Human Factors Issues in Ventricular Assist Device Recipients and Their Family Caregivers

Ultimately, for ventricular assist devices (VADs) to be acceptable as permanent alternatives to heart transplantation, patients’ and their families’ satisfaction with specific features and risks of VADs must be addressed. Of 42 eligible patients who received VADs between February of 1996 and December of 1998, we interviewed 37 patients (17 Novacor, 18 Thoratec, 2 with both devices) and 20 of their primary family caregivers about device related concerns and reactions. Demographic and health related correlates of respondents’ concerns were examined. Eleven patients discharged from the hospital with the VAD in place were then reinterviewed 1 month after discharge. At baseline, patients’ general perceptions of the VAD were positive, although 22–52% reported specific concerns, including most often worry about infection (52%), difficulty sleeping due to the position of the driveline (52%), pain at the driveline exit site (46%), worry about device malfunction (40%), and being bothered during the day by device noise (32%). The prevalence of most concerns rose with duration of VAD support. Caregivers’ perceptions did not differ significantly from patients’ perceptions. Outpatients were somewhat more concerned than inpatients about device noise and risk of stroke, but were markedly less concerned about infection. Across all patients, higher levels of device related concerns were correlated with more physical functional limitations and more psychological distress, and reduced quality of life. Demographic characteristics and device type were not uniformly related to device concerns.