Comparison of the effectiveness of WHO short-course chemotherapy and standard Russian antituberculous regimens in Tomsk, western Siberia
Background There has been a resurgence of tuberculosis in Russia in the past decade. Traditional Russian services for treatment of tuberculosis are very different from those in the west. We aimed to compare the effects of WHO short-course chemotherapy with standard Russian antituberculous regimens....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2001-08, Vol.358 (9280), p.445-449 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 449 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9280 |
container_start_page | 445 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 358 |
creator | Mawer, C Ignatenko, NV Wares, DF Strelis, AK Golubchikova, VT Yanova, GV Lyagoshina, TV Sharaburova, OE Banatvala, N |
description | Background There has been a resurgence of tuberculosis in Russia in the past decade. Traditional Russian services for treatment of tuberculosis are very different from those in the west. We aimed to compare the effects of WHO short-course chemotherapy with standard Russian antituberculous regimens.
New tuberculosis patients aged 18 years or older were included in a trial and systematically allocated to traditional Russian tuberculosis treatments or WHO shortcourse chemotherapy in the two largest tuberculosis diagnostic and treatment centres of Tomsk Oblast, western Siberia. Standard WHO tuberculosis outcomes and rates of sputum conversion were used as primary outcomes. Analyses were by intention-to-treat.
646 new cases were enrolled into the trial, of which 356 patients were given Russian tuberculosis treatment (155 smear positive) and 290 were given WHO short-course chemotherapy (155 smear positive). There was no statistical difference between the proportion cured or completing treatment (63% for both groups [difference in proportion=0%, 95% CI −11 to 11%]); or dying (short-course chemotherapy, 8%vs Russian, 11% [difference in proportion=−3%, 95% CI -9 to 4%]). There was no statistical difference with respect to sputum conversion rate at 6 months (91%vs 85% [difference in proportion=6%, 95% CI -2 to 13%]). Overall, outcomes were worse among patients with multidrug resistant isolates than non-resistant isolates.
WHO short-course chemotherapy treatment for tuberculosis can work well in Russia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05621-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71114261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673601056215</els_id><sourcerecordid>71114261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b7b0fe4ad7c4b54926f7c579dc59059b736cd97ce6afa1ce496a2e6915ecc9bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9qFDEUh4Modlt9BCUoFAVHc2byp7kSWdQKhYKt6F3IZE7c1J1kTWYqfQMf22x3URDEmwQO3zn5nXyEPAL2EhjIVxcMOGuk6uQzBs-ZkC004g5ZAFe8EVx9uUsWv5EDcljKFWOMSybukwMAAZ1makF-LtO4sTmUFGnydFohRe_RTeEaI5ayLX4-PadllfLUuDTngtStcEwVzXZzQ20caJnqafNAP86lBBtrcQrT3GN28zrNhWb8GkaMhYZIL9NYvr2gP7BMmCO9CBUL9gG55-264MP9fUQ-vXt7uTxtzs7ff1i-OWscBzk1veqZR24H5XgvuG6lV04oPTihmdB9XdYNWjmU1ltwyLW0LUoNAp3Tve-OyPFu7ian73PNYMZQHK7XNmJNahQA8FZCBZ_-BV7V7WPNZlomleL6RLaVevIvCvSJ5p3QXYXEDnI5lZLRm00Oo803BpjZ2jS3Ns1WlWFgbm0aUfse74fP_YjDn669vgq83gFYf-w6YDbFBYwOh5CrQzOk8J8nfgFCCrEv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198943593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the effectiveness of WHO short-course chemotherapy and standard Russian antituberculous regimens in Tomsk, western Siberia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Mawer, C ; Ignatenko, NV ; Wares, DF ; Strelis, AK ; Golubchikova, VT ; Yanova, GV ; Lyagoshina, TV ; Sharaburova, OE ; Banatvala, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Mawer, C ; Ignatenko, NV ; Wares, DF ; Strelis, AK ; Golubchikova, VT ; Yanova, GV ; Lyagoshina, TV ; Sharaburova, OE ; Banatvala, N</creatorcontrib><description>Background There has been a resurgence of tuberculosis in Russia in the past decade. Traditional Russian services for treatment of tuberculosis are very different from those in the west. We aimed to compare the effects of WHO short-course chemotherapy with standard Russian antituberculous regimens.
New tuberculosis patients aged 18 years or older were included in a trial and systematically allocated to traditional Russian tuberculosis treatments or WHO shortcourse chemotherapy in the two largest tuberculosis diagnostic and treatment centres of Tomsk Oblast, western Siberia. Standard WHO tuberculosis outcomes and rates of sputum conversion were used as primary outcomes. Analyses were by intention-to-treat.
646 new cases were enrolled into the trial, of which 356 patients were given Russian tuberculosis treatment (155 smear positive) and 290 were given WHO short-course chemotherapy (155 smear positive). There was no statistical difference between the proportion cured or completing treatment (63% for both groups [difference in proportion=0%, 95% CI −11 to 11%]); or dying (short-course chemotherapy, 8%vs Russian, 11% [difference in proportion=−3%, 95% CI -9 to 4%]). There was no statistical difference with respect to sputum conversion rate at 6 months (91%vs 85% [difference in proportion=6%, 95% CI -2 to 13%]). Overall, outcomes were worse among patients with multidrug resistant isolates than non-resistant isolates.
WHO short-course chemotherapy treatment for tuberculosis can work well in Russia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05621-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11513907</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibiotics ; Antitubercular Agents - administration & dosage ; Antitubercular Agents - therapeutic use ; Bias ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical trials ; Collaboration ; Conversion ; Diagnostic systems ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical research ; Microscopy ; Motivation ; Multidrug resistance ; Patients ; Physicians ; Population ; Risk Factors ; Russia - epidemiology ; Siberia - epidemiology ; Smear ; Sputum ; Sputum - microbiology ; Statistics ; Substance abuse treatment ; Time Factors ; Tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant - drug therapy ; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant - epidemiology ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - drug therapy ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - epidemiology ; World Health Organization</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2001-08, Vol.358 (9280), p.445-449</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Lancet Ltd. Aug 11, 2001</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 11, 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b7b0fe4ad7c4b54926f7c579dc59059b736cd97ce6afa1ce496a2e6915ecc9bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b7b0fe4ad7c4b54926f7c579dc59059b736cd97ce6afa1ce496a2e6915ecc9bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673601056215$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11513907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mawer, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ignatenko, NV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wares, DF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strelis, AK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golubchikova, VT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanova, GV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyagoshina, TV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharaburova, OE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banatvala, N</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the effectiveness of WHO short-course chemotherapy and standard Russian antituberculous regimens in Tomsk, western Siberia</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Background There has been a resurgence of tuberculosis in Russia in the past decade. Traditional Russian services for treatment of tuberculosis are very different from those in the west. We aimed to compare the effects of WHO short-course chemotherapy with standard Russian antituberculous regimens.
New tuberculosis patients aged 18 years or older were included in a trial and systematically allocated to traditional Russian tuberculosis treatments or WHO shortcourse chemotherapy in the two largest tuberculosis diagnostic and treatment centres of Tomsk Oblast, western Siberia. Standard WHO tuberculosis outcomes and rates of sputum conversion were used as primary outcomes. Analyses were by intention-to-treat.
646 new cases were enrolled into the trial, of which 356 patients were given Russian tuberculosis treatment (155 smear positive) and 290 were given WHO short-course chemotherapy (155 smear positive). There was no statistical difference between the proportion cured or completing treatment (63% for both groups [difference in proportion=0%, 95% CI −11 to 11%]); or dying (short-course chemotherapy, 8%vs Russian, 11% [difference in proportion=−3%, 95% CI -9 to 4%]). There was no statistical difference with respect to sputum conversion rate at 6 months (91%vs 85% [difference in proportion=6%, 95% CI -2 to 13%]). Overall, outcomes were worse among patients with multidrug resistant isolates than non-resistant isolates.
WHO short-course chemotherapy treatment for tuberculosis can work well in Russia.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antitubercular Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antitubercular Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Multidrug resistance</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Russia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Siberia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Smear</subject><subject>Sputum</subject><subject>Sputum - microbiology</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant - drug therapy</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant - epidemiology</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - drug therapy</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - epidemiology</subject><subject>World Health Organization</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9qFDEUh4Modlt9BCUoFAVHc2byp7kSWdQKhYKt6F3IZE7c1J1kTWYqfQMf22x3URDEmwQO3zn5nXyEPAL2EhjIVxcMOGuk6uQzBs-ZkC004g5ZAFe8EVx9uUsWv5EDcljKFWOMSybukwMAAZ1makF-LtO4sTmUFGnydFohRe_RTeEaI5ayLX4-PadllfLUuDTngtStcEwVzXZzQ20caJnqafNAP86lBBtrcQrT3GN28zrNhWb8GkaMhYZIL9NYvr2gP7BMmCO9CBUL9gG55-264MP9fUQ-vXt7uTxtzs7ff1i-OWscBzk1veqZR24H5XgvuG6lV04oPTihmdB9XdYNWjmU1ltwyLW0LUoNAp3Tve-OyPFu7ian73PNYMZQHK7XNmJNahQA8FZCBZ_-BV7V7WPNZlomleL6RLaVevIvCvSJ5p3QXYXEDnI5lZLRm00Oo803BpjZ2jS3Ns1WlWFgbm0aUfse74fP_YjDn669vgq83gFYf-w6YDbFBYwOh5CrQzOk8J8nfgFCCrEv</recordid><startdate>20010811</startdate><enddate>20010811</enddate><creator>Mawer, C</creator><creator>Ignatenko, NV</creator><creator>Wares, DF</creator><creator>Strelis, AK</creator><creator>Golubchikova, VT</creator><creator>Yanova, GV</creator><creator>Lyagoshina, TV</creator><creator>Sharaburova, OE</creator><creator>Banatvala, N</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010811</creationdate><title>Comparison of the effectiveness of WHO short-course chemotherapy and standard Russian antituberculous regimens in Tomsk, western Siberia</title><author>Mawer, C ; Ignatenko, NV ; Wares, DF ; Strelis, AK ; Golubchikova, VT ; Yanova, GV ; Lyagoshina, TV ; Sharaburova, OE ; Banatvala, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b7b0fe4ad7c4b54926f7c579dc59059b736cd97ce6afa1ce496a2e6915ecc9bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antitubercular Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antitubercular Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Multidrug resistance</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Russia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Siberia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Smear</topic><topic>Sputum</topic><topic>Sputum - microbiology</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant - drug therapy</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant - epidemiology</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - drug therapy</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - epidemiology</topic><topic>World Health Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mawer, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ignatenko, NV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wares, DF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strelis, AK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golubchikova, VT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanova, GV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyagoshina, TV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharaburova, OE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banatvala, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mawer, C</au><au>Ignatenko, NV</au><au>Wares, DF</au><au>Strelis, AK</au><au>Golubchikova, VT</au><au>Yanova, GV</au><au>Lyagoshina, TV</au><au>Sharaburova, OE</au><au>Banatvala, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the effectiveness of WHO short-course chemotherapy and standard Russian antituberculous regimens in Tomsk, western Siberia</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2001-08-11</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>358</volume><issue>9280</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>449</epage><pages>445-449</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Background There has been a resurgence of tuberculosis in Russia in the past decade. Traditional Russian services for treatment of tuberculosis are very different from those in the west. We aimed to compare the effects of WHO short-course chemotherapy with standard Russian antituberculous regimens.
New tuberculosis patients aged 18 years or older were included in a trial and systematically allocated to traditional Russian tuberculosis treatments or WHO shortcourse chemotherapy in the two largest tuberculosis diagnostic and treatment centres of Tomsk Oblast, western Siberia. Standard WHO tuberculosis outcomes and rates of sputum conversion were used as primary outcomes. Analyses were by intention-to-treat.
646 new cases were enrolled into the trial, of which 356 patients were given Russian tuberculosis treatment (155 smear positive) and 290 were given WHO short-course chemotherapy (155 smear positive). There was no statistical difference between the proportion cured or completing treatment (63% for both groups [difference in proportion=0%, 95% CI −11 to 11%]); or dying (short-course chemotherapy, 8%vs Russian, 11% [difference in proportion=−3%, 95% CI -9 to 4%]). There was no statistical difference with respect to sputum conversion rate at 6 months (91%vs 85% [difference in proportion=6%, 95% CI -2 to 13%]). Overall, outcomes were worse among patients with multidrug resistant isolates than non-resistant isolates.
WHO short-course chemotherapy treatment for tuberculosis can work well in Russia.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11513907</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05621-5</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2001-08, Vol.358 (9280), p.445-449 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71114261 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Adult Antibiotics Antitubercular Agents - administration & dosage Antitubercular Agents - therapeutic use Bias Chemotherapy Clinical trials Collaboration Conversion Diagnostic systems Drug Administration Schedule Drug Therapy, Combination Female Humans Male Medical research Microscopy Motivation Multidrug resistance Patients Physicians Population Risk Factors Russia - epidemiology Siberia - epidemiology Smear Sputum Sputum - microbiology Statistics Substance abuse treatment Time Factors Tuberculosis Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant - drug therapy Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant - epidemiology Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - drug therapy Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - epidemiology World Health Organization |
title | Comparison of the effectiveness of WHO short-course chemotherapy and standard Russian antituberculous regimens in Tomsk, western Siberia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A48%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20WHO%20short-course%20chemotherapy%20and%20standard%20Russian%20antituberculous%20regimens%20in%20Tomsk,%20western%20Siberia&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Mawer,%20C&rft.date=2001-08-11&rft.volume=358&rft.issue=9280&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=449&rft.pages=445-449&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05621-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71114261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198943593&rft_id=info:pmid/11513907&rft_els_id=S0140673601056215&rfr_iscdi=true |