DANGERS AND UNRELIABILITY OF MAMMOGRAPHY: BREAST EXAMINATION IS A SAFE, EFFECTIVE, AND PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVE
Mammography screening is a profit-driven technology posing risks compounded by unreliability. In striking contrast, annual clinical breast examination (CBE) by a trained health professional, together with monthly breast self-examination (BSE), is safe, at least as effective, and low in cost. Interna...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of health services 2001-01, Vol.31 (3), p.605-615 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 615 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 605 |
| container_title | International journal of health services |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Epstein, Samuel S. Bertell, Rosalie Seaman, Barbara |
| description | Mammography screening is a profit-driven technology posing risks compounded by unreliability. In striking contrast, annual clinical breast examination (CBE) by a trained health professional, together with monthly breast self-examination (BSE), is safe, at least as effective, and low in cost. International programs for training nurses how to perform CBE and teach BSE are critical and overdue. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2190/2RHD-05T6-BRY0-1CEX |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71181599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45132209</jstor_id><sage_id>10.2190_2RHD-05T6-BRY0-1CEX</sage_id><sourcerecordid>45132209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-53563f2a662cd1110affaa7b04bbf65292808be507e9ffdfc153acdc4527d0f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCL0Agn_ZEYMax88HNbZ02Upqu0uxqe7LyYaOt2s0Stwf-PYlawbGn8UjP-47kh5DPCN8ZxvCDFcu5B6IMvGmxBQ9n6ukNmaDg6HEexG_JBICBF_rIb8gH53bjGiC8JzeIImAA0YTs5zJfqGJDZT6nD3mhslRO0ywtt3Sd0JVcrdaLQt4vtz_ptFByU1L1JFdpLst0ndN0yNGNTNQ3qpJEzcr0cXiOVfeFHLaZzKjMSlWM_KP6SN7Zau_Mp8u8JQ-JKmdLL1svRtZruAiPnvBF4FtWBQFrWkSEytqqCmvgdW0DwWIWQVQbAaGJrW1tg8KvmnYIs7AFG_i35O7c-9p3v0_GHfXh2TVmv69eTHdyOkSMUMTxVVCEIcaR4FdBP2JRFHF2FRwOA8YcB9A_g03fOdcbq1_750PV_9EIevSrR7969KtHv3r0O6S-XupP9cG0_zMXoQMAZ8BVv4zedaf-ZfjpK51fzpGdO3b9v0ou0GcMYv8v0yawBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18101941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DANGERS AND UNRELIABILITY OF MAMMOGRAPHY: BREAST EXAMINATION IS A SAFE, EFFECTIVE, AND PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVE</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Epstein, Samuel S. ; Bertell, Rosalie ; Seaman, Barbara</creator><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Samuel S. ; Bertell, Rosalie ; Seaman, Barbara</creatorcontrib><description>Mammography screening is a profit-driven technology posing risks compounded by unreliability. In striking contrast, annual clinical breast examination (CBE) by a trained health professional, together with monthly breast self-examination (BSE), is safe, at least as effective, and low in cost. International programs for training nurses how to perform CBE and teach BSE are critical and overdue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-4469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2190/2RHD-05T6-BRY0-1CEX</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11562008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJHSC6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Baywood Publishing Company, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; American Cancer Society ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Self-Examination - standards ; Conflict of Interest ; False Negative Reactions ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Health ; Health care ; Health services ; Humans ; Mammography ; Mammography - adverse effects ; Mammography - economics ; Mammography - standards ; Mass Screening - adverse effects ; Mass Screening - economics ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medicine ; Middle Aged ; National Institutes of Health (U.S.) ; Palpation ; Public health ; reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Factors ; Safety ; Screening ; Selfexamination ; Technology ; U.S.A ; United States ; Women's Health</subject><ispartof>International journal of health services, 2001-01, Vol.31 (3), p.605-615</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001, Baywood Publishing Co., Inc.</rights><rights>2001 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-53563f2a662cd1110affaa7b04bbf65292808be507e9ffdfc153acdc4527d0f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-53563f2a662cd1110affaa7b04bbf65292808be507e9ffdfc153acdc4527d0f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45132209$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45132209$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21818,27923,27924,30999,43620,43621,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11562008$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Samuel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertell, Rosalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seaman, Barbara</creatorcontrib><title>DANGERS AND UNRELIABILITY OF MAMMOGRAPHY: BREAST EXAMINATION IS A SAFE, EFFECTIVE, AND PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVE</title><title>International journal of health services</title><addtitle>Int J Health Serv</addtitle><description>Mammography screening is a profit-driven technology posing risks compounded by unreliability. In striking contrast, annual clinical breast examination (CBE) by a trained health professional, together with monthly breast self-examination (BSE), is safe, at least as effective, and low in cost. International programs for training nurses how to perform CBE and teach BSE are critical and overdue.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>American Cancer Society</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Self-Examination - standards</subject><subject>Conflict of Interest</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mammography - economics</subject><subject>Mammography - standards</subject><subject>Mass Screening - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>National Institutes of Health (U.S.)</subject><subject>Palpation</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Selfexamination</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Women's Health</subject><issn>0020-7314</issn><issn>1541-4469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCL0Agn_ZEYMax88HNbZ02Upqu0uxqe7LyYaOt2s0Stwf-PYlawbGn8UjP-47kh5DPCN8ZxvCDFcu5B6IMvGmxBQ9n6ukNmaDg6HEexG_JBICBF_rIb8gH53bjGiC8JzeIImAA0YTs5zJfqGJDZT6nD3mhslRO0ywtt3Sd0JVcrdaLQt4vtz_ptFByU1L1JFdpLst0ndN0yNGNTNQ3qpJEzcr0cXiOVfeFHLaZzKjMSlWM_KP6SN7Zau_Mp8u8JQ-JKmdLL1svRtZruAiPnvBF4FtWBQFrWkSEytqqCmvgdW0DwWIWQVQbAaGJrW1tg8KvmnYIs7AFG_i35O7c-9p3v0_GHfXh2TVmv69eTHdyOkSMUMTxVVCEIcaR4FdBP2JRFHF2FRwOA8YcB9A_g03fOdcbq1_750PV_9EIevSrR7969KtHv3r0O6S-XupP9cG0_zMXoQMAZ8BVv4zedaf-ZfjpK51fzpGdO3b9v0ou0GcMYv8v0yawBg</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Epstein, Samuel S.</creator><creator>Bertell, Rosalie</creator><creator>Seaman, Barbara</creator><general>Baywood Publishing Company, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>DANGERS AND UNRELIABILITY OF MAMMOGRAPHY: BREAST EXAMINATION IS A SAFE, EFFECTIVE, AND PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVE</title><author>Epstein, Samuel S. ; Bertell, Rosalie ; Seaman, Barbara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-53563f2a662cd1110affaa7b04bbf65292808be507e9ffdfc153acdc4527d0f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>American Cancer Society</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Self-Examination - standards</topic><topic>Conflict of Interest</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mammography - economics</topic><topic>Mammography - standards</topic><topic>Mass Screening - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>National Institutes of Health (U.S.)</topic><topic>Palpation</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Selfexamination</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Women's Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Samuel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertell, Rosalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seaman, Barbara</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of health services</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Epstein, Samuel S.</au><au>Bertell, Rosalie</au><au>Seaman, Barbara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DANGERS AND UNRELIABILITY OF MAMMOGRAPHY: BREAST EXAMINATION IS A SAFE, EFFECTIVE, AND PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVE</atitle><jtitle>International journal of health services</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Health Serv</addtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>605</spage><epage>615</epage><pages>605-615</pages><issn>0020-7314</issn><eissn>1541-4469</eissn><coden>IJHSC6</coden><abstract>Mammography screening is a profit-driven technology posing risks compounded by unreliability. In striking contrast, annual clinical breast examination (CBE) by a trained health professional, together with monthly breast self-examination (BSE), is safe, at least as effective, and low in cost. International programs for training nurses how to perform CBE and teach BSE are critical and overdue.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Baywood Publishing Company, Inc</pub><pmid>11562008</pmid><doi>10.2190/2RHD-05T6-BRY0-1CEX</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0020-7314 |
| ispartof | International journal of health services, 2001-01, Vol.31 (3), p.605-615 |
| issn | 0020-7314 1541-4469 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71181599 |
| source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Adult Aged American Cancer Society Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Self-Examination - standards Conflict of Interest False Negative Reactions False Positive Reactions Female Health Health care Health services Humans Mammography Mammography - adverse effects Mammography - economics Mammography - standards Mass Screening - adverse effects Mass Screening - economics Mass Screening - methods Medicine Middle Aged National Institutes of Health (U.S.) Palpation Public health reliability Reproducibility of Results Risk Factors Safety Screening Selfexamination Technology U.S.A United States Women's Health |
| title | DANGERS AND UNRELIABILITY OF MAMMOGRAPHY: BREAST EXAMINATION IS A SAFE, EFFECTIVE, AND PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVE |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A06%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DANGERS%20AND%20UNRELIABILITY%20OF%20MAMMOGRAPHY:%20BREAST%20EXAMINATION%20IS%20A%20SAFE,%20EFFECTIVE,%20AND%20PRACTICAL%20ALTERNATIVE&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20health%20services&rft.au=Epstein,%20Samuel%20S.&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=605&rft.epage=615&rft.pages=605-615&rft.issn=0020-7314&rft.eissn=1541-4469&rft.coden=IJHSC6&rft_id=info:doi/10.2190/2RHD-05T6-BRY0-1CEX&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45132209%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18101941&rft_id=info:pmid/11562008&rft_jstor_id=45132209&rft_sage_id=10.2190_2RHD-05T6-BRY0-1CEX&rfr_iscdi=true |