Killip and Forrester classifications: should they be abandoned, kept, reevaluated, or modified?

Killip and Forrester classifications: should they be abandoned, kept, reevaluated, or modified?

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 2000-05, Vol.117 (5), p.1223-1226
1. Verfasser: Madias, J E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Cardiac Catheterization
Health Status Indicators
Hemodynamics - physiology
Humans
Myocardial Infarction - classification
Myocardial Infarction - mortality
Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1226
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1223
container_title Chest
container_volume 117
creator Madias, J E
description
doi_str_mv 10.1378/chest.117.5.1223
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71108717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>53886407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p234t-3c5074384f268cc9b2c9f0fa6f5569e558e4f73569ada514892a4aa7c11b52a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkDtPwzAUhS0EoqWwMyGLgakJfsYOC0IVBUQlFpijG8dRU5I42AlS_z1GwMJ0H_ru0TkXoXNKUsqVvjZbG8aUUpXKlDLGD9Cc5pwmXAp-iOaEUJbwLGczdBLCjsSZ5tkxmlGiidKEzVHx3LRtM2DoK7x23kc967FpIYSmbgyMjevDDQ5bN7UVHrd2j0uLoYy86221xO92GJfYW_sJ7QTj98p53Lkqntvq9hQd1dAGe_ZbF-htff-6ekw2Lw9Pq7tNMjAuxoQbSZTgWtQs08bkJTN5TWrIaimz3EqpragVjz1UIKnQOQMBoAylpWRA-AJd_egO3n1MMUXRNcHYtoXeuikUisbMiqoIXv4Dd27yffRWMEKEZlTICF38QlPZ2aoYfNOB3xd_f-Nf1WFvUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200482145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Killip and Forrester classifications: should they be abandoned, kept, reevaluated, or modified?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Madias, J E</creator><creatorcontrib>Madias, J E</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1378/chest.117.5.1223</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10807802</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHETBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American College of Chest Physicians</publisher><subject>Cardiac Catheterization ; Health Status Indicators ; Hemodynamics - physiology ; Humans ; Myocardial Infarction - classification ; Myocardial Infarction - mortality ; Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology ; Prognosis ; Survival Rate</subject><ispartof>Chest, 2000-05, Vol.117 (5), p.1223-1226</ispartof><rights>Copyright American College of Chest Physicians May 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10807802$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madias, J E</creatorcontrib><title>Killip and Forrester classifications: should they be abandoned, kept, reevaluated, or modified?</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><subject>Cardiac Catheterization</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Hemodynamics - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - classification</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><issn>0012-3692</issn><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkDtPwzAUhS0EoqWwMyGLgakJfsYOC0IVBUQlFpijG8dRU5I42AlS_z1GwMJ0H_ru0TkXoXNKUsqVvjZbG8aUUpXKlDLGD9Cc5pwmXAp-iOaEUJbwLGczdBLCjsSZ5tkxmlGiidKEzVHx3LRtM2DoK7x23kc967FpIYSmbgyMjevDDQ5bN7UVHrd2j0uLoYy86221xO92GJfYW_sJ7QTj98p53Lkqntvq9hQd1dAGe_ZbF-htff-6ekw2Lw9Pq7tNMjAuxoQbSZTgWtQs08bkJTN5TWrIaimz3EqpragVjz1UIKnQOQMBoAylpWRA-AJd_egO3n1MMUXRNcHYtoXeuikUisbMiqoIXv4Dd27yffRWMEKEZlTICF38QlPZ2aoYfNOB3xd_f-Nf1WFvUA</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Madias, J E</creator><general>American College of Chest Physicians</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>Killip and Forrester classifications: should they be abandoned, kept, reevaluated, or modified?</title><author>Madias, J E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p234t-3c5074384f268cc9b2c9f0fa6f5569e558e4f73569ada514892a4aa7c11b52a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Cardiac Catheterization</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Hemodynamics - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - classification</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madias, J E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madias, J E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Killip and Forrester classifications: should they be abandoned, kept, reevaluated, or modified?</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1223</spage><epage>1226</epage><pages>1223-1226</pages><issn>0012-3692</issn><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><coden>CHETBF</coden><cop>United States</cop><pub>American College of Chest Physicians</pub><pmid>10807802</pmid><doi>10.1378/chest.117.5.1223</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3692
ispartof Chest, 2000-05, Vol.117 (5), p.1223-1226
issn 0012-3692
1931-3543
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71108717
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cardiac Catheterization
Health Status Indicators
Hemodynamics - physiology
Humans
Myocardial Infarction - classification
Myocardial Infarction - mortality
Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology
Prognosis
Survival Rate
title Killip and Forrester classifications: should they be abandoned, kept, reevaluated, or modified?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T11%3A46%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Killip%20and%20Forrester%20classifications:%20should%20they%20be%20abandoned,%20kept,%20reevaluated,%20or%20modified?&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Madias,%20J%20E&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1223&rft.epage=1226&rft.pages=1223-1226&rft.issn=0012-3692&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft.coden=CHETBF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1378/chest.117.5.1223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E53886407%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200482145&rft_id=info:pmid/10807802&rfr_iscdi=true