Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum : analysis of 31 patients

Between 1985 and 1996, 190 patients underwent a low anterior rectal resection with coloanal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. This article reports on 31 (17 males) of these patients with a very low localization of the tumor (distal tumor margin 1.3 +/- 0.9 cm above...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diseases of the colon & rectum 2000-06, Vol.43 (6), p.843-850
Hauptverfasser: KÖHLER, A, ATHANASIADIS, S, OMMER, A, PSARAKIS, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 850
container_issue 6
container_start_page 843
container_title Diseases of the colon & rectum
container_volume 43
creator KÖHLER, A
ATHANASIADIS, S
OMMER, A
PSARAKIS, E
description Between 1985 and 1996, 190 patients underwent a low anterior rectal resection with coloanal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. This article reports on 31 (17 males) of these patients with a very low localization of the tumor (distal tumor margin 1.3 +/- 0.9 cm above the dentate line). If the function of the sphincter was acceptable and we could exclude tumor infiltration into the sphincter through endosonography, we relocated the resection plane distally into the intersphincteric region to attain an acceptable margin of safety. In all of these cases, it was impossible for us to perform the usual surgical procedure of a mechanical anastomosis by means of a circular stapler. After intersphincteric rectal resection, the anastomosis was handsewn, using interrupted sutures from the perineal approach, 2.5 to 3 cm above the anal verge, implementing Parks' retractor. A protective stoma was performed in all cases. All data were documented prospectively. Postoperative mortality was 0 percent. Postoperatively, none of the patients showed an indication for relaparotomy. The leakage rate was 48 percent. Only 16 percent later needed additional surgery for anastomotic strictures or for rectovaginal fistulas. Long-term observations showed that the anastomosis healed well in 27 patients (87.1 percent). Four patients (12.9 percent) decided to have a terminal colostomy performed (anastomotic stricture, 3 patients; anorectal incontinence, 1 patient). During the follow-up period of 6.8 +/- 3.7 years, six patients (19.4 percent) developed a tumor progression (9.7 percent local recurrences and 12.9 percent distant spread). The five-year survival rate was 79 percent (Dukes A, 100 percent (n = 18); Dukes B, 67 percent (n = 4); and Dukes C, 44 percent (n = 9)). Continence: One-third of patients developed anorectal incontinence for liquid (29.6 percent) or solid stool (3.7 percent). Average stool frequency was 3.3 times per day. Resting pressure decreased significantly by 29 percent (preoperative, 105 +/- 37 cm H2O and postoperative, 75 +/- 19 cm H2O; P < 0.05), whereas squeeze pressure did not change. In selected patients with tumors close to the dentate line, an intersphincteric resection of the rectum may help to avoid an abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with a terminal stoma, without any curtailment of oncologic standards. A protective stoma for three months is advantageous.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02238025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71195653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71195653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-8c6387eed0d4f84008db8a1774a22c600a37ec4c9337b9b1dbf3e91baae058ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkcFu1DAQhi1ERbeFCw-AfEAcKoWO7WTtcCsVBaSVeoFzNHEmrFFiL7ajqo_St8XRLiqn0fzzzXeYYeytgI8CQF9_vgMplQHZvGAb0SioQDXmJdsACFkpDdtzdpHS79KCBP2KnQswTQtGb9jTLvhfVaY480hpmXLiYeRTeODoS-pCXHOy2QXPH1zec7fm6bB33q6ALSCmHOaQXCpDbjFa58OMqyjvaZVR5MFTlfcuDv_iWKTLzD-t-9PjulwGSvADZkc-p9fsbMQp0ZtTvWQ_7778uP1W7e6_fr-92VVWapUrY7fKaKIBhno0NYAZeoNC6xqltFsAVJpsbVuldN_2YuhHRa3oEQkaY1Fdsg9H7yGGPwul3M0uWZom9BSW1Gkh2mbbqAJeHUEbQ0qRxu4Q3YzxsRPQrY_onh9R4Hcn69LPNPyHHi9fgPcnAJPFaYzorUvPXC1kK4z6C808knA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71195653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum : analysis of 31 patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>KÖHLER, A ; ATHANASIADIS, S ; OMMER, A ; PSARAKIS, E</creator><creatorcontrib>KÖHLER, A ; ATHANASIADIS, S ; OMMER, A ; PSARAKIS, E</creatorcontrib><description>Between 1985 and 1996, 190 patients underwent a low anterior rectal resection with coloanal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. This article reports on 31 (17 males) of these patients with a very low localization of the tumor (distal tumor margin 1.3 +/- 0.9 cm above the dentate line). If the function of the sphincter was acceptable and we could exclude tumor infiltration into the sphincter through endosonography, we relocated the resection plane distally into the intersphincteric region to attain an acceptable margin of safety. In all of these cases, it was impossible for us to perform the usual surgical procedure of a mechanical anastomosis by means of a circular stapler. After intersphincteric rectal resection, the anastomosis was handsewn, using interrupted sutures from the perineal approach, 2.5 to 3 cm above the anal verge, implementing Parks' retractor. A protective stoma was performed in all cases. All data were documented prospectively. Postoperative mortality was 0 percent. Postoperatively, none of the patients showed an indication for relaparotomy. The leakage rate was 48 percent. Only 16 percent later needed additional surgery for anastomotic strictures or for rectovaginal fistulas. Long-term observations showed that the anastomosis healed well in 27 patients (87.1 percent). Four patients (12.9 percent) decided to have a terminal colostomy performed (anastomotic stricture, 3 patients; anorectal incontinence, 1 patient). During the follow-up period of 6.8 +/- 3.7 years, six patients (19.4 percent) developed a tumor progression (9.7 percent local recurrences and 12.9 percent distant spread). The five-year survival rate was 79 percent (Dukes A, 100 percent (n = 18); Dukes B, 67 percent (n = 4); and Dukes C, 44 percent (n = 9)). Continence: One-third of patients developed anorectal incontinence for liquid (29.6 percent) or solid stool (3.7 percent). Average stool frequency was 3.3 times per day. Resting pressure decreased significantly by 29 percent (preoperative, 105 +/- 37 cm H2O and postoperative, 75 +/- 19 cm H2O; P &lt; 0.05), whereas squeeze pressure did not change. In selected patients with tumors close to the dentate line, an intersphincteric resection of the rectum may help to avoid an abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with a terminal stoma, without any curtailment of oncologic standards. A protective stoma for three months is advantageous.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02238025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10859087</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DICRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Secaucus, NJ: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; Biological and medical sciences ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Surgical Stapling ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence - etiology ; Suture Techniques ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum, 2000-06, Vol.43 (6), p.843-850</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-8c6387eed0d4f84008db8a1774a22c600a37ec4c9337b9b1dbf3e91baae058ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1412918$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10859087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KÖHLER, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ATHANASIADIS, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OMMER, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PSARAKIS, E</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum : analysis of 31 patients</title><title>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</title><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><description>Between 1985 and 1996, 190 patients underwent a low anterior rectal resection with coloanal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. This article reports on 31 (17 males) of these patients with a very low localization of the tumor (distal tumor margin 1.3 +/- 0.9 cm above the dentate line). If the function of the sphincter was acceptable and we could exclude tumor infiltration into the sphincter through endosonography, we relocated the resection plane distally into the intersphincteric region to attain an acceptable margin of safety. In all of these cases, it was impossible for us to perform the usual surgical procedure of a mechanical anastomosis by means of a circular stapler. After intersphincteric rectal resection, the anastomosis was handsewn, using interrupted sutures from the perineal approach, 2.5 to 3 cm above the anal verge, implementing Parks' retractor. A protective stoma was performed in all cases. All data were documented prospectively. Postoperative mortality was 0 percent. Postoperatively, none of the patients showed an indication for relaparotomy. The leakage rate was 48 percent. Only 16 percent later needed additional surgery for anastomotic strictures or for rectovaginal fistulas. Long-term observations showed that the anastomosis healed well in 27 patients (87.1 percent). Four patients (12.9 percent) decided to have a terminal colostomy performed (anastomotic stricture, 3 patients; anorectal incontinence, 1 patient). During the follow-up period of 6.8 +/- 3.7 years, six patients (19.4 percent) developed a tumor progression (9.7 percent local recurrences and 12.9 percent distant spread). The five-year survival rate was 79 percent (Dukes A, 100 percent (n = 18); Dukes B, 67 percent (n = 4); and Dukes C, 44 percent (n = 9)). Continence: One-third of patients developed anorectal incontinence for liquid (29.6 percent) or solid stool (3.7 percent). Average stool frequency was 3.3 times per day. Resting pressure decreased significantly by 29 percent (preoperative, 105 +/- 37 cm H2O and postoperative, 75 +/- 19 cm H2O; P &lt; 0.05), whereas squeeze pressure did not change. In selected patients with tumors close to the dentate line, an intersphincteric resection of the rectum may help to avoid an abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with a terminal stoma, without any curtailment of oncologic standards. A protective stoma for three months is advantageous.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Digestive System Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - etiology</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0012-3706</issn><issn>1530-0358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkcFu1DAQhi1ERbeFCw-AfEAcKoWO7WTtcCsVBaSVeoFzNHEmrFFiL7ajqo_St8XRLiqn0fzzzXeYYeytgI8CQF9_vgMplQHZvGAb0SioQDXmJdsACFkpDdtzdpHS79KCBP2KnQswTQtGb9jTLvhfVaY480hpmXLiYeRTeODoS-pCXHOy2QXPH1zec7fm6bB33q6ALSCmHOaQXCpDbjFa58OMqyjvaZVR5MFTlfcuDv_iWKTLzD-t-9PjulwGSvADZkc-p9fsbMQp0ZtTvWQ_7778uP1W7e6_fr-92VVWapUrY7fKaKIBhno0NYAZeoNC6xqltFsAVJpsbVuldN_2YuhHRa3oEQkaY1Fdsg9H7yGGPwul3M0uWZom9BSW1Gkh2mbbqAJeHUEbQ0qRxu4Q3YzxsRPQrY_onh9R4Hcn69LPNPyHHi9fgPcnAJPFaYzorUvPXC1kK4z6C808knA</recordid><startdate>20000601</startdate><enddate>20000601</enddate><creator>KÖHLER, A</creator><creator>ATHANASIADIS, S</creator><creator>OMMER, A</creator><creator>PSARAKIS, E</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000601</creationdate><title>Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum : analysis of 31 patients</title><author>KÖHLER, A ; ATHANASIADIS, S ; OMMER, A ; PSARAKIS, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-8c6387eed0d4f84008db8a1774a22c600a37ec4c9337b9b1dbf3e91baae058ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Digestive System Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - etiology</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KÖHLER, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ATHANASIADIS, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OMMER, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PSARAKIS, E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KÖHLER, A</au><au>ATHANASIADIS, S</au><au>OMMER, A</au><au>PSARAKIS, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum : analysis of 31 patients</atitle><jtitle>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</jtitle><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><date>2000-06-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>843</spage><epage>850</epage><pages>843-850</pages><issn>0012-3706</issn><eissn>1530-0358</eissn><coden>DICRAG</coden><abstract>Between 1985 and 1996, 190 patients underwent a low anterior rectal resection with coloanal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. This article reports on 31 (17 males) of these patients with a very low localization of the tumor (distal tumor margin 1.3 +/- 0.9 cm above the dentate line). If the function of the sphincter was acceptable and we could exclude tumor infiltration into the sphincter through endosonography, we relocated the resection plane distally into the intersphincteric region to attain an acceptable margin of safety. In all of these cases, it was impossible for us to perform the usual surgical procedure of a mechanical anastomosis by means of a circular stapler. After intersphincteric rectal resection, the anastomosis was handsewn, using interrupted sutures from the perineal approach, 2.5 to 3 cm above the anal verge, implementing Parks' retractor. A protective stoma was performed in all cases. All data were documented prospectively. Postoperative mortality was 0 percent. Postoperatively, none of the patients showed an indication for relaparotomy. The leakage rate was 48 percent. Only 16 percent later needed additional surgery for anastomotic strictures or for rectovaginal fistulas. Long-term observations showed that the anastomosis healed well in 27 patients (87.1 percent). Four patients (12.9 percent) decided to have a terminal colostomy performed (anastomotic stricture, 3 patients; anorectal incontinence, 1 patient). During the follow-up period of 6.8 +/- 3.7 years, six patients (19.4 percent) developed a tumor progression (9.7 percent local recurrences and 12.9 percent distant spread). The five-year survival rate was 79 percent (Dukes A, 100 percent (n = 18); Dukes B, 67 percent (n = 4); and Dukes C, 44 percent (n = 9)). Continence: One-third of patients developed anorectal incontinence for liquid (29.6 percent) or solid stool (3.7 percent). Average stool frequency was 3.3 times per day. Resting pressure decreased significantly by 29 percent (preoperative, 105 +/- 37 cm H2O and postoperative, 75 +/- 19 cm H2O; P &lt; 0.05), whereas squeeze pressure did not change. In selected patients with tumors close to the dentate line, an intersphincteric resection of the rectum may help to avoid an abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with a terminal stoma, without any curtailment of oncologic standards. A protective stoma for three months is advantageous.</abstract><cop>Secaucus, NJ</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>10859087</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02238025</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3706
ispartof Diseases of the colon & rectum, 2000-06, Vol.43 (6), p.843-850
issn 0012-3706
1530-0358
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71195653
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Anastomosis, Surgical
Biological and medical sciences
Digestive System Surgical Procedures
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Postoperative Complications
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
Surgical Stapling
Surgical Wound Dehiscence - etiology
Suture Techniques
Treatment Outcome
title Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum : analysis of 31 patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A32%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20results%20of%20low%20anterior%20resection%20with%20intersphincteric%20anastomosis%20in%20carcinoma%20of%20the%20lower%20one-third%20of%20the%20rectum%20:%20analysis%20of%2031%20patients&rft.jtitle=Diseases%20of%20the%20colon%20&%20rectum&rft.au=K%C3%96HLER,%20A&rft.date=2000-06-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=843&rft.epage=850&rft.pages=843-850&rft.issn=0012-3706&rft.eissn=1530-0358&rft.coden=DICRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02238025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71195653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71195653&rft_id=info:pmid/10859087&rfr_iscdi=true