Which patients with major depression benefit from prefrontal repetitive magnetic stimulation

Antidepressive benefit of prefrontal repetitive magnetic stimulation (RTMS) for one or two weeks varies between 6 % and 60 % (mean 37 %) improvement of the Hamilton depression scale vs. 12 % improvement following sham RTMS. This variance is probably caused by study specific stimulus parameters but a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fortschritte der Neurologie, Psychiatrie Psychiatrie, 2001-09, Vol.69 (9), p.402-409
Hauptverfasser: Eschweiler, G W, Plewnia, C, Bartels, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:ger
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 409
container_issue 9
container_start_page 402
container_title Fortschritte der Neurologie, Psychiatrie
container_volume 69
creator Eschweiler, G W
Plewnia, C
Bartels, M
description Antidepressive benefit of prefrontal repetitive magnetic stimulation (RTMS) for one or two weeks varies between 6 % and 60 % (mean 37 %) improvement of the Hamilton depression scale vs. 12 % improvement following sham RTMS. This variance is probably caused by study specific stimulus parameters but also by genetic, psychopathological and neuropsychological characteristics of the patients as well as by the functional state of the cortex area below the stimulation coil. Data from 10 open and 7 sham controlled studies including two own studies comprising more than 300 patients with major depression have been published to date. In synopsis several positive predictors for antidepressive response of prefrontal RTMS become apparent: 1) younger age, 2) somatic signs of anxiety, 3) lack of cortical hyperactivity below the magnetic coil pulsed by 10 Hz stimuli, 4) cortical hypermetabolism below the 1 Hz pulsed coil. Negative predictors of response to prefrontal RTMS were: 1) Advanced age, 2) prefrontal atrophy, 3) cognitive impairment in neuropsychological tasks assigned to the prefrontal cortex, 4) psychotic symptoms, 5) cortical hyperactivity below 10 Hz pulsed coil 6) non-response to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). While prefrontal RTMS will probably not replace ECT in severe major depression with psychotic symptoms it could be beneficial especially in younger anxious patients without cognitive impairment.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-2001-16906
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71148423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71148423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-n168t-76e7560a7a843847f4c5b0a4974507d4010f28d43c4742356b106b3c3a067a7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UDtPwzAY9ACipbAxI09sgc_xKxlRxUuqxAJiQYqc5AtxlTjBdkD8eyxRpjvdazhCLhhcM5DyJmQ5AMuYKkEdkTXoHDKRl-WKnIawT5YomT4hK8YkVyDVmry_9bbp6WyiRRcD_baxp6PZT562OHsMwU6O1uiws5F2fhppUhO6aAbqccZoo_3C1PlwiTc0RDsuQ9qb3Bk57swQ8PyAG_J6f_eyfcx2zw9P29td5pgqYqYVaqnAaFMIXgjdiUbWYESphQTdCmDQ5UUreCO0yLlUNQNV84YbUNpo5Bty9bc7--lzwRCr0YYGh8E4nJZQacZEkZopeHkILvWIbTV7Oxr_U_3_wX8BjIVgIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71148423</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which patients with major depression benefit from prefrontal repetitive magnetic stimulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Eschweiler, G W ; Plewnia, C ; Bartels, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Eschweiler, G W ; Plewnia, C ; Bartels, M</creatorcontrib><description>Antidepressive benefit of prefrontal repetitive magnetic stimulation (RTMS) for one or two weeks varies between 6 % and 60 % (mean 37 %) improvement of the Hamilton depression scale vs. 12 % improvement following sham RTMS. This variance is probably caused by study specific stimulus parameters but also by genetic, psychopathological and neuropsychological characteristics of the patients as well as by the functional state of the cortex area below the stimulation coil. Data from 10 open and 7 sham controlled studies including two own studies comprising more than 300 patients with major depression have been published to date. In synopsis several positive predictors for antidepressive response of prefrontal RTMS become apparent: 1) younger age, 2) somatic signs of anxiety, 3) lack of cortical hyperactivity below the magnetic coil pulsed by 10 Hz stimuli, 4) cortical hypermetabolism below the 1 Hz pulsed coil. Negative predictors of response to prefrontal RTMS were: 1) Advanced age, 2) prefrontal atrophy, 3) cognitive impairment in neuropsychological tasks assigned to the prefrontal cortex, 4) psychotic symptoms, 5) cortical hyperactivity below 10 Hz pulsed coil 6) non-response to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). While prefrontal RTMS will probably not replace ECT in severe major depression with psychotic symptoms it could be beneficial especially in younger anxious patients without cognitive impairment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-4299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-16906</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11536056</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic ; Depressive Disorder - psychology ; Depressive Disorder - therapy ; Electromagnetic Fields ; Humans ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><ispartof>Fortschritte der Neurologie, Psychiatrie, 2001-09, Vol.69 (9), p.402-409</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11536056$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eschweiler, G W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plewnia, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, M</creatorcontrib><title>Which patients with major depression benefit from prefrontal repetitive magnetic stimulation</title><title>Fortschritte der Neurologie, Psychiatrie</title><addtitle>Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr</addtitle><description>Antidepressive benefit of prefrontal repetitive magnetic stimulation (RTMS) for one or two weeks varies between 6 % and 60 % (mean 37 %) improvement of the Hamilton depression scale vs. 12 % improvement following sham RTMS. This variance is probably caused by study specific stimulus parameters but also by genetic, psychopathological and neuropsychological characteristics of the patients as well as by the functional state of the cortex area below the stimulation coil. Data from 10 open and 7 sham controlled studies including two own studies comprising more than 300 patients with major depression have been published to date. In synopsis several positive predictors for antidepressive response of prefrontal RTMS become apparent: 1) younger age, 2) somatic signs of anxiety, 3) lack of cortical hyperactivity below the magnetic coil pulsed by 10 Hz stimuli, 4) cortical hypermetabolism below the 1 Hz pulsed coil. Negative predictors of response to prefrontal RTMS were: 1) Advanced age, 2) prefrontal atrophy, 3) cognitive impairment in neuropsychological tasks assigned to the prefrontal cortex, 4) psychotic symptoms, 5) cortical hyperactivity below 10 Hz pulsed coil 6) non-response to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). While prefrontal RTMS will probably not replace ECT in severe major depression with psychotic symptoms it could be beneficial especially in younger anxious patients without cognitive impairment.</description><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - therapy</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><issn>0720-4299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UDtPwzAY9ACipbAxI09sgc_xKxlRxUuqxAJiQYqc5AtxlTjBdkD8eyxRpjvdazhCLhhcM5DyJmQ5AMuYKkEdkTXoHDKRl-WKnIawT5YomT4hK8YkVyDVmry_9bbp6WyiRRcD_baxp6PZT562OHsMwU6O1uiws5F2fhppUhO6aAbqccZoo_3C1PlwiTc0RDsuQ9qb3Bk57swQ8PyAG_J6f_eyfcx2zw9P29td5pgqYqYVaqnAaFMIXgjdiUbWYESphQTdCmDQ5UUreCO0yLlUNQNV84YbUNpo5Bty9bc7--lzwRCr0YYGh8E4nJZQacZEkZopeHkILvWIbTV7Oxr_U_3_wX8BjIVgIw</recordid><startdate>20010901</startdate><enddate>20010901</enddate><creator>Eschweiler, G W</creator><creator>Plewnia, C</creator><creator>Bartels, M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010901</creationdate><title>Which patients with major depression benefit from prefrontal repetitive magnetic stimulation</title><author>Eschweiler, G W ; Plewnia, C ; Bartels, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-n168t-76e7560a7a843847f4c5b0a4974507d4010f28d43c4742356b106b3c3a067a7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - therapy</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eschweiler, G W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plewnia, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fortschritte der Neurologie, Psychiatrie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eschweiler, G W</au><au>Plewnia, C</au><au>Bartels, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which patients with major depression benefit from prefrontal repetitive magnetic stimulation</atitle><jtitle>Fortschritte der Neurologie, Psychiatrie</jtitle><addtitle>Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr</addtitle><date>2001-09-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>402</spage><epage>409</epage><pages>402-409</pages><issn>0720-4299</issn><abstract>Antidepressive benefit of prefrontal repetitive magnetic stimulation (RTMS) for one or two weeks varies between 6 % and 60 % (mean 37 %) improvement of the Hamilton depression scale vs. 12 % improvement following sham RTMS. This variance is probably caused by study specific stimulus parameters but also by genetic, psychopathological and neuropsychological characteristics of the patients as well as by the functional state of the cortex area below the stimulation coil. Data from 10 open and 7 sham controlled studies including two own studies comprising more than 300 patients with major depression have been published to date. In synopsis several positive predictors for antidepressive response of prefrontal RTMS become apparent: 1) younger age, 2) somatic signs of anxiety, 3) lack of cortical hyperactivity below the magnetic coil pulsed by 10 Hz stimuli, 4) cortical hypermetabolism below the 1 Hz pulsed coil. Negative predictors of response to prefrontal RTMS were: 1) Advanced age, 2) prefrontal atrophy, 3) cognitive impairment in neuropsychological tasks assigned to the prefrontal cortex, 4) psychotic symptoms, 5) cortical hyperactivity below 10 Hz pulsed coil 6) non-response to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). While prefrontal RTMS will probably not replace ECT in severe major depression with psychotic symptoms it could be beneficial especially in younger anxious patients without cognitive impairment.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>11536056</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2001-16906</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-4299
ispartof Fortschritte der Neurologie, Psychiatrie, 2001-09, Vol.69 (9), p.402-409
issn 0720-4299
language ger
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71148423
source MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals
subjects Clinical Trials as Topic
Depressive Disorder - psychology
Depressive Disorder - therapy
Electromagnetic Fields
Humans
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
title Which patients with major depression benefit from prefrontal repetitive magnetic stimulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A13%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20patients%20with%20major%20depression%20benefit%20from%20prefrontal%20repetitive%20magnetic%20stimulation&rft.jtitle=Fortschritte%20der%20Neurologie,%20Psychiatrie&rft.au=Eschweiler,%20G%20W&rft.date=2001-09-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=402&rft.epage=409&rft.pages=402-409&rft.issn=0720-4299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2001-16906&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71148423%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71148423&rft_id=info:pmid/11536056&rfr_iscdi=true