RAPD discrimination of Agaricus bisporus mushroom cultivars
Cultivars of the white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus are difficult to differentiate, which has made strain protection problematic for this crop species. We have used RAPDs to discriminate between 26 strains of A. bisporus, 24 of which were commercial cultivars, and to characterise the genetic re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied microbiology and biotechnology 2001-06, Vol.55 (6), p.742-749 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 749 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 742 |
container_title | Applied microbiology and biotechnology |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Moore, A.J Challen, M.P Warner, P.J Elliott, T.J |
description | Cultivars of the white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus are difficult to differentiate, which has made strain protection problematic for this crop species. We have used RAPDs to discriminate between 26 strains of A. bisporus, 24 of which were commercial cultivars, and to characterise the genetic relatedness of these strains. Using 20 primers, 211 RAPD markers were identified and used in hierarchical cluster, patristic distance and parsimony analyses. All strains could be differentiated using the aggregated primer data. Although no one primer could differentiate all 26 strains, several individual primers yielded unique fingerprints for a variety of strains. The greatest differences (up to 28% variation) were observed in comparisons with or between two wild collections of A. bisporus. Quondam cultivars, commercial brown and off-white varieties proved more variable than the widely grown 'hybrid' types. Of the 15 hybrid varieties analysed, only one differed substantially (20% or more variable). The patristic and parsimony analyses both demonstrated the gross similarity of the hybrids, many of which appear to be essentially derived varieties from two original hybrid cultivars. RAPD analyses can assist mushroom strain identification and could play a role in the protection of novel cultivars. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s002530000588 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71127505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71127505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-289f819304a1516067fae32dde415b9cb077f2ea5b63271d94e5c2d39ff2a2b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0MtP3DAQB2ALtYJl6ZErjRDiljJjxy9xWvFqpZVAbfccOY5Ng5J4sTdI_e9rtCtBe6kv48OnefwIOUb4ggDyIgFQziA_rtQemWHFaAkCqw9kBih5KblWB-QwpScApEqIfXKAyCkXlM3I5ffFw3XRdsnGbuhGs-nCWARfLB5N7OyUiqZL6xDzZ5jSrxjCUNip33QvJqYj8tGbPrlPuzonq9ubn1dfy-X93berxbK0FcCmpEp7hZpBZZCjACG9cYy2rauQN9o2IKWnzvBGMCqx1ZXjlrZMe08NbSSbk_Nt33UMz5NLm3rI-7q-N6MLU6olIpUc-H8hqjxe5lXm5PQf-BSmOOYjaqUqwYHp17HlFtkYUorO1-uckYm_a4T6Nfv6r-yzP9k1nZrBtW96F3YGZztgkjW9j2a0XXrXVel8SGaft8ybUJvHmMnqB4W8OoAWmbA_IwqSQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884650397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RAPD discrimination of Agaricus bisporus mushroom cultivars</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Moore, A.J ; Challen, M.P ; Warner, P.J ; Elliott, T.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Moore, A.J ; Challen, M.P ; Warner, P.J ; Elliott, T.J</creatorcontrib><description>Cultivars of the white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus are difficult to differentiate, which has made strain protection problematic for this crop species. We have used RAPDs to discriminate between 26 strains of A. bisporus, 24 of which were commercial cultivars, and to characterise the genetic relatedness of these strains. Using 20 primers, 211 RAPD markers were identified and used in hierarchical cluster, patristic distance and parsimony analyses. All strains could be differentiated using the aggregated primer data. Although no one primer could differentiate all 26 strains, several individual primers yielded unique fingerprints for a variety of strains. The greatest differences (up to 28% variation) were observed in comparisons with or between two wild collections of A. bisporus. Quondam cultivars, commercial brown and off-white varieties proved more variable than the widely grown 'hybrid' types. Of the 15 hybrid varieties analysed, only one differed substantially (20% or more variable). The patristic and parsimony analyses both demonstrated the gross similarity of the hybrids, many of which appear to be essentially derived varieties from two original hybrid cultivars. RAPD analyses can assist mushroom strain identification and could play a role in the protection of novel cultivars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0175-7598</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s002530000588</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11525623</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMBIDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Agaricus - classification ; Agaricus - genetics ; Agaricus bisporus ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; crops ; Cultivars ; DNA Primers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities. Genetics. Plant material ; genetic relationships ; Genetic resources, diversity ; Genetics and breeding of economic plants ; Hybridization, Genetic ; Hybrids ; Mushrooms ; Phylogeny ; Plant material ; Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</subject><ispartof>Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2001-06, Vol.55 (6), p.742-749</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-289f819304a1516067fae32dde415b9cb077f2ea5b63271d94e5c2d39ff2a2b73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1089127$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11525623$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moore, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Challen, M.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, P.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, T.J</creatorcontrib><title>RAPD discrimination of Agaricus bisporus mushroom cultivars</title><title>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</title><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><description>Cultivars of the white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus are difficult to differentiate, which has made strain protection problematic for this crop species. We have used RAPDs to discriminate between 26 strains of A. bisporus, 24 of which were commercial cultivars, and to characterise the genetic relatedness of these strains. Using 20 primers, 211 RAPD markers were identified and used in hierarchical cluster, patristic distance and parsimony analyses. All strains could be differentiated using the aggregated primer data. Although no one primer could differentiate all 26 strains, several individual primers yielded unique fingerprints for a variety of strains. The greatest differences (up to 28% variation) were observed in comparisons with or between two wild collections of A. bisporus. Quondam cultivars, commercial brown and off-white varieties proved more variable than the widely grown 'hybrid' types. Of the 15 hybrid varieties analysed, only one differed substantially (20% or more variable). The patristic and parsimony analyses both demonstrated the gross similarity of the hybrids, many of which appear to be essentially derived varieties from two original hybrid cultivars. RAPD analyses can assist mushroom strain identification and could play a role in the protection of novel cultivars.</description><subject>Agaricus - classification</subject><subject>Agaricus - genetics</subject><subject>Agaricus bisporus</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>DNA Primers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities. Genetics. Plant material</subject><subject>genetic relationships</subject><subject>Genetic resources, diversity</subject><subject>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</subject><subject>Hybridization, Genetic</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Mushrooms</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant material</subject><subject>Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</subject><issn>0175-7598</issn><issn>1432-0614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0MtP3DAQB2ALtYJl6ZErjRDiljJjxy9xWvFqpZVAbfccOY5Ng5J4sTdI_e9rtCtBe6kv48OnefwIOUb4ggDyIgFQziA_rtQemWHFaAkCqw9kBih5KblWB-QwpScApEqIfXKAyCkXlM3I5ffFw3XRdsnGbuhGs-nCWARfLB5N7OyUiqZL6xDzZ5jSrxjCUNip33QvJqYj8tGbPrlPuzonq9ubn1dfy-X93berxbK0FcCmpEp7hZpBZZCjACG9cYy2rauQN9o2IKWnzvBGMCqx1ZXjlrZMe08NbSSbk_Nt33UMz5NLm3rI-7q-N6MLU6olIpUc-H8hqjxe5lXm5PQf-BSmOOYjaqUqwYHp17HlFtkYUorO1-uckYm_a4T6Nfv6r-yzP9k1nZrBtW96F3YGZztgkjW9j2a0XXrXVel8SGaft8ybUJvHmMnqB4W8OoAWmbA_IwqSQQ</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Moore, A.J</creator><creator>Challen, M.P</creator><creator>Warner, P.J</creator><creator>Elliott, T.J</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>RAPD discrimination of Agaricus bisporus mushroom cultivars</title><author>Moore, A.J ; Challen, M.P ; Warner, P.J ; Elliott, T.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-289f819304a1516067fae32dde415b9cb077f2ea5b63271d94e5c2d39ff2a2b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Agaricus - classification</topic><topic>Agaricus - genetics</topic><topic>Agaricus bisporus</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>DNA Primers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities. Genetics. Plant material</topic><topic>genetic relationships</topic><topic>Genetic resources, diversity</topic><topic>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</topic><topic>Hybridization, Genetic</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Mushrooms</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant material</topic><topic>Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moore, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Challen, M.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, P.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, T.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moore, A.J</au><au>Challen, M.P</au><au>Warner, P.J</au><au>Elliott, T.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RAPD discrimination of Agaricus bisporus mushroom cultivars</atitle><jtitle>Applied microbiology and biotechnology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>742</spage><epage>749</epage><pages>742-749</pages><issn>0175-7598</issn><eissn>1432-0614</eissn><coden>AMBIDG</coden><abstract>Cultivars of the white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus are difficult to differentiate, which has made strain protection problematic for this crop species. We have used RAPDs to discriminate between 26 strains of A. bisporus, 24 of which were commercial cultivars, and to characterise the genetic relatedness of these strains. Using 20 primers, 211 RAPD markers were identified and used in hierarchical cluster, patristic distance and parsimony analyses. All strains could be differentiated using the aggregated primer data. Although no one primer could differentiate all 26 strains, several individual primers yielded unique fingerprints for a variety of strains. The greatest differences (up to 28% variation) were observed in comparisons with or between two wild collections of A. bisporus. Quondam cultivars, commercial brown and off-white varieties proved more variable than the widely grown 'hybrid' types. Of the 15 hybrid varieties analysed, only one differed substantially (20% or more variable). The patristic and parsimony analyses both demonstrated the gross similarity of the hybrids, many of which appear to be essentially derived varieties from two original hybrid cultivars. RAPD analyses can assist mushroom strain identification and could play a role in the protection of novel cultivars.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>11525623</pmid><doi>10.1007/s002530000588</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0175-7598 |
ispartof | Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2001-06, Vol.55 (6), p.742-749 |
issn | 0175-7598 1432-0614 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71127505 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agaricus - classification Agaricus - genetics Agaricus bisporus Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences crops Cultivars DNA Primers Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Generalities. Genetics. Plant material genetic relationships Genetic resources, diversity Genetics and breeding of economic plants Hybridization, Genetic Hybrids Mushrooms Phylogeny Plant material Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique |
title | RAPD discrimination of Agaricus bisporus mushroom cultivars |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RAPD%20discrimination%20of%20Agaricus%20bisporus%20mushroom%20cultivars&rft.jtitle=Applied%20microbiology%20and%20biotechnology&rft.au=Moore,%20A.J&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=742&rft.epage=749&rft.pages=742-749&rft.issn=0175-7598&rft.eissn=1432-0614&rft.coden=AMBIDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s002530000588&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71127505%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884650397&rft_id=info:pmid/11525623&rfr_iscdi=true |