Measuring the effectiveness of bioptic telescopes for persons with central vision loss
1) To evaluate a vision rehabilitation program aimed at training persons with central vision loss to use a bioptic telescope for improving life skills, including driving and 2) to compare the outcomes of subjects who are given bioptic telescopes and training, with subjects who are prescribed telesco...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of rehabilitation research and development 2000, Vol.37 (1), p.101-108 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 108 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | Journal of rehabilitation research and development |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | SZLYK, Janet P SEIPLE, William LADERMAN, Denice J KELSCH, Roger STELMACK, Joan MCMAHON, Timothy |
description | 1) To evaluate a vision rehabilitation program aimed at training persons with central vision loss to use a bioptic telescope for improving life skills, including driving and 2) to compare the outcomes of subjects who are given bioptic telescopes and training, with subjects who are prescribed telescopic lenses without training.
Twenty-five subjects ranging in age from 16 to 78 years were included in the study. Each subject was randomized to one of three groups: Group 1 received bioptic telescopes and training during the first approximately 3-month-long period of the approximately 6-month-long study; Group 2 received lenses and training during the second approximately 3-month-long period of the study; and Group 3 received the lenses for approximately 3 months without any training. An assessment battery consisting of clinical vision tests, functional tasks evaluated by an orientation and mobility specialist, driving skills evaluated by a kinesiotherapist specializing in driver's education, and psychophysical measures was administered to Groups 1 and 2 at baseline, and at approximately 3 and 6 months, and to Group 3 at baseline and at approximately 3 months. The tasks were categorized into 6 major functional categories: Recognition, Mobility, Peripheral Identification, Scanning, Tracking, and Visual Memory. Training consisted of 5 weeks of laboratory-based training focusing on skills within these 6 categories, and 8 weeks of on-road driving training.
There was significant improvement in all task categories with use of the telescopes. There was improvement in all task groups with training, though a significant difference between the trained and untrained groups existed only in the Recognition, Peripheral Identification, and Scanning Categories, but not in Mobility, Tracking, or Visual Memory. When the tasks involving driving-related skills were analyzed separately, training also had a significant effect.
There was significant improvement in visual skills with the use of a bioptic telescope. This improvement was greater with training in the use of the lenses in a number of visual skills categories including driving-related skills. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71170904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>53311720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p263t-e234bab3cb910de5692625b8a7328c0986747c589fb4232235d0e4e74343ad1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0EtLxDAUBeAgijOO_gUJIu4KeU6apQy-YMSNui1peutk6DQ1N1X89xYcQVzdzcflnHNA5tzKsuBSi0MyZ0aVhTGcz8gJ4pYxJqTgx2TGWamMNmZOXh_B4ZhC_0bzBii0LfgcPqAHRBpbWoc45OBphg7QxwGQtjHRARLGHulnyBvqoc_JdfQjYIg97SLiKTlqXYdwtr8L8nJ787y6L9ZPdw-r63UxiKXMBQipaldLX1vOGtBLK5ZC16UzUpSe2XJplPG6tG2tpuhC6oaBAqOkkq7hjVyQq5-_Q4rvI2CudgE9dJ3rIY5YTd0Ns0xN8OIf3MYx9VO2SnAt7DSGnND5Ho31DppqSGHn0lf1O9cELvfAoXddm1zvA_5xVmur5Te5bHOm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215295773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the effectiveness of bioptic telescopes for persons with central vision loss</title><source>U.S. Government Documents</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>SZLYK, Janet P ; SEIPLE, William ; LADERMAN, Denice J ; KELSCH, Roger ; STELMACK, Joan ; MCMAHON, Timothy</creator><creatorcontrib>SZLYK, Janet P ; SEIPLE, William ; LADERMAN, Denice J ; KELSCH, Roger ; STELMACK, Joan ; MCMAHON, Timothy</creatorcontrib><description>1) To evaluate a vision rehabilitation program aimed at training persons with central vision loss to use a bioptic telescope for improving life skills, including driving and 2) to compare the outcomes of subjects who are given bioptic telescopes and training, with subjects who are prescribed telescopic lenses without training.
Twenty-five subjects ranging in age from 16 to 78 years were included in the study. Each subject was randomized to one of three groups: Group 1 received bioptic telescopes and training during the first approximately 3-month-long period of the approximately 6-month-long study; Group 2 received lenses and training during the second approximately 3-month-long period of the study; and Group 3 received the lenses for approximately 3 months without any training. An assessment battery consisting of clinical vision tests, functional tasks evaluated by an orientation and mobility specialist, driving skills evaluated by a kinesiotherapist specializing in driver's education, and psychophysical measures was administered to Groups 1 and 2 at baseline, and at approximately 3 and 6 months, and to Group 3 at baseline and at approximately 3 months. The tasks were categorized into 6 major functional categories: Recognition, Mobility, Peripheral Identification, Scanning, Tracking, and Visual Memory. Training consisted of 5 weeks of laboratory-based training focusing on skills within these 6 categories, and 8 weeks of on-road driving training.
There was significant improvement in all task categories with use of the telescopes. There was improvement in all task groups with training, though a significant difference between the trained and untrained groups existed only in the Recognition, Peripheral Identification, and Scanning Categories, but not in Mobility, Tracking, or Visual Memory. When the tasks involving driving-related skills were analyzed separately, training also had a significant effect.
There was significant improvement in visual skills with the use of a bioptic telescope. This improvement was greater with training in the use of the lenses in a number of visual skills categories including driving-related skills.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1352</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10847577</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRRDDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, MD: Rehabilitation Research and Development Service</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Audiovisual Aids - utilization ; Automobile Driving ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the eye ; Eyes & eyesight ; Female ; Humans ; Lenses ; Male ; Medical disorders ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prognosis ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Rehabilitation ; Telescopes ; Treatment Outcome ; Vision, Low - diagnosis ; Vision, Low - rehabilitation ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 2000, Vol.37 (1), p.101-108</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Superintendent of Documents Jan/Feb 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1095595$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10847577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SZLYK, Janet P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEIPLE, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LADERMAN, Denice J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELSCH, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STELMACK, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCMAHON, Timothy</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the effectiveness of bioptic telescopes for persons with central vision loss</title><title>Journal of rehabilitation research and development</title><addtitle>J Rehabil Res Dev</addtitle><description>1) To evaluate a vision rehabilitation program aimed at training persons with central vision loss to use a bioptic telescope for improving life skills, including driving and 2) to compare the outcomes of subjects who are given bioptic telescopes and training, with subjects who are prescribed telescopic lenses without training.
Twenty-five subjects ranging in age from 16 to 78 years were included in the study. Each subject was randomized to one of three groups: Group 1 received bioptic telescopes and training during the first approximately 3-month-long period of the approximately 6-month-long study; Group 2 received lenses and training during the second approximately 3-month-long period of the study; and Group 3 received the lenses for approximately 3 months without any training. An assessment battery consisting of clinical vision tests, functional tasks evaluated by an orientation and mobility specialist, driving skills evaluated by a kinesiotherapist specializing in driver's education, and psychophysical measures was administered to Groups 1 and 2 at baseline, and at approximately 3 and 6 months, and to Group 3 at baseline and at approximately 3 months. The tasks were categorized into 6 major functional categories: Recognition, Mobility, Peripheral Identification, Scanning, Tracking, and Visual Memory. Training consisted of 5 weeks of laboratory-based training focusing on skills within these 6 categories, and 8 weeks of on-road driving training.
There was significant improvement in all task categories with use of the telescopes. There was improvement in all task groups with training, though a significant difference between the trained and untrained groups existed only in the Recognition, Peripheral Identification, and Scanning Categories, but not in Mobility, Tracking, or Visual Memory. When the tasks involving driving-related skills were analyzed separately, training also had a significant effect.
There was significant improvement in visual skills with the use of a bioptic telescope. This improvement was greater with training in the use of the lenses in a number of visual skills categories including driving-related skills.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Audiovisual Aids - utilization</subject><subject>Automobile Driving</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the eye</subject><subject>Eyes & eyesight</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lenses</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical disorders</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Telescopes</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vision, Low - diagnosis</subject><subject>Vision, Low - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>0748-7711</issn><issn>1938-1352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0EtLxDAUBeAgijOO_gUJIu4KeU6apQy-YMSNui1peutk6DQ1N1X89xYcQVzdzcflnHNA5tzKsuBSi0MyZ0aVhTGcz8gJ4pYxJqTgx2TGWamMNmZOXh_B4ZhC_0bzBii0LfgcPqAHRBpbWoc45OBphg7QxwGQtjHRARLGHulnyBvqoc_JdfQjYIg97SLiKTlqXYdwtr8L8nJ787y6L9ZPdw-r63UxiKXMBQipaldLX1vOGtBLK5ZC16UzUpSe2XJplPG6tG2tpuhC6oaBAqOkkq7hjVyQq5-_Q4rvI2CudgE9dJ3rIY5YTd0Ns0xN8OIf3MYx9VO2SnAt7DSGnND5Ho31DppqSGHn0lf1O9cELvfAoXddm1zvA_5xVmur5Te5bHOm</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>SZLYK, Janet P</creator><creator>SEIPLE, William</creator><creator>LADERMAN, Denice J</creator><creator>KELSCH, Roger</creator><creator>STELMACK, Joan</creator><creator>MCMAHON, Timothy</creator><general>Rehabilitation Research and Development Service</general><general>Superintendent of Documents</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Measuring the effectiveness of bioptic telescopes for persons with central vision loss</title><author>SZLYK, Janet P ; SEIPLE, William ; LADERMAN, Denice J ; KELSCH, Roger ; STELMACK, Joan ; MCMAHON, Timothy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p263t-e234bab3cb910de5692625b8a7328c0986747c589fb4232235d0e4e74343ad1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Audiovisual Aids - utilization</topic><topic>Automobile Driving</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the eye</topic><topic>Eyes & eyesight</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lenses</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical disorders</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Telescopes</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vision, Low - diagnosis</topic><topic>Vision, Low - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SZLYK, Janet P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEIPLE, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LADERMAN, Denice J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELSCH, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STELMACK, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCMAHON, Timothy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of rehabilitation research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SZLYK, Janet P</au><au>SEIPLE, William</au><au>LADERMAN, Denice J</au><au>KELSCH, Roger</au><au>STELMACK, Joan</au><au>MCMAHON, Timothy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the effectiveness of bioptic telescopes for persons with central vision loss</atitle><jtitle>Journal of rehabilitation research and development</jtitle><addtitle>J Rehabil Res Dev</addtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>101-108</pages><issn>0748-7711</issn><eissn>1938-1352</eissn><coden>JRRDDB</coden><abstract>1) To evaluate a vision rehabilitation program aimed at training persons with central vision loss to use a bioptic telescope for improving life skills, including driving and 2) to compare the outcomes of subjects who are given bioptic telescopes and training, with subjects who are prescribed telescopic lenses without training.
Twenty-five subjects ranging in age from 16 to 78 years were included in the study. Each subject was randomized to one of three groups: Group 1 received bioptic telescopes and training during the first approximately 3-month-long period of the approximately 6-month-long study; Group 2 received lenses and training during the second approximately 3-month-long period of the study; and Group 3 received the lenses for approximately 3 months without any training. An assessment battery consisting of clinical vision tests, functional tasks evaluated by an orientation and mobility specialist, driving skills evaluated by a kinesiotherapist specializing in driver's education, and psychophysical measures was administered to Groups 1 and 2 at baseline, and at approximately 3 and 6 months, and to Group 3 at baseline and at approximately 3 months. The tasks were categorized into 6 major functional categories: Recognition, Mobility, Peripheral Identification, Scanning, Tracking, and Visual Memory. Training consisted of 5 weeks of laboratory-based training focusing on skills within these 6 categories, and 8 weeks of on-road driving training.
There was significant improvement in all task categories with use of the telescopes. There was improvement in all task groups with training, though a significant difference between the trained and untrained groups existed only in the Recognition, Peripheral Identification, and Scanning Categories, but not in Mobility, Tracking, or Visual Memory. When the tasks involving driving-related skills were analyzed separately, training also had a significant effect.
There was significant improvement in visual skills with the use of a bioptic telescope. This improvement was greater with training in the use of the lenses in a number of visual skills categories including driving-related skills.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, MD</cop><pub>Rehabilitation Research and Development Service</pub><pmid>10847577</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0748-7711 |
ispartof | Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 2000, Vol.37 (1), p.101-108 |
issn | 0748-7711 1938-1352 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71170904 |
source | U.S. Government Documents; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Audiovisual Aids - utilization Automobile Driving Biological and medical sciences Diseases of the eye Eyes & eyesight Female Humans Lenses Male Medical disorders Medical sciences Middle Aged Patient Satisfaction Prognosis Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Rehabilitation Telescopes Treatment Outcome Vision, Low - diagnosis Vision, Low - rehabilitation Visual Acuity |
title | Measuring the effectiveness of bioptic telescopes for persons with central vision loss |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A35%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20bioptic%20telescopes%20for%20persons%20with%20central%20vision%20loss&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20rehabilitation%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=SZLYK,%20Janet%20P&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=101-108&rft.issn=0748-7711&rft.eissn=1938-1352&rft.coden=JRRDDB&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E53311720%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215295773&rft_id=info:pmid/10847577&rfr_iscdi=true |