The effect of handgrip position on upper extremity neuromuscular responses to arm cranking exercise

The purpose of this study was to determine if handgrip position during arm cranking exercise influences the neuromuscular activity of muscles biceps brachii (BB), lateral head of triceps brachii (TB), middle deltoid (DT), infraspinatus (IS) and brachioradialis (BR). Fifteen participants cranked an a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of electromyography and kinesiology 2001-08, Vol.11 (4), p.291-298
Hauptverfasser: Bressel, Eadric, Bressel, Megan, Marquez, Michael, Heise, Gary D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 298
container_issue 4
container_start_page 291
container_title Journal of electromyography and kinesiology
container_volume 11
creator Bressel, Eadric
Bressel, Megan
Marquez, Michael
Heise, Gary D
description The purpose of this study was to determine if handgrip position during arm cranking exercise influences the neuromuscular activity of muscles biceps brachii (BB), lateral head of triceps brachii (TB), middle deltoid (DT), infraspinatus (IS) and brachioradialis (BR). Fifteen participants cranked an arm ergometer using three different handgrip positions (supinated, pronated, and neutral). Electromyographic (EMG) data were recorded from the aforementioned muscles, and relative duration of EMG activation and amplitude were quantified for the first and second 180° of crank angle. EMG measures were analyzed with MANOVA and follow-up univariate procedures; alpha was set at 0.01. The relative durations of EMG activation did not differ between handgrip positions. Muscle IS exhibited 36% less amplitude in the supinated versus neutral handgrip position (second half-cycle), and muscle BR displayed 63% greater amplitude across cycles in the neutral versus supinated and pronated handgrip positions. The greater BR activity displayed in the neutral handgrip position may reflect its anatomical advantage as an elbow flexor when the forearm is in neutral position. Muscle IS exhibited less activity in the supinated position and may be clinically relevant if it allows arm cranking to occur without subsequent shoulder pain, which is often the aim of shoulder rehabilitation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1050-6411(01)00002-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71143285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1050641101000025</els_id><sourcerecordid>71143285</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-62157d31edea66343cae518ad8fee371518224760fc7a21d89e9349fd90cd4843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMo7rr6E5ScRA_VTNKP9CQifoHgQT2HmEw1um1q0or-e7PuiscdBmYOz8wL70vIPrATYFCePgArWFbmAEcMjlkqnhUbZAqyEllRAWym_Q-ZkJ0Y3xiDikm2TSYAheAlY1NiHl-RYtOgGahv6Kvu7EtwPe19dIPzHU099j0Gil9DwNYN37TDMfh2jGac60ADxt53ESMdPNWhpSbo7t11L-kCg3ERd8lWo-cR91ZzRp6uLh8vbrK7--vbi_O7zIiaD1nJoaisALSoy1LkwmgsQGorG0RRQdo5z6uSNabSHKyssRZ53diaGZvLXMzI4fJvH_zHiHFQrYsG53PdoR-jSqbkgstiLQhS5JxzmcBiCZrgYwzYqD64VodvBUwtYlC_MaiFx4qlXsSgFgIHK4HxuUX7f7XyPQFnSwCTH58Og4rGYWfQupCiUNa7NRI_8yKX3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18342228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of handgrip position on upper extremity neuromuscular responses to arm cranking exercise</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Bressel, Eadric ; Bressel, Megan ; Marquez, Michael ; Heise, Gary D</creator><creatorcontrib>Bressel, Eadric ; Bressel, Megan ; Marquez, Michael ; Heise, Gary D</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to determine if handgrip position during arm cranking exercise influences the neuromuscular activity of muscles biceps brachii (BB), lateral head of triceps brachii (TB), middle deltoid (DT), infraspinatus (IS) and brachioradialis (BR). Fifteen participants cranked an arm ergometer using three different handgrip positions (supinated, pronated, and neutral). Electromyographic (EMG) data were recorded from the aforementioned muscles, and relative duration of EMG activation and amplitude were quantified for the first and second 180° of crank angle. EMG measures were analyzed with MANOVA and follow-up univariate procedures; alpha was set at 0.01. The relative durations of EMG activation did not differ between handgrip positions. Muscle IS exhibited 36% less amplitude in the supinated versus neutral handgrip position (second half-cycle), and muscle BR displayed 63% greater amplitude across cycles in the neutral versus supinated and pronated handgrip positions. The greater BR activity displayed in the neutral handgrip position may reflect its anatomical advantage as an elbow flexor when the forearm is in neutral position. Muscle IS exhibited less activity in the supinated position and may be clinically relevant if it allows arm cranking to occur without subsequent shoulder pain, which is often the aim of shoulder rehabilitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-6411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1050-6411(01)00002-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11532600</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arm - physiology ; Electromyography ; Ergometry ; Exercise - physiology ; Female ; Hand Strength - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Upper body exercise ; Upper extremity rehabilitation ; Wheelchair propulsion</subject><ispartof>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2001-08, Vol.11 (4), p.291-298</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-62157d31edea66343cae518ad8fee371518224760fc7a21d89e9349fd90cd4843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-62157d31edea66343cae518ad8fee371518224760fc7a21d89e9349fd90cd4843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(01)00002-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11532600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bressel, Eadric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bressel, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquez, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heise, Gary D</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of handgrip position on upper extremity neuromuscular responses to arm cranking exercise</title><title>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</title><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to determine if handgrip position during arm cranking exercise influences the neuromuscular activity of muscles biceps brachii (BB), lateral head of triceps brachii (TB), middle deltoid (DT), infraspinatus (IS) and brachioradialis (BR). Fifteen participants cranked an arm ergometer using three different handgrip positions (supinated, pronated, and neutral). Electromyographic (EMG) data were recorded from the aforementioned muscles, and relative duration of EMG activation and amplitude were quantified for the first and second 180° of crank angle. EMG measures were analyzed with MANOVA and follow-up univariate procedures; alpha was set at 0.01. The relative durations of EMG activation did not differ between handgrip positions. Muscle IS exhibited 36% less amplitude in the supinated versus neutral handgrip position (second half-cycle), and muscle BR displayed 63% greater amplitude across cycles in the neutral versus supinated and pronated handgrip positions. The greater BR activity displayed in the neutral handgrip position may reflect its anatomical advantage as an elbow flexor when the forearm is in neutral position. Muscle IS exhibited less activity in the supinated position and may be clinically relevant if it allows arm cranking to occur without subsequent shoulder pain, which is often the aim of shoulder rehabilitation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arm - physiology</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Ergometry</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hand Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Upper body exercise</subject><subject>Upper extremity rehabilitation</subject><subject>Wheelchair propulsion</subject><issn>1050-6411</issn><issn>1873-5711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMo7rr6E5ScRA_VTNKP9CQifoHgQT2HmEw1um1q0or-e7PuiscdBmYOz8wL70vIPrATYFCePgArWFbmAEcMjlkqnhUbZAqyEllRAWym_Q-ZkJ0Y3xiDikm2TSYAheAlY1NiHl-RYtOgGahv6Kvu7EtwPe19dIPzHU099j0Gil9DwNYN37TDMfh2jGac60ADxt53ESMdPNWhpSbo7t11L-kCg3ERd8lWo-cR91ZzRp6uLh8vbrK7--vbi_O7zIiaD1nJoaisALSoy1LkwmgsQGorG0RRQdo5z6uSNabSHKyssRZ53diaGZvLXMzI4fJvH_zHiHFQrYsG53PdoR-jSqbkgstiLQhS5JxzmcBiCZrgYwzYqD64VodvBUwtYlC_MaiFx4qlXsSgFgIHK4HxuUX7f7XyPQFnSwCTH58Og4rGYWfQupCiUNa7NRI_8yKX3w</recordid><startdate>20010801</startdate><enddate>20010801</enddate><creator>Bressel, Eadric</creator><creator>Bressel, Megan</creator><creator>Marquez, Michael</creator><creator>Heise, Gary D</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010801</creationdate><title>The effect of handgrip position on upper extremity neuromuscular responses to arm cranking exercise</title><author>Bressel, Eadric ; Bressel, Megan ; Marquez, Michael ; Heise, Gary D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-62157d31edea66343cae518ad8fee371518224760fc7a21d89e9349fd90cd4843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arm - physiology</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Ergometry</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hand Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Upper body exercise</topic><topic>Upper extremity rehabilitation</topic><topic>Wheelchair propulsion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bressel, Eadric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bressel, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquez, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heise, Gary D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bressel, Eadric</au><au>Bressel, Megan</au><au>Marquez, Michael</au><au>Heise, Gary D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of handgrip position on upper extremity neuromuscular responses to arm cranking exercise</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><date>2001-08-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>291-298</pages><issn>1050-6411</issn><eissn>1873-5711</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to determine if handgrip position during arm cranking exercise influences the neuromuscular activity of muscles biceps brachii (BB), lateral head of triceps brachii (TB), middle deltoid (DT), infraspinatus (IS) and brachioradialis (BR). Fifteen participants cranked an arm ergometer using three different handgrip positions (supinated, pronated, and neutral). Electromyographic (EMG) data were recorded from the aforementioned muscles, and relative duration of EMG activation and amplitude were quantified for the first and second 180° of crank angle. EMG measures were analyzed with MANOVA and follow-up univariate procedures; alpha was set at 0.01. The relative durations of EMG activation did not differ between handgrip positions. Muscle IS exhibited 36% less amplitude in the supinated versus neutral handgrip position (second half-cycle), and muscle BR displayed 63% greater amplitude across cycles in the neutral versus supinated and pronated handgrip positions. The greater BR activity displayed in the neutral handgrip position may reflect its anatomical advantage as an elbow flexor when the forearm is in neutral position. Muscle IS exhibited less activity in the supinated position and may be clinically relevant if it allows arm cranking to occur without subsequent shoulder pain, which is often the aim of shoulder rehabilitation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11532600</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1050-6411(01)00002-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1050-6411
ispartof Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2001-08, Vol.11 (4), p.291-298
issn 1050-6411
1873-5711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71143285
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Arm - physiology
Electromyography
Ergometry
Exercise - physiology
Female
Hand Strength - physiology
Humans
Male
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Upper body exercise
Upper extremity rehabilitation
Wheelchair propulsion
title The effect of handgrip position on upper extremity neuromuscular responses to arm cranking exercise
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A57%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20handgrip%20position%20on%20upper%20extremity%20neuromuscular%20responses%20to%20arm%20cranking%20exercise&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electromyography%20and%20kinesiology&rft.au=Bressel,%20Eadric&rft.date=2001-08-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=291-298&rft.issn=1050-6411&rft.eissn=1873-5711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1050-6411(01)00002-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71143285%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18342228&rft_id=info:pmid/11532600&rft_els_id=S1050641101000025&rfr_iscdi=true