p53 and bcl-2 in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Their Value as Prognostic Indicators at a Median Follow-up of 60 Months
Objective. p53 is the most common tumor suppressor gene involved with human malignancies. Mutations in p53 are present in approximately 50% of human malignancies. bcl-2 is a protooncogene. Expression of its protein product is related to better prognosis in several malignancies. Methods. One hundred...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecologic oncology 2000-05, Vol.77 (2), p.278-282 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 282 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 278 |
container_title | Gynecologic oncology |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Geisler, John P. Geisler, Hans E. Miller, Greg A. Wiemann, Michael C. Zhou, Zhen Crabtree, William |
description | Objective. p53 is the most common tumor suppressor gene involved with human malignancies. Mutations in p53 are present in approximately 50% of human malignancies. bcl-2 is a protooncogene. Expression of its protein product is related to better prognosis in several malignancies.
Methods. One hundred and three patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma were studied. Immunohistochemical staining using the pAb1801 monoclonal antibody to p53 and the anti-bcl-2 124 monoclonal antibody to bcl-2 was performed. Image analysis was used to measure percentage positive nuclear area staining of mutant p53. In addition to bcl-2 and p53, FIGO stage, grade, histology, and level of cytoreduction were analyzed as prognostic factors. Univariate as well as Cox regression analysis was performed.
Results. One hundred and three patients were followed for a mean of 60 months. Twenty patients had FIGO stage I disease, 4 stage II, 59 stage III, and 20 stage IV. Immunohistochemical staining for mutant p53 was not significantly related to DNA index (P = 0.99) but was related to increasing FIGO stage (P < 0.001) and increasing histologic grade (P = 0.039). Using Cox regression analysis, increased mutant p53 staining was an independent predictor of survival in these patients (P = 0.0032), along with stage (P < 0.0001) and level of cytoreduction (P < 0.0001). Although by itself bcl-2 was not an independent prognostic indicator (P = 0.18), the combination of p53 and bcl-2 was independently predictive of survival (P = 0.038).
Conclusion. This study confirms the authors' earlier report on the importance of p53 as a prognostic indicator of survival in ovarian carcinoma. Cox regression analysis reveals mutant p53 staining to be a better independent indicator of prognosis and survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma than the combination of bcl-2 and p53. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/gyno.2000.5780 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71085725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825800957809</els_id><sourcerecordid>71085725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-a279c1b3fa0f4f5c2a7540e3d0c8d13699d3840a06a209ac6487b3c0fa143ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFv2zAQRomiReOmXTsWN3WTexRFiepWGEkaIEEyGFmJM0XFLGhSJSUH-feR4AxZMt3yvgfcY-w7xzVHrH89Poe4LhFxLRuFH9iKYyuLWsn2I1shtlioUqoz9iXnfzMlkJef2RnHRsmqUSt2HKQACh3sjC9KcAEuBjfurXfk4e5IyVGADSXjQjzQb9jurUvwQH6yQBnuU3wMMY_OwHXonKExpgw0AsGt7ZbtZfQ-PhXTALGHGuE2hnGfv7JPPflsv73ec7a9vNhu_hY3d1fXmz83hREVjgWVTWv4TvSEfdVLU1IjK7SiQ6M6Luq27YSqkLCmElsydaWanTDYE68EGXHOfp60Q4r_J5tHfXDZWO8p2Dhl3XBUsinlDK5PoEkx52R7PSR3oPSsOeoltF5C6yW0XkLPgx-v5ml3sN0b_FR2BtQJsPN7R2eTzsbZYOYqyZpRd9G9534BwYGLuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71085725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>p53 and bcl-2 in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Their Value as Prognostic Indicators at a Median Follow-up of 60 Months</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Geisler, John P. ; Geisler, Hans E. ; Miller, Greg A. ; Wiemann, Michael C. ; Zhou, Zhen ; Crabtree, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Geisler, John P. ; Geisler, Hans E. ; Miller, Greg A. ; Wiemann, Michael C. ; Zhou, Zhen ; Crabtree, William</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. p53 is the most common tumor suppressor gene involved with human malignancies. Mutations in p53 are present in approximately 50% of human malignancies. bcl-2 is a protooncogene. Expression of its protein product is related to better prognosis in several malignancies.
Methods. One hundred and three patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma were studied. Immunohistochemical staining using the pAb1801 monoclonal antibody to p53 and the anti-bcl-2 124 monoclonal antibody to bcl-2 was performed. Image analysis was used to measure percentage positive nuclear area staining of mutant p53. In addition to bcl-2 and p53, FIGO stage, grade, histology, and level of cytoreduction were analyzed as prognostic factors. Univariate as well as Cox regression analysis was performed.
Results. One hundred and three patients were followed for a mean of 60 months. Twenty patients had FIGO stage I disease, 4 stage II, 59 stage III, and 20 stage IV. Immunohistochemical staining for mutant p53 was not significantly related to DNA index (P = 0.99) but was related to increasing FIGO stage (P < 0.001) and increasing histologic grade (P = 0.039). Using Cox regression analysis, increased mutant p53 staining was an independent predictor of survival in these patients (P = 0.0032), along with stage (P < 0.0001) and level of cytoreduction (P < 0.0001). Although by itself bcl-2 was not an independent prognostic indicator (P = 0.18), the combination of p53 and bcl-2 was independently predictive of survival (P = 0.038).
Conclusion. This study confirms the authors' earlier report on the importance of p53 as a prognostic indicator of survival in ovarian carcinoma. Cox regression analysis reveals mutant p53 staining to be a better independent indicator of prognosis and survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma than the combination of bcl-2 and p53.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5780</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10785478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; bcl-2 ; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Carcinoma - genetics ; Carcinoma - pathology ; Carcinoma - therapy ; DNA Mutational Analysis ; DNA, Neoplasm - analysis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Genes, bcl-2 - genetics ; Genes, p53 - genetics ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; ovarian cancer ; Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics ; Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology ; Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy ; p53 ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; survival ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2000-05, Vol.77 (2), p.278-282</ispartof><rights>2000 Academic Press</rights><rights>Copyright 2000 Academic Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-a279c1b3fa0f4f5c2a7540e3d0c8d13699d3840a06a209ac6487b3c0fa143ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-a279c1b3fa0f4f5c2a7540e3d0c8d13699d3840a06a209ac6487b3c0fa143ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2000.5780$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10785478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geisler, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geisler, Hans E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Greg A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiemann, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crabtree, William</creatorcontrib><title>p53 and bcl-2 in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Their Value as Prognostic Indicators at a Median Follow-up of 60 Months</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>Objective. p53 is the most common tumor suppressor gene involved with human malignancies. Mutations in p53 are present in approximately 50% of human malignancies. bcl-2 is a protooncogene. Expression of its protein product is related to better prognosis in several malignancies.
Methods. One hundred and three patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma were studied. Immunohistochemical staining using the pAb1801 monoclonal antibody to p53 and the anti-bcl-2 124 monoclonal antibody to bcl-2 was performed. Image analysis was used to measure percentage positive nuclear area staining of mutant p53. In addition to bcl-2 and p53, FIGO stage, grade, histology, and level of cytoreduction were analyzed as prognostic factors. Univariate as well as Cox regression analysis was performed.
Results. One hundred and three patients were followed for a mean of 60 months. Twenty patients had FIGO stage I disease, 4 stage II, 59 stage III, and 20 stage IV. Immunohistochemical staining for mutant p53 was not significantly related to DNA index (P = 0.99) but was related to increasing FIGO stage (P < 0.001) and increasing histologic grade (P = 0.039). Using Cox regression analysis, increased mutant p53 staining was an independent predictor of survival in these patients (P = 0.0032), along with stage (P < 0.0001) and level of cytoreduction (P < 0.0001). Although by itself bcl-2 was not an independent prognostic indicator (P = 0.18), the combination of p53 and bcl-2 was independently predictive of survival (P = 0.038).
Conclusion. This study confirms the authors' earlier report on the importance of p53 as a prognostic indicator of survival in ovarian carcinoma. Cox regression analysis reveals mutant p53 staining to be a better independent indicator of prognosis and survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma than the combination of bcl-2 and p53.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>bcl-2</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Carcinoma - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma - therapy</subject><subject>DNA Mutational Analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Genes, bcl-2 - genetics</subject><subject>Genes, p53 - genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>p53</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFv2zAQRomiReOmXTsWN3WTexRFiepWGEkaIEEyGFmJM0XFLGhSJSUH-feR4AxZMt3yvgfcY-w7xzVHrH89Poe4LhFxLRuFH9iKYyuLWsn2I1shtlioUqoz9iXnfzMlkJef2RnHRsmqUSt2HKQACh3sjC9KcAEuBjfurXfk4e5IyVGADSXjQjzQb9jurUvwQH6yQBnuU3wMMY_OwHXonKExpgw0AsGt7ZbtZfQ-PhXTALGHGuE2hnGfv7JPPflsv73ec7a9vNhu_hY3d1fXmz83hREVjgWVTWv4TvSEfdVLU1IjK7SiQ6M6Luq27YSqkLCmElsydaWanTDYE68EGXHOfp60Q4r_J5tHfXDZWO8p2Dhl3XBUsinlDK5PoEkx52R7PSR3oPSsOeoltF5C6yW0XkLPgx-v5ml3sN0b_FR2BtQJsPN7R2eTzsbZYOYqyZpRd9G9534BwYGLuw</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Geisler, John P.</creator><creator>Geisler, Hans E.</creator><creator>Miller, Greg A.</creator><creator>Wiemann, Michael C.</creator><creator>Zhou, Zhen</creator><creator>Crabtree, William</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>p53 and bcl-2 in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Their Value as Prognostic Indicators at a Median Follow-up of 60 Months</title><author>Geisler, John P. ; Geisler, Hans E. ; Miller, Greg A. ; Wiemann, Michael C. ; Zhou, Zhen ; Crabtree, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-a279c1b3fa0f4f5c2a7540e3d0c8d13699d3840a06a209ac6487b3c0fa143ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>bcl-2</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Carcinoma - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma - therapy</topic><topic>DNA Mutational Analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Genes, bcl-2 - genetics</topic><topic>Genes, p53 - genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>p53</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geisler, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geisler, Hans E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Greg A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiemann, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crabtree, William</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geisler, John P.</au><au>Geisler, Hans E.</au><au>Miller, Greg A.</au><au>Wiemann, Michael C.</au><au>Zhou, Zhen</au><au>Crabtree, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>p53 and bcl-2 in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Their Value as Prognostic Indicators at a Median Follow-up of 60 Months</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>278</spage><epage>282</epage><pages>278-282</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>Objective. p53 is the most common tumor suppressor gene involved with human malignancies. Mutations in p53 are present in approximately 50% of human malignancies. bcl-2 is a protooncogene. Expression of its protein product is related to better prognosis in several malignancies.
Methods. One hundred and three patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma were studied. Immunohistochemical staining using the pAb1801 monoclonal antibody to p53 and the anti-bcl-2 124 monoclonal antibody to bcl-2 was performed. Image analysis was used to measure percentage positive nuclear area staining of mutant p53. In addition to bcl-2 and p53, FIGO stage, grade, histology, and level of cytoreduction were analyzed as prognostic factors. Univariate as well as Cox regression analysis was performed.
Results. One hundred and three patients were followed for a mean of 60 months. Twenty patients had FIGO stage I disease, 4 stage II, 59 stage III, and 20 stage IV. Immunohistochemical staining for mutant p53 was not significantly related to DNA index (P = 0.99) but was related to increasing FIGO stage (P < 0.001) and increasing histologic grade (P = 0.039). Using Cox regression analysis, increased mutant p53 staining was an independent predictor of survival in these patients (P = 0.0032), along with stage (P < 0.0001) and level of cytoreduction (P < 0.0001). Although by itself bcl-2 was not an independent prognostic indicator (P = 0.18), the combination of p53 and bcl-2 was independently predictive of survival (P = 0.038).
Conclusion. This study confirms the authors' earlier report on the importance of p53 as a prognostic indicator of survival in ovarian carcinoma. Cox regression analysis reveals mutant p53 staining to be a better independent indicator of prognosis and survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma than the combination of bcl-2 and p53.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10785478</pmid><doi>10.1006/gyno.2000.5780</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-8258 |
ispartof | Gynecologic oncology, 2000-05, Vol.77 (2), p.278-282 |
issn | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71085725 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Aged bcl-2 Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis Carcinoma - genetics Carcinoma - pathology Carcinoma - therapy DNA Mutational Analysis DNA, Neoplasm - analysis Female Follow-Up Studies Genes, bcl-2 - genetics Genes, p53 - genetics Humans Middle Aged ovarian cancer Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy p53 Predictive Value of Tests Prognosis survival Survival Analysis |
title | p53 and bcl-2 in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Their Value as Prognostic Indicators at a Median Follow-up of 60 Months |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A22%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=p53%20and%20bcl-2%20in%20Epithelial%20Ovarian%20Carcinoma:%20Their%20Value%20as%20Prognostic%20Indicators%20at%20a%20Median%20Follow-up%20of%2060%20Months&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Geisler,%20John%20P.&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=278&rft.epage=282&rft.pages=278-282&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/gyno.2000.5780&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71085725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71085725&rft_id=info:pmid/10785478&rft_els_id=S0090825800957809&rfr_iscdi=true |