The cost-effectiveness of varicella screening and vaccination in U.S. Army recruits

Varicella outbreaks in the U.S. Army disrupt training, reduce readiness, and represent substantial costs. Vaccination of susceptible individuals may be cost-effective. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing screening of all incoming recruits and vaccination of susceptible individuals a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Military medicine 2000-04, Vol.165 (4), p.309-315
Hauptverfasser: HOWELL, M. R, LEE, T, GAYDOS, C. A, NANG, R. N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 315
container_issue 4
container_start_page 309
container_title Military medicine
container_volume 165
creator HOWELL, M. R
LEE, T
GAYDOS, C. A
NANG, R. N
description Varicella outbreaks in the U.S. Army disrupt training, reduce readiness, and represent substantial costs. Vaccination of susceptible individuals may be cost-effective. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing screening of all incoming recruits and vaccination of susceptible individuals at either initial entry training (IET) or medical entrance processing station (MEPS), universal vaccination at IET, and no intervention. Primary health outcomes included the number of varicella cases prevented during the 8-week initial training period. The varicella hospitalization rate was 21.6 per 10,000 per year. In 100,000 recruits, 36 cases of varicella are expected at a cost of $181,000 in the absence of an intervention. Screening at IET would prevent 4 cases but would cost an additional $3,255,000 more than no intervention. Screening at MEPS would prevent 3 cases and save $521,000 per case prevented during the IET but would cost $2,734,000 more than no intervention. Universal vaccination would prevent 2 cases but would cost $15,858,000 more than MEPS screening and $18,592,000 more than no intervention. These results are robust. Cost per case of varicella prevented ranged from $390,000 to $7.9 million. Scarce prevention resources could be more cost-effectively allocated to other prevention programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/milmed/165.4.309
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71093963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71093963</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-e94ff486fe2fe80cc26756a0f3f02aa401824e2e1d9b652a38e3d2157ae25cf43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouq7ePUkQ8dY6-WjaHkX8AsHDKngLMTvRSJtq0gr-e7PuguBpYOaZd4aHkCMGJYNWnPe-63F5zlRVylJAu0VmrBVQKCaet8kMgKtCQl3tkf2U3gGYbBu2S_YYNCAAmhlZPL4htUMaC3QO7ei_MGBKdHD0y0RvsesMTTYiBh9eqQnL3LfWBzP6IVAf6FO5KOlF7L9pRBsnP6YDsuNMl_BwU-fk6frq8fK2uH-4ubu8uC-saEU-2ErnZKMccocNWMtVXSkDTjjgxkhgDZfIkS3bF1VxIxoUS86q2iCvrJNiTs7WuR9x-Jwwjbr36ffjgMOUdL1y1CqRwZN_4PswxZB_05zVIJXgTYZgDdk4pBTR6Y_oexO_NQO9StJr2zrb1lJn23nleJM7vawmfwtrvRk43QAmWdO5aIL16Y8TUgAH8QOvXIhB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217046328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The cost-effectiveness of varicella screening and vaccination in U.S. Army recruits</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>HOWELL, M. R ; LEE, T ; GAYDOS, C. A ; NANG, R. N</creator><creatorcontrib>HOWELL, M. R ; LEE, T ; GAYDOS, C. A ; NANG, R. N</creatorcontrib><description>Varicella outbreaks in the U.S. Army disrupt training, reduce readiness, and represent substantial costs. Vaccination of susceptible individuals may be cost-effective. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing screening of all incoming recruits and vaccination of susceptible individuals at either initial entry training (IET) or medical entrance processing station (MEPS), universal vaccination at IET, and no intervention. Primary health outcomes included the number of varicella cases prevented during the 8-week initial training period. The varicella hospitalization rate was 21.6 per 10,000 per year. In 100,000 recruits, 36 cases of varicella are expected at a cost of $181,000 in the absence of an intervention. Screening at IET would prevent 4 cases but would cost an additional $3,255,000 more than no intervention. Screening at MEPS would prevent 3 cases and save $521,000 per case prevented during the IET but would cost $2,734,000 more than no intervention. Universal vaccination would prevent 2 cases but would cost $15,858,000 more than MEPS screening and $18,592,000 more than no intervention. These results are robust. Cost per case of varicella prevented ranged from $390,000 to $7.9 million. Scarce prevention resources could be more cost-effectively allocated to other prevention programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/milmed/165.4.309</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10803008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MMEDA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Association of Military Surgeons</publisher><subject>Absenteeism ; Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chickenpox - economics ; Chickenpox - epidemiology ; Chickenpox - prevention &amp; control ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Decision Support Techniques ; Disease Outbreaks - prevention &amp; control ; Health Care Costs - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hospitalization - economics ; Human viral diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Mass Screening - economics ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical sciences ; Military Medicine - economics ; Military Medicine - methods ; Military Personnel ; Morbidity ; Program Evaluation ; United States - epidemiology ; Vaccination - economics ; Vaccination - methods ; Viral diseases ; Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 2000-04, Vol.165 (4), p.309-315</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Association of Military Surgeons of the United States Apr 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-e94ff486fe2fe80cc26756a0f3f02aa401824e2e1d9b652a38e3d2157ae25cf43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1343020$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10803008$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HOWELL, M. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEE, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GAYDOS, C. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NANG, R. N</creatorcontrib><title>The cost-effectiveness of varicella screening and vaccination in U.S. Army recruits</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>Varicella outbreaks in the U.S. Army disrupt training, reduce readiness, and represent substantial costs. Vaccination of susceptible individuals may be cost-effective. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing screening of all incoming recruits and vaccination of susceptible individuals at either initial entry training (IET) or medical entrance processing station (MEPS), universal vaccination at IET, and no intervention. Primary health outcomes included the number of varicella cases prevented during the 8-week initial training period. The varicella hospitalization rate was 21.6 per 10,000 per year. In 100,000 recruits, 36 cases of varicella are expected at a cost of $181,000 in the absence of an intervention. Screening at IET would prevent 4 cases but would cost an additional $3,255,000 more than no intervention. Screening at MEPS would prevent 3 cases and save $521,000 per case prevented during the IET but would cost $2,734,000 more than no intervention. Universal vaccination would prevent 2 cases but would cost $15,858,000 more than MEPS screening and $18,592,000 more than no intervention. These results are robust. Cost per case of varicella prevented ranged from $390,000 to $7.9 million. Scarce prevention resources could be more cost-effectively allocated to other prevention programs.</description><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chickenpox - economics</subject><subject>Chickenpox - epidemiology</subject><subject>Chickenpox - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Health Care Costs - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitalization - economics</subject><subject>Human viral diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Military Medicine - economics</subject><subject>Military Medicine - methods</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Vaccination - economics</subject><subject>Vaccination - methods</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouq7ePUkQ8dY6-WjaHkX8AsHDKngLMTvRSJtq0gr-e7PuguBpYOaZd4aHkCMGJYNWnPe-63F5zlRVylJAu0VmrBVQKCaet8kMgKtCQl3tkf2U3gGYbBu2S_YYNCAAmhlZPL4htUMaC3QO7ei_MGBKdHD0y0RvsesMTTYiBh9eqQnL3LfWBzP6IVAf6FO5KOlF7L9pRBsnP6YDsuNMl_BwU-fk6frq8fK2uH-4ubu8uC-saEU-2ErnZKMccocNWMtVXSkDTjjgxkhgDZfIkS3bF1VxIxoUS86q2iCvrJNiTs7WuR9x-Jwwjbr36ffjgMOUdL1y1CqRwZN_4PswxZB_05zVIJXgTYZgDdk4pBTR6Y_oexO_NQO9StJr2zrb1lJn23nleJM7vawmfwtrvRk43QAmWdO5aIL16Y8TUgAH8QOvXIhB</recordid><startdate>20000401</startdate><enddate>20000401</enddate><creator>HOWELL, M. R</creator><creator>LEE, T</creator><creator>GAYDOS, C. A</creator><creator>NANG, R. N</creator><general>Association of Military Surgeons</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000401</creationdate><title>The cost-effectiveness of varicella screening and vaccination in U.S. Army recruits</title><author>HOWELL, M. R ; LEE, T ; GAYDOS, C. A ; NANG, R. N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-e94ff486fe2fe80cc26756a0f3f02aa401824e2e1d9b652a38e3d2157ae25cf43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chickenpox - economics</topic><topic>Chickenpox - epidemiology</topic><topic>Chickenpox - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Health Care Costs - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitalization - economics</topic><topic>Human viral diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Military Medicine - economics</topic><topic>Military Medicine - methods</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Vaccination - economics</topic><topic>Vaccination - methods</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HOWELL, M. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEE, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GAYDOS, C. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NANG, R. N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HOWELL, M. R</au><au>LEE, T</au><au>GAYDOS, C. A</au><au>NANG, R. N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The cost-effectiveness of varicella screening and vaccination in U.S. Army recruits</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>2000-04-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>309-315</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><coden>MMEDA9</coden><abstract>Varicella outbreaks in the U.S. Army disrupt training, reduce readiness, and represent substantial costs. Vaccination of susceptible individuals may be cost-effective. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing screening of all incoming recruits and vaccination of susceptible individuals at either initial entry training (IET) or medical entrance processing station (MEPS), universal vaccination at IET, and no intervention. Primary health outcomes included the number of varicella cases prevented during the 8-week initial training period. The varicella hospitalization rate was 21.6 per 10,000 per year. In 100,000 recruits, 36 cases of varicella are expected at a cost of $181,000 in the absence of an intervention. Screening at IET would prevent 4 cases but would cost an additional $3,255,000 more than no intervention. Screening at MEPS would prevent 3 cases and save $521,000 per case prevented during the IET but would cost $2,734,000 more than no intervention. Universal vaccination would prevent 2 cases but would cost $15,858,000 more than MEPS screening and $18,592,000 more than no intervention. These results are robust. Cost per case of varicella prevented ranged from $390,000 to $7.9 million. Scarce prevention resources could be more cost-effectively allocated to other prevention programs.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Association of Military Surgeons</pub><pmid>10803008</pmid><doi>10.1093/milmed/165.4.309</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-4075
ispartof Military medicine, 2000-04, Vol.165 (4), p.309-315
issn 0026-4075
1930-613X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71093963
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Absenteeism
Analysis of Variance
Biological and medical sciences
Chickenpox - economics
Chickenpox - epidemiology
Chickenpox - prevention & control
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Support Techniques
Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control
Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data
Hospitalization - economics
Human viral diseases
Humans
Infectious diseases
Mass Screening - economics
Mass Screening - methods
Medical sciences
Military Medicine - economics
Military Medicine - methods
Military Personnel
Morbidity
Program Evaluation
United States - epidemiology
Vaccination - economics
Vaccination - methods
Viral diseases
Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye
title The cost-effectiveness of varicella screening and vaccination in U.S. Army recruits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A54%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20cost-effectiveness%20of%20varicella%20screening%20and%20vaccination%20in%20U.S.%20Army%20recruits&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=HOWELL,%20M.%20R&rft.date=2000-04-01&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=309-315&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft.coden=MMEDA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/milmed/165.4.309&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71093963%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217046328&rft_id=info:pmid/10803008&rfr_iscdi=true