Evaluation of Crystals in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections for the Differential Diagnosis of Pseudogout, Gout, and Tumoral Calcinosis

Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)–stained sections may not allow proper evaluation of birefringence properties of the crystals in the lesions of pseudogout, gout, and tumoral calcinosis. This study was undertaken to verify the application of a special stain that could facilitate the evaluation of the bire...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Modern pathology 2001-08, Vol.14 (8), p.806-810
Hauptverfasser: Shidham, Vinod, Chivukula, Mamatha, Basir, Zainab, Shidham, Ganesh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 810
container_issue 8
container_start_page 806
container_title Modern pathology
container_volume 14
creator Shidham, Vinod
Chivukula, Mamatha
Basir, Zainab
Shidham, Ganesh
description Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)–stained sections may not allow proper evaluation of birefringence properties of the crystals in the lesions of pseudogout, gout, and tumoral calcinosis. This study was undertaken to verify the application of a special stain that could facilitate the evaluation of the birefringence properties of these crystals for definitive diagnosis. We evaluated previously described nonaqueous alcoholic eosin staining (NAES) method based on the principle of using alcoholic eosin without hematoxylin and any other aqueous reagents for staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Two observers, in a blinded fashion, evaluated the sections stained with routine H&E and NEAS method without the knowledge about clinical diagnosis. All pseudogout (nine sections from seven cases) and gout (eight sections from five cases) lesions demonstrated birefringence in the sections stained with NAES method. H&E–stained sections showing the respective diagnostic histomorphology failed to demonstrate the birefringent crystals by polarizing microscopy in all the eight sections from gout and in seven of nine sections from pseudogout. Only two H&E–stained sections showed scant calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) crystals in pseudogout. None of the three sections from two cases of tumoral calcinosis showed birefringence with either stain. We conclude that CPPD in pseudogout and monosodium urate in gout may not polarize in the routine H&E–stained sections. However, polarizing microscopy of sections stained with NAES method allowed demonstration of CPPD crystals with positive birefringence in pseudogout, MSU crystals with negative birefringence in gout, and calcium hydroxyapatite crystals without birefringence in tumoral calcinosis. Section stained with NAES method is a significantly useful adjunct to the routine H&E stain for proper evaluation of the crystals under polarizing microscope in these lesions.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/modpathol.3880394
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71092472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0893395222037267</els_id><sourcerecordid>71092472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-9fe96fb99623f6852a13923fc6a73f6de3c2db83c80295b0ebae3900c9bd639d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokPhAViALBasmuKfOBOLFRpmClIlKlHWkWNfT10l9mDHFX0RnhdPM-pILLqxfX3P-Xzlg9BbSs4p4e2nMZidmm7CcM7blnBZP0MLKjipCGvFc7QgreQVl4KdoFcp3RJCa9Gyl-iEUkHqtqYL9Hd9p4asJhc8Dhav4n2a1JCw83gT4qgG56uN-wPmDF-pqKwt9XrswRgw-NqllAH_BL33J2xDxNMN4K_OWojgJ6eGUqitD8mlPf8qQTZhG_J0hi8eVuULJ48hFulKDdo9aF-jF7aMAW8O-yn6tVlfr75Vlz8uvq--XFZaCDJV0oJsbC9lw7htWsEU5bIcdaOW5cIA18z0LdctYVL0BHoFXBKiZW8aLg0_RR9n7i6G3xnS1I0uaRgG5SHk1C0pkaxesiL88J_wNuToy2wdY-U7aypFEdFZpGNIKYLtdtGNKt53lHT7xLrHxLpDYsXz_gDO_Qjm6DhEVARsFqTS8luIx5efor6bTV5NOcIj9dj_PPehfO6dK9CkHXgNxsWSZmeCe4L-D44CxWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221154195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Crystals in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections for the Differential Diagnosis of Pseudogout, Gout, and Tumoral Calcinosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Shidham, Vinod ; Chivukula, Mamatha ; Basir, Zainab ; Shidham, Ganesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Shidham, Vinod ; Chivukula, Mamatha ; Basir, Zainab ; Shidham, Ganesh</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)–stained sections may not allow proper evaluation of birefringence properties of the crystals in the lesions of pseudogout, gout, and tumoral calcinosis. This study was undertaken to verify the application of a special stain that could facilitate the evaluation of the birefringence properties of these crystals for definitive diagnosis. We evaluated previously described nonaqueous alcoholic eosin staining (NAES) method based on the principle of using alcoholic eosin without hematoxylin and any other aqueous reagents for staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Two observers, in a blinded fashion, evaluated the sections stained with routine H&E and NEAS method without the knowledge about clinical diagnosis. All pseudogout (nine sections from seven cases) and gout (eight sections from five cases) lesions demonstrated birefringence in the sections stained with NAES method. H&E–stained sections showing the respective diagnostic histomorphology failed to demonstrate the birefringent crystals by polarizing microscopy in all the eight sections from gout and in seven of nine sections from pseudogout. Only two H&E–stained sections showed scant calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) crystals in pseudogout. None of the three sections from two cases of tumoral calcinosis showed birefringence with either stain. We conclude that CPPD in pseudogout and monosodium urate in gout may not polarize in the routine H&E–stained sections. However, polarizing microscopy of sections stained with NAES method allowed demonstration of CPPD crystals with positive birefringence in pseudogout, MSU crystals with negative birefringence in gout, and calcium hydroxyapatite crystals without birefringence in tumoral calcinosis. Section stained with NAES method is a significantly useful adjunct to the routine H&E stain for proper evaluation of the crystals under polarizing microscope in these lesions.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-3952</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3880394</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11504841</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MODPEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Birefringence ; Calcinosis - pathology ; Calcium hydroxyapatite ; Calcium Pyrophosphate - chemistry ; Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate ; Chondrocalcinosis ; Chondrocalcinosis - pathology ; Crystallization ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Durapatite - chemistry ; Formaldehyde ; Gout ; Gout - pathology ; Humans ; Laboratory Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; methods-in-pathology ; Monosodium urate ; Paraffin Embedding ; Pathology ; Polarizing microscope ; Pseudogout ; Staining and Labeling - methods ; Staining and Labeling - standards ; Tissue Fixation ; Tumoral calcinosis ; Uric Acid - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Modern pathology, 2001-08, Vol.14 (8), p.806-810</ispartof><rights>2001 United States &amp; Canadian Academy of Pathology</rights><rights>The United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc. 2001</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-9fe96fb99623f6852a13923fc6a73f6de3c2db83c80295b0ebae3900c9bd639d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-9fe96fb99623f6852a13923fc6a73f6de3c2db83c80295b0ebae3900c9bd639d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/221154195?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11504841$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shidham, Vinod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivukula, Mamatha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basir, Zainab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shidham, Ganesh</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Crystals in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections for the Differential Diagnosis of Pseudogout, Gout, and Tumoral Calcinosis</title><title>Modern pathology</title><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)–stained sections may not allow proper evaluation of birefringence properties of the crystals in the lesions of pseudogout, gout, and tumoral calcinosis. This study was undertaken to verify the application of a special stain that could facilitate the evaluation of the birefringence properties of these crystals for definitive diagnosis. We evaluated previously described nonaqueous alcoholic eosin staining (NAES) method based on the principle of using alcoholic eosin without hematoxylin and any other aqueous reagents for staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Two observers, in a blinded fashion, evaluated the sections stained with routine H&E and NEAS method without the knowledge about clinical diagnosis. All pseudogout (nine sections from seven cases) and gout (eight sections from five cases) lesions demonstrated birefringence in the sections stained with NAES method. H&E–stained sections showing the respective diagnostic histomorphology failed to demonstrate the birefringent crystals by polarizing microscopy in all the eight sections from gout and in seven of nine sections from pseudogout. Only two H&E–stained sections showed scant calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) crystals in pseudogout. None of the three sections from two cases of tumoral calcinosis showed birefringence with either stain. We conclude that CPPD in pseudogout and monosodium urate in gout may not polarize in the routine H&E–stained sections. However, polarizing microscopy of sections stained with NAES method allowed demonstration of CPPD crystals with positive birefringence in pseudogout, MSU crystals with negative birefringence in gout, and calcium hydroxyapatite crystals without birefringence in tumoral calcinosis. Section stained with NAES method is a significantly useful adjunct to the routine H&E stain for proper evaluation of the crystals under polarizing microscope in these lesions.]]></description><subject>Birefringence</subject><subject>Calcinosis - pathology</subject><subject>Calcium hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Calcium Pyrophosphate - chemistry</subject><subject>Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate</subject><subject>Chondrocalcinosis</subject><subject>Chondrocalcinosis - pathology</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Durapatite - chemistry</subject><subject>Formaldehyde</subject><subject>Gout</subject><subject>Gout - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>methods-in-pathology</subject><subject>Monosodium urate</subject><subject>Paraffin Embedding</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Polarizing microscope</subject><subject>Pseudogout</subject><subject>Staining and Labeling - methods</subject><subject>Staining and Labeling - standards</subject><subject>Tissue Fixation</subject><subject>Tumoral calcinosis</subject><subject>Uric Acid - chemistry</subject><issn>0893-3952</issn><issn>1530-0285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokPhAViALBasmuKfOBOLFRpmClIlKlHWkWNfT10l9mDHFX0RnhdPM-pILLqxfX3P-Xzlg9BbSs4p4e2nMZidmm7CcM7blnBZP0MLKjipCGvFc7QgreQVl4KdoFcp3RJCa9Gyl-iEUkHqtqYL9Hd9p4asJhc8Dhav4n2a1JCw83gT4qgG56uN-wPmDF-pqKwt9XrswRgw-NqllAH_BL33J2xDxNMN4K_OWojgJ6eGUqitD8mlPf8qQTZhG_J0hi8eVuULJ48hFulKDdo9aF-jF7aMAW8O-yn6tVlfr75Vlz8uvq--XFZaCDJV0oJsbC9lw7htWsEU5bIcdaOW5cIA18z0LdctYVL0BHoFXBKiZW8aLg0_RR9n7i6G3xnS1I0uaRgG5SHk1C0pkaxesiL88J_wNuToy2wdY-U7aypFEdFZpGNIKYLtdtGNKt53lHT7xLrHxLpDYsXz_gDO_Qjm6DhEVARsFqTS8luIx5efor6bTV5NOcIj9dj_PPehfO6dK9CkHXgNxsWSZmeCe4L-D44CxWg</recordid><startdate>20010801</startdate><enddate>20010801</enddate><creator>Shidham, Vinod</creator><creator>Chivukula, Mamatha</creator><creator>Basir, Zainab</creator><creator>Shidham, Ganesh</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010801</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Crystals in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections for the Differential Diagnosis of Pseudogout, Gout, and Tumoral Calcinosis</title><author>Shidham, Vinod ; Chivukula, Mamatha ; Basir, Zainab ; Shidham, Ganesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-9fe96fb99623f6852a13923fc6a73f6de3c2db83c80295b0ebae3900c9bd639d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Birefringence</topic><topic>Calcinosis - pathology</topic><topic>Calcium hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Calcium Pyrophosphate - chemistry</topic><topic>Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate</topic><topic>Chondrocalcinosis</topic><topic>Chondrocalcinosis - pathology</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Durapatite - chemistry</topic><topic>Formaldehyde</topic><topic>Gout</topic><topic>Gout - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>methods-in-pathology</topic><topic>Monosodium urate</topic><topic>Paraffin Embedding</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Polarizing microscope</topic><topic>Pseudogout</topic><topic>Staining and Labeling - methods</topic><topic>Staining and Labeling - standards</topic><topic>Tissue Fixation</topic><topic>Tumoral calcinosis</topic><topic>Uric Acid - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shidham, Vinod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivukula, Mamatha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basir, Zainab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shidham, Ganesh</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Modern pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shidham, Vinod</au><au>Chivukula, Mamatha</au><au>Basir, Zainab</au><au>Shidham, Ganesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Crystals in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections for the Differential Diagnosis of Pseudogout, Gout, and Tumoral Calcinosis</atitle><jtitle>Modern pathology</jtitle><stitle>Mod Pathol</stitle><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><date>2001-08-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>806</spage><epage>810</epage><pages>806-810</pages><issn>0893-3952</issn><eissn>1530-0285</eissn><coden>MODPEO</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)–stained sections may not allow proper evaluation of birefringence properties of the crystals in the lesions of pseudogout, gout, and tumoral calcinosis. This study was undertaken to verify the application of a special stain that could facilitate the evaluation of the birefringence properties of these crystals for definitive diagnosis. We evaluated previously described nonaqueous alcoholic eosin staining (NAES) method based on the principle of using alcoholic eosin without hematoxylin and any other aqueous reagents for staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Two observers, in a blinded fashion, evaluated the sections stained with routine H&E and NEAS method without the knowledge about clinical diagnosis. All pseudogout (nine sections from seven cases) and gout (eight sections from five cases) lesions demonstrated birefringence in the sections stained with NAES method. H&E–stained sections showing the respective diagnostic histomorphology failed to demonstrate the birefringent crystals by polarizing microscopy in all the eight sections from gout and in seven of nine sections from pseudogout. Only two H&E–stained sections showed scant calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) crystals in pseudogout. None of the three sections from two cases of tumoral calcinosis showed birefringence with either stain. We conclude that CPPD in pseudogout and monosodium urate in gout may not polarize in the routine H&E–stained sections. However, polarizing microscopy of sections stained with NAES method allowed demonstration of CPPD crystals with positive birefringence in pseudogout, MSU crystals with negative birefringence in gout, and calcium hydroxyapatite crystals without birefringence in tumoral calcinosis. Section stained with NAES method is a significantly useful adjunct to the routine H&E stain for proper evaluation of the crystals under polarizing microscope in these lesions.]]></abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11504841</pmid><doi>10.1038/modpathol.3880394</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-3952
ispartof Modern pathology, 2001-08, Vol.14 (8), p.806-810
issn 0893-3952
1530-0285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71092472
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Birefringence
Calcinosis - pathology
Calcium hydroxyapatite
Calcium Pyrophosphate - chemistry
Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate
Chondrocalcinosis
Chondrocalcinosis - pathology
Crystallization
Diagnosis, Differential
Durapatite - chemistry
Formaldehyde
Gout
Gout - pathology
Humans
Laboratory Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
methods-in-pathology
Monosodium urate
Paraffin Embedding
Pathology
Polarizing microscope
Pseudogout
Staining and Labeling - methods
Staining and Labeling - standards
Tissue Fixation
Tumoral calcinosis
Uric Acid - chemistry
title Evaluation of Crystals in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections for the Differential Diagnosis of Pseudogout, Gout, and Tumoral Calcinosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T21%3A11%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Crystals%20in%20Formalin-Fixed,%20Paraffin-Embedded%20Tissue%20Sections%20for%20the%20Differential%20Diagnosis%20of%20Pseudogout,%20Gout,%20and%20Tumoral%20Calcinosis&rft.jtitle=Modern%20pathology&rft.au=Shidham,%20Vinod&rft.date=2001-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=806&rft.epage=810&rft.pages=806-810&rft.issn=0893-3952&rft.eissn=1530-0285&rft.coden=MODPEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/modpathol.3880394&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71092472%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221154195&rft_id=info:pmid/11504841&rft_els_id=S0893395222037267&rfr_iscdi=true