Results of and Comments on the 2000 Survey of the American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology
The American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology (A 3CR 2) annually surveys radiology residency programs on issues related to training. The objective is to highlight national similarities, differences, and trends to help programs establish standards and improve residency training. Q...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic radiology 2001-08, Vol.8 (8), p.777-781 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 781 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 777 |
container_title | Academic radiology |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Lawler, Leo P Fromke, Jon Jost, R.Gilbert Evens, Ronald G |
description | The American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology (A
3CR
2) annually surveys radiology residency programs on issues related to training. The objective is to highlight national similarities, differences, and trends to help programs establish standards and improve residency training.
Questionnaires were mailed to 180 accredited diagnostic radiology residency training programs in the United States. The survey covered the usual general topics and more specific topics considered every 4 years; for 2000 the latter were on-call issues and the chief residency year.
Completed surveys were returned from 63 programs (35%). Important findings included increased caseload and call commitments, especially for smaller programs. Resident salaries appear to have increased more than the consumer price index. Nonemergent after-hour coverage and teleradiology are now a large part of the resident work practice. Women continue to be underrepresented, with a trend downward. Chief residents are more involved in organizing preparation for board examinations and have greater office facilities and more administrative duties.
This survey provided useful insights. All levels of residency face increased workloads. On-call hours have not changed, but the work has intensified and the use of teleradiology has increased. Many programs have adopted a “night-float” system, and nonemergent after-hours coverage should be considered in any program evaluation. Continued vigilance and sustained efforts are required to ensure that radiology is considered as a specialty by both men and women. With increased demands on attending physicians' time, chief residents may need to take on more administrative responsibilities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80586-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71109146</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S107663320380586X</els_id><sourcerecordid>71109146</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-9be23737eb6a79db2dec45ac0adcfd0e0852de42270d597763326c81df1ac42a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EoqXwE0A-oXIIjO34Iye0WvElVUJqQerN8toTapTExU4q7b_H2V3EsSfbM8-8M-OXkNcM3jNg6sMNA60aJQS_BPHOgDSquX1CzpnRpmmhVU_r_R9yRl6U8huASWXEc3LGmASjpTkn6RrLMsyFpp66KdBtGkec1vdE5zukHADozZIfcL8ia2gzYo7eTXRTSvLRzbGyNbfxLuAYPd3eRexpFY7hIBUneu1CTEP6tX9JnvVuKPjqdF6Qn58__dh-ba6-f_m23Vw1XnR8brodcqGFxp1yugs7HtC30nlwwfcBEIysoZZzDUF2Wq9LKm9Y6JnzLXfigrw96t7n9GfBMtsxFo_D4CZMS7GaMehYqx4FBWetZB2roDyCPqdSMvb2PsfR5b1lYFdL7MESu45iQdiDJfa21r05NVh2I4b_VScPKvDxCGD9j4eI2RYfcfIYYkY_25DiIy3-ArZQmz8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>32145191</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Results of and Comments on the 2000 Survey of the American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lawler, Leo P ; Fromke, Jon ; Jost, R.Gilbert ; Evens, Ronald G</creator><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Leo P ; Fromke, Jon ; Jost, R.Gilbert ; Evens, Ronald G</creatorcontrib><description>The American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology (A
3CR
2) annually surveys radiology residency programs on issues related to training. The objective is to highlight national similarities, differences, and trends to help programs establish standards and improve residency training.
Questionnaires were mailed to 180 accredited diagnostic radiology residency training programs in the United States. The survey covered the usual general topics and more specific topics considered every 4 years; for 2000 the latter were on-call issues and the chief residency year.
Completed surveys were returned from 63 programs (35%). Important findings included increased caseload and call commitments, especially for smaller programs. Resident salaries appear to have increased more than the consumer price index. Nonemergent after-hour coverage and teleradiology are now a large part of the resident work practice. Women continue to be underrepresented, with a trend downward. Chief residents are more involved in organizing preparation for board examinations and have greater office facilities and more administrative duties.
This survey provided useful insights. All levels of residency face increased workloads. On-call hours have not changed, but the work has intensified and the use of teleradiology has increased. Many programs have adopted a “night-float” system, and nonemergent after-hours coverage should be considered in any program evaluation. Continued vigilance and sustained efforts are required to ensure that radiology is considered as a specialty by both men and women. With increased demands on attending physicians' time, chief residents may need to take on more administrative responsibilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-6332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80586-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11508758</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Curriculum ; Data Collection ; Education ; Humans ; Internship and Residency - economics ; Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data ; Personnel Staffing and Scheduling ; Physicians, Women - statistics & numerical data ; Radiology - economics ; Radiology - education ; Radiology - statistics & numerical data ; radiology and radiologists, departmental management ; Salaries and Fringe Benefits - statistics & numerical data ; Salaries and Fringe Benefits - trends ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Academic radiology, 2001-08, Vol.8 (8), p.777-781</ispartof><rights>2001 Acad Radiol</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-9be23737eb6a79db2dec45ac0adcfd0e0852de42270d597763326c81df1ac42a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-9be23737eb6a79db2dec45ac0adcfd0e0852de42270d597763326c81df1ac42a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80586-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11508758$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Leo P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fromke, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jost, R.Gilbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evens, Ronald G</creatorcontrib><title>Results of and Comments on the 2000 Survey of the American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology</title><title>Academic radiology</title><addtitle>Acad Radiol</addtitle><description>The American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology (A
3CR
2) annually surveys radiology residency programs on issues related to training. The objective is to highlight national similarities, differences, and trends to help programs establish standards and improve residency training.
Questionnaires were mailed to 180 accredited diagnostic radiology residency training programs in the United States. The survey covered the usual general topics and more specific topics considered every 4 years; for 2000 the latter were on-call issues and the chief residency year.
Completed surveys were returned from 63 programs (35%). Important findings included increased caseload and call commitments, especially for smaller programs. Resident salaries appear to have increased more than the consumer price index. Nonemergent after-hour coverage and teleradiology are now a large part of the resident work practice. Women continue to be underrepresented, with a trend downward. Chief residents are more involved in organizing preparation for board examinations and have greater office facilities and more administrative duties.
This survey provided useful insights. All levels of residency face increased workloads. On-call hours have not changed, but the work has intensified and the use of teleradiology has increased. Many programs have adopted a “night-float” system, and nonemergent after-hours coverage should be considered in any program evaluation. Continued vigilance and sustained efforts are required to ensure that radiology is considered as a specialty by both men and women. With increased demands on attending physicians' time, chief residents may need to take on more administrative responsibilities.</description><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - economics</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling</subject><subject>Physicians, Women - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Radiology - economics</subject><subject>Radiology - education</subject><subject>Radiology - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>radiology and radiologists, departmental management</subject><subject>Salaries and Fringe Benefits - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Salaries and Fringe Benefits - trends</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1076-6332</issn><issn>1878-4046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EoqXwE0A-oXIIjO34Iye0WvElVUJqQerN8toTapTExU4q7b_H2V3EsSfbM8-8M-OXkNcM3jNg6sMNA60aJQS_BPHOgDSquX1CzpnRpmmhVU_r_R9yRl6U8huASWXEc3LGmASjpTkn6RrLMsyFpp66KdBtGkec1vdE5zukHADozZIfcL8ia2gzYo7eTXRTSvLRzbGyNbfxLuAYPd3eRexpFY7hIBUneu1CTEP6tX9JnvVuKPjqdF6Qn58__dh-ba6-f_m23Vw1XnR8brodcqGFxp1yugs7HtC30nlwwfcBEIysoZZzDUF2Wq9LKm9Y6JnzLXfigrw96t7n9GfBMtsxFo_D4CZMS7GaMehYqx4FBWetZB2roDyCPqdSMvb2PsfR5b1lYFdL7MESu45iQdiDJfa21r05NVh2I4b_VScPKvDxCGD9j4eI2RYfcfIYYkY_25DiIy3-ArZQmz8</recordid><startdate>20010801</startdate><enddate>20010801</enddate><creator>Lawler, Leo P</creator><creator>Fromke, Jon</creator><creator>Jost, R.Gilbert</creator><creator>Evens, Ronald G</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010801</creationdate><title>Results of and Comments on the 2000 Survey of the American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology</title><author>Lawler, Leo P ; Fromke, Jon ; Jost, R.Gilbert ; Evens, Ronald G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-9be23737eb6a79db2dec45ac0adcfd0e0852de42270d597763326c81df1ac42a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - economics</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling</topic><topic>Physicians, Women - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Radiology - economics</topic><topic>Radiology - education</topic><topic>Radiology - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>radiology and radiologists, departmental management</topic><topic>Salaries and Fringe Benefits - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Salaries and Fringe Benefits - trends</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Leo P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fromke, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jost, R.Gilbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evens, Ronald G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lawler, Leo P</au><au>Fromke, Jon</au><au>Jost, R.Gilbert</au><au>Evens, Ronald G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Results of and Comments on the 2000 Survey of the American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology</atitle><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Radiol</addtitle><date>2001-08-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>777</spage><epage>781</epage><pages>777-781</pages><issn>1076-6332</issn><eissn>1878-4046</eissn><abstract>The American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology (A
3CR
2) annually surveys radiology residency programs on issues related to training. The objective is to highlight national similarities, differences, and trends to help programs establish standards and improve residency training.
Questionnaires were mailed to 180 accredited diagnostic radiology residency training programs in the United States. The survey covered the usual general topics and more specific topics considered every 4 years; for 2000 the latter were on-call issues and the chief residency year.
Completed surveys were returned from 63 programs (35%). Important findings included increased caseload and call commitments, especially for smaller programs. Resident salaries appear to have increased more than the consumer price index. Nonemergent after-hour coverage and teleradiology are now a large part of the resident work practice. Women continue to be underrepresented, with a trend downward. Chief residents are more involved in organizing preparation for board examinations and have greater office facilities and more administrative duties.
This survey provided useful insights. All levels of residency face increased workloads. On-call hours have not changed, but the work has intensified and the use of teleradiology has increased. Many programs have adopted a “night-float” system, and nonemergent after-hours coverage should be considered in any program evaluation. Continued vigilance and sustained efforts are required to ensure that radiology is considered as a specialty by both men and women. With increased demands on attending physicians' time, chief residents may need to take on more administrative responsibilities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11508758</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80586-X</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1076-6332 |
ispartof | Academic radiology, 2001-08, Vol.8 (8), p.777-781 |
issn | 1076-6332 1878-4046 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71109146 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Curriculum Data Collection Education Humans Internship and Residency - economics Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data Personnel Staffing and Scheduling Physicians, Women - statistics & numerical data Radiology - economics Radiology - education Radiology - statistics & numerical data radiology and radiologists, departmental management Salaries and Fringe Benefits - statistics & numerical data Salaries and Fringe Benefits - trends Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Results of and Comments on the 2000 Survey of the American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A25%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Results%20of%20and%20Comments%20on%20the%202000%20Survey%20of%20the%20American%20Association%20of%20Academic%20Chief%20Residents%20in%20Radiology&rft.jtitle=Academic%20radiology&rft.au=Lawler,%20Leo%20P&rft.date=2001-08-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=777&rft.epage=781&rft.pages=777-781&rft.issn=1076-6332&rft.eissn=1878-4046&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80586-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71109146%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=32145191&rft_id=info:pmid/11508758&rft_els_id=S107663320380586X&rfr_iscdi=true |