The Optimal Number of Fathers: Evolution, Demography, and History in the Shaping of Female Mate Preferences

: Around the world polygynous marriage (one man, several women) is vastly more common than polyandrous marriage (one woman, several men), and women tend to be more cautious about entering into sexual relationships than men are. Such patterns are often assumed to reflect essential differences between...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2000-04, Vol.907 (1), p.75-96
1. Verfasser: HRDY, SARAH BLAFFER
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue 1
container_start_page 75
container_title Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
container_volume 907
creator HRDY, SARAH BLAFFER
description : Around the world polygynous marriage (one man, several women) is vastly more common than polyandrous marriage (one woman, several men), and women tend to be more cautious about entering into sexual relationships than men are. Such patterns are often assumed to reflect essential differences between the sexes. However, the same dichotomy between “ardent” males and “coy” females is not found in other primates. Furthermore, under a range of circumstances females enhance their reproductive success by mating with multiple partners and use polyandrous mating (soliciting copulations from several or more males) to circumvent male‐imposed costs on their free choice of mates. The existence of one‐male mating systems does not prove that females “naturally” gravitate to them. Typically monandrous (copulating with just one partner) mating systems are maintained by one male excluding rivals or by other circumstances that distort female options. As with many other animals, primate females (including women) can benefit reproductively from polyandrous matings. Understanding this takes us beyond narrow research programs intent on demonstrating “universal” differences between the sexes, and allows us to study females as flexible and opportunistic individuals who confront recurring reproductive dilemmas and tradeoffs within a world of shifting options.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06617.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71118549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71118549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4085-4379e5f7d22cd5e49dd9ccb4aeb5e61e987bcf33df855e99f8afb6662e4832503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEtv1DAURi0EokPhLyCLBasm2E786gKpKn2JdjrSDEKsLCe56WSaV-0EZv59PWRUscWbu_D3nXt1EPpESUzD-7KJqUx1JETCYkYIiYeMCEFlvH2FZi9fr9GMECkjpVlyhN55vyGEMpXKt-iIEkWVYGyGHldrwPf9UDW2xvOxycDhrsSXdliD86f44ndXj0PVtSf4GzTdg7P9eneCbVvg68oPndvhqsUhjJdr21ftw982BBrgOzsAXjgowUGbg3-P3pS29vDhMI_Rj8uL1fl1dHt_dXN-dhvlKVE8ShOpgZeyYCwvOKS6KHSeZ6mFjIOgoJXM8jJJilJxDlqXypaZEIJBqhLGSXKMPk_c3nVPI_jBNJXPoa5tC93ojQwSFU91CJ5Owdx13odDTe-CCLczlJi9arMxe59m79PsVZuDarMN5Y-HLWPWQPFPdXIbAl-nwJ-qht1_oM3819lS8gCIJkAQDdsXgHWPRshEcvNzfmWWC71Qd-S7WSXP45OeLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71118549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Optimal Number of Fathers: Evolution, Demography, and History in the Shaping of Female Mate Preferences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>HRDY, SARAH BLAFFER</creator><creatorcontrib>HRDY, SARAH BLAFFER</creatorcontrib><description>: Around the world polygynous marriage (one man, several women) is vastly more common than polyandrous marriage (one woman, several men), and women tend to be more cautious about entering into sexual relationships than men are. Such patterns are often assumed to reflect essential differences between the sexes. However, the same dichotomy between “ardent” males and “coy” females is not found in other primates. Furthermore, under a range of circumstances females enhance their reproductive success by mating with multiple partners and use polyandrous mating (soliciting copulations from several or more males) to circumvent male‐imposed costs on their free choice of mates. The existence of one‐male mating systems does not prove that females “naturally” gravitate to them. Typically monandrous (copulating with just one partner) mating systems are maintained by one male excluding rivals or by other circumstances that distort female options. As with many other animals, primate females (including women) can benefit reproductively from polyandrous matings. Understanding this takes us beyond narrow research programs intent on demonstrating “universal” differences between the sexes, and allows us to study females as flexible and opportunistic individuals who confront recurring reproductive dilemmas and tradeoffs within a world of shifting options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0077-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-6632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06617.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10818622</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological Evolution ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Demography ; Fathers ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Marriage ; Reproduction - physiology ; Sexual Behavior - physiology</subject><ispartof>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2000-04, Vol.907 (1), p.75-96</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4085-4379e5f7d22cd5e49dd9ccb4aeb5e61e987bcf33df855e99f8afb6662e4832503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4085-4379e5f7d22cd5e49dd9ccb4aeb5e61e987bcf33df855e99f8afb6662e4832503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1749-6632.2000.tb06617.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1749-6632.2000.tb06617.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10818622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HRDY, SARAH BLAFFER</creatorcontrib><title>The Optimal Number of Fathers: Evolution, Demography, and History in the Shaping of Female Mate Preferences</title><title>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</title><addtitle>Ann N Y Acad Sci</addtitle><description>: Around the world polygynous marriage (one man, several women) is vastly more common than polyandrous marriage (one woman, several men), and women tend to be more cautious about entering into sexual relationships than men are. Such patterns are often assumed to reflect essential differences between the sexes. However, the same dichotomy between “ardent” males and “coy” females is not found in other primates. Furthermore, under a range of circumstances females enhance their reproductive success by mating with multiple partners and use polyandrous mating (soliciting copulations from several or more males) to circumvent male‐imposed costs on their free choice of mates. The existence of one‐male mating systems does not prove that females “naturally” gravitate to them. Typically monandrous (copulating with just one partner) mating systems are maintained by one male excluding rivals or by other circumstances that distort female options. As with many other animals, primate females (including women) can benefit reproductively from polyandrous matings. Understanding this takes us beyond narrow research programs intent on demonstrating “universal” differences between the sexes, and allows us to study females as flexible and opportunistic individuals who confront recurring reproductive dilemmas and tradeoffs within a world of shifting options.</description><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Fathers</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Reproduction - physiology</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior - physiology</subject><issn>0077-8923</issn><issn>1749-6632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEtv1DAURi0EokPhLyCLBasm2E786gKpKn2JdjrSDEKsLCe56WSaV-0EZv59PWRUscWbu_D3nXt1EPpESUzD-7KJqUx1JETCYkYIiYeMCEFlvH2FZi9fr9GMECkjpVlyhN55vyGEMpXKt-iIEkWVYGyGHldrwPf9UDW2xvOxycDhrsSXdliD86f44ndXj0PVtSf4GzTdg7P9eneCbVvg68oPndvhqsUhjJdr21ftw982BBrgOzsAXjgowUGbg3-P3pS29vDhMI_Rj8uL1fl1dHt_dXN-dhvlKVE8ShOpgZeyYCwvOKS6KHSeZ6mFjIOgoJXM8jJJilJxDlqXypaZEIJBqhLGSXKMPk_c3nVPI_jBNJXPoa5tC93ojQwSFU91CJ5Owdx13odDTe-CCLczlJi9arMxe59m79PsVZuDarMN5Y-HLWPWQPFPdXIbAl-nwJ-qht1_oM3819lS8gCIJkAQDdsXgHWPRshEcvNzfmWWC71Qd-S7WSXP45OeLA</recordid><startdate>200004</startdate><enddate>200004</enddate><creator>HRDY, SARAH BLAFFER</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200004</creationdate><title>The Optimal Number of Fathers: Evolution, Demography, and History in the Shaping of Female Mate Preferences</title><author>HRDY, SARAH BLAFFER</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4085-4379e5f7d22cd5e49dd9ccb4aeb5e61e987bcf33df855e99f8afb6662e4832503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Fathers</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Reproduction - physiology</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HRDY, SARAH BLAFFER</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HRDY, SARAH BLAFFER</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Optimal Number of Fathers: Evolution, Demography, and History in the Shaping of Female Mate Preferences</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Ann N Y Acad Sci</addtitle><date>2000-04</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>907</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>75-96</pages><issn>0077-8923</issn><eissn>1749-6632</eissn><abstract>: Around the world polygynous marriage (one man, several women) is vastly more common than polyandrous marriage (one woman, several men), and women tend to be more cautious about entering into sexual relationships than men are. Such patterns are often assumed to reflect essential differences between the sexes. However, the same dichotomy between “ardent” males and “coy” females is not found in other primates. Furthermore, under a range of circumstances females enhance their reproductive success by mating with multiple partners and use polyandrous mating (soliciting copulations from several or more males) to circumvent male‐imposed costs on their free choice of mates. The existence of one‐male mating systems does not prove that females “naturally” gravitate to them. Typically monandrous (copulating with just one partner) mating systems are maintained by one male excluding rivals or by other circumstances that distort female options. As with many other animals, primate females (including women) can benefit reproductively from polyandrous matings. Understanding this takes us beyond narrow research programs intent on demonstrating “universal” differences between the sexes, and allows us to study females as flexible and opportunistic individuals who confront recurring reproductive dilemmas and tradeoffs within a world of shifting options.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>10818622</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06617.x</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0077-8923
ispartof Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2000-04, Vol.907 (1), p.75-96
issn 0077-8923
1749-6632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71118549
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Biological Evolution
Choice Behavior - physiology
Demography
Fathers
Female
Humans
Male
Marriage
Reproduction - physiology
Sexual Behavior - physiology
title The Optimal Number of Fathers: Evolution, Demography, and History in the Shaping of Female Mate Preferences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T14%3A32%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Optimal%20Number%20of%20Fathers:%20Evolution,%20Demography,%20and%20History%20in%20the%20Shaping%20of%20Female%20Mate%20Preferences&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20New%20York%20Academy%20of%20Sciences&rft.au=HRDY,%20SARAH%20BLAFFER&rft.date=2000-04&rft.volume=907&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=75-96&rft.issn=0077-8923&rft.eissn=1749-6632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06617.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71118549%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71118549&rft_id=info:pmid/10818622&rfr_iscdi=true