Effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional and crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene studied with a multi-directional motion pin-on-disk device

The effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional γ‐sterilized, and electron‐beam‐crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene was studied with a circularly translating pin‐on‐disk device. The counterfaces, CoCr disks, were either polished, or roughened so that they represented...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomedical materials research 2001-12, Vol.57 (4), p.506-512
Hauptverfasser: Saikko, Vesa, Calonius, Olof, Keränen, Jaakko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 512
container_issue 4
container_start_page 506
container_title Journal of biomedical materials research
container_volume 57
creator Saikko, Vesa
Calonius, Olof
Keränen, Jaakko
description The effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional γ‐sterilized, and electron‐beam‐crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene was studied with a circularly translating pin‐on‐disk device. The counterfaces, CoCr disks, were either polished, or roughened so that they represented the type of roughening and the range of surface roughness values (Ra = 0.014–0.24 μm) observed in explanted femoral heads of total hip prostheses. The lubricant was diluted calf serum, and the test length 3 million cycles. A total of 24 tests were done. With both types of polyethylene, there was a strong correlation between Ra and wear factor k. The power equations were k = 5.87 × 10−5(Ra)0.91 for conventional polyethylene (R2 = 0.94), and k = 7.87 × 10−5(Ra)2.49 for crosslinked polyethylene (R2 = 0.82). Crosslinking improved wear resistance significantly. The wear of crosslinked polyethylene against the roughest counterfaces was lower than the wear of conventional polyethylene against the polished counterfaces. Against rough counterfaces, the wear of crosslinked polyethylene was an order of magnitude lower than that of conventional polyethylene. On the crosslinked polyethylene pins that were tested against polished counterfaces, remains of original machining marks were still visible after the test. The average size of wear particles produced by both types of polyethylene against rough counterfaces was similar, 0.4 μm, whereas that produced by conventional and crosslinked polyethylene against polished counterfaces was significantly smaller, 0.2 and 0.1 μm, respectively. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 57: 506–512, 2001
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1097-4636(20011215)57:4<506::AID-JBM1196>3.0.CO;2-H
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71167708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26709884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-26713f8da093b8ccb1ccd2901a1f09a26c2501063830da68cf7a5cde1de00e0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkd9u0zAUhyMEYqXwCsg3ILhIOY7zt0NIo4x100YvGNul5Toni2liFztZ6UvxjLik226QEFe2j7_z85G_IDikMKEA0TsKRRbGKUvfRACURjR5m2TT-H0C6XR6dPopPPt4QWmRfmATmMwWh1E4fxSM7rseByOfQsOCQXwQPHPuOwAUBaNPgwNKk4TlOYyCX8dVhbIjpiLS9LpDWwmJxJr-ptboHDGadDWSDQo7QPoWdaeMFg0RuiTSGucapVdYkr7prKjVTU1a06DsG9-zQX_uyNo0W-zqbYMaiev6Unl-o7qaCNL6PhWWyvpBhuDW7DZkrXRotL9xK1LirZL4PHhSicbhi_06Dr59Pr6czcPzxcnp7Og8lHEapWGUZpRVeSmgYMtcyiWVsowKoIJWUIgolVECFFKWMyhFmssqE4kskZYIgIBsHLwectfW_OjRdbxVTmLTCI2mdzyjNM0yyP8J-kmgyPPYg18H8M-HWaz42qpW2C2nwHe--c4c35njd7554gvc--bc--Z735xx4LMFj_jcp77cP98vWywfMveCPfBqDwgnRVNZoaVyD1wMRbL7iHFwPXAb1eD2v2b7-2h3JZ8cDsnKdfjzPlnYFU8zliX8-ssJz-nZxTy_uuKX7DczFeSr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26709884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional and crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene studied with a multi-directional motion pin-on-disk device</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Saikko, Vesa ; Calonius, Olof ; Keränen, Jaakko</creator><creatorcontrib>Saikko, Vesa ; Calonius, Olof ; Keränen, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional γ‐sterilized, and electron‐beam‐crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene was studied with a circularly translating pin‐on‐disk device. The counterfaces, CoCr disks, were either polished, or roughened so that they represented the type of roughening and the range of surface roughness values (Ra = 0.014–0.24 μm) observed in explanted femoral heads of total hip prostheses. The lubricant was diluted calf serum, and the test length 3 million cycles. A total of 24 tests were done. With both types of polyethylene, there was a strong correlation between Ra and wear factor k. The power equations were k = 5.87 × 10−5(Ra)0.91 for conventional polyethylene (R2 = 0.94), and k = 7.87 × 10−5(Ra)2.49 for crosslinked polyethylene (R2 = 0.82). Crosslinking improved wear resistance significantly. The wear of crosslinked polyethylene against the roughest counterfaces was lower than the wear of conventional polyethylene against the polished counterfaces. Against rough counterfaces, the wear of crosslinked polyethylene was an order of magnitude lower than that of conventional polyethylene. On the crosslinked polyethylene pins that were tested against polished counterfaces, remains of original machining marks were still visible after the test. The average size of wear particles produced by both types of polyethylene against rough counterfaces was similar, 0.4 μm, whereas that produced by conventional and crosslinked polyethylene against polished counterfaces was significantly smaller, 0.2 and 0.1 μm, respectively. © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 57: 506–512, 2001</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9304</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4636</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(20011215)57:4&lt;506::AID-JBM1196&gt;3.0.CO;2-H</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11553880</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBMRBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biocompatible Materials ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chromium Alloys - chemistry ; crosslinking ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Orthopedic surgery ; Particle Size ; Polyethylene - chemistry ; Regression Analysis ; Surface Properties ; surface roughness ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments ; total hip prosthesis ; ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene ; wear</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research, 2001-12, Vol.57 (4), p.506-512</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 57: 506-512, 2001</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-26713f8da093b8ccb1ccd2901a1f09a26c2501063830da68cf7a5cde1de00e0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F1097-4636%2820011215%2957%3A4%3C506%3A%3AAID-JBM1196%3E3.0.CO%3B2-H$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F1097-4636%2820011215%2957%3A4%3C506%3A%3AAID-JBM1196%3E3.0.CO%3B2-H$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14095106$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11553880$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saikko, Vesa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calonius, Olof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keränen, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional and crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene studied with a multi-directional motion pin-on-disk device</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>The effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional γ‐sterilized, and electron‐beam‐crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene was studied with a circularly translating pin‐on‐disk device. The counterfaces, CoCr disks, were either polished, or roughened so that they represented the type of roughening and the range of surface roughness values (Ra = 0.014–0.24 μm) observed in explanted femoral heads of total hip prostheses. The lubricant was diluted calf serum, and the test length 3 million cycles. A total of 24 tests were done. With both types of polyethylene, there was a strong correlation between Ra and wear factor k. The power equations were k = 5.87 × 10−5(Ra)0.91 for conventional polyethylene (R2 = 0.94), and k = 7.87 × 10−5(Ra)2.49 for crosslinked polyethylene (R2 = 0.82). Crosslinking improved wear resistance significantly. The wear of crosslinked polyethylene against the roughest counterfaces was lower than the wear of conventional polyethylene against the polished counterfaces. Against rough counterfaces, the wear of crosslinked polyethylene was an order of magnitude lower than that of conventional polyethylene. On the crosslinked polyethylene pins that were tested against polished counterfaces, remains of original machining marks were still visible after the test. The average size of wear particles produced by both types of polyethylene against rough counterfaces was similar, 0.4 μm, whereas that produced by conventional and crosslinked polyethylene against polished counterfaces was significantly smaller, 0.2 and 0.1 μm, respectively. © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 57: 506–512, 2001</description><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chromium Alloys - chemistry</subject><subject>crosslinking</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Polyethylene - chemistry</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>surface roughness</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</subject><subject>total hip prosthesis</subject><subject>ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene</subject><subject>wear</subject><issn>0021-9304</issn><issn>1097-4636</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkd9u0zAUhyMEYqXwCsg3ILhIOY7zt0NIo4x100YvGNul5Toni2liFztZ6UvxjLik226QEFe2j7_z85G_IDikMKEA0TsKRRbGKUvfRACURjR5m2TT-H0C6XR6dPopPPt4QWmRfmATmMwWh1E4fxSM7rseByOfQsOCQXwQPHPuOwAUBaNPgwNKk4TlOYyCX8dVhbIjpiLS9LpDWwmJxJr-ptboHDGadDWSDQo7QPoWdaeMFg0RuiTSGucapVdYkr7prKjVTU1a06DsG9-zQX_uyNo0W-zqbYMaiev6Unl-o7qaCNL6PhWWyvpBhuDW7DZkrXRotL9xK1LirZL4PHhSicbhi_06Dr59Pr6czcPzxcnp7Og8lHEapWGUZpRVeSmgYMtcyiWVsowKoIJWUIgolVECFFKWMyhFmssqE4kskZYIgIBsHLwectfW_OjRdbxVTmLTCI2mdzyjNM0yyP8J-kmgyPPYg18H8M-HWaz42qpW2C2nwHe--c4c35njd7554gvc--bc--Z735xx4LMFj_jcp77cP98vWywfMveCPfBqDwgnRVNZoaVyD1wMRbL7iHFwPXAb1eD2v2b7-2h3JZ8cDsnKdfjzPlnYFU8zliX8-ssJz-nZxTy_uuKX7DczFeSr</recordid><startdate>20011215</startdate><enddate>20011215</enddate><creator>Saikko, Vesa</creator><creator>Calonius, Olof</creator><creator>Keränen, Jaakko</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011215</creationdate><title>Effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional and crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene studied with a multi-directional motion pin-on-disk device</title><author>Saikko, Vesa ; Calonius, Olof ; Keränen, Jaakko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4626-26713f8da093b8ccb1ccd2901a1f09a26c2501063830da68cf7a5cde1de00e0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chromium Alloys - chemistry</topic><topic>crosslinking</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Polyethylene - chemistry</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>surface roughness</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</topic><topic>total hip prosthesis</topic><topic>ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene</topic><topic>wear</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saikko, Vesa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calonius, Olof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keränen, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saikko, Vesa</au><au>Calonius, Olof</au><au>Keränen, Jaakko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional and crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene studied with a multi-directional motion pin-on-disk device</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>2001-12-15</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>506</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>506-512</pages><issn>0021-9304</issn><eissn>1097-4636</eissn><coden>JBMRBG</coden><abstract>The effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional γ‐sterilized, and electron‐beam‐crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene was studied with a circularly translating pin‐on‐disk device. The counterfaces, CoCr disks, were either polished, or roughened so that they represented the type of roughening and the range of surface roughness values (Ra = 0.014–0.24 μm) observed in explanted femoral heads of total hip prostheses. The lubricant was diluted calf serum, and the test length 3 million cycles. A total of 24 tests were done. With both types of polyethylene, there was a strong correlation between Ra and wear factor k. The power equations were k = 5.87 × 10−5(Ra)0.91 for conventional polyethylene (R2 = 0.94), and k = 7.87 × 10−5(Ra)2.49 for crosslinked polyethylene (R2 = 0.82). Crosslinking improved wear resistance significantly. The wear of crosslinked polyethylene against the roughest counterfaces was lower than the wear of conventional polyethylene against the polished counterfaces. Against rough counterfaces, the wear of crosslinked polyethylene was an order of magnitude lower than that of conventional polyethylene. On the crosslinked polyethylene pins that were tested against polished counterfaces, remains of original machining marks were still visible after the test. The average size of wear particles produced by both types of polyethylene against rough counterfaces was similar, 0.4 μm, whereas that produced by conventional and crosslinked polyethylene against polished counterfaces was significantly smaller, 0.2 and 0.1 μm, respectively. © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 57: 506–512, 2001</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>11553880</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-4636(20011215)57:4&lt;506::AID-JBM1196&gt;3.0.CO;2-H</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9304
ispartof Journal of biomedical materials research, 2001-12, Vol.57 (4), p.506-512
issn 0021-9304
1097-4636
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71167708
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Biocompatible Materials
Biological and medical sciences
Chromium Alloys - chemistry
crosslinking
Equipment Failure Analysis
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Medical sciences
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Orthopedic surgery
Particle Size
Polyethylene - chemistry
Regression Analysis
Surface Properties
surface roughness
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments
total hip prosthesis
ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene
wear
title Effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional and crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene studied with a multi-directional motion pin-on-disk device
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A46%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20counterface%20roughness%20on%20the%20wear%20of%20conventional%20and%20crosslinked%20ultrahigh%20molecular%20weight%20polyethylene%20studied%20with%20a%20multi-directional%20motion%20pin-on-disk%20device&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research&rft.au=Saikko,%20Vesa&rft.date=2001-12-15&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=506&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=506-512&rft.issn=0021-9304&rft.eissn=1097-4636&rft.coden=JBMRBG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-4636(20011215)57:4%3C506::AID-JBM1196%3E3.0.CO;2-H&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26709884%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26709884&rft_id=info:pmid/11553880&rfr_iscdi=true