"Echo attributions" and other risks when publishing on novel therapies without peer review
A special series on Thought Field Therapy in the Journal of Clinical Psychology provides an opportunity for psychologists to learn about techniques and theories outside the mainstream of our field. Unfortunately, by publishing this series of manuscripts without meeting the standards of peer review,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical psychology 2001-10, Vol.57 (10), p.1245-1250 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1250 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1245 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical psychology |
| container_volume | 57 |
| creator | Rosen, Gerald M. Davison, Gerald C. |
| description | A special series on Thought Field Therapy in the Journal of Clinical Psychology provides an opportunity for psychologists to learn about techniques and theories outside the mainstream of our field. Unfortunately, by publishing this series of manuscripts without meeting the standards of peer review, the Journal also provides an avenue for the misuse of its good reputation and the improper promotion of untested methods. “Echo attributions” can be made whereby an author attributes the source of his own words to the professional journal in which the text appears. Historical examples illustrate that such misuse of scientific journals and institutions occurs. A formal statement of guidelines is needed to instruct authors on appropriate versus unethical representations of their publications. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Clin Psychol 57: 1245–1250, 2001. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jclp.1092 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71131801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>83508589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3862-fff0c28773251ca589c57ce30679315fcbd605fe172776371de60dbf3a546e053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFrFDEUB_Agil2rB7-AhD0IHsbmJZtk5yhrrS2DWlAEL2Em88bJdnYyTWa69tubYRcLQk8vkN_7k_wJeQ3sPTDGz7a2G9Ip50_IIg2drZTOn5JFuoMs14qfkBcxbhljKwbyOTkBkFwp4Avya3luW0_LcQyumkbn-7ikZV9TP7YYaHDxJtJ9iz0dpqpzsXX9b-p72vs77OhsysFhIm5s_TTSAectvHO4f0meNWUX8dVxnpIfn86_bz5nxdeLy82HIrNirXjWNA2zfK214BJsKde5ldqiYOkPAmRjq1ox2SBorrUSGmpUrK4aUcqVQibFKXl7yB2Cv50wjmbnosWuK3v0UzQaQMCaQYLL_-DWT6FPbzNcqJytBMzo3QHZ4GMM2JghuF0Z7g0wM7dt5rbN3Hayb46BU7XD-kEe603g7AD2rsP7x5PM1ab4dozMDhsujvjn30YZbozSQkvz88uFub7-yCTkhSnEX8KlmAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236904311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"Echo attributions" and other risks when publishing on novel therapies without peer review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Rosen, Gerald M. ; Davison, Gerald C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Gerald M. ; Davison, Gerald C.</creatorcontrib><description>A special series on Thought Field Therapy in the Journal of Clinical Psychology provides an opportunity for psychologists to learn about techniques and theories outside the mainstream of our field. Unfortunately, by publishing this series of manuscripts without meeting the standards of peer review, the Journal also provides an avenue for the misuse of its good reputation and the improper promotion of untested methods. “Echo attributions” can be made whereby an author attributes the source of his own words to the professional journal in which the text appears. Historical examples illustrate that such misuse of scientific journals and institutions occurs. A formal statement of guidelines is needed to instruct authors on appropriate versus unethical representations of their publications. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Clin Psychol 57: 1245–1250, 2001.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jclp.1092</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11526612</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPYAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Advertising as Topic ; Desensitization, Psychologic - methods ; Evidence-Based Medicine - standards ; Eye Movements ; Humans ; Meridians ; Peer review ; Peer Review, Research - standards ; Psychology ; Psychology, Clinical - standards ; Psychotherapy, Brief - methods ; Psychotherapy, Brief - standards ; Publishing ; Publishing - standards ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical psychology, 2001-10, Vol.57 (10), p.1245-1250</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Oct 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3862-fff0c28773251ca589c57ce30679315fcbd605fe172776371de60dbf3a546e053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3862-fff0c28773251ca589c57ce30679315fcbd605fe172776371de60dbf3a546e053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjclp.1092$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjclp.1092$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11526612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Gerald M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davison, Gerald C.</creatorcontrib><title>"Echo attributions" and other risks when publishing on novel therapies without peer review</title><title>Journal of clinical psychology</title><addtitle>J. Clin. Psychol</addtitle><description>A special series on Thought Field Therapy in the Journal of Clinical Psychology provides an opportunity for psychologists to learn about techniques and theories outside the mainstream of our field. Unfortunately, by publishing this series of manuscripts without meeting the standards of peer review, the Journal also provides an avenue for the misuse of its good reputation and the improper promotion of untested methods. “Echo attributions” can be made whereby an author attributes the source of his own words to the professional journal in which the text appears. Historical examples illustrate that such misuse of scientific journals and institutions occurs. A formal statement of guidelines is needed to instruct authors on appropriate versus unethical representations of their publications. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Clin Psychol 57: 1245–1250, 2001.</description><subject>Advertising as Topic</subject><subject>Desensitization, Psychologic - methods</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meridians</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Peer Review, Research - standards</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology, Clinical - standards</subject><subject>Psychotherapy, Brief - methods</subject><subject>Psychotherapy, Brief - standards</subject><subject>Publishing</subject><subject>Publishing - standards</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0021-9762</issn><issn>1097-4679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EFrFDEUB_Agil2rB7-AhD0IHsbmJZtk5yhrrS2DWlAEL2Em88bJdnYyTWa69tubYRcLQk8vkN_7k_wJeQ3sPTDGz7a2G9Ip50_IIg2drZTOn5JFuoMs14qfkBcxbhljKwbyOTkBkFwp4Avya3luW0_LcQyumkbn-7ikZV9TP7YYaHDxJtJ9iz0dpqpzsXX9b-p72vs77OhsysFhIm5s_TTSAectvHO4f0meNWUX8dVxnpIfn86_bz5nxdeLy82HIrNirXjWNA2zfK214BJsKde5ldqiYOkPAmRjq1ox2SBorrUSGmpUrK4aUcqVQibFKXl7yB2Cv50wjmbnosWuK3v0UzQaQMCaQYLL_-DWT6FPbzNcqJytBMzo3QHZ4GMM2JghuF0Z7g0wM7dt5rbN3Hayb46BU7XD-kEe603g7AD2rsP7x5PM1ab4dozMDhsujvjn30YZbozSQkvz88uFub7-yCTkhSnEX8KlmAg</recordid><startdate>200110</startdate><enddate>200110</enddate><creator>Rosen, Gerald M.</creator><creator>Davison, Gerald C.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200110</creationdate><title>"Echo attributions" and other risks when publishing on novel therapies without peer review</title><author>Rosen, Gerald M. ; Davison, Gerald C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3862-fff0c28773251ca589c57ce30679315fcbd605fe172776371de60dbf3a546e053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Advertising as Topic</topic><topic>Desensitization, Psychologic - methods</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meridians</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Peer Review, Research - standards</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology, Clinical - standards</topic><topic>Psychotherapy, Brief - methods</topic><topic>Psychotherapy, Brief - standards</topic><topic>Publishing</topic><topic>Publishing - standards</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Gerald M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davison, Gerald C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosen, Gerald M.</au><au>Davison, Gerald C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"Echo attributions" and other risks when publishing on novel therapies without peer review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Clin. Psychol</addtitle><date>2001-10</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1245</spage><epage>1250</epage><pages>1245-1250</pages><issn>0021-9762</issn><eissn>1097-4679</eissn><coden>JCPYAO</coden><abstract>A special series on Thought Field Therapy in the Journal of Clinical Psychology provides an opportunity for psychologists to learn about techniques and theories outside the mainstream of our field. Unfortunately, by publishing this series of manuscripts without meeting the standards of peer review, the Journal also provides an avenue for the misuse of its good reputation and the improper promotion of untested methods. “Echo attributions” can be made whereby an author attributes the source of his own words to the professional journal in which the text appears. Historical examples illustrate that such misuse of scientific journals and institutions occurs. A formal statement of guidelines is needed to instruct authors on appropriate versus unethical representations of their publications. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Clin Psychol 57: 1245–1250, 2001.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>11526612</pmid><doi>10.1002/jclp.1092</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9762 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical psychology, 2001-10, Vol.57 (10), p.1245-1250 |
| issn | 0021-9762 1097-4679 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71131801 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | Advertising as Topic Desensitization, Psychologic - methods Evidence-Based Medicine - standards Eye Movements Humans Meridians Peer review Peer Review, Research - standards Psychology Psychology, Clinical - standards Psychotherapy, Brief - methods Psychotherapy, Brief - standards Publishing Publishing - standards United States |
| title | "Echo attributions" and other risks when publishing on novel therapies without peer review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T17%3A52%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Echo%20attributions%22%20and%20other%20risks%20when%20publishing%20on%20novel%20therapies%20without%20peer%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=Rosen,%20Gerald%20M.&rft.date=2001-10&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1245&rft.epage=1250&rft.pages=1245-1250&rft.issn=0021-9762&rft.eissn=1097-4679&rft.coden=JCPYAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jclp.1092&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E83508589%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236904311&rft_id=info:pmid/11526612&rfr_iscdi=true |