Screening for High Utilizing Somatizing Patients Using a Prediction Rule Derived from the Management Information System of an HMO: A Preliminary Study

Background. Somatization is a common, costly problem with great morbidity, but there has been no effective screening method to identify these patients and target them for treatment. Objectives. We tested a hypothesis that we could identify high utilizing somatizing patients from a management informa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical care 2001-09, Vol.39 (9), p.968-978
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Robert C., Gardiner, Joseph C., Armatti, Stacey, Johnson, Monica, Lyles, Judith S., Given, Charles W., Lein, Catherine, Given, Barbara, Goddeeris, John, Korban, Elie, Haddad, Robert, Kanj, Mohammed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 978
container_issue 9
container_start_page 968
container_title Medical care
container_volume 39
creator Smith, Robert C.
Gardiner, Joseph C.
Armatti, Stacey
Johnson, Monica
Lyles, Judith S.
Given, Charles W.
Lein, Catherine
Given, Barbara
Goddeeris, John
Korban, Elie
Haddad, Robert
Kanj, Mohammed
description Background. Somatization is a common, costly problem with great morbidity, but there has been no effective screening method to identify these patients and target them for treatment. Objectives. We tested a hypothesis that we could identify high utilizing somatizing patients from a management information system (MIS) by total number of visits and what we termed "somatization potential," the percentage of visits for which ICD-9 primary diagnosis codes represented disorders in the musculoskeletal, nervous, or gastrointestinal systems or ill-defined complaints. Methods. We identified 883 high users from the MIS of a large staff model HMO as those having six or more visits during the year studied (65th percentile). A physician rater, without knowledge of hypotheses and predictors, then reviewed the medical records of these patients and identified somatizing patients (n = 122) and nonsomatizing patients (n = 761). In two-thirds of the population (the derivation set), we used logistic regression to refine our hypothesis and identify predictors of somatization available from the MIS: demographic data, all medical encounters, and primary diagnoses made by usual care physicians (ICD-9 codes). We then tested our prediction model in the remaining one-third of the population (the validation set) to validate its usefulness. Results. The derivation set contained the following significant correlates of somatization: gender, total number of visits, and percent of visits with somatization potential. The c-statistic, equivalent to the area under the ROC curve, was 0.90. In the validation set, the explanatory power was less with a still impressive c-statistic of 0.78. A predicted probability of 0.04 identified almost all somatizers, whereas a predicted probability of 0.40 identified about half of all somatizers but produced few false positives. Conclusions. We have developed and validated a prediction model from the MIS that helps to distinguish chronic somatizing patients from other high utilizing patients. Our method requires corroboration but carries the promise of providing clinicians and health plan directors with an inexpensive, simple approach for identifying the common somatizing patient and, in turn, targeting them for treatment. The screener does not require clinicians' time.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00005650-200109000-00007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71101083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3767776</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3767776</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3247-48d29ecce9777b897ab17d61dd044b31e865d3773431cdcd7ec6b87fc9a29f8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UcFu1DAQtRCILoU_QMgnbgE7TjIJt6oFtlKrVix7jhx7suvixMV2qJYP4XtxyFJOzGVmnt57tuYRQjl7x1kD71mqsipZljOWgLRlMwRPyIqXAjLeFPVTsmIsLzNg0JyQFyHcJS6IMn9OTjgvWd6UxYr82iiPOJpxR3vn6drs9nQbjTU_Z2jjBhmX8TYNOMZAt2FeJb31qI2Kxo30y2SRXqA3P1DT3ruBxj3SaznKHQ5JRC_HZD5bJfLmECIO1PVUjnR9ffOBns1e1gxmlP5AN3HSh5fkWS9twFfHfkq2nz5-PV9nVzefL8_PrjIl8gKyotZ5g0phAwBd3YDsOOiKa82KohMc66rUAkAUgiutNKCquhp61ci86WslTsnbxffeu-8ThtgOJii0Vo7optAC5-nAtUjEeiEq70Lw2Lf33gzpvy1n7ZxJ-zeT9jGTPxAk6ZvjG1M3oP4nPIaQCMVCeHA2og_f7PSAvt2jtHHf_i_rJHu9yO5CdP7RVkCVjlGJ3yxJocs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71101083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening for High Utilizing Somatizing Patients Using a Prediction Rule Derived from the Management Information System of an HMO: A Preliminary Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Smith, Robert C. ; Gardiner, Joseph C. ; Armatti, Stacey ; Johnson, Monica ; Lyles, Judith S. ; Given, Charles W. ; Lein, Catherine ; Given, Barbara ; Goddeeris, John ; Korban, Elie ; Haddad, Robert ; Kanj, Mohammed</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Robert C. ; Gardiner, Joseph C. ; Armatti, Stacey ; Johnson, Monica ; Lyles, Judith S. ; Given, Charles W. ; Lein, Catherine ; Given, Barbara ; Goddeeris, John ; Korban, Elie ; Haddad, Robert ; Kanj, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Somatization is a common, costly problem with great morbidity, but there has been no effective screening method to identify these patients and target them for treatment. Objectives. We tested a hypothesis that we could identify high utilizing somatizing patients from a management information system (MIS) by total number of visits and what we termed "somatization potential," the percentage of visits for which ICD-9 primary diagnosis codes represented disorders in the musculoskeletal, nervous, or gastrointestinal systems or ill-defined complaints. Methods. We identified 883 high users from the MIS of a large staff model HMO as those having six or more visits during the year studied (65th percentile). A physician rater, without knowledge of hypotheses and predictors, then reviewed the medical records of these patients and identified somatizing patients (n = 122) and nonsomatizing patients (n = 761). In two-thirds of the population (the derivation set), we used logistic regression to refine our hypothesis and identify predictors of somatization available from the MIS: demographic data, all medical encounters, and primary diagnoses made by usual care physicians (ICD-9 codes). We then tested our prediction model in the remaining one-third of the population (the validation set) to validate its usefulness. Results. The derivation set contained the following significant correlates of somatization: gender, total number of visits, and percent of visits with somatization potential. The c-statistic, equivalent to the area under the ROC curve, was 0.90. In the validation set, the explanatory power was less with a still impressive c-statistic of 0.78. A predicted probability of 0.04 identified almost all somatizers, whereas a predicted probability of 0.40 identified about half of all somatizers but produced few false positives. Conclusions. We have developed and validated a prediction model from the MIS that helps to distinguish chronic somatizing patients from other high utilizing patients. Our method requires corroboration but carries the promise of providing clinicians and health plan directors with an inexpensive, simple approach for identifying the common somatizing patient and, in turn, targeting them for treatment. The screener does not require clinicians' time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200109000-00007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11502954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chronic Disease - epidemiology ; Digestive system diseases ; Disorders ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Diseases - epidemiology ; Health Maintenance Organizations - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; International Statistical Classification of Diseases ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Management Information Systems ; Medical Records ; Mental illness ; Middle Aged ; Modeling ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - epidemiology ; Nervous system diseases ; Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology ; Office Visits - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Physicians ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Somatoform disorders ; Somatoform Disorders - diagnosis ; Somatoform Disorders - epidemiology ; Symptoms ; United States - epidemiology ; Utilization Review - methods</subject><ispartof>Medical care, 2001-09, Vol.39 (9), p.968-978</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2001 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3247-48d29ecce9777b897ab17d61dd044b31e865d3773431cdcd7ec6b87fc9a29f8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3767776$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3767776$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11502954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, Joseph C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armatti, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyles, Judith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Given, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lein, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Given, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddeeris, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korban, Elie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanj, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><title>Screening for High Utilizing Somatizing Patients Using a Prediction Rule Derived from the Management Information System of an HMO: A Preliminary Study</title><title>Medical care</title><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><description>Background. Somatization is a common, costly problem with great morbidity, but there has been no effective screening method to identify these patients and target them for treatment. Objectives. We tested a hypothesis that we could identify high utilizing somatizing patients from a management information system (MIS) by total number of visits and what we termed "somatization potential," the percentage of visits for which ICD-9 primary diagnosis codes represented disorders in the musculoskeletal, nervous, or gastrointestinal systems or ill-defined complaints. Methods. We identified 883 high users from the MIS of a large staff model HMO as those having six or more visits during the year studied (65th percentile). A physician rater, without knowledge of hypotheses and predictors, then reviewed the medical records of these patients and identified somatizing patients (n = 122) and nonsomatizing patients (n = 761). In two-thirds of the population (the derivation set), we used logistic regression to refine our hypothesis and identify predictors of somatization available from the MIS: demographic data, all medical encounters, and primary diagnoses made by usual care physicians (ICD-9 codes). We then tested our prediction model in the remaining one-third of the population (the validation set) to validate its usefulness. Results. The derivation set contained the following significant correlates of somatization: gender, total number of visits, and percent of visits with somatization potential. The c-statistic, equivalent to the area under the ROC curve, was 0.90. In the validation set, the explanatory power was less with a still impressive c-statistic of 0.78. A predicted probability of 0.04 identified almost all somatizers, whereas a predicted probability of 0.40 identified about half of all somatizers but produced few false positives. Conclusions. We have developed and validated a prediction model from the MIS that helps to distinguish chronic somatizing patients from other high utilizing patients. Our method requires corroboration but carries the promise of providing clinicians and health plan directors with an inexpensive, simple approach for identifying the common somatizing patient and, in turn, targeting them for treatment. The screener does not require clinicians' time.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - epidemiology</subject><subject>Digestive system diseases</subject><subject>Disorders</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Health Maintenance Organizations - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International Statistical Classification of Diseases</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management Information Systems</subject><subject>Medical Records</subject><subject>Mental illness</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Nervous system diseases</subject><subject>Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Office Visits - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Somatoform disorders</subject><subject>Somatoform Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Somatoform Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Utilization Review - methods</subject><issn>0025-7079</issn><issn>1537-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UcFu1DAQtRCILoU_QMgnbgE7TjIJt6oFtlKrVix7jhx7suvixMV2qJYP4XtxyFJOzGVmnt57tuYRQjl7x1kD71mqsipZljOWgLRlMwRPyIqXAjLeFPVTsmIsLzNg0JyQFyHcJS6IMn9OTjgvWd6UxYr82iiPOJpxR3vn6drs9nQbjTU_Z2jjBhmX8TYNOMZAt2FeJb31qI2Kxo30y2SRXqA3P1DT3ruBxj3SaznKHQ5JRC_HZD5bJfLmECIO1PVUjnR9ffOBns1e1gxmlP5AN3HSh5fkWS9twFfHfkq2nz5-PV9nVzefL8_PrjIl8gKyotZ5g0phAwBd3YDsOOiKa82KohMc66rUAkAUgiutNKCquhp61ci86WslTsnbxffeu-8ThtgOJii0Vo7optAC5-nAtUjEeiEq70Lw2Lf33gzpvy1n7ZxJ-zeT9jGTPxAk6ZvjG1M3oP4nPIaQCMVCeHA2og_f7PSAvt2jtHHf_i_rJHu9yO5CdP7RVkCVjlGJ3yxJocs</recordid><startdate>200109</startdate><enddate>200109</enddate><creator>Smith, Robert C.</creator><creator>Gardiner, Joseph C.</creator><creator>Armatti, Stacey</creator><creator>Johnson, Monica</creator><creator>Lyles, Judith S.</creator><creator>Given, Charles W.</creator><creator>Lein, Catherine</creator><creator>Given, Barbara</creator><creator>Goddeeris, John</creator><creator>Korban, Elie</creator><creator>Haddad, Robert</creator><creator>Kanj, Mohammed</creator><general>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200109</creationdate><title>Screening for High Utilizing Somatizing Patients Using a Prediction Rule Derived from the Management Information System of an HMO: A Preliminary Study</title><author>Smith, Robert C. ; Gardiner, Joseph C. ; Armatti, Stacey ; Johnson, Monica ; Lyles, Judith S. ; Given, Charles W. ; Lein, Catherine ; Given, Barbara ; Goddeeris, John ; Korban, Elie ; Haddad, Robert ; Kanj, Mohammed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3247-48d29ecce9777b897ab17d61dd044b31e865d3773431cdcd7ec6b87fc9a29f8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - epidemiology</topic><topic>Digestive system diseases</topic><topic>Disorders</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Health Maintenance Organizations - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International Statistical Classification of Diseases</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management Information Systems</topic><topic>Medical Records</topic><topic>Mental illness</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Nervous system diseases</topic><topic>Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Office Visits - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Somatoform disorders</topic><topic>Somatoform Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Somatoform Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Utilization Review - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, Joseph C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armatti, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyles, Judith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Given, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lein, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Given, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddeeris, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korban, Elie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanj, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Robert C.</au><au>Gardiner, Joseph C.</au><au>Armatti, Stacey</au><au>Johnson, Monica</au><au>Lyles, Judith S.</au><au>Given, Charles W.</au><au>Lein, Catherine</au><au>Given, Barbara</au><au>Goddeeris, John</au><au>Korban, Elie</au><au>Haddad, Robert</au><au>Kanj, Mohammed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening for High Utilizing Somatizing Patients Using a Prediction Rule Derived from the Management Information System of an HMO: A Preliminary Study</atitle><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><date>2001-09</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>968</spage><epage>978</epage><pages>968-978</pages><issn>0025-7079</issn><eissn>1537-1948</eissn><abstract>Background. Somatization is a common, costly problem with great morbidity, but there has been no effective screening method to identify these patients and target them for treatment. Objectives. We tested a hypothesis that we could identify high utilizing somatizing patients from a management information system (MIS) by total number of visits and what we termed "somatization potential," the percentage of visits for which ICD-9 primary diagnosis codes represented disorders in the musculoskeletal, nervous, or gastrointestinal systems or ill-defined complaints. Methods. We identified 883 high users from the MIS of a large staff model HMO as those having six or more visits during the year studied (65th percentile). A physician rater, without knowledge of hypotheses and predictors, then reviewed the medical records of these patients and identified somatizing patients (n = 122) and nonsomatizing patients (n = 761). In two-thirds of the population (the derivation set), we used logistic regression to refine our hypothesis and identify predictors of somatization available from the MIS: demographic data, all medical encounters, and primary diagnoses made by usual care physicians (ICD-9 codes). We then tested our prediction model in the remaining one-third of the population (the validation set) to validate its usefulness. Results. The derivation set contained the following significant correlates of somatization: gender, total number of visits, and percent of visits with somatization potential. The c-statistic, equivalent to the area under the ROC curve, was 0.90. In the validation set, the explanatory power was less with a still impressive c-statistic of 0.78. A predicted probability of 0.04 identified almost all somatizers, whereas a predicted probability of 0.40 identified about half of all somatizers but produced few false positives. Conclusions. We have developed and validated a prediction model from the MIS that helps to distinguish chronic somatizing patients from other high utilizing patients. Our method requires corroboration but carries the promise of providing clinicians and health plan directors with an inexpensive, simple approach for identifying the common somatizing patient and, in turn, targeting them for treatment. The screener does not require clinicians' time.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</pub><pmid>11502954</pmid><doi>10.1097/00005650-200109000-00007</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7079
ispartof Medical care, 2001-09, Vol.39 (9), p.968-978
issn 0025-7079
1537-1948
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71101083
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Adult
Chronic Disease - epidemiology
Digestive system diseases
Disorders
Epidemiology
Female
Gastrointestinal Diseases - epidemiology
Health Maintenance Organizations - statistics & numerical data
Humans
International Statistical Classification of Diseases
Logistic Models
Male
Management Information Systems
Medical Records
Mental illness
Middle Aged
Modeling
Musculoskeletal Diseases - epidemiology
Nervous system diseases
Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology
Office Visits - statistics & numerical data
Physicians
Sensitivity and Specificity
Somatoform disorders
Somatoform Disorders - diagnosis
Somatoform Disorders - epidemiology
Symptoms
United States - epidemiology
Utilization Review - methods
title Screening for High Utilizing Somatizing Patients Using a Prediction Rule Derived from the Management Information System of an HMO: A Preliminary Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T13%3A44%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20for%20High%20Utilizing%20Somatizing%20Patients%20Using%20a%20Prediction%20Rule%20Derived%20from%20the%20Management%20Information%20System%20of%20an%20HMO:%20A%20Preliminary%20Study&rft.jtitle=Medical%20care&rft.au=Smith,%20Robert%20C.&rft.date=2001-09&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=968&rft.epage=978&rft.pages=968-978&rft.issn=0025-7079&rft.eissn=1537-1948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00005650-200109000-00007&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3767776%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71101083&rft_id=info:pmid/11502954&rft_jstor_id=3767776&rfr_iscdi=true