RAPD discrimination of Agaricus bisporus mushroom cultivars

Cultivars of the white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus are difficult to differentiate, which has made strain protection problematic for this crop species. We have used RAPDs to discriminate between 26 strains of A. bisporus, 24 of which were commercial cultivars, and to characterise the genetic re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied microbiology and biotechnology 2001-06, Vol.55 (6), p.742-749
Hauptverfasser: Moore, A.J, Challen, M.P, Warner, P.J, Elliott, T.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 749
container_issue 6
container_start_page 742
container_title Applied microbiology and biotechnology
container_volume 55
creator Moore, A.J
Challen, M.P
Warner, P.J
Elliott, T.J
description Cultivars of the white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus are difficult to differentiate, which has made strain protection problematic for this crop species. We have used RAPDs to discriminate between 26 strains of A. bisporus, 24 of which were commercial cultivars, and to characterise the genetic relatedness of these strains. Using 20 primers, 211 RAPD markers were identified and used in hierarchical cluster, patristic distance and parsimony analyses. All strains could be differentiated using the aggregated primer data. Although no one primer could differentiate all 26 strains, several individual primers yielded unique fingerprints for a variety of strains. The greatest differences (up to 28% variation) were observed in comparisons with or between two wild collections of A. bisporus. Quondam cultivars, commercial brown and off-white varieties proved more variable than the widely grown 'hybrid' types. Of the 15 hybrid varieties analysed, only one differed substantially (20% or more variable). The patristic and parsimony analyses both demonstrated the gross similarity of the hybrids, many of which appear to be essentially derived varieties from two original hybrid cultivars. RAPD analyses can assist mushroom strain identification and could play a role in the protection of novel cultivars.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s002530000588
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71127505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71127505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-289f819304a1516067fae32dde415b9cb077f2ea5b63271d94e5c2d39ff2a2b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0MtP3DAQB2ALtYJl6ZErjRDiljJjxy9xWvFqpZVAbfccOY5Ng5J4sTdI_e9rtCtBe6kv48OnefwIOUb4ggDyIgFQziA_rtQemWHFaAkCqw9kBih5KblWB-QwpScApEqIfXKAyCkXlM3I5ffFw3XRdsnGbuhGs-nCWARfLB5N7OyUiqZL6xDzZ5jSrxjCUNip33QvJqYj8tGbPrlPuzonq9ubn1dfy-X93berxbK0FcCmpEp7hZpBZZCjACG9cYy2rauQN9o2IKWnzvBGMCqx1ZXjlrZMe08NbSSbk_Nt33UMz5NLm3rI-7q-N6MLU6olIpUc-H8hqjxe5lXm5PQf-BSmOOYjaqUqwYHp17HlFtkYUorO1-uckYm_a4T6Nfv6r-yzP9k1nZrBtW96F3YGZztgkjW9j2a0XXrXVel8SGaft8ybUJvHmMnqB4W8OoAWmbA_IwqSQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884650397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RAPD discrimination of Agaricus bisporus mushroom cultivars</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Moore, A.J ; Challen, M.P ; Warner, P.J ; Elliott, T.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Moore, A.J ; Challen, M.P ; Warner, P.J ; Elliott, T.J</creatorcontrib><description>Cultivars of the white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus are difficult to differentiate, which has made strain protection problematic for this crop species. We have used RAPDs to discriminate between 26 strains of A. bisporus, 24 of which were commercial cultivars, and to characterise the genetic relatedness of these strains. Using 20 primers, 211 RAPD markers were identified and used in hierarchical cluster, patristic distance and parsimony analyses. All strains could be differentiated using the aggregated primer data. Although no one primer could differentiate all 26 strains, several individual primers yielded unique fingerprints for a variety of strains. The greatest differences (up to 28% variation) were observed in comparisons with or between two wild collections of A. bisporus. Quondam cultivars, commercial brown and off-white varieties proved more variable than the widely grown 'hybrid' types. Of the 15 hybrid varieties analysed, only one differed substantially (20% or more variable). The patristic and parsimony analyses both demonstrated the gross similarity of the hybrids, many of which appear to be essentially derived varieties from two original hybrid cultivars. RAPD analyses can assist mushroom strain identification and could play a role in the protection of novel cultivars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0175-7598</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s002530000588</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11525623</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMBIDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Agaricus - classification ; Agaricus - genetics ; Agaricus bisporus ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; crops ; Cultivars ; DNA Primers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities. Genetics. Plant material ; genetic relationships ; Genetic resources, diversity ; Genetics and breeding of economic plants ; Hybridization, Genetic ; Hybrids ; Mushrooms ; Phylogeny ; Plant material ; Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</subject><ispartof>Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2001-06, Vol.55 (6), p.742-749</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-289f819304a1516067fae32dde415b9cb077f2ea5b63271d94e5c2d39ff2a2b73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1089127$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11525623$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moore, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Challen, M.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, P.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, T.J</creatorcontrib><title>RAPD discrimination of Agaricus bisporus mushroom cultivars</title><title>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</title><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><description>Cultivars of the white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus are difficult to differentiate, which has made strain protection problematic for this crop species. We have used RAPDs to discriminate between 26 strains of A. bisporus, 24 of which were commercial cultivars, and to characterise the genetic relatedness of these strains. Using 20 primers, 211 RAPD markers were identified and used in hierarchical cluster, patristic distance and parsimony analyses. All strains could be differentiated using the aggregated primer data. Although no one primer could differentiate all 26 strains, several individual primers yielded unique fingerprints for a variety of strains. The greatest differences (up to 28% variation) were observed in comparisons with or between two wild collections of A. bisporus. Quondam cultivars, commercial brown and off-white varieties proved more variable than the widely grown 'hybrid' types. Of the 15 hybrid varieties analysed, only one differed substantially (20% or more variable). The patristic and parsimony analyses both demonstrated the gross similarity of the hybrids, many of which appear to be essentially derived varieties from two original hybrid cultivars. RAPD analyses can assist mushroom strain identification and could play a role in the protection of novel cultivars.</description><subject>Agaricus - classification</subject><subject>Agaricus - genetics</subject><subject>Agaricus bisporus</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>DNA Primers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities. Genetics. Plant material</subject><subject>genetic relationships</subject><subject>Genetic resources, diversity</subject><subject>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</subject><subject>Hybridization, Genetic</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Mushrooms</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant material</subject><subject>Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</subject><issn>0175-7598</issn><issn>1432-0614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0MtP3DAQB2ALtYJl6ZErjRDiljJjxy9xWvFqpZVAbfccOY5Ng5J4sTdI_e9rtCtBe6kv48OnefwIOUb4ggDyIgFQziA_rtQemWHFaAkCqw9kBih5KblWB-QwpScApEqIfXKAyCkXlM3I5ffFw3XRdsnGbuhGs-nCWARfLB5N7OyUiqZL6xDzZ5jSrxjCUNip33QvJqYj8tGbPrlPuzonq9ubn1dfy-X93berxbK0FcCmpEp7hZpBZZCjACG9cYy2rauQN9o2IKWnzvBGMCqx1ZXjlrZMe08NbSSbk_Nt33UMz5NLm3rI-7q-N6MLU6olIpUc-H8hqjxe5lXm5PQf-BSmOOYjaqUqwYHp17HlFtkYUorO1-uckYm_a4T6Nfv6r-yzP9k1nZrBtW96F3YGZztgkjW9j2a0XXrXVel8SGaft8ybUJvHmMnqB4W8OoAWmbA_IwqSQQ</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Moore, A.J</creator><creator>Challen, M.P</creator><creator>Warner, P.J</creator><creator>Elliott, T.J</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>RAPD discrimination of Agaricus bisporus mushroom cultivars</title><author>Moore, A.J ; Challen, M.P ; Warner, P.J ; Elliott, T.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-289f819304a1516067fae32dde415b9cb077f2ea5b63271d94e5c2d39ff2a2b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Agaricus - classification</topic><topic>Agaricus - genetics</topic><topic>Agaricus bisporus</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>DNA Primers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities. Genetics. Plant material</topic><topic>genetic relationships</topic><topic>Genetic resources, diversity</topic><topic>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</topic><topic>Hybridization, Genetic</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Mushrooms</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant material</topic><topic>Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moore, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Challen, M.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, P.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, T.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moore, A.J</au><au>Challen, M.P</au><au>Warner, P.J</au><au>Elliott, T.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RAPD discrimination of Agaricus bisporus mushroom cultivars</atitle><jtitle>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>742</spage><epage>749</epage><pages>742-749</pages><issn>0175-7598</issn><eissn>1432-0614</eissn><coden>AMBIDG</coden><abstract>Cultivars of the white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus are difficult to differentiate, which has made strain protection problematic for this crop species. We have used RAPDs to discriminate between 26 strains of A. bisporus, 24 of which were commercial cultivars, and to characterise the genetic relatedness of these strains. Using 20 primers, 211 RAPD markers were identified and used in hierarchical cluster, patristic distance and parsimony analyses. All strains could be differentiated using the aggregated primer data. Although no one primer could differentiate all 26 strains, several individual primers yielded unique fingerprints for a variety of strains. The greatest differences (up to 28% variation) were observed in comparisons with or between two wild collections of A. bisporus. Quondam cultivars, commercial brown and off-white varieties proved more variable than the widely grown 'hybrid' types. Of the 15 hybrid varieties analysed, only one differed substantially (20% or more variable). The patristic and parsimony analyses both demonstrated the gross similarity of the hybrids, many of which appear to be essentially derived varieties from two original hybrid cultivars. RAPD analyses can assist mushroom strain identification and could play a role in the protection of novel cultivars.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>11525623</pmid><doi>10.1007/s002530000588</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0175-7598
ispartof Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2001-06, Vol.55 (6), p.742-749
issn 0175-7598
1432-0614
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71127505
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agaricus - classification
Agaricus - genetics
Agaricus bisporus
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
crops
Cultivars
DNA Primers
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Generalities. Genetics. Plant material
genetic relationships
Genetic resources, diversity
Genetics and breeding of economic plants
Hybridization, Genetic
Hybrids
Mushrooms
Phylogeny
Plant material
Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique
title RAPD discrimination of Agaricus bisporus mushroom cultivars
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RAPD%20discrimination%20of%20Agaricus%20bisporus%20mushroom%20cultivars&rft.jtitle=Applied%20microbiology%20and%20biotechnology&rft.au=Moore,%20A.J&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=742&rft.epage=749&rft.pages=742-749&rft.issn=0175-7598&rft.eissn=1432-0614&rft.coden=AMBIDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s002530000588&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71127505%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884650397&rft_id=info:pmid/11525623&rfr_iscdi=true