Seminal vesicle epithelium as a potential pitfall in the cytodiagnosis of presacral masses. A report of two cases

Whenever abdominoperineal resection is performed because of a rectal adenocarcinoma, the prostate and seminal vesicles may be displaced backward to the presacral space, giving rise to a false radiologic image of a presacral tumor. Due to cytologic atypia associated with the epithelium of seminal ves...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta cytologica 2000-05, Vol.44 (3), p.399-402
Hauptverfasser: Ibarrola de Andrés, C, Castellano Megías, V M, Perez Barrios, A, Alberti Masgrau, N, Lozano Ojeda, F, De Agustín De Agustín, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 402
container_issue 3
container_start_page 399
container_title Acta cytologica
container_volume 44
creator Ibarrola de Andrés, C
Castellano Megías, V M
Perez Barrios, A
Alberti Masgrau, N
Lozano Ojeda, F
De Agustín De Agustín, P
description Whenever abdominoperineal resection is performed because of a rectal adenocarcinoma, the prostate and seminal vesicles may be displaced backward to the presacral space, giving rise to a false radiologic image of a presacral tumor. Due to cytologic atypia associated with the epithelium of seminal vesicles, there is a real possibility, in fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), of erroneously giving a malignant diagnosis. Two men, aged 53 and 57 years, presented with presacral masses three months and six years, respectively, after abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. In both cases, FNAB smears showed some groups and single cells with large and irregular nuclei. These cells suggested a recurrence of carcinoma. The presence of cytoplasmic coarse pigment and a background with spermatozoa and blobs of inspissated secretory product were sufficient to determine that these presacral masses represented the seminal vesicles. Awareness that seminal vesicles may give rise to a radiologic impression of presacral tumor after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum will avoid unnecessary FNAB and a cytologic false positive diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000328486
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71148724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71148724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-6989540d2a609baf93f51ae8f307ae8afb18f2f440a02822c3bd4c3d2cb1d6183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kDtPwzAUhT2AaCkM_AHkiS3FryT2WFW8pEoMwBw5zjUYJXFqO6D-e4wo0zm636czXISuKFlTWqpbQghnUsjqBC1zp0VZinqBzmP8zIRXFT9DC0ok50qpJdq_wOBG3eMviM70gGFy6QN6Nw9YR6zx5BOMyWUjA6v7HrsRZwObQ_Kd0--jjy5ib_EUIGoTsjnoGCGu8QYHmHxIvzR9e2x0Pl-g0zwT4fKYK_R2f_e6fSx2zw9P282umBipU1EpqUpBOqYrolptFbcl1SAtJ3UObVsqLbNCEE2YZMzwthOGd8y0tKuo5Ct087c7Bb-fIaZmcNFA3-sR_BybmlIhayayeH0U53aArpmCG3Q4NP9P4j94oWc-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71148724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seminal vesicle epithelium as a potential pitfall in the cytodiagnosis of presacral masses. A report of two cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Ibarrola de Andrés, C ; Castellano Megías, V M ; Perez Barrios, A ; Alberti Masgrau, N ; Lozano Ojeda, F ; De Agustín De Agustín, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Ibarrola de Andrés, C ; Castellano Megías, V M ; Perez Barrios, A ; Alberti Masgrau, N ; Lozano Ojeda, F ; De Agustín De Agustín, P</creatorcontrib><description>Whenever abdominoperineal resection is performed because of a rectal adenocarcinoma, the prostate and seminal vesicles may be displaced backward to the presacral space, giving rise to a false radiologic image of a presacral tumor. Due to cytologic atypia associated with the epithelium of seminal vesicles, there is a real possibility, in fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), of erroneously giving a malignant diagnosis. Two men, aged 53 and 57 years, presented with presacral masses three months and six years, respectively, after abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. In both cases, FNAB smears showed some groups and single cells with large and irregular nuclei. These cells suggested a recurrence of carcinoma. The presence of cytoplasmic coarse pigment and a background with spermatozoa and blobs of inspissated secretory product were sufficient to determine that these presacral masses represented the seminal vesicles. Awareness that seminal vesicles may give rise to a radiologic impression of presacral tumor after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum will avoid unnecessary FNAB and a cytologic false positive diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5547</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000328486</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10833999</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Diagnostic Errors - prevention &amp; control ; Epithelium - pathology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Sacrococcygeal Region ; Seminal Vesicles - pathology</subject><ispartof>Acta cytologica, 2000-05, Vol.44 (3), p.399-402</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10833999$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ibarrola de Andrés, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castellano Megías, V M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez Barrios, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberti Masgrau, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lozano Ojeda, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Agustín De Agustín, P</creatorcontrib><title>Seminal vesicle epithelium as a potential pitfall in the cytodiagnosis of presacral masses. A report of two cases</title><title>Acta cytologica</title><addtitle>Acta Cytol</addtitle><description>Whenever abdominoperineal resection is performed because of a rectal adenocarcinoma, the prostate and seminal vesicles may be displaced backward to the presacral space, giving rise to a false radiologic image of a presacral tumor. Due to cytologic atypia associated with the epithelium of seminal vesicles, there is a real possibility, in fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), of erroneously giving a malignant diagnosis. Two men, aged 53 and 57 years, presented with presacral masses three months and six years, respectively, after abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. In both cases, FNAB smears showed some groups and single cells with large and irregular nuclei. These cells suggested a recurrence of carcinoma. The presence of cytoplasmic coarse pigment and a background with spermatozoa and blobs of inspissated secretory product were sufficient to determine that these presacral masses represented the seminal vesicles. Awareness that seminal vesicles may give rise to a radiologic impression of presacral tumor after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum will avoid unnecessary FNAB and a cytologic false positive diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Epithelium - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Sacrococcygeal Region</subject><subject>Seminal Vesicles - pathology</subject><issn>0001-5547</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kDtPwzAUhT2AaCkM_AHkiS3FryT2WFW8pEoMwBw5zjUYJXFqO6D-e4wo0zm636czXISuKFlTWqpbQghnUsjqBC1zp0VZinqBzmP8zIRXFT9DC0ok50qpJdq_wOBG3eMviM70gGFy6QN6Nw9YR6zx5BOMyWUjA6v7HrsRZwObQ_Kd0--jjy5ib_EUIGoTsjnoGCGu8QYHmHxIvzR9e2x0Pl-g0zwT4fKYK_R2f_e6fSx2zw9P282umBipU1EpqUpBOqYrolptFbcl1SAtJ3UObVsqLbNCEE2YZMzwthOGd8y0tKuo5Ct087c7Bb-fIaZmcNFA3-sR_BybmlIhayayeH0U53aArpmCG3Q4NP9P4j94oWc-</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Ibarrola de Andrés, C</creator><creator>Castellano Megías, V M</creator><creator>Perez Barrios, A</creator><creator>Alberti Masgrau, N</creator><creator>Lozano Ojeda, F</creator><creator>De Agustín De Agustín, P</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>Seminal vesicle epithelium as a potential pitfall in the cytodiagnosis of presacral masses. A report of two cases</title><author>Ibarrola de Andrés, C ; Castellano Megías, V M ; Perez Barrios, A ; Alberti Masgrau, N ; Lozano Ojeda, F ; De Agustín De Agustín, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-6989540d2a609baf93f51ae8f307ae8afb18f2f440a02822c3bd4c3d2cb1d6183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Epithelium - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Sacrococcygeal Region</topic><topic>Seminal Vesicles - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ibarrola de Andrés, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castellano Megías, V M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez Barrios, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberti Masgrau, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lozano Ojeda, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Agustín De Agustín, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta cytologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ibarrola de Andrés, C</au><au>Castellano Megías, V M</au><au>Perez Barrios, A</au><au>Alberti Masgrau, N</au><au>Lozano Ojeda, F</au><au>De Agustín De Agustín, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seminal vesicle epithelium as a potential pitfall in the cytodiagnosis of presacral masses. A report of two cases</atitle><jtitle>Acta cytologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Cytol</addtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>402</epage><pages>399-402</pages><issn>0001-5547</issn><abstract>Whenever abdominoperineal resection is performed because of a rectal adenocarcinoma, the prostate and seminal vesicles may be displaced backward to the presacral space, giving rise to a false radiologic image of a presacral tumor. Due to cytologic atypia associated with the epithelium of seminal vesicles, there is a real possibility, in fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), of erroneously giving a malignant diagnosis. Two men, aged 53 and 57 years, presented with presacral masses three months and six years, respectively, after abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. In both cases, FNAB smears showed some groups and single cells with large and irregular nuclei. These cells suggested a recurrence of carcinoma. The presence of cytoplasmic coarse pigment and a background with spermatozoa and blobs of inspissated secretory product were sufficient to determine that these presacral masses represented the seminal vesicles. Awareness that seminal vesicles may give rise to a radiologic impression of presacral tumor after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum will avoid unnecessary FNAB and a cytologic false positive diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pmid>10833999</pmid><doi>10.1159/000328486</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-5547
ispartof Acta cytologica, 2000-05, Vol.44 (3), p.399-402
issn 0001-5547
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71148724
source MEDLINE; Karger Journals
subjects Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Diagnostic Errors - prevention & control
Epithelium - pathology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Sacrococcygeal Region
Seminal Vesicles - pathology
title Seminal vesicle epithelium as a potential pitfall in the cytodiagnosis of presacral masses. A report of two cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T05%3A57%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seminal%20vesicle%20epithelium%20as%20a%20potential%20pitfall%20in%20the%20cytodiagnosis%20of%20presacral%20masses.%20A%20report%20of%20two%20cases&rft.jtitle=Acta%20cytologica&rft.au=Ibarrola%20de%20Andr%C3%A9s,%20C&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=402&rft.pages=399-402&rft.issn=0001-5547&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000328486&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71148724%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71148724&rft_id=info:pmid/10833999&rfr_iscdi=true