Anesthesia breathing circuits protected by the DAR Barrierbac S® breathing filter have a low bacterial contamination rate

In order to reuse the same anesthesia breathing circuit for more than one patient, it has been proposed to add a breathing filter between the Y-piece and the artificial airway. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo bacterial filtration efficacy of an anesthesia filter in a usual clin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of anesthesia 2001-09, Vol.48 (8), p.748-754
Hauptverfasser: FRCPC, Daniel P. Vézina M. D, FRCPC, Claude A. Trépanier M. D, FRCPC, Martin R. Lessard M. D, FRCPC, Marie Gourdeau M. D, FRCPC, T. Claude Tremblay M. D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 754
container_issue 8
container_start_page 748
container_title Canadian journal of anesthesia
container_volume 48
creator FRCPC, Daniel P. Vézina M. D
FRCPC, Claude A. Trépanier M. D
FRCPC, Martin R. Lessard M. D
FRCPC, Marie Gourdeau M. D
FRCPC, T. Claude Tremblay M. D
description In order to reuse the same anesthesia breathing circuit for more than one patient, it has been proposed to add a breathing filter between the Y-piece and the artificial airway. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo bacterial filtration efficacy of an anesthesia filter in a usual clinical anesthesia setting. A sterile DAR Barrierbac S breathing filter was inserted at the Y-piece of a sterile single-use anesthesia breathing circuit before induction of general anesthesia. At the end of anesthesia, the breathing circuit connector of the filter and of the endotracheal tube connector were cultured separately on growth media (chocolate and blood agar). These were incubated for 48 hr and bacterial identification was conducted using standard methods. Bacterial cultures were negative on both sides of the filter membrane of 1842 of the 2001 filters studied. Cultures were positive on the patient side of 104 filters. In two of those, the same bacteria were found on both the circuit side and the patient side of the filter. Therefore these data indicate a clinical effectiveness of 99.9% (confidence interval, CI 95%, 99.6-99.998%), and an in vivo filtration efficacy of 98.08% (CI 95%, 92.54-99.67%). Using the upper limit of the CI, it can be assumed that the practice of using a sterile DAR Barrierbac S breathing filter for every patient while reusing the anesthesia breathing circuit would result in a cross contamination rate of the breathing circuit lower than once every 250 cases.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF03016689
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71153746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2434296151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a83e33971296ad3bdf21d373b6ae4dac2c22fe091801b53d63d316d7e35077b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0d1qFTEQAOAgFntavfEBJIh4IawmO5ufvTytrS0UBH_Au2U2mfWk7Nltk6zSPpQP4ZOZ0gMtXg0M3wzzw9hLKd5LIcyHo1MBQmpt2ydsJZtWV7Y16ilbCQt1paX4sc8OUroUQlit7DO2L6VqtJHNit2uJ0p5Qykg7yNh3oTpJ3chuiXkxK_inMll8ry_4YXxj-sv_AhjDBR7dPzr3z-PyoYwZop8g7-IIx_n37yYkgk4cjdPGbdhwhzmiUfM9JztDTgmerGLh-z76cm347Pq4vOn8-P1ReXAqFyhBQJojaxbjR56P9TSg4FeIzUeXe3qeiDRSitkr8Br8CC1NwRKGNNLOGRv7_uWZa6Xsm23DcnROOJE85I6U64BptEFvv4PXs5LnMpsnbVKQNPoO_TuHrk4pxRp6K5i2GK86aTo7t7RPbyj4Fe7jku_Jf9Ad_cv4M0OYHI4DhEnF9IjV9dKSfgH2dKSQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>885034466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anesthesia breathing circuits protected by the DAR Barrierbac S® breathing filter have a low bacterial contamination rate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>FRCPC, Daniel P. Vézina M. D ; FRCPC, Claude A. Trépanier M. D ; FRCPC, Martin R. Lessard M. D ; FRCPC, Marie Gourdeau M. D ; FRCPC, T. Claude Tremblay M. D</creator><creatorcontrib>FRCPC, Daniel P. Vézina M. D ; FRCPC, Claude A. Trépanier M. D ; FRCPC, Martin R. Lessard M. D ; FRCPC, Marie Gourdeau M. D ; FRCPC, T. Claude Tremblay M. D</creatorcontrib><description>In order to reuse the same anesthesia breathing circuit for more than one patient, it has been proposed to add a breathing filter between the Y-piece and the artificial airway. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo bacterial filtration efficacy of an anesthesia filter in a usual clinical anesthesia setting. A sterile DAR Barrierbac S breathing filter was inserted at the Y-piece of a sterile single-use anesthesia breathing circuit before induction of general anesthesia. At the end of anesthesia, the breathing circuit connector of the filter and of the endotracheal tube connector were cultured separately on growth media (chocolate and blood agar). These were incubated for 48 hr and bacterial identification was conducted using standard methods. Bacterial cultures were negative on both sides of the filter membrane of 1842 of the 2001 filters studied. Cultures were positive on the patient side of 104 filters. In two of those, the same bacteria were found on both the circuit side and the patient side of the filter. Therefore these data indicate a clinical effectiveness of 99.9% (confidence interval, CI 95%, 99.6-99.998%), and an in vivo filtration efficacy of 98.08% (CI 95%, 92.54-99.67%). Using the upper limit of the CI, it can be assumed that the practice of using a sterile DAR Barrierbac S breathing filter for every patient while reusing the anesthesia breathing circuit would result in a cross contamination rate of the breathing circuit lower than once every 250 cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0832-610X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1496-8975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03016689</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11546714</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJOAEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Toronto, ON: Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthesia: equipment, devices ; Anesthesiology - instrumentation ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Biological and medical sciences ; Confidence intervals ; Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control ; Filtration ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Respiration</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of anesthesia, 2001-09, Vol.48 (8), p.748-754</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Canadian Anesthesiologists 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a83e33971296ad3bdf21d373b6ae4dac2c22fe091801b53d63d316d7e35077b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a83e33971296ad3bdf21d373b6ae4dac2c22fe091801b53d63d316d7e35077b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1122551$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11546714$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FRCPC, Daniel P. Vézina M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRCPC, Claude A. Trépanier M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRCPC, Martin R. Lessard M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRCPC, Marie Gourdeau M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRCPC, T. Claude Tremblay M. D</creatorcontrib><title>Anesthesia breathing circuits protected by the DAR Barrierbac S® breathing filter have a low bacterial contamination rate</title><title>Canadian journal of anesthesia</title><addtitle>Can J Anaesth</addtitle><description>In order to reuse the same anesthesia breathing circuit for more than one patient, it has been proposed to add a breathing filter between the Y-piece and the artificial airway. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo bacterial filtration efficacy of an anesthesia filter in a usual clinical anesthesia setting. A sterile DAR Barrierbac S breathing filter was inserted at the Y-piece of a sterile single-use anesthesia breathing circuit before induction of general anesthesia. At the end of anesthesia, the breathing circuit connector of the filter and of the endotracheal tube connector were cultured separately on growth media (chocolate and blood agar). These were incubated for 48 hr and bacterial identification was conducted using standard methods. Bacterial cultures were negative on both sides of the filter membrane of 1842 of the 2001 filters studied. Cultures were positive on the patient side of 104 filters. In two of those, the same bacteria were found on both the circuit side and the patient side of the filter. Therefore these data indicate a clinical effectiveness of 99.9% (confidence interval, CI 95%, 99.6-99.998%), and an in vivo filtration efficacy of 98.08% (CI 95%, 92.54-99.67%). Using the upper limit of the CI, it can be assumed that the practice of using a sterile DAR Barrierbac S breathing filter for every patient while reusing the anesthesia breathing circuit would result in a cross contamination rate of the breathing circuit lower than once every 250 cases.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesia: equipment, devices</subject><subject>Anesthesiology - instrumentation</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><issn>0832-610X</issn><issn>1496-8975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0d1qFTEQAOAgFntavfEBJIh4IawmO5ufvTytrS0UBH_Au2U2mfWk7Nltk6zSPpQP4ZOZ0gMtXg0M3wzzw9hLKd5LIcyHo1MBQmpt2ydsJZtWV7Y16ilbCQt1paX4sc8OUroUQlit7DO2L6VqtJHNit2uJ0p5Qykg7yNh3oTpJ3chuiXkxK_inMll8ry_4YXxj-sv_AhjDBR7dPzr3z-PyoYwZop8g7-IIx_n37yYkgk4cjdPGbdhwhzmiUfM9JztDTgmerGLh-z76cm347Pq4vOn8-P1ReXAqFyhBQJojaxbjR56P9TSg4FeIzUeXe3qeiDRSitkr8Br8CC1NwRKGNNLOGRv7_uWZa6Xsm23DcnROOJE85I6U64BptEFvv4PXs5LnMpsnbVKQNPoO_TuHrk4pxRp6K5i2GK86aTo7t7RPbyj4Fe7jku_Jf9Ad_cv4M0OYHI4DhEnF9IjV9dKSfgH2dKSQA</recordid><startdate>20010901</startdate><enddate>20010901</enddate><creator>FRCPC, Daniel P. Vézina M. D</creator><creator>FRCPC, Claude A. Trépanier M. D</creator><creator>FRCPC, Martin R. Lessard M. D</creator><creator>FRCPC, Marie Gourdeau M. D</creator><creator>FRCPC, T. Claude Tremblay M. D</creator><general>Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010901</creationdate><title>Anesthesia breathing circuits protected by the DAR Barrierbac S® breathing filter have a low bacterial contamination rate</title><author>FRCPC, Daniel P. Vézina M. D ; FRCPC, Claude A. Trépanier M. D ; FRCPC, Martin R. Lessard M. D ; FRCPC, Marie Gourdeau M. D ; FRCPC, T. Claude Tremblay M. D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a83e33971296ad3bdf21d373b6ae4dac2c22fe091801b53d63d316d7e35077b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesia: equipment, devices</topic><topic>Anesthesiology - instrumentation</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FRCPC, Daniel P. Vézina M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRCPC, Claude A. Trépanier M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRCPC, Martin R. Lessard M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRCPC, Marie Gourdeau M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRCPC, T. Claude Tremblay M. D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FRCPC, Daniel P. Vézina M. D</au><au>FRCPC, Claude A. Trépanier M. D</au><au>FRCPC, Martin R. Lessard M. D</au><au>FRCPC, Marie Gourdeau M. D</au><au>FRCPC, T. Claude Tremblay M. D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anesthesia breathing circuits protected by the DAR Barrierbac S® breathing filter have a low bacterial contamination rate</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2001-09-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>748</spage><epage>754</epage><pages>748-754</pages><issn>0832-610X</issn><eissn>1496-8975</eissn><coden>CJOAEP</coden><abstract>In order to reuse the same anesthesia breathing circuit for more than one patient, it has been proposed to add a breathing filter between the Y-piece and the artificial airway. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo bacterial filtration efficacy of an anesthesia filter in a usual clinical anesthesia setting. A sterile DAR Barrierbac S breathing filter was inserted at the Y-piece of a sterile single-use anesthesia breathing circuit before induction of general anesthesia. At the end of anesthesia, the breathing circuit connector of the filter and of the endotracheal tube connector were cultured separately on growth media (chocolate and blood agar). These were incubated for 48 hr and bacterial identification was conducted using standard methods. Bacterial cultures were negative on both sides of the filter membrane of 1842 of the 2001 filters studied. Cultures were positive on the patient side of 104 filters. In two of those, the same bacteria were found on both the circuit side and the patient side of the filter. Therefore these data indicate a clinical effectiveness of 99.9% (confidence interval, CI 95%, 99.6-99.998%), and an in vivo filtration efficacy of 98.08% (CI 95%, 92.54-99.67%). Using the upper limit of the CI, it can be assumed that the practice of using a sterile DAR Barrierbac S breathing filter for every patient while reusing the anesthesia breathing circuit would result in a cross contamination rate of the breathing circuit lower than once every 250 cases.</abstract><cop>Toronto, ON</cop><pub>Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society</pub><pmid>11546714</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF03016689</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0832-610X
ispartof Canadian journal of anesthesia, 2001-09, Vol.48 (8), p.748-754
issn 0832-610X
1496-8975
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71153746
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Anesthesia: equipment, devices
Anesthesiology - instrumentation
Bacteria
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Biological and medical sciences
Confidence intervals
Equipment Contamination - prevention & control
Filtration
Humans
Medical sciences
Respiration
title Anesthesia breathing circuits protected by the DAR Barrierbac S® breathing filter have a low bacterial contamination rate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A06%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anesthesia%20breathing%20circuits%20protected%20by%20the%20DAR%20Barrierbac%20S%C2%AE%20breathing%20filter%20have%20a%20low%20bacterial%20contamination%20rate&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20anesthesia&rft.au=FRCPC,%20Daniel%20P.%20V%C3%A9zina%20M.%20D&rft.date=2001-09-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=748&rft.epage=754&rft.pages=748-754&rft.issn=0832-610X&rft.eissn=1496-8975&rft.coden=CJOAEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03016689&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2434296151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=885034466&rft_id=info:pmid/11546714&rfr_iscdi=true