Community Characteristics Associated with Elder Abuse

OBJECTIVES: To help define the relationship between elder abuse rates and counties' demographics, healthcare resources, and social service characteristics. DESIGN: County‐level data from Iowa were analyzed to test the association between county characteristics and rates of elder abuse between 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2000-05, Vol.48 (5), p.513-518
Hauptverfasser: Jogerst, Gerald J., Dawson, Jeffrey D., Hartz, Arthur J., Ely, John W., Schweitzer, L. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 518
container_issue 5
container_start_page 513
container_title Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)
container_volume 48
creator Jogerst, Gerald J.
Dawson, Jeffrey D.
Hartz, Arthur J.
Ely, John W.
Schweitzer, L. A.
description OBJECTIVES: To help define the relationship between elder abuse rates and counties' demographics, healthcare resources, and social service characteristics. DESIGN: County‐level data from Iowa were analyzed to test the association between county characteristics and rates of elder abuse between 1984 and 1993 using univariate correlation analysis and stagewise linear regression. SETTING: Ninety‐nine counties in Iowa. PARTICIPANTS: Iowa residents aged 65 years and older. MEASUREMENTS: County‐level population‐adjusted numbers of abused elderly, abused children, children in poverty, high school dropouts, physicians and other healthcare providers, hospital beds, social workers and caseworkers in the Department of Human Services (DHS). RESULTS: Community characteristics that had a positive association with rates of reported or substantiated elder abuse at the P < .001 level were population density, children in poverty, and reported child abuse. Lower substantiated elder abuse rates were associated at P < .05 with higher community rates of high school dropouts, number of chiropractors, and number of nurse practitioners. After adjusting for number of DHS caseworkers and reported child abuse rates (a surrogate for workload) a district effect persists for substantiated elder abuse cases (P = .002). CONCLUSION: County demographics are risk factors for reported and substantiated elder abuse. The strongest risk factor for reported elder abuse was reported child abuse. The difference in districts may reflect differences in resources and/or differing characteristics of caseworkers who substantiate elder abuse. The risk factors may reflect conditions that influence the amount of elder abuse or the detection of existing elder abuse. J Am Geriatr Soc 48: 513–518, 2000.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04997.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71108383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>54143294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4967-2d636b18d471f147fd1ab8886f407288f37617c563d1e79feaa01b8ddf292513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkVtr3DAQhUVpaTZp_0IxofTNrkYXS-pLWZZk0yb0QgOFvghZkom39jqVbLL77yPjJQ15KdWLBPPNGc05CJ0CLiCd95sCOCU5Z8ALgjEuhgozpUSxe4YWD6XnaJFqJJclsCN0HOMGYyBYypfoCLAE4IwtEF_1XTdum2GfrW5MMHbwoYlDY2O2jLG3jRm8y-6a4SY7a50P2bIao3-FXtSmjf714T5B1-dn16uL_Orr-tNqeZVbpkqRE1fSsgLpmIAamKgdmEpKWdYMCyJlTUUJwvKSOvBC1d4YDJV0riaKcKAn6N0sexv6P6OPg-6aaH3bmq3vx6gFpEWopP8EueCSKDEpnj4BN_0YtmkHTQBTIZTgCfowQzb0MQZf69vQdCbsNWA9JaA3erJZTzbrKQF9SEDvUvObw4Sx6rx71DpbnoC3B8BEa9o6mK1t4l-OEZW0EvZxxu6a1u__4wf68_rH9EoK-ayQ8vS7BwUTfutSUMH1zy9r_f3br8v1pRRa0XvaxK-F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210377975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community Characteristics Associated with Elder Abuse</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Jogerst, Gerald J. ; Dawson, Jeffrey D. ; Hartz, Arthur J. ; Ely, John W. ; Schweitzer, L. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jogerst, Gerald J. ; Dawson, Jeffrey D. ; Hartz, Arthur J. ; Ely, John W. ; Schweitzer, L. A.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES: To help define the relationship between elder abuse rates and counties' demographics, healthcare resources, and social service characteristics. DESIGN: County‐level data from Iowa were analyzed to test the association between county characteristics and rates of elder abuse between 1984 and 1993 using univariate correlation analysis and stagewise linear regression. SETTING: Ninety‐nine counties in Iowa. PARTICIPANTS: Iowa residents aged 65 years and older. MEASUREMENTS: County‐level population‐adjusted numbers of abused elderly, abused children, children in poverty, high school dropouts, physicians and other healthcare providers, hospital beds, social workers and caseworkers in the Department of Human Services (DHS). RESULTS: Community characteristics that had a positive association with rates of reported or substantiated elder abuse at the P &lt; .001 level were population density, children in poverty, and reported child abuse. Lower substantiated elder abuse rates were associated at P &lt; .05 with higher community rates of high school dropouts, number of chiropractors, and number of nurse practitioners. After adjusting for number of DHS caseworkers and reported child abuse rates (a surrogate for workload) a district effect persists for substantiated elder abuse cases (P = .002). CONCLUSION: County demographics are risk factors for reported and substantiated elder abuse. The strongest risk factor for reported elder abuse was reported child abuse. The difference in districts may reflect differences in resources and/or differing characteristics of caseworkers who substantiate elder abuse. The risk factors may reflect conditions that influence the amount of elder abuse or the detection of existing elder abuse. J Am Geriatr Soc 48: 513–518, 2000.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04997.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10811544</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAGSAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult abuse ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Child, Preschool ; Community Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Community living ; Counties ; Demographics ; Demography ; Elder abuse ; Elder Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data ; elder mistreatment ; Elderly people ; Health care ; Humans ; Incidence ; Iowa - epidemiology ; Logistic Models ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Older people ; Poverty ; Prevention and actions ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Risk Factors ; Social aspects ; Social services ; Social Work</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2000-05, Vol.48 (5), p.513-518</ispartof><rights>2000 The American Geriatrics Society</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins May 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4967-2d636b18d471f147fd1ab8886f407288f37617c563d1e79feaa01b8ddf292513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4967-2d636b18d471f147fd1ab8886f407288f37617c563d1e79feaa01b8ddf292513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1532-5415.2000.tb04997.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1532-5415.2000.tb04997.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1429049$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10811544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jogerst, Gerald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Jeffrey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartz, Arthur J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ely, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweitzer, L. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Community Characteristics Associated with Elder Abuse</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES: To help define the relationship between elder abuse rates and counties' demographics, healthcare resources, and social service characteristics. DESIGN: County‐level data from Iowa were analyzed to test the association between county characteristics and rates of elder abuse between 1984 and 1993 using univariate correlation analysis and stagewise linear regression. SETTING: Ninety‐nine counties in Iowa. PARTICIPANTS: Iowa residents aged 65 years and older. MEASUREMENTS: County‐level population‐adjusted numbers of abused elderly, abused children, children in poverty, high school dropouts, physicians and other healthcare providers, hospital beds, social workers and caseworkers in the Department of Human Services (DHS). RESULTS: Community characteristics that had a positive association with rates of reported or substantiated elder abuse at the P &lt; .001 level were population density, children in poverty, and reported child abuse. Lower substantiated elder abuse rates were associated at P &lt; .05 with higher community rates of high school dropouts, number of chiropractors, and number of nurse practitioners. After adjusting for number of DHS caseworkers and reported child abuse rates (a surrogate for workload) a district effect persists for substantiated elder abuse cases (P = .002). CONCLUSION: County demographics are risk factors for reported and substantiated elder abuse. The strongest risk factor for reported elder abuse was reported child abuse. The difference in districts may reflect differences in resources and/or differing characteristics of caseworkers who substantiate elder abuse. The risk factors may reflect conditions that influence the amount of elder abuse or the detection of existing elder abuse. J Am Geriatr Soc 48: 513–518, 2000.</description><subject>Adult abuse</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Community Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Community living</subject><subject>Counties</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Elder abuse</subject><subject>Elder Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>elder mistreatment</subject><subject>Elderly people</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Iowa - epidemiology</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkVtr3DAQhUVpaTZp_0IxofTNrkYXS-pLWZZk0yb0QgOFvghZkom39jqVbLL77yPjJQ15KdWLBPPNGc05CJ0CLiCd95sCOCU5Z8ALgjEuhgozpUSxe4YWD6XnaJFqJJclsCN0HOMGYyBYypfoCLAE4IwtEF_1XTdum2GfrW5MMHbwoYlDY2O2jLG3jRm8y-6a4SY7a50P2bIao3-FXtSmjf714T5B1-dn16uL_Orr-tNqeZVbpkqRE1fSsgLpmIAamKgdmEpKWdYMCyJlTUUJwvKSOvBC1d4YDJV0riaKcKAn6N0sexv6P6OPg-6aaH3bmq3vx6gFpEWopP8EueCSKDEpnj4BN_0YtmkHTQBTIZTgCfowQzb0MQZf69vQdCbsNWA9JaA3erJZTzbrKQF9SEDvUvObw4Sx6rx71DpbnoC3B8BEa9o6mK1t4l-OEZW0EvZxxu6a1u__4wf68_rH9EoK-ayQ8vS7BwUTfutSUMH1zy9r_f3br8v1pRRa0XvaxK-F</recordid><startdate>200005</startdate><enddate>200005</enddate><creator>Jogerst, Gerald J.</creator><creator>Dawson, Jeffrey D.</creator><creator>Hartz, Arthur J.</creator><creator>Ely, John W.</creator><creator>Schweitzer, L. A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200005</creationdate><title>Community Characteristics Associated with Elder Abuse</title><author>Jogerst, Gerald J. ; Dawson, Jeffrey D. ; Hartz, Arthur J. ; Ely, John W. ; Schweitzer, L. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4967-2d636b18d471f147fd1ab8886f407288f37617c563d1e79feaa01b8ddf292513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult abuse</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Community Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Community living</topic><topic>Counties</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Elder abuse</topic><topic>Elder Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>elder mistreatment</topic><topic>Elderly people</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Iowa - epidemiology</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jogerst, Gerald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Jeffrey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartz, Arthur J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ely, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweitzer, L. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jogerst, Gerald J.</au><au>Dawson, Jeffrey D.</au><au>Hartz, Arthur J.</au><au>Ely, John W.</au><au>Schweitzer, L. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community Characteristics Associated with Elder Abuse</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><date>2000-05</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>513-518</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><coden>JAGSAF</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVES: To help define the relationship between elder abuse rates and counties' demographics, healthcare resources, and social service characteristics. DESIGN: County‐level data from Iowa were analyzed to test the association between county characteristics and rates of elder abuse between 1984 and 1993 using univariate correlation analysis and stagewise linear regression. SETTING: Ninety‐nine counties in Iowa. PARTICIPANTS: Iowa residents aged 65 years and older. MEASUREMENTS: County‐level population‐adjusted numbers of abused elderly, abused children, children in poverty, high school dropouts, physicians and other healthcare providers, hospital beds, social workers and caseworkers in the Department of Human Services (DHS). RESULTS: Community characteristics that had a positive association with rates of reported or substantiated elder abuse at the P &lt; .001 level were population density, children in poverty, and reported child abuse. Lower substantiated elder abuse rates were associated at P &lt; .05 with higher community rates of high school dropouts, number of chiropractors, and number of nurse practitioners. After adjusting for number of DHS caseworkers and reported child abuse rates (a surrogate for workload) a district effect persists for substantiated elder abuse cases (P = .002). CONCLUSION: County demographics are risk factors for reported and substantiated elder abuse. The strongest risk factor for reported elder abuse was reported child abuse. The difference in districts may reflect differences in resources and/or differing characteristics of caseworkers who substantiate elder abuse. The risk factors may reflect conditions that influence the amount of elder abuse or the detection of existing elder abuse. J Am Geriatr Soc 48: 513–518, 2000.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>10811544</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04997.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8614
ispartof Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2000-05, Vol.48 (5), p.513-518
issn 0002-8614
1532-5415
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71108383
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adult abuse
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data
Child, Preschool
Community Health Services - statistics & numerical data
Community living
Counties
Demographics
Demography
Elder abuse
Elder Abuse - statistics & numerical data
elder mistreatment
Elderly people
Health care
Humans
Incidence
Iowa - epidemiology
Logistic Models
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Older people
Poverty
Prevention and actions
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Risk Factors
Social aspects
Social services
Social Work
title Community Characteristics Associated with Elder Abuse
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A29%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community%20Characteristics%20Associated%20with%20Elder%20Abuse&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=Jogerst,%20Gerald%20J.&rft.date=2000-05&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=513-518&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft.coden=JAGSAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04997.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E54143294%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210377975&rft_id=info:pmid/10811544&rfr_iscdi=true