Comparison of different derivatization approaches for mercury speciation in biological tissues by gas chromatography/inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

A novel interface design for coupling gas chromatography and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (GC/ICP‐MS) was used to perform mercury speciation in biological tissues. Three derivatization approaches were optimized and compared for this purpose: anhydrous butylation using a Grignard reag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of mass spectrometry. 2000-05, Vol.35 (5), p.639-646
Hauptverfasser: Garc a Fern ndez, Rub n, Montes Bay n, Mar a, Garc a Alonso, J. Ignacio, Sanz-Medel, Alfredo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 646
container_issue 5
container_start_page 639
container_title Journal of mass spectrometry.
container_volume 35
creator Garc a Fern ndez, Rub n
Montes Bay n, Mar a
Garc a Alonso, J. Ignacio
Sanz-Medel, Alfredo
description A novel interface design for coupling gas chromatography and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (GC/ICP‐MS) was used to perform mercury speciation in biological tissues. Three derivatization approaches were optimized and compared for this purpose: anhydrous butylation using a Grignard reagent, aqueous ethylation by means of NaEt4B and aqueous propylation with NaPr4B. The last reagent was synthesized in the laboratory as it is not commercially available. Detection limits obtained by GC/ICP‐MS ranged between 100 and 200 fg (as absolute mass) for methylmercury and between 500 and 600 fg for inorganic mercury using a 1 µl injection. Quantification of methyl‐ and inorganic mercury was carried out by resorting to aqueous calibration, using ethylmercury as internal standard for both propylation and butylation derivatization techniques. For ethylation procedures, a methylpropylmercury solution was used as internal standard. The absence of transmethylation during sample preparation was checked using a 97% enriched 202Hg inorganic standard. The accuracy of the three derivatization approaches was evaluated by the analysis of the certified reference material DOLT‐2 (dogfish liver) from the National Research Council of Canada and certified for methylmercury, with satisfactory results. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(200005)35:5<639::AID-JMS990>3.0.CO;2-G
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71090986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71090986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4050-b826a63d35fff5a1390c07d9d11b67b9772fd3452186d862bf841de4ba5dc8223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkW9v1CAcxxujcXP6FgyPzPagN1pKS0-zZOnpeWa6xDv_PPuFAr1jtkeFdlrfje9Uai-LiSaSEAh8-fyATxBcRHgWYRyfn65Xxeoswnka5oyx0xj7Rs8IndMXKcnn88vVInzzdp3n-ILM8Ky4fh6Hy3vB8d2R--M8S0MaZclR8Mi5G0_I8yR9GBxFmI245Dj4WZim5VY7s0emQlJXlbJq3yGprL7lnf7hu9_jbWsNFzvlUGUsapQVvR2Qa5XQU0LvUalNbbZa8Bp12rneh8sBbblDYmdNwzuztbzdDed6L3vR6VtVD0iYvq2VRG3NXcNRw537je38CdXZ4XHwoOK1U08O40nw4dXLTfE6vLperorLq1AkmOKwZHHKUyIJraqK8ojkWOBM5jKKyjQr8yyLK0kSGkcslSyNy4olkVRJyakULI7JSfBs4vqHfvVX76DRTqi65ntlegeZ_1mcs9QHP05BYY1zVlXQWt1wO0CEYZQHMMqD0QSMJmCSB4QCBS8PwMuDSR4QwFBcQwxLD356uEFfNkr-gZ1s-cDnKfBN12r4q-x_qv6z6GHFo8MJrV2nvt-huf0CaUYyCp_eLWGxWazZ5r3nk19PmcoS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71090986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of different derivatization approaches for mercury speciation in biological tissues by gas chromatography/inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Garc a Fern ndez, Rub n ; Montes Bay n, Mar a ; Garc a Alonso, J. Ignacio ; Sanz-Medel, Alfredo</creator><creatorcontrib>Garc a Fern ndez, Rub n ; Montes Bay n, Mar a ; Garc a Alonso, J. Ignacio ; Sanz-Medel, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><description>A novel interface design for coupling gas chromatography and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (GC/ICP‐MS) was used to perform mercury speciation in biological tissues. Three derivatization approaches were optimized and compared for this purpose: anhydrous butylation using a Grignard reagent, aqueous ethylation by means of NaEt4B and aqueous propylation with NaPr4B. The last reagent was synthesized in the laboratory as it is not commercially available. Detection limits obtained by GC/ICP‐MS ranged between 100 and 200 fg (as absolute mass) for methylmercury and between 500 and 600 fg for inorganic mercury using a 1 µl injection. Quantification of methyl‐ and inorganic mercury was carried out by resorting to aqueous calibration, using ethylmercury as internal standard for both propylation and butylation derivatization techniques. For ethylation procedures, a methylpropylmercury solution was used as internal standard. The absence of transmethylation during sample preparation was checked using a 97% enriched 202Hg inorganic standard. The accuracy of the three derivatization approaches was evaluated by the analysis of the certified reference material DOLT‐2 (dogfish liver) from the National Research Council of Canada and certified for methylmercury, with satisfactory results. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-5174</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(200005)35:5&lt;639::AID-JMS990&gt;3.0.CO;2-G</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10800054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; butylation ; Chromatography, Gas - methods ; ethylation ; gas chromatography ; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry ; Liver ; Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Mercury - analysis ; methylmercury ; propylation ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of mass spectrometry., 2000-05, Vol.35 (5), p.639-646</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4050-b826a63d35fff5a1390c07d9d11b67b9772fd3452186d862bf841de4ba5dc8223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291096-9888%28200005%2935%3A5%3C639%3A%3AAID-JMS990%3E3.0.CO%3B2-G$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291096-9888%28200005%2935%3A5%3C639%3A%3AAID-JMS990%3E3.0.CO%3B2-G$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10800054$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garc a Fern ndez, Rub n</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montes Bay n, Mar a</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garc a Alonso, J. Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz-Medel, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of different derivatization approaches for mercury speciation in biological tissues by gas chromatography/inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry</title><title>Journal of mass spectrometry.</title><addtitle>J. Mass Spectrom</addtitle><description>A novel interface design for coupling gas chromatography and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (GC/ICP‐MS) was used to perform mercury speciation in biological tissues. Three derivatization approaches were optimized and compared for this purpose: anhydrous butylation using a Grignard reagent, aqueous ethylation by means of NaEt4B and aqueous propylation with NaPr4B. The last reagent was synthesized in the laboratory as it is not commercially available. Detection limits obtained by GC/ICP‐MS ranged between 100 and 200 fg (as absolute mass) for methylmercury and between 500 and 600 fg for inorganic mercury using a 1 µl injection. Quantification of methyl‐ and inorganic mercury was carried out by resorting to aqueous calibration, using ethylmercury as internal standard for both propylation and butylation derivatization techniques. For ethylation procedures, a methylpropylmercury solution was used as internal standard. The absence of transmethylation during sample preparation was checked using a 97% enriched 202Hg inorganic standard. The accuracy of the three derivatization approaches was evaluated by the analysis of the certified reference material DOLT‐2 (dogfish liver) from the National Research Council of Canada and certified for methylmercury, with satisfactory results. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>butylation</subject><subject>Chromatography, Gas - methods</subject><subject>ethylation</subject><subject>gas chromatography</subject><subject>inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Mercury - analysis</subject><subject>methylmercury</subject><subject>propylation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1076-5174</issn><issn>1096-9888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkW9v1CAcxxujcXP6FgyPzPagN1pKS0-zZOnpeWa6xDv_PPuFAr1jtkeFdlrfje9Uai-LiSaSEAh8-fyATxBcRHgWYRyfn65Xxeoswnka5oyx0xj7Rs8IndMXKcnn88vVInzzdp3n-ILM8Ky4fh6Hy3vB8d2R--M8S0MaZclR8Mi5G0_I8yR9GBxFmI245Dj4WZim5VY7s0emQlJXlbJq3yGprL7lnf7hu9_jbWsNFzvlUGUsapQVvR2Qa5XQU0LvUalNbbZa8Bp12rneh8sBbblDYmdNwzuztbzdDed6L3vR6VtVD0iYvq2VRG3NXcNRw537je38CdXZ4XHwoOK1U08O40nw4dXLTfE6vLperorLq1AkmOKwZHHKUyIJraqK8ojkWOBM5jKKyjQr8yyLK0kSGkcslSyNy4olkVRJyakULI7JSfBs4vqHfvVX76DRTqi65ntlegeZ_1mcs9QHP05BYY1zVlXQWt1wO0CEYZQHMMqD0QSMJmCSB4QCBS8PwMuDSR4QwFBcQwxLD356uEFfNkr-gZ1s-cDnKfBN12r4q-x_qv6z6GHFo8MJrV2nvt-huf0CaUYyCp_eLWGxWazZ5r3nk19PmcoS</recordid><startdate>200005</startdate><enddate>200005</enddate><creator>Garc a Fern ndez, Rub n</creator><creator>Montes Bay n, Mar a</creator><creator>Garc a Alonso, J. Ignacio</creator><creator>Sanz-Medel, Alfredo</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200005</creationdate><title>Comparison of different derivatization approaches for mercury speciation in biological tissues by gas chromatography/inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry</title><author>Garc a Fern ndez, Rub n ; Montes Bay n, Mar a ; Garc a Alonso, J. Ignacio ; Sanz-Medel, Alfredo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4050-b826a63d35fff5a1390c07d9d11b67b9772fd3452186d862bf841de4ba5dc8223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>butylation</topic><topic>Chromatography, Gas - methods</topic><topic>ethylation</topic><topic>gas chromatography</topic><topic>inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Mercury - analysis</topic><topic>methylmercury</topic><topic>propylation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garc a Fern ndez, Rub n</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montes Bay n, Mar a</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garc a Alonso, J. Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz-Medel, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of mass spectrometry.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garc a Fern ndez, Rub n</au><au>Montes Bay n, Mar a</au><au>Garc a Alonso, J. Ignacio</au><au>Sanz-Medel, Alfredo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of different derivatization approaches for mercury speciation in biological tissues by gas chromatography/inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mass spectrometry.</jtitle><addtitle>J. Mass Spectrom</addtitle><date>2000-05</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>639</spage><epage>646</epage><pages>639-646</pages><issn>1076-5174</issn><eissn>1096-9888</eissn><abstract>A novel interface design for coupling gas chromatography and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (GC/ICP‐MS) was used to perform mercury speciation in biological tissues. Three derivatization approaches were optimized and compared for this purpose: anhydrous butylation using a Grignard reagent, aqueous ethylation by means of NaEt4B and aqueous propylation with NaPr4B. The last reagent was synthesized in the laboratory as it is not commercially available. Detection limits obtained by GC/ICP‐MS ranged between 100 and 200 fg (as absolute mass) for methylmercury and between 500 and 600 fg for inorganic mercury using a 1 µl injection. Quantification of methyl‐ and inorganic mercury was carried out by resorting to aqueous calibration, using ethylmercury as internal standard for both propylation and butylation derivatization techniques. For ethylation procedures, a methylpropylmercury solution was used as internal standard. The absence of transmethylation during sample preparation was checked using a 97% enriched 202Hg inorganic standard. The accuracy of the three derivatization approaches was evaluated by the analysis of the certified reference material DOLT‐2 (dogfish liver) from the National Research Council of Canada and certified for methylmercury, with satisfactory results. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>10800054</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(200005)35:5&lt;639::AID-JMS990&gt;3.0.CO;2-G</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-5174
ispartof Journal of mass spectrometry., 2000-05, Vol.35 (5), p.639-646
issn 1076-5174
1096-9888
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71090986
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Animals
butylation
Chromatography, Gas - methods
ethylation
gas chromatography
inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
Liver
Mass Spectrometry - methods
Mercury - analysis
methylmercury
propylation
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Comparison of different derivatization approaches for mercury speciation in biological tissues by gas chromatography/inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A02%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20different%20derivatization%20approaches%20for%20mercury%20speciation%20in%20biological%20tissues%20by%20gas%20chromatography/inductively%20coupled%20plasma%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mass%20spectrometry.&rft.au=Garc%20a%20Fern%20ndez,%20Rub%20n&rft.date=2000-05&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=639&rft.epage=646&rft.pages=639-646&rft.issn=1076-5174&rft.eissn=1096-9888&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(200005)35:5%3C639::AID-JMS990%3E3.0.CO;2-G&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71090986%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71090986&rft_id=info:pmid/10800054&rfr_iscdi=true