Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty

The need for revision total hip arthroplasty has been increasing. The early results have been poor, and different revision techniques have been introduced. We report our results of 84 consecutive cemented first-time revisions of femoral components performed from 1981 through 1988 using a long-stem r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2001-09, Vol.16 (6), p.777-783
Hauptverfasser: Gramkow, J., Jensen, T.H., Varmarken, J.E., Retpen, J.B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 783
container_issue 6
container_start_page 777
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 16
creator Gramkow, J.
Jensen, T.H.
Varmarken, J.E.
Retpen, J.B.
description The need for revision total hip arthroplasty has been increasing. The early results have been poor, and different revision techniques have been introduced. We report our results of 84 consecutive cemented first-time revisions of femoral components performed from 1981 through 1988 using a long-stem revision component. The average time to follow-up was 11.4 years (range, 7.9–15.0 years). Patients with 47 revisions had died; 2 of these had been rerevised. Two additional patients were lost to follow-up for other reasons. Of the living patients, 12 had been rerevised, leaving 23 patients (23 hips) for complete follow-up evaluation, including clinical and radiographic assessment. Of 23 patients, 15 reported no pain, 4 had only slight pain, and 4 had more severe pain. In 4 cases, there were definite radiographic signs of loosening of the femoral component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed an overall 10-year survival of the femoral component of 77.9%. Using rerevision because of aseptic loosening or definite radiographic loosening as endpoint, the 10-year survival was 80.7%. Simple recementation is well indicated in elderly patients with only minor bone loss.
doi_str_mv 10.1054/arth.2001.23923
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71152570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S088354030190484X</els_id><sourcerecordid>71152570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-afb212b3e4637b125a1925b6d4d99e144e6bf50defb73257e3df0cb8e912d22d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMotlbP3iQnb9vms9s9ivgFBS96E0I2mdjI7mZNUsH_3tQWPHl6zPCbx5uH0CUlc0qkWOiYN3NGCJ0z3jB-hKZUclatBFkeoylZrXglBeETdJbSR8GolOIUTYqKmtf1FL2tw_BeZYg9jpC2XU5YuzJiAz0MGWxZf_nkw4CDw3kD2EEfou6wCf0YhsJgP-Accllt_Ih3iWIYO53y9zk6cbpLcHHQGXq9v3u5fazWzw9PtzfryvCa5Uq7llHWchBLXreUSU0bJtulFbZpgAoBy9ZJYsG1NWeyBm4dMe0KGsosY5bP0PXed4zhcwspq94nA12nBwjbpOryb7kjBVzsQRNDShGcGqPvdfxWlKhdoWoXX-0KVb-Flourg_W27cH-8YcGC9DsASgPfnmIKhkPgwHrI5isbPD_mv8ATDyGog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71152570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gramkow, J. ; Jensen, T.H. ; Varmarken, J.E. ; Retpen, J.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gramkow, J. ; Jensen, T.H. ; Varmarken, J.E. ; Retpen, J.B. ; Study performed at Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark</creatorcontrib><description>The need for revision total hip arthroplasty has been increasing. The early results have been poor, and different revision techniques have been introduced. We report our results of 84 consecutive cemented first-time revisions of femoral components performed from 1981 through 1988 using a long-stem revision component. The average time to follow-up was 11.4 years (range, 7.9–15.0 years). Patients with 47 revisions had died; 2 of these had been rerevised. Two additional patients were lost to follow-up for other reasons. Of the living patients, 12 had been rerevised, leaving 23 patients (23 hips) for complete follow-up evaluation, including clinical and radiographic assessment. Of 23 patients, 15 reported no pain, 4 had only slight pain, and 4 had more severe pain. In 4 cases, there were definite radiographic signs of loosening of the femoral component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed an overall 10-year survival of the femoral component of 77.9%. Using rerevision because of aseptic loosening or definite radiographic loosening as endpoint, the 10-year survival was 80.7%. Simple recementation is well indicated in elderly patients with only minor bone loss.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.23923</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11547377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; arthroplasty ; Bone Cements ; cement ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Female ; follow-up ; Follow-Up Studies ; hip ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; long-term ; Male ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnosis ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery ; Pain Measurement ; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Prosthesis Design ; Reoperation ; revision ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2001-09, Vol.16 (6), p.777-783</ispartof><rights>2001 Churchill Livingstone</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-afb212b3e4637b125a1925b6d4d99e144e6bf50defb73257e3df0cb8e912d22d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-afb212b3e4637b125a1925b6d4d99e144e6bf50defb73257e3df0cb8e912d22d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088354030190484X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11547377$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gramkow, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, T.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varmarken, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retpen, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Study performed at Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>The need for revision total hip arthroplasty has been increasing. The early results have been poor, and different revision techniques have been introduced. We report our results of 84 consecutive cemented first-time revisions of femoral components performed from 1981 through 1988 using a long-stem revision component. The average time to follow-up was 11.4 years (range, 7.9–15.0 years). Patients with 47 revisions had died; 2 of these had been rerevised. Two additional patients were lost to follow-up for other reasons. Of the living patients, 12 had been rerevised, leaving 23 patients (23 hips) for complete follow-up evaluation, including clinical and radiographic assessment. Of 23 patients, 15 reported no pain, 4 had only slight pain, and 4 had more severe pain. In 4 cases, there were definite radiographic signs of loosening of the femoral component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed an overall 10-year survival of the femoral component of 77.9%. Using rerevision because of aseptic loosening or definite radiographic loosening as endpoint, the 10-year survival was 80.7%. Simple recementation is well indicated in elderly patients with only minor bone loss.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>arthroplasty</subject><subject>Bone Cements</subject><subject>cement</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>follow-up</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>hip</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>long-term</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnosis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>revision</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMotlbP3iQnb9vms9s9ivgFBS96E0I2mdjI7mZNUsH_3tQWPHl6zPCbx5uH0CUlc0qkWOiYN3NGCJ0z3jB-hKZUclatBFkeoylZrXglBeETdJbSR8GolOIUTYqKmtf1FL2tw_BeZYg9jpC2XU5YuzJiAz0MGWxZf_nkw4CDw3kD2EEfou6wCf0YhsJgP-Accllt_Ih3iWIYO53y9zk6cbpLcHHQGXq9v3u5fazWzw9PtzfryvCa5Uq7llHWchBLXreUSU0bJtulFbZpgAoBy9ZJYsG1NWeyBm4dMe0KGsosY5bP0PXed4zhcwspq94nA12nBwjbpOryb7kjBVzsQRNDShGcGqPvdfxWlKhdoWoXX-0KVb-Flourg_W27cH-8YcGC9DsASgPfnmIKhkPgwHrI5isbPD_mv8ATDyGog</recordid><startdate>20010901</startdate><enddate>20010901</enddate><creator>Gramkow, J.</creator><creator>Jensen, T.H.</creator><creator>Varmarken, J.E.</creator><creator>Retpen, J.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010901</creationdate><title>Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty</title><author>Gramkow, J. ; Jensen, T.H. ; Varmarken, J.E. ; Retpen, J.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-afb212b3e4637b125a1925b6d4d99e144e6bf50defb73257e3df0cb8e912d22d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>arthroplasty</topic><topic>Bone Cements</topic><topic>cement</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>follow-up</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>hip</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>long-term</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnosis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>revision</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gramkow, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, T.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varmarken, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retpen, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Study performed at Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gramkow, J.</au><au>Jensen, T.H.</au><au>Varmarken, J.E.</au><au>Retpen, J.B.</au><aucorp>Study performed at Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2001-09-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>777</spage><epage>783</epage><pages>777-783</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>The need for revision total hip arthroplasty has been increasing. The early results have been poor, and different revision techniques have been introduced. We report our results of 84 consecutive cemented first-time revisions of femoral components performed from 1981 through 1988 using a long-stem revision component. The average time to follow-up was 11.4 years (range, 7.9–15.0 years). Patients with 47 revisions had died; 2 of these had been rerevised. Two additional patients were lost to follow-up for other reasons. Of the living patients, 12 had been rerevised, leaving 23 patients (23 hips) for complete follow-up evaluation, including clinical and radiographic assessment. Of 23 patients, 15 reported no pain, 4 had only slight pain, and 4 had more severe pain. In 4 cases, there were definite radiographic signs of loosening of the femoral component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed an overall 10-year survival of the femoral component of 77.9%. Using rerevision because of aseptic loosening or definite radiographic loosening as endpoint, the 10-year survival was 80.7%. Simple recementation is well indicated in elderly patients with only minor bone loss.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11547377</pmid><doi>10.1054/arth.2001.23923</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2001-09, Vol.16 (6), p.777-783
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71152570
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
arthroplasty
Bone Cements
cement
Equipment Failure Analysis
Female
follow-up
Follow-Up Studies
hip
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
long-term
Male
Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnosis
Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery
Pain Measurement
Postoperative Complications - diagnosis
Postoperative Complications - surgery
Prosthesis Design
Reoperation
revision
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
title Long-term results after cemented revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A21%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20results%20after%20cemented%20revision%20of%20the%20femoral%20component%20in%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Gramkow,%20J.&rft.aucorp=Study%20performed%20at%20Department%20of%20Orthopedic%20Surgery,%20Rigshospitalet,%20Copenhagen,%20Denmark&rft.date=2001-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=777&rft.epage=783&rft.pages=777-783&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1054/arth.2001.23923&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71152570%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71152570&rft_id=info:pmid/11547377&rft_els_id=S088354030190484X&rfr_iscdi=true