Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty
The need for revision total hip arthroplasty has been increasing. The early results have been poor, and different revision techniques have been introduced. We report our results of 84 consecutive cemented first-time revisions of femoral components performed from 1981 through 1988 using a long-stem r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2001-09, Vol.16 (6), p.777-783 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 783 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 777 |
container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Gramkow, J. Jensen, T.H. Varmarken, J.E. Retpen, J.B. |
description | The need for revision total hip arthroplasty has been increasing. The early results have been poor, and different revision techniques have been introduced. We report our results of 84 consecutive cemented first-time revisions of femoral components performed from 1981 through 1988 using a long-stem revision component. The average time to follow-up was 11.4 years (range, 7.9–15.0 years). Patients with 47 revisions had died; 2 of these had been rerevised. Two additional patients were lost to follow-up for other reasons. Of the living patients, 12 had been rerevised, leaving 23 patients (23 hips) for complete follow-up evaluation, including clinical and radiographic assessment. Of 23 patients, 15 reported no pain, 4 had only slight pain, and 4 had more severe pain. In 4 cases, there were definite radiographic signs of loosening of the femoral component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed an overall 10-year survival of the femoral component of 77.9%. Using rerevision because of aseptic loosening or definite radiographic loosening as endpoint, the 10-year survival was 80.7%. Simple recementation is well indicated in elderly patients with only minor bone loss. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1054/arth.2001.23923 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71152570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S088354030190484X</els_id><sourcerecordid>71152570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-afb212b3e4637b125a1925b6d4d99e144e6bf50defb73257e3df0cb8e912d22d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMotlbP3iQnb9vms9s9ivgFBS96E0I2mdjI7mZNUsH_3tQWPHl6zPCbx5uH0CUlc0qkWOiYN3NGCJ0z3jB-hKZUclatBFkeoylZrXglBeETdJbSR8GolOIUTYqKmtf1FL2tw_BeZYg9jpC2XU5YuzJiAz0MGWxZf_nkw4CDw3kD2EEfou6wCf0YhsJgP-Accllt_Ih3iWIYO53y9zk6cbpLcHHQGXq9v3u5fazWzw9PtzfryvCa5Uq7llHWchBLXreUSU0bJtulFbZpgAoBy9ZJYsG1NWeyBm4dMe0KGsosY5bP0PXed4zhcwspq94nA12nBwjbpOryb7kjBVzsQRNDShGcGqPvdfxWlKhdoWoXX-0KVb-Flourg_W27cH-8YcGC9DsASgPfnmIKhkPgwHrI5isbPD_mv8ATDyGog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71152570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gramkow, J. ; Jensen, T.H. ; Varmarken, J.E. ; Retpen, J.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gramkow, J. ; Jensen, T.H. ; Varmarken, J.E. ; Retpen, J.B. ; Study performed at Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark</creatorcontrib><description>The need for revision total hip arthroplasty has been increasing. The early results have been poor, and different revision techniques have been introduced. We report our results of 84 consecutive cemented first-time revisions of femoral components performed from 1981 through 1988 using a long-stem revision component. The average time to follow-up was 11.4 years (range, 7.9–15.0 years). Patients with 47 revisions had died; 2 of these had been rerevised. Two additional patients were lost to follow-up for other reasons. Of the living patients, 12 had been rerevised, leaving 23 patients (23 hips) for complete follow-up evaluation, including clinical and radiographic assessment. Of 23 patients, 15 reported no pain, 4 had only slight pain, and 4 had more severe pain. In 4 cases, there were definite radiographic signs of loosening of the femoral component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed an overall 10-year survival of the femoral component of 77.9%. Using rerevision because of aseptic loosening or definite radiographic loosening as endpoint, the 10-year survival was 80.7%. Simple recementation is well indicated in elderly patients with only minor bone loss.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.23923</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11547377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; arthroplasty ; Bone Cements ; cement ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Female ; follow-up ; Follow-Up Studies ; hip ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; long-term ; Male ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnosis ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery ; Pain Measurement ; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Prosthesis Design ; Reoperation ; revision ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2001-09, Vol.16 (6), p.777-783</ispartof><rights>2001 Churchill Livingstone</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-afb212b3e4637b125a1925b6d4d99e144e6bf50defb73257e3df0cb8e912d22d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-afb212b3e4637b125a1925b6d4d99e144e6bf50defb73257e3df0cb8e912d22d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088354030190484X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11547377$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gramkow, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, T.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varmarken, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retpen, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Study performed at Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>The need for revision total hip arthroplasty has been increasing. The early results have been poor, and different revision techniques have been introduced. We report our results of 84 consecutive cemented first-time revisions of femoral components performed from 1981 through 1988 using a long-stem revision component. The average time to follow-up was 11.4 years (range, 7.9–15.0 years). Patients with 47 revisions had died; 2 of these had been rerevised. Two additional patients were lost to follow-up for other reasons. Of the living patients, 12 had been rerevised, leaving 23 patients (23 hips) for complete follow-up evaluation, including clinical and radiographic assessment. Of 23 patients, 15 reported no pain, 4 had only slight pain, and 4 had more severe pain. In 4 cases, there were definite radiographic signs of loosening of the femoral component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed an overall 10-year survival of the femoral component of 77.9%. Using rerevision because of aseptic loosening or definite radiographic loosening as endpoint, the 10-year survival was 80.7%. Simple recementation is well indicated in elderly patients with only minor bone loss.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>arthroplasty</subject><subject>Bone Cements</subject><subject>cement</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>follow-up</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>hip</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>long-term</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnosis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>revision</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMotlbP3iQnb9vms9s9ivgFBS96E0I2mdjI7mZNUsH_3tQWPHl6zPCbx5uH0CUlc0qkWOiYN3NGCJ0z3jB-hKZUclatBFkeoylZrXglBeETdJbSR8GolOIUTYqKmtf1FL2tw_BeZYg9jpC2XU5YuzJiAz0MGWxZf_nkw4CDw3kD2EEfou6wCf0YhsJgP-Accllt_Ih3iWIYO53y9zk6cbpLcHHQGXq9v3u5fazWzw9PtzfryvCa5Uq7llHWchBLXreUSU0bJtulFbZpgAoBy9ZJYsG1NWeyBm4dMe0KGsosY5bP0PXed4zhcwspq94nA12nBwjbpOryb7kjBVzsQRNDShGcGqPvdfxWlKhdoWoXX-0KVb-Flourg_W27cH-8YcGC9DsASgPfnmIKhkPgwHrI5isbPD_mv8ATDyGog</recordid><startdate>20010901</startdate><enddate>20010901</enddate><creator>Gramkow, J.</creator><creator>Jensen, T.H.</creator><creator>Varmarken, J.E.</creator><creator>Retpen, J.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010901</creationdate><title>Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty</title><author>Gramkow, J. ; Jensen, T.H. ; Varmarken, J.E. ; Retpen, J.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-afb212b3e4637b125a1925b6d4d99e144e6bf50defb73257e3df0cb8e912d22d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>arthroplasty</topic><topic>Bone Cements</topic><topic>cement</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>follow-up</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>hip</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>long-term</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnosis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>revision</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gramkow, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, T.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varmarken, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retpen, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Study performed at Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gramkow, J.</au><au>Jensen, T.H.</au><au>Varmarken, J.E.</au><au>Retpen, J.B.</au><aucorp>Study performed at Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2001-09-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>777</spage><epage>783</epage><pages>777-783</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>The need for revision total hip arthroplasty has been increasing. The early results have been poor, and different revision techniques have been introduced. We report our results of 84 consecutive cemented first-time revisions of femoral components performed from 1981 through 1988 using a long-stem revision component. The average time to follow-up was 11.4 years (range, 7.9–15.0 years). Patients with 47 revisions had died; 2 of these had been rerevised. Two additional patients were lost to follow-up for other reasons. Of the living patients, 12 had been rerevised, leaving 23 patients (23 hips) for complete follow-up evaluation, including clinical and radiographic assessment. Of 23 patients, 15 reported no pain, 4 had only slight pain, and 4 had more severe pain. In 4 cases, there were definite radiographic signs of loosening of the femoral component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed an overall 10-year survival of the femoral component of 77.9%. Using rerevision because of aseptic loosening or definite radiographic loosening as endpoint, the 10-year survival was 80.7%. Simple recementation is well indicated in elderly patients with only minor bone loss.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11547377</pmid><doi>10.1054/arth.2001.23923</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-5403 |
ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 2001-09, Vol.16 (6), p.777-783 |
issn | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71152570 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over arthroplasty Bone Cements cement Equipment Failure Analysis Female follow-up Follow-Up Studies hip Hip Prosthesis Humans long-term Male Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnosis Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery Pain Measurement Postoperative Complications - diagnosis Postoperative Complications - surgery Prosthesis Design Reoperation revision Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome |
title | Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A21%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20results%20after%20cemented%20revision%20of%20the%20femoral%20component%20in%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Gramkow,%20J.&rft.aucorp=Study%20performed%20at%20Department%20of%20Orthopedic%20Surgery,%20Rigshospitalet,%20Copenhagen,%20Denmark&rft.date=2001-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=777&rft.epage=783&rft.pages=777-783&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1054/arth.2001.23923&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71152570%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71152570&rft_id=info:pmid/11547377&rft_els_id=S088354030190484X&rfr_iscdi=true |