Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: a contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality

Objectives. To compare postoperative morbidity and mortality in a concurrent and contemporary series of patients who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder. Methods. The data of 198 patients were reviewed, 117 with orthotopic reconstruction and 81 with ileal con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2000-06, Vol.55 (6), p.852-855
Hauptverfasser: Parekh, Dipen J, Gilbert, W.Barritt, Koch, Michael O, Smith, Joseph A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 855
container_issue 6
container_start_page 852
container_title Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)
container_volume 55
creator Parekh, Dipen J
Gilbert, W.Barritt
Koch, Michael O
Smith, Joseph A
description Objectives. To compare postoperative morbidity and mortality in a concurrent and contemporary series of patients who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder. Methods. The data of 198 patients were reviewed, 117 with orthotopic reconstruction and 81 with ileal conduit during a 5-year time frame. Thirty-day morbidity, mortality, reoperative rates, and parameters associated with the surgical procedures were obtained from chart review. Results. No perioperative or postoperative deaths occurred in either group. The median operative time for the ileal conduit was 201 minutes (range 140 to 373), and for the orthotopic neobladder, it was 270 minutes (range 230 to 425). The median blood loss was 389 and 474 mL, respectively. The median length of hospitalization was 8 days for the ileal conduit group and 7 days for the orthotopic neobladder group. Diversion-related complications recognized within 30 days that ultimately required a return to the operating room occurred in 3.4% of those with a neobladder and 1.2% of those with an ileal conduit. Conclusions. The orthotopic neobladder is a longer and technically more complex procedure than the ileal conduit procedure. However, no demonstrable difference in morbidity or perioperative complications were found between the two procedures in our review.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00619-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71169011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429599006196</els_id><sourcerecordid>71169011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-db7ec742f9e662564f04622124c9c00bb1a41d3dc860d475198b2e13729738063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuqFDEQhoMonvHoIyi9ENFFa9Kdy8SNyOANDrhQ1yGdVEtJd9Im6YHzDj606ZlB3blJqqjvr0rqJ-Qxoy8ZZfLVF0o1bXmnxXOtX1AqmW7lHbJjolOt1lrcJbs_yBV5kPMPWikp1X1yxeieb8Ud-XWIoWCAUJo1YbDptkngYsglra5gDM0RUl5zgxPYqakVv2J53dgtLDAvMW2ajOH7BC1WHZb1pHNxXmzCXMM4NgskjPWwBY_QzDEN6LHcNjb4LSt2qtlDcm-0U4ZHl_uafHv_7uvhY3vz-cOnw9ub1oleldYPCpzi3ahByk5IPlIuu4513GlH6TAwy5nvvdtL6rkSTO-HDlivOq36PZX9NXl27ruk-HOFXMyM2cE02QBxzUYxJjVlrILiDLoUc04wmiXhXD9sGDWbDeZkg9l2bLQ2JxvMNuDJZcA6zOD_UZ33XoGnF8BmZ6cx2eAw_-U4FVroir05Y1C3cURIJjuE4MBjdakYH_E_L_kN0m2n7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71169011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: a contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Parekh, Dipen J ; Gilbert, W.Barritt ; Koch, Michael O ; Smith, Joseph A</creator><creatorcontrib>Parekh, Dipen J ; Gilbert, W.Barritt ; Koch, Michael O ; Smith, Joseph A</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. To compare postoperative morbidity and mortality in a concurrent and contemporary series of patients who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder. Methods. The data of 198 patients were reviewed, 117 with orthotopic reconstruction and 81 with ileal conduit during a 5-year time frame. Thirty-day morbidity, mortality, reoperative rates, and parameters associated with the surgical procedures were obtained from chart review. Results. No perioperative or postoperative deaths occurred in either group. The median operative time for the ileal conduit was 201 minutes (range 140 to 373), and for the orthotopic neobladder, it was 270 minutes (range 230 to 425). The median blood loss was 389 and 474 mL, respectively. The median length of hospitalization was 8 days for the ileal conduit group and 7 days for the orthotopic neobladder group. Diversion-related complications recognized within 30 days that ultimately required a return to the operating room occurred in 3.4% of those with a neobladder and 1.2% of those with an ileal conduit. Conclusions. The orthotopic neobladder is a longer and technically more complex procedure than the ileal conduit procedure. However, no demonstrable difference in morbidity or perioperative complications were found between the two procedures in our review.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00619-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10840090</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URGYAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cystectomy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Postoperative Complications ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the urinary system ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urinary Diversion ; Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2000-06, Vol.55 (6), p.852-855</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-db7ec742f9e662564f04622124c9c00bb1a41d3dc860d475198b2e13729738063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-db7ec742f9e662564f04622124c9c00bb1a41d3dc860d475198b2e13729738063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00619-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1405959$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10840090$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parekh, Dipen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, W.Barritt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Michael O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joseph A</creatorcontrib><title>Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: a contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>Objectives. To compare postoperative morbidity and mortality in a concurrent and contemporary series of patients who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder. Methods. The data of 198 patients were reviewed, 117 with orthotopic reconstruction and 81 with ileal conduit during a 5-year time frame. Thirty-day morbidity, mortality, reoperative rates, and parameters associated with the surgical procedures were obtained from chart review. Results. No perioperative or postoperative deaths occurred in either group. The median operative time for the ileal conduit was 201 minutes (range 140 to 373), and for the orthotopic neobladder, it was 270 minutes (range 230 to 425). The median blood loss was 389 and 474 mL, respectively. The median length of hospitalization was 8 days for the ileal conduit group and 7 days for the orthotopic neobladder group. Diversion-related complications recognized within 30 days that ultimately required a return to the operating room occurred in 3.4% of those with a neobladder and 1.2% of those with an ileal conduit. Conclusions. The orthotopic neobladder is a longer and technically more complex procedure than the ileal conduit procedure. However, no demonstrable difference in morbidity or perioperative complications were found between the two procedures in our review.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cystectomy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the urinary system</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Diversion</subject><subject>Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuqFDEQhoMonvHoIyi9ENFFa9Kdy8SNyOANDrhQ1yGdVEtJd9Im6YHzDj606ZlB3blJqqjvr0rqJ-Qxoy8ZZfLVF0o1bXmnxXOtX1AqmW7lHbJjolOt1lrcJbs_yBV5kPMPWikp1X1yxeieb8Ud-XWIoWCAUJo1YbDptkngYsglra5gDM0RUl5zgxPYqakVv2J53dgtLDAvMW2ajOH7BC1WHZb1pHNxXmzCXMM4NgskjPWwBY_QzDEN6LHcNjb4LSt2qtlDcm-0U4ZHl_uafHv_7uvhY3vz-cOnw9ub1oleldYPCpzi3ahByk5IPlIuu4513GlH6TAwy5nvvdtL6rkSTO-HDlivOq36PZX9NXl27ruk-HOFXMyM2cE02QBxzUYxJjVlrILiDLoUc04wmiXhXD9sGDWbDeZkg9l2bLQ2JxvMNuDJZcA6zOD_UZ33XoGnF8BmZ6cx2eAw_-U4FVroir05Y1C3cURIJjuE4MBjdakYH_E_L_kN0m2n7w</recordid><startdate>20000601</startdate><enddate>20000601</enddate><creator>Parekh, Dipen J</creator><creator>Gilbert, W.Barritt</creator><creator>Koch, Michael O</creator><creator>Smith, Joseph A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000601</creationdate><title>Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: a contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality</title><author>Parekh, Dipen J ; Gilbert, W.Barritt ; Koch, Michael O ; Smith, Joseph A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-db7ec742f9e662564f04622124c9c00bb1a41d3dc860d475198b2e13729738063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cystectomy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the urinary system</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Diversion</topic><topic>Urinary Reservoirs, Continent</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parekh, Dipen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, W.Barritt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Michael O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joseph A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parekh, Dipen J</au><au>Gilbert, W.Barritt</au><au>Koch, Michael O</au><au>Smith, Joseph A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: a contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2000-06-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>852</spage><epage>855</epage><pages>852-855</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><coden>URGYAZ</coden><abstract>Objectives. To compare postoperative morbidity and mortality in a concurrent and contemporary series of patients who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder. Methods. The data of 198 patients were reviewed, 117 with orthotopic reconstruction and 81 with ileal conduit during a 5-year time frame. Thirty-day morbidity, mortality, reoperative rates, and parameters associated with the surgical procedures were obtained from chart review. Results. No perioperative or postoperative deaths occurred in either group. The median operative time for the ileal conduit was 201 minutes (range 140 to 373), and for the orthotopic neobladder, it was 270 minutes (range 230 to 425). The median blood loss was 389 and 474 mL, respectively. The median length of hospitalization was 8 days for the ileal conduit group and 7 days for the orthotopic neobladder group. Diversion-related complications recognized within 30 days that ultimately required a return to the operating room occurred in 3.4% of those with a neobladder and 1.2% of those with an ileal conduit. Conclusions. The orthotopic neobladder is a longer and technically more complex procedure than the ileal conduit procedure. However, no demonstrable difference in morbidity or perioperative complications were found between the two procedures in our review.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10840090</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00619-6</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2000-06, Vol.55 (6), p.852-855
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71169011
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Cystectomy
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Postoperative Complications
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the urinary system
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery
Urinary Diversion
Urinary Reservoirs, Continent
title Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: a contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T15%3A00%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continent%20urinary%20reconstruction%20versus%20ileal%20conduit:%20a%20contemporary%20single-institution%20comparison%20of%20perioperative%20morbidity%20and%20mortality&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Parekh,%20Dipen%20J&rft.date=2000-06-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=852&rft.epage=855&rft.pages=852-855&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft.coden=URGYAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00619-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71169011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71169011&rft_id=info:pmid/10840090&rft_els_id=S0090429599006196&rfr_iscdi=true