Health care reform in Oregon: the impact of the Oregon Health Plan on utilization of mammography

Background: In 1994, Oregon implemented the Oregon Health Plan (OHP), extending health care coverage under a system of capitated managed care to uninsured citizens living below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). We conducted a study to measure receipt of clinical preventive services among women newly...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of preventive medicine 2000, Vol.18 (1), p.11-17
Hauptverfasser: Schillinger, Julia A., Mosbaek, Craig, Austin, Don, Jack, Leonard, Heumann, Michael, Moore, Jane, Bussman, John, Van Osdal, Judith, Fleming, David W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
container_title American journal of preventive medicine
container_volume 18
creator Schillinger, Julia A.
Mosbaek, Craig
Austin, Don
Jack, Leonard
Heumann, Michael
Moore, Jane
Bussman, John
Van Osdal, Judith
Fleming, David W.
description Background: In 1994, Oregon implemented the Oregon Health Plan (OHP), extending health care coverage under a system of capitated managed care to uninsured citizens living below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). We conducted a study to measure receipt of clinical preventive services among women newly enrolled in the OHP. Methods: Six hundred and sixty six women aged 52–64, and living below the FPL in Oregon were randomly selected from OHP enrollment rosters and interviewed by telephone. A follow-up survey was conducted 1 year later. The main outcome of interest was receipt of a screening mammogram during the first year in the OHP. Results: At enrollment 17% (65/383) of participants had never had health care coverage. Sixty-six percent of the women (220/333) were overdue for a mammogram. Fifty-five percent (121/220) reported cost as the main reason they had not had this procedure. Mammography rates doubled under the OHP (21% to 52%, 95% CI = 0.25–0.38, p < 0.001). Among women who were overdue for a mammogram at the time they enrolled, an expressed plan to get a mammogram (OR3.0, 95% CI = 1.1–8.7, p = 0.04), citing cost as the main reason for being overdue (OR3.0, 95% CI = 1.3-7.2, p = 0.014), receipt of a routine checkup (OR9.5, 95%CI = 3.7–24.9, p < 0.001), and health care provider’s (HCP’s) recommendation for mammography (OR8.1, 95% CI = 2.9–23.0, p < 0.001) were independently associated with receipt of a mammogram.. Conclusion: The OHP enrolled and successfully delivered clinical preventive services to a medically under served population. Even after removing the financial barrier, obstacles to mammography remain. These may be overcome by health systems changes to insure receipt of routine checkups and appropriate provider recommendations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00104-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71105930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S074937979900104X</els_id><sourcerecordid>71105930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fd41bfe4ceca35aa00eeef8c9953e21100438e147176f470f1d1efc393c6d5fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMotlYfQclJ9LA6aXabjReRolYoVFChtxizExvZ7dZkK9SnN-0W8eYpGfL9M5mPkGMGFwzY4PIJRCoTLqQ4k_IcgEGaTHdIl-WCJ_0BiF3S_UU65CCEDwAQOZP7pMMgh1yKvEteR6jLZkaN9kg92tpX1M3pxON7Pb-izQypqxbaNLS2m6p9odvYY6nnNJbLxpXuWzcu3iNY6aqq371ezFaHZM_qMuDR9uyRl7vb5-EoGU_uH4Y348SkkDeJLVL2ZjE1aDTPtAZARJsbKTOOfcYAUp4jSwUTA5sKsKxgaA2X3AyKzGreI6dt34WvP5cYGlW5YLCMH8R6GZSIPTLJIYJZCxpfhxBXVgvvKu1XioFaq1UbtWrtTUmpNmrVNOZOtgOWbxUWf1KtywhctwDGNb8cehWMw7nBwnk0jSpq98-IH5Ibieg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71105930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Health care reform in Oregon: the impact of the Oregon Health Plan on utilization of mammography</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Schillinger, Julia A. ; Mosbaek, Craig ; Austin, Don ; Jack, Leonard ; Heumann, Michael ; Moore, Jane ; Bussman, John ; Van Osdal, Judith ; Fleming, David W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schillinger, Julia A. ; Mosbaek, Craig ; Austin, Don ; Jack, Leonard ; Heumann, Michael ; Moore, Jane ; Bussman, John ; Van Osdal, Judith ; Fleming, David W.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: In 1994, Oregon implemented the Oregon Health Plan (OHP), extending health care coverage under a system of capitated managed care to uninsured citizens living below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). We conducted a study to measure receipt of clinical preventive services among women newly enrolled in the OHP. Methods: Six hundred and sixty six women aged 52–64, and living below the FPL in Oregon were randomly selected from OHP enrollment rosters and interviewed by telephone. A follow-up survey was conducted 1 year later. The main outcome of interest was receipt of a screening mammogram during the first year in the OHP. Results: At enrollment 17% (65/383) of participants had never had health care coverage. Sixty-six percent of the women (220/333) were overdue for a mammogram. Fifty-five percent (121/220) reported cost as the main reason they had not had this procedure. Mammography rates doubled under the OHP (21% to 52%, 95% CI = 0.25–0.38, p &lt; 0.001). Among women who were overdue for a mammogram at the time they enrolled, an expressed plan to get a mammogram (OR3.0, 95% CI = 1.1–8.7, p = 0.04), citing cost as the main reason for being overdue (OR3.0, 95% CI = 1.3-7.2, p = 0.014), receipt of a routine checkup (OR9.5, 95%CI = 3.7–24.9, p &lt; 0.001), and health care provider’s (HCP’s) recommendation for mammography (OR8.1, 95% CI = 2.9–23.0, p &lt; 0.001) were independently associated with receipt of a mammogram.. Conclusion: The OHP enrolled and successfully delivered clinical preventive services to a medically under served population. Even after removing the financial barrier, obstacles to mammography remain. These may be overcome by health systems changes to insure receipt of routine checkups and appropriate provider recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-3797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00104-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10808978</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health Care Reform ; health services ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; mammography ; Mammography - utilization ; Managed Care Programs ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Oregon ; plan ; Poverty ; Preventive Health Services - utilization ; preventive; managed care ; state health ; State Health Plans ; United States</subject><ispartof>American journal of preventive medicine, 2000, Vol.18 (1), p.11-17</ispartof><rights>2000 American Journal of Preventive Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fd41bfe4ceca35aa00eeef8c9953e21100438e147176f470f1d1efc393c6d5fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fd41bfe4ceca35aa00eeef8c9953e21100438e147176f470f1d1efc393c6d5fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00104-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,4012,27910,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10808978$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schillinger, Julia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosbaek, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jack, Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heumann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bussman, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Osdal, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, David W.</creatorcontrib><title>Health care reform in Oregon: the impact of the Oregon Health Plan on utilization of mammography</title><title>American journal of preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><description>Background: In 1994, Oregon implemented the Oregon Health Plan (OHP), extending health care coverage under a system of capitated managed care to uninsured citizens living below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). We conducted a study to measure receipt of clinical preventive services among women newly enrolled in the OHP. Methods: Six hundred and sixty six women aged 52–64, and living below the FPL in Oregon were randomly selected from OHP enrollment rosters and interviewed by telephone. A follow-up survey was conducted 1 year later. The main outcome of interest was receipt of a screening mammogram during the first year in the OHP. Results: At enrollment 17% (65/383) of participants had never had health care coverage. Sixty-six percent of the women (220/333) were overdue for a mammogram. Fifty-five percent (121/220) reported cost as the main reason they had not had this procedure. Mammography rates doubled under the OHP (21% to 52%, 95% CI = 0.25–0.38, p &lt; 0.001). Among women who were overdue for a mammogram at the time they enrolled, an expressed plan to get a mammogram (OR3.0, 95% CI = 1.1–8.7, p = 0.04), citing cost as the main reason for being overdue (OR3.0, 95% CI = 1.3-7.2, p = 0.014), receipt of a routine checkup (OR9.5, 95%CI = 3.7–24.9, p &lt; 0.001), and health care provider’s (HCP’s) recommendation for mammography (OR8.1, 95% CI = 2.9–23.0, p &lt; 0.001) were independently associated with receipt of a mammogram.. Conclusion: The OHP enrolled and successfully delivered clinical preventive services to a medically under served population. Even after removing the financial barrier, obstacles to mammography remain. These may be overcome by health systems changes to insure receipt of routine checkups and appropriate provider recommendations.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health Care Reform</subject><subject>health services</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - utilization</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>plan</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Preventive Health Services - utilization</subject><subject>preventive; managed care</subject><subject>state health</subject><subject>State Health Plans</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0749-3797</issn><issn>1873-2607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMotlYfQclJ9LA6aXabjReRolYoVFChtxizExvZ7dZkK9SnN-0W8eYpGfL9M5mPkGMGFwzY4PIJRCoTLqQ4k_IcgEGaTHdIl-WCJ_0BiF3S_UU65CCEDwAQOZP7pMMgh1yKvEteR6jLZkaN9kg92tpX1M3pxON7Pb-izQypqxbaNLS2m6p9odvYY6nnNJbLxpXuWzcu3iNY6aqq371ezFaHZM_qMuDR9uyRl7vb5-EoGU_uH4Y348SkkDeJLVL2ZjE1aDTPtAZARJsbKTOOfcYAUp4jSwUTA5sKsKxgaA2X3AyKzGreI6dt34WvP5cYGlW5YLCMH8R6GZSIPTLJIYJZCxpfhxBXVgvvKu1XioFaq1UbtWrtTUmpNmrVNOZOtgOWbxUWf1KtywhctwDGNb8cehWMw7nBwnk0jSpq98-IH5Ibieg</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Schillinger, Julia A.</creator><creator>Mosbaek, Craig</creator><creator>Austin, Don</creator><creator>Jack, Leonard</creator><creator>Heumann, Michael</creator><creator>Moore, Jane</creator><creator>Bussman, John</creator><creator>Van Osdal, Judith</creator><creator>Fleming, David W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Health care reform in Oregon: the impact of the Oregon Health Plan on utilization of mammography</title><author>Schillinger, Julia A. ; Mosbaek, Craig ; Austin, Don ; Jack, Leonard ; Heumann, Michael ; Moore, Jane ; Bussman, John ; Van Osdal, Judith ; Fleming, David W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fd41bfe4ceca35aa00eeef8c9953e21100438e147176f470f1d1efc393c6d5fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health Care Reform</topic><topic>health services</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - utilization</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>plan</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Preventive Health Services - utilization</topic><topic>preventive; managed care</topic><topic>state health</topic><topic>State Health Plans</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schillinger, Julia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosbaek, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jack, Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heumann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bussman, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Osdal, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, David W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schillinger, Julia A.</au><au>Mosbaek, Craig</au><au>Austin, Don</au><au>Jack, Leonard</au><au>Heumann, Michael</au><au>Moore, Jane</au><au>Bussman, John</au><au>Van Osdal, Judith</au><au>Fleming, David W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Health care reform in Oregon: the impact of the Oregon Health Plan on utilization of mammography</atitle><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>11-17</pages><issn>0749-3797</issn><eissn>1873-2607</eissn><abstract>Background: In 1994, Oregon implemented the Oregon Health Plan (OHP), extending health care coverage under a system of capitated managed care to uninsured citizens living below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). We conducted a study to measure receipt of clinical preventive services among women newly enrolled in the OHP. Methods: Six hundred and sixty six women aged 52–64, and living below the FPL in Oregon were randomly selected from OHP enrollment rosters and interviewed by telephone. A follow-up survey was conducted 1 year later. The main outcome of interest was receipt of a screening mammogram during the first year in the OHP. Results: At enrollment 17% (65/383) of participants had never had health care coverage. Sixty-six percent of the women (220/333) were overdue for a mammogram. Fifty-five percent (121/220) reported cost as the main reason they had not had this procedure. Mammography rates doubled under the OHP (21% to 52%, 95% CI = 0.25–0.38, p &lt; 0.001). Among women who were overdue for a mammogram at the time they enrolled, an expressed plan to get a mammogram (OR3.0, 95% CI = 1.1–8.7, p = 0.04), citing cost as the main reason for being overdue (OR3.0, 95% CI = 1.3-7.2, p = 0.014), receipt of a routine checkup (OR9.5, 95%CI = 3.7–24.9, p &lt; 0.001), and health care provider’s (HCP’s) recommendation for mammography (OR8.1, 95% CI = 2.9–23.0, p &lt; 0.001) were independently associated with receipt of a mammogram.. Conclusion: The OHP enrolled and successfully delivered clinical preventive services to a medically under served population. Even after removing the financial barrier, obstacles to mammography remain. These may be overcome by health systems changes to insure receipt of routine checkups and appropriate provider recommendations.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10808978</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00104-X</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-3797
ispartof American journal of preventive medicine, 2000, Vol.18 (1), p.11-17
issn 0749-3797
1873-2607
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71105930
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health Care Reform
health services
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Logistic Models
mammography
Mammography - utilization
Managed Care Programs
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Oregon
plan
Poverty
Preventive Health Services - utilization
preventive
managed care
state health
State Health Plans
United States
title Health care reform in Oregon: the impact of the Oregon Health Plan on utilization of mammography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T10%3A13%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Health%20care%20reform%20in%20Oregon:%20the%20impact%20of%20the%20Oregon%20Health%20Plan%20on%20utilization%20of%20mammography&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Schillinger,%20Julia%20A.&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=11-17&rft.issn=0749-3797&rft.eissn=1873-2607&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00104-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71105930%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71105930&rft_id=info:pmid/10808978&rft_els_id=S074937979900104X&rfr_iscdi=true