublingual immunotherapy</topic><topic>Tablets</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LOMBARDI, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GARGIONI, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MELCHIORRE, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIRI, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FALAGIANI, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CANONICA, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PASSALACQUA, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Allergy (Copenhagen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LOMBARDI, C</au><au>GARGIONI, S</au><au>MELCHIORRE, A</au><au>TIRI, A</au><au>FALAGIANI, P</au><au>CANONICA, G. W</au><au>PASSALACQUA, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of sublingual immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid in adults: multicenter post-marketing surveillance study</atitle><jtitle>Allergy (Copenhagen)</jtitle><addtitle>Allergy</addtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>989</spage><epage>992</epage><pages>989-992</pages><issn>0105-4538</issn><coden>LLRGDY</coden><abstract>Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) appears to be acceptably safe in clinical trials, but post-marketing data are needed to provide essential information. This study specifically evaluated the safety of commercial SLIT in adult patients in a post-marketing phase.
A total of 198 patients (83 male, 115 female, mean age 24.4 years) receiving SLIT for respiratory allergy were followed up for 3 years by a specific questionnaire for side-effects. SLIT (LAIS, Lofarma SpA, Milan, Italy), a monomeric allergoid in tablets, was administered, in association with drug therapy, pre- or pre-coseasonally for pollen and continuously for mites. The average duration was 12-36 months, and the total of doses was about 32 800. Side-effects were grouped as ocular, gastrointestinal, rhinitis, asthma, urticaria, edema of tongue/lips, and anaphylaxis. The severity was graded as low (no need for treatment or dose adjusting, no interference with activities), moderate (interference with activities/need for drugs/SLIT discontinuation), and severe (life-threatening/hospitalization/emergency care).
Seventeen events corresponding to 7.5% of patients and 0.52 per 1000 doses were reported. Seven episodes of rhinitis (two in two patients), three of oral itching, and one of abdominal pain were self-limiting. Two cases of urticaria and two of abdominal pain/nausea were controlled by a temporary dose-adjustment, and one case of urticaria and conjunctivitis required oral antihistamines. Medical intervention was needed in six patients only during a 3-year period.
The results of this study, performed in a real situation of clinical practice, confirm the satisfactory safety profile of SLIT.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell</pub><pmid>11576079</pmid><doi>10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.00181.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0105-4538 |
ispartof | Allergy (Copenhagen), 2001-10, Vol.56 (10), p.989-992 |
issn | 0105-4538 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71205997 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Administration, Sublingual Adolescent Adult Allergens - administration & dosage Allergens - adverse effects Biological and medical sciences clinical trials Desensitization, Immunologic - adverse effects Desensitization, Immunologic - methods Female Humans Immunopathology Immunotherapy (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Plant Extracts - administration & dosage Plant Extracts - adverse effects Product Surveillance, Postmarketing Respiratory Hypersensitivity - drug therapy sublingual immunotherapy Tablets Treatment Outcome |
title | Safety of sublingual immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid in adults: multicenter post-marketing surveillance study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T01%3A27%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20sublingual%20immunotherapy%20with%20monomeric%20allergoid%20in%20adults:%20multicenter%20post-marketing%20surveillance%20study&rft.jtitle=Allergy%20(Copenhagen)&rft.au=LOMBARDI,%20C&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=989&rft.epage=992&rft.pages=989-992&rft.issn=0105-4538&rft.coden=LLRGDY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.00181.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E18207237%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18207237&rft_id=info:pmid/11576079&rfr_iscdi=true |