p53 and bcl-2 in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Their Value as Prognostic Indicators at a Median Follow-up of 60 Months

Objective. p53 is the most common tumor suppressor gene involved with human malignancies. Mutations in p53 are present in approximately 50% of human malignancies. bcl-2 is a protooncogene. Expression of its protein product is related to better prognosis in several malignancies. Methods. One hundred...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2000-05, Vol.77 (2), p.278-282
Hauptverfasser: Geisler, John P., Geisler, Hans E., Miller, Greg A., Wiemann, Michael C., Zhou, Zhen, Crabtree, William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 282
container_issue 2
container_start_page 278
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 77
creator Geisler, John P.
Geisler, Hans E.
Miller, Greg A.
Wiemann, Michael C.
Zhou, Zhen
Crabtree, William
description Objective. p53 is the most common tumor suppressor gene involved with human malignancies. Mutations in p53 are present in approximately 50% of human malignancies. bcl-2 is a protooncogene. Expression of its protein product is related to better prognosis in several malignancies. Methods. One hundred and three patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma were studied. Immunohistochemical staining using the pAb1801 monoclonal antibody to p53 and the anti-bcl-2 124 monoclonal antibody to bcl-2 was performed. Image analysis was used to measure percentage positive nuclear area staining of mutant p53. In addition to bcl-2 and p53, FIGO stage, grade, histology, and level of cytoreduction were analyzed as prognostic factors. Univariate as well as Cox regression analysis was performed. Results. One hundred and three patients were followed for a mean of 60 months. Twenty patients had FIGO stage I disease, 4 stage II, 59 stage III, and 20 stage IV. Immunohistochemical staining for mutant p53 was not significantly related to DNA index (P = 0.99) but was related to increasing FIGO stage (P < 0.001) and increasing histologic grade (P = 0.039). Using Cox regression analysis, increased mutant p53 staining was an independent predictor of survival in these patients (P = 0.0032), along with stage (P < 0.0001) and level of cytoreduction (P < 0.0001). Although by itself bcl-2 was not an independent prognostic indicator (P = 0.18), the combination of p53 and bcl-2 was independently predictive of survival (P = 0.038). Conclusion. This study confirms the authors' earlier report on the importance of p53 as a prognostic indicator of survival in ovarian carcinoma. Cox regression analysis reveals mutant p53 staining to be a better independent indicator of prognosis and survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma than the combination of bcl-2 and p53.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/gyno.2000.5780
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71085725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825800957809</els_id><sourcerecordid>71085725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-a279c1b3fa0f4f5c2a7540e3d0c8d13699d3840a06a209ac6487b3c0fa143ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFv2zAQRomiReOmXTsWN3WTexRFiepWGEkaIEEyGFmJM0XFLGhSJSUH-feR4AxZMt3yvgfcY-w7xzVHrH89Poe4LhFxLRuFH9iKYyuLWsn2I1shtlioUqoz9iXnfzMlkJef2RnHRsmqUSt2HKQACh3sjC9KcAEuBjfurXfk4e5IyVGADSXjQjzQb9jurUvwQH6yQBnuU3wMMY_OwHXonKExpgw0AsGt7ZbtZfQ-PhXTALGHGuE2hnGfv7JPPflsv73ec7a9vNhu_hY3d1fXmz83hREVjgWVTWv4TvSEfdVLU1IjK7SiQ6M6Luq27YSqkLCmElsydaWanTDYE68EGXHOfp60Q4r_J5tHfXDZWO8p2Dhl3XBUsinlDK5PoEkx52R7PSR3oPSsOeoltF5C6yW0XkLPgx-v5ml3sN0b_FR2BtQJsPN7R2eTzsbZYOYqyZpRd9G9534BwYGLuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71085725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>p53 and bcl-2 in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Their Value as Prognostic Indicators at a Median Follow-up of 60 Months</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Geisler, John P. ; Geisler, Hans E. ; Miller, Greg A. ; Wiemann, Michael C. ; Zhou, Zhen ; Crabtree, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Geisler, John P. ; Geisler, Hans E. ; Miller, Greg A. ; Wiemann, Michael C. ; Zhou, Zhen ; Crabtree, William</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. p53 is the most common tumor suppressor gene involved with human malignancies. Mutations in p53 are present in approximately 50% of human malignancies. bcl-2 is a protooncogene. Expression of its protein product is related to better prognosis in several malignancies. Methods. One hundred and three patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma were studied. Immunohistochemical staining using the pAb1801 monoclonal antibody to p53 and the anti-bcl-2 124 monoclonal antibody to bcl-2 was performed. Image analysis was used to measure percentage positive nuclear area staining of mutant p53. In addition to bcl-2 and p53, FIGO stage, grade, histology, and level of cytoreduction were analyzed as prognostic factors. Univariate as well as Cox regression analysis was performed. Results. One hundred and three patients were followed for a mean of 60 months. Twenty patients had FIGO stage I disease, 4 stage II, 59 stage III, and 20 stage IV. Immunohistochemical staining for mutant p53 was not significantly related to DNA index (P = 0.99) but was related to increasing FIGO stage (P &lt; 0.001) and increasing histologic grade (P = 0.039). Using Cox regression analysis, increased mutant p53 staining was an independent predictor of survival in these patients (P = 0.0032), along with stage (P &lt; 0.0001) and level of cytoreduction (P &lt; 0.0001). Although by itself bcl-2 was not an independent prognostic indicator (P = 0.18), the combination of p53 and bcl-2 was independently predictive of survival (P = 0.038). Conclusion. This study confirms the authors' earlier report on the importance of p53 as a prognostic indicator of survival in ovarian carcinoma. Cox regression analysis reveals mutant p53 staining to be a better independent indicator of prognosis and survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma than the combination of bcl-2 and p53.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5780</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10785478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; bcl-2 ; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Carcinoma - genetics ; Carcinoma - pathology ; Carcinoma - therapy ; DNA Mutational Analysis ; DNA, Neoplasm - analysis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Genes, bcl-2 - genetics ; Genes, p53 - genetics ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; ovarian cancer ; Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics ; Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology ; Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy ; p53 ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; survival ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2000-05, Vol.77 (2), p.278-282</ispartof><rights>2000 Academic Press</rights><rights>Copyright 2000 Academic Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-a279c1b3fa0f4f5c2a7540e3d0c8d13699d3840a06a209ac6487b3c0fa143ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-a279c1b3fa0f4f5c2a7540e3d0c8d13699d3840a06a209ac6487b3c0fa143ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2000.5780$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10785478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geisler, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geisler, Hans E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Greg A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiemann, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crabtree, William</creatorcontrib><title>p53 and bcl-2 in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Their Value as Prognostic Indicators at a Median Follow-up of 60 Months</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>Objective. p53 is the most common tumor suppressor gene involved with human malignancies. Mutations in p53 are present in approximately 50% of human malignancies. bcl-2 is a protooncogene. Expression of its protein product is related to better prognosis in several malignancies. Methods. One hundred and three patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma were studied. Immunohistochemical staining using the pAb1801 monoclonal antibody to p53 and the anti-bcl-2 124 monoclonal antibody to bcl-2 was performed. Image analysis was used to measure percentage positive nuclear area staining of mutant p53. In addition to bcl-2 and p53, FIGO stage, grade, histology, and level of cytoreduction were analyzed as prognostic factors. Univariate as well as Cox regression analysis was performed. Results. One hundred and three patients were followed for a mean of 60 months. Twenty patients had FIGO stage I disease, 4 stage II, 59 stage III, and 20 stage IV. Immunohistochemical staining for mutant p53 was not significantly related to DNA index (P = 0.99) but was related to increasing FIGO stage (P &lt; 0.001) and increasing histologic grade (P = 0.039). Using Cox regression analysis, increased mutant p53 staining was an independent predictor of survival in these patients (P = 0.0032), along with stage (P &lt; 0.0001) and level of cytoreduction (P &lt; 0.0001). Although by itself bcl-2 was not an independent prognostic indicator (P = 0.18), the combination of p53 and bcl-2 was independently predictive of survival (P = 0.038). Conclusion. This study confirms the authors' earlier report on the importance of p53 as a prognostic indicator of survival in ovarian carcinoma. Cox regression analysis reveals mutant p53 staining to be a better independent indicator of prognosis and survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma than the combination of bcl-2 and p53.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>bcl-2</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Carcinoma - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma - therapy</subject><subject>DNA Mutational Analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Genes, bcl-2 - genetics</subject><subject>Genes, p53 - genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>p53</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFv2zAQRomiReOmXTsWN3WTexRFiepWGEkaIEEyGFmJM0XFLGhSJSUH-feR4AxZMt3yvgfcY-w7xzVHrH89Poe4LhFxLRuFH9iKYyuLWsn2I1shtlioUqoz9iXnfzMlkJef2RnHRsmqUSt2HKQACh3sjC9KcAEuBjfurXfk4e5IyVGADSXjQjzQb9jurUvwQH6yQBnuU3wMMY_OwHXonKExpgw0AsGt7ZbtZfQ-PhXTALGHGuE2hnGfv7JPPflsv73ec7a9vNhu_hY3d1fXmz83hREVjgWVTWv4TvSEfdVLU1IjK7SiQ6M6Luq27YSqkLCmElsydaWanTDYE68EGXHOfp60Q4r_J5tHfXDZWO8p2Dhl3XBUsinlDK5PoEkx52R7PSR3oPSsOeoltF5C6yW0XkLPgx-v5ml3sN0b_FR2BtQJsPN7R2eTzsbZYOYqyZpRd9G9534BwYGLuw</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Geisler, John P.</creator><creator>Geisler, Hans E.</creator><creator>Miller, Greg A.</creator><creator>Wiemann, Michael C.</creator><creator>Zhou, Zhen</creator><creator>Crabtree, William</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>p53 and bcl-2 in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Their Value as Prognostic Indicators at a Median Follow-up of 60 Months</title><author>Geisler, John P. ; Geisler, Hans E. ; Miller, Greg A. ; Wiemann, Michael C. ; Zhou, Zhen ; Crabtree, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-a279c1b3fa0f4f5c2a7540e3d0c8d13699d3840a06a209ac6487b3c0fa143ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>bcl-2</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Carcinoma - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma - therapy</topic><topic>DNA Mutational Analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Genes, bcl-2 - genetics</topic><topic>Genes, p53 - genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>p53</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geisler, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geisler, Hans E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Greg A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiemann, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crabtree, William</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geisler, John P.</au><au>Geisler, Hans E.</au><au>Miller, Greg A.</au><au>Wiemann, Michael C.</au><au>Zhou, Zhen</au><au>Crabtree, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>p53 and bcl-2 in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Their Value as Prognostic Indicators at a Median Follow-up of 60 Months</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>278</spage><epage>282</epage><pages>278-282</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>Objective. p53 is the most common tumor suppressor gene involved with human malignancies. Mutations in p53 are present in approximately 50% of human malignancies. bcl-2 is a protooncogene. Expression of its protein product is related to better prognosis in several malignancies. Methods. One hundred and three patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma were studied. Immunohistochemical staining using the pAb1801 monoclonal antibody to p53 and the anti-bcl-2 124 monoclonal antibody to bcl-2 was performed. Image analysis was used to measure percentage positive nuclear area staining of mutant p53. In addition to bcl-2 and p53, FIGO stage, grade, histology, and level of cytoreduction were analyzed as prognostic factors. Univariate as well as Cox regression analysis was performed. Results. One hundred and three patients were followed for a mean of 60 months. Twenty patients had FIGO stage I disease, 4 stage II, 59 stage III, and 20 stage IV. Immunohistochemical staining for mutant p53 was not significantly related to DNA index (P = 0.99) but was related to increasing FIGO stage (P &lt; 0.001) and increasing histologic grade (P = 0.039). Using Cox regression analysis, increased mutant p53 staining was an independent predictor of survival in these patients (P = 0.0032), along with stage (P &lt; 0.0001) and level of cytoreduction (P &lt; 0.0001). Although by itself bcl-2 was not an independent prognostic indicator (P = 0.18), the combination of p53 and bcl-2 was independently predictive of survival (P = 0.038). Conclusion. This study confirms the authors' earlier report on the importance of p53 as a prognostic indicator of survival in ovarian carcinoma. Cox regression analysis reveals mutant p53 staining to be a better independent indicator of prognosis and survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma than the combination of bcl-2 and p53.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10785478</pmid><doi>10.1006/gyno.2000.5780</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 2000-05, Vol.77 (2), p.278-282
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71085725
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
bcl-2
Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis
Carcinoma - genetics
Carcinoma - pathology
Carcinoma - therapy
DNA Mutational Analysis
DNA, Neoplasm - analysis
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Genes, bcl-2 - genetics
Genes, p53 - genetics
Humans
Middle Aged
ovarian cancer
Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics
Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology
Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy
p53
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
survival
Survival Analysis
title p53 and bcl-2 in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Their Value as Prognostic Indicators at a Median Follow-up of 60 Months
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A22%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=p53%20and%20bcl-2%20in%20Epithelial%20Ovarian%20Carcinoma:%20Their%20Value%20as%20Prognostic%20Indicators%20at%20a%20Median%20Follow-up%20of%2060%20Months&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Geisler,%20John%20P.&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=278&rft.epage=282&rft.pages=278-282&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/gyno.2000.5780&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71085725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71085725&rft_id=info:pmid/10785478&rft_els_id=S0090825800957809&rfr_iscdi=true