Esophagectomy and staged reconstruction

Objective: Esophageal resection with diversion and staged reconstruction of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract is an option in the management of complex problems. This study characterizes circumstances, indications, outcomes and their predictors for staged reconstruction, and estimates the optima...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery 2000-06, Vol.17 (6), p.702-709
Hauptverfasser: DiPierro, Francis V., Rice, Thomas W., DeCamp, Malcolm M., Rybicki, Lisa A., Blackstone, Eugene H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 709
container_issue 6
container_start_page 702
container_title European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery
container_volume 17
creator DiPierro, Francis V.
Rice, Thomas W.
DeCamp, Malcolm M.
Rybicki, Lisa A.
Blackstone, Eugene H.
description Objective: Esophageal resection with diversion and staged reconstruction of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract is an option in the management of complex problems. This study characterizes circumstances, indications, outcomes and their predictors for staged reconstruction, and estimates the optimal timing for reconstruction. Methods: Between October 1981 and March 1999, 43 patients were identified with planned staged reconstruction. Twenty-six had esophageal cancer, and 17 had complications of benign disease. Primary diversion with esophageal resection was needed in 16 patients, and secondary diversion with takedown of previous esophageal reconstruction was needed in 27. Common indications were failed esophageal anastomosis and esophageal perforation. Death before and death after reconstruction were considered as competing risks. Multivariable analyses were used to estimate the optimal timing of reconstruction. Results: The survival was 75, 21 and 9% at 3 months, 5 and 10 years, with survival only somewhat better (P=0.06) among patients having benign versus malignant disease. A similar proportion of patients died before reconstruction as underwent reconstruction, resulting in only 17 reconstructions, typically 9 months after diversion. The risk factors for death included cancer and primary diversion. The survival was best for benign disease when reconstruction was early. The survival was poor after reconstruction in the few patients with malignant disease. Conclusions: Patients requiring staged esophageal reconstruction are heterogeneous, with malignant or benign disease, and primary or secondary diversion. The outcome is poor, and is influenced by the pathology and timing of diversion. Patients with benign disease should be reconstructed as early as feasible; reconstruction is rarely indicated for patients with cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00408-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71192234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00408-5</oup_id><sourcerecordid>71192234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-4ed757447181268229bde16d5d3031bf51336e00656a41441eca0701483f204e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkFlLxDAUhYMo7j9BmQdxeYje22ztowzjAoqKC-JLyKSpVmfaMWlB_70ZO24gXHJv4Dv3JIeQDYR9BJQH1_EEqjIOuwB7ABxSKubIMqaKUcX4_Xycv5AlshLCMwBIlqhFsoSQCplKtkx2BqGePJlHZ5t6_N4zVd4LTbzmPe9sXYXGt7Yp62qNLBRmFNz6rK-S26PBTf-Enl0cn_YPz6jlmWgod7kSinOFKSYyTZJsmDuUucgZMBwWAhmTLr5DSMORc3TWgALkKSsS4I6tku1u78TXr60LjR6XwbrRyFSuboNWiFmSMB5B0YHW1yF4V-iJL8fGv2sEPU1Ifyakp9_XMK2YkBZRtzkzaIdjl_9SdZFEYGsGmGDNqPCmsmX44ViWopARgw6r28n_1vSPNZ1a005Shsa9fYuMf9FSMSX0yf2Dvrq5vOtfnWe6zz4APPeIaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71192234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Esophagectomy and staged reconstruction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>DiPierro, Francis V. ; Rice, Thomas W. ; DeCamp, Malcolm M. ; Rybicki, Lisa A. ; Blackstone, Eugene H.</creator><creatorcontrib>DiPierro, Francis V. ; Rice, Thomas W. ; DeCamp, Malcolm M. ; Rybicki, Lisa A. ; Blackstone, Eugene H.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Esophageal resection with diversion and staged reconstruction of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract is an option in the management of complex problems. This study characterizes circumstances, indications, outcomes and their predictors for staged reconstruction, and estimates the optimal timing for reconstruction. Methods: Between October 1981 and March 1999, 43 patients were identified with planned staged reconstruction. Twenty-six had esophageal cancer, and 17 had complications of benign disease. Primary diversion with esophageal resection was needed in 16 patients, and secondary diversion with takedown of previous esophageal reconstruction was needed in 27. Common indications were failed esophageal anastomosis and esophageal perforation. Death before and death after reconstruction were considered as competing risks. Multivariable analyses were used to estimate the optimal timing of reconstruction. Results: The survival was 75, 21 and 9% at 3 months, 5 and 10 years, with survival only somewhat better (P=0.06) among patients having benign versus malignant disease. A similar proportion of patients died before reconstruction as underwent reconstruction, resulting in only 17 reconstructions, typically 9 months after diversion. The risk factors for death included cancer and primary diversion. The survival was best for benign disease when reconstruction was early. The survival was poor after reconstruction in the few patients with malignant disease. Conclusions: Patients requiring staged esophageal reconstruction are heterogeneous, with malignant or benign disease, and primary or secondary diversion. The outcome is poor, and is influenced by the pathology and timing of diversion. Patients with benign disease should be reconstructed as early as feasible; reconstruction is rarely indicated for patients with cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-7940</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-734X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00408-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10856863</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJCSE7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anastomosis, Surgical - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Esophageal Diseases - mortality ; Esophageal Diseases - pathology ; Esophageal Diseases - surgery ; Esophageal diversion ; Esophageal perforation ; Esophagectomy ; Esophagectomy - methods ; Esophagostomy ; Esophagostomy - methods ; Esophagus ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Postoperative Complications ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - mortality ; Registries ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2000-06, Vol.17 (6), p.702-709</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Science B.V. ©2000 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. 2000</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-4ed757447181268229bde16d5d3031bf51336e00656a41441eca0701483f204e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-4ed757447181268229bde16d5d3031bf51336e00656a41441eca0701483f204e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1398156$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10856863$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DiPierro, Francis V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeCamp, Malcolm M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rybicki, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackstone, Eugene H.</creatorcontrib><title>Esophagectomy and staged reconstruction</title><title>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Cardiothorac Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cardiothorac Surg</addtitle><description>Objective: Esophageal resection with diversion and staged reconstruction of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract is an option in the management of complex problems. This study characterizes circumstances, indications, outcomes and their predictors for staged reconstruction, and estimates the optimal timing for reconstruction. Methods: Between October 1981 and March 1999, 43 patients were identified with planned staged reconstruction. Twenty-six had esophageal cancer, and 17 had complications of benign disease. Primary diversion with esophageal resection was needed in 16 patients, and secondary diversion with takedown of previous esophageal reconstruction was needed in 27. Common indications were failed esophageal anastomosis and esophageal perforation. Death before and death after reconstruction were considered as competing risks. Multivariable analyses were used to estimate the optimal timing of reconstruction. Results: The survival was 75, 21 and 9% at 3 months, 5 and 10 years, with survival only somewhat better (P=0.06) among patients having benign versus malignant disease. A similar proportion of patients died before reconstruction as underwent reconstruction, resulting in only 17 reconstructions, typically 9 months after diversion. The risk factors for death included cancer and primary diversion. The survival was best for benign disease when reconstruction was early. The survival was poor after reconstruction in the few patients with malignant disease. Conclusions: Patients requiring staged esophageal reconstruction are heterogeneous, with malignant or benign disease, and primary or secondary diversion. The outcome is poor, and is influenced by the pathology and timing of diversion. Patients with benign disease should be reconstructed as early as feasible; reconstruction is rarely indicated for patients with cancer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Esophageal Diseases - mortality</subject><subject>Esophageal Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Esophageal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal diversion</subject><subject>Esophageal perforation</subject><subject>Esophagectomy</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - methods</subject><subject>Esophagostomy</subject><subject>Esophagostomy - methods</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - mortality</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1010-7940</issn><issn>1873-734X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkFlLxDAUhYMo7j9BmQdxeYje22ztowzjAoqKC-JLyKSpVmfaMWlB_70ZO24gXHJv4Dv3JIeQDYR9BJQH1_EEqjIOuwB7ABxSKubIMqaKUcX4_Xycv5AlshLCMwBIlqhFsoSQCplKtkx2BqGePJlHZ5t6_N4zVd4LTbzmPe9sXYXGt7Yp62qNLBRmFNz6rK-S26PBTf-Enl0cn_YPz6jlmWgod7kSinOFKSYyTZJsmDuUucgZMBwWAhmTLr5DSMORc3TWgALkKSsS4I6tku1u78TXr60LjR6XwbrRyFSuboNWiFmSMB5B0YHW1yF4V-iJL8fGv2sEPU1Ifyakp9_XMK2YkBZRtzkzaIdjl_9SdZFEYGsGmGDNqPCmsmX44ViWopARgw6r28n_1vSPNZ1a005Shsa9fYuMf9FSMSX0yf2Dvrq5vOtfnWe6zz4APPeIaw</recordid><startdate>20000601</startdate><enddate>20000601</enddate><creator>DiPierro, Francis V.</creator><creator>Rice, Thomas W.</creator><creator>DeCamp, Malcolm M.</creator><creator>Rybicki, Lisa A.</creator><creator>Blackstone, Eugene H.</creator><general>Elsevier Science B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000601</creationdate><title>Esophagectomy and staged reconstruction</title><author>DiPierro, Francis V. ; Rice, Thomas W. ; DeCamp, Malcolm M. ; Rybicki, Lisa A. ; Blackstone, Eugene H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-4ed757447181268229bde16d5d3031bf51336e00656a41441eca0701483f204e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Esophageal Diseases - mortality</topic><topic>Esophageal Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Esophageal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal diversion</topic><topic>Esophageal perforation</topic><topic>Esophagectomy</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - methods</topic><topic>Esophagostomy</topic><topic>Esophagostomy - methods</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - mortality</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DiPierro, Francis V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeCamp, Malcolm M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rybicki, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackstone, Eugene H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DiPierro, Francis V.</au><au>Rice, Thomas W.</au><au>DeCamp, Malcolm M.</au><au>Rybicki, Lisa A.</au><au>Blackstone, Eugene H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Esophagectomy and staged reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Cardiothorac Surg</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Cardiothorac Surg</addtitle><date>2000-06-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>702</spage><epage>709</epage><pages>702-709</pages><issn>1010-7940</issn><eissn>1873-734X</eissn><coden>EJCSE7</coden><abstract>Objective: Esophageal resection with diversion and staged reconstruction of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract is an option in the management of complex problems. This study characterizes circumstances, indications, outcomes and their predictors for staged reconstruction, and estimates the optimal timing for reconstruction. Methods: Between October 1981 and March 1999, 43 patients were identified with planned staged reconstruction. Twenty-six had esophageal cancer, and 17 had complications of benign disease. Primary diversion with esophageal resection was needed in 16 patients, and secondary diversion with takedown of previous esophageal reconstruction was needed in 27. Common indications were failed esophageal anastomosis and esophageal perforation. Death before and death after reconstruction were considered as competing risks. Multivariable analyses were used to estimate the optimal timing of reconstruction. Results: The survival was 75, 21 and 9% at 3 months, 5 and 10 years, with survival only somewhat better (P=0.06) among patients having benign versus malignant disease. A similar proportion of patients died before reconstruction as underwent reconstruction, resulting in only 17 reconstructions, typically 9 months after diversion. The risk factors for death included cancer and primary diversion. The survival was best for benign disease when reconstruction was early. The survival was poor after reconstruction in the few patients with malignant disease. Conclusions: Patients requiring staged esophageal reconstruction are heterogeneous, with malignant or benign disease, and primary or secondary diversion. The outcome is poor, and is influenced by the pathology and timing of diversion. Patients with benign disease should be reconstructed as early as feasible; reconstruction is rarely indicated for patients with cancer.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Science B.V</pub><pmid>10856863</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00408-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-7940
ispartof European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2000-06, Vol.17 (6), p.702-709
issn 1010-7940
1873-734X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71192234
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anastomosis, Surgical - methods
Biological and medical sciences
Esophageal Diseases - mortality
Esophageal Diseases - pathology
Esophageal Diseases - surgery
Esophageal diversion
Esophageal perforation
Esophagectomy
Esophagectomy - methods
Esophagostomy
Esophagostomy - methods
Esophagus
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Postoperative Complications
Predictive Value of Tests
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - mortality
Registries
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
title Esophagectomy and staged reconstruction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T21%3A43%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Esophagectomy%20and%20staged%20reconstruction&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cardio-thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=DiPierro,%20Francis%20V.&rft.date=2000-06-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=702&rft.epage=709&rft.pages=702-709&rft.issn=1010-7940&rft.eissn=1873-734X&rft.coden=EJCSE7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00408-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71192234%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71192234&rft_id=info:pmid/10856863&rft_oup_id=10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00408-5&rfr_iscdi=true