The Liverpool brief Assessment system for Communication Skills in the making of doctors
The teaching of clinical communication skills is gaining importance in medical schools. There is a need to design feasible assessments that are credible to faculty, students and the profession. To design, and assess the reliability and validity of a new communication skills assessment system (the Li...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice 2001-01, Vol.6 (1), p.69-80 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 80 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 69 |
| container_title | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice |
| container_volume | 6 |
| creator | HUMPHRIS, G. M KANEY, S |
| description | The teaching of clinical communication skills is gaining importance in medical schools. There is a need to design feasible assessments that are credible to faculty, students and the profession.
To design, and assess the reliability and validity of a new communication skills assessment system (the Liverpool Communication Skills Assessment Scale-LCSAS, and the Global Simulated Patient Rating Scale-GSPRS) for employment in OSCEs.
The first three annual intakes of students to the new medical curriculum at Liverpool Medical School (n = 600). Two further sub samples of 1st year (n = 60) and 2nd year students (n = 80) were included for further validation purposes in separate studies.
Intra class correlation coefficients and generalisability coefficients were employed to assess reliability of the LCSAS and GSPRS. Validity was tested by examining predicted relationships using pearson product moment correlation coefficients.
The LCSAS and GSPRS showed reasonable evidence for their reliability and validity although further work is recommended. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1009879220949 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71081517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71081517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-620496051dcfd46fccdc478f725231ca3c9020ff8111bbe5c0a5a766de2e2e853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1LxDAQBuAgit9nbxJQvFVnkqZJvC2LX7DgQcVjyaaJRttmTVrBf2_BFUTm8M7h4WUYQo4QzhEYv5hdIoBWUjMGutQbZBeF5AVWUm5OO1esKLWudshezm8AwFGpbbKDWKoKS9glz4-vji7Cp0urGFu6TMF5OsvZ5dy5fqD5Kw-uoz4mOo9dN_bBmiHEnj68h7bNNPR0mBo68x76Fxo9baIdYsoHZMubNrvDde6Tp-urx_ltsbi_uZvPFoXlCENRMSh1BQIb65uy8tY2tpTKSyYYR2u41cDAe4WIy6UTFowwsqoax6ZRgu-Ts5_eVYofo8tD3YVsXdua3sUx1xJBoUA5wZN_8C2OqZ9uqxkTGgXXUk3qeK3GZeeaepVCZ9JX_fuwCZyugcnWtD6Z3ob8xwnBNPBv9c95DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259153978</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Liverpool brief Assessment system for Communication Skills in the making of doctors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>HUMPHRIS, G. M ; KANEY, S</creator><creatorcontrib>HUMPHRIS, G. M ; KANEY, S</creatorcontrib><description>The teaching of clinical communication skills is gaining importance in medical schools. There is a need to design feasible assessments that are credible to faculty, students and the profession.
To design, and assess the reliability and validity of a new communication skills assessment system (the Liverpool Communication Skills Assessment Scale-LCSAS, and the Global Simulated Patient Rating Scale-GSPRS) for employment in OSCEs.
The first three annual intakes of students to the new medical curriculum at Liverpool Medical School (n = 600). Two further sub samples of 1st year (n = 60) and 2nd year students (n = 80) were included for further validation purposes in separate studies.
Intra class correlation coefficients and generalisability coefficients were employed to assess reliability of the LCSAS and GSPRS. Validity was tested by examining predicted relationships using pearson product moment correlation coefficients.
The LCSAS and GSPRS showed reasonable evidence for their reliability and validity although further work is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1382-4996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1009879220949</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11486140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Clinical Competence ; Communication ; Communication Skills ; Correlation ; Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods ; Education, Medical - standards ; Educational sciences ; Humans ; Medical and paramedical education ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Rating Scales ; Reproducibility of Results ; Skill Analysis ; Statistical Analysis ; Teaching methods ; United Kingdom ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2001-01, Vol.6 (1), p.69-80</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Advances in Health Sciences Education is a copyright of Springer, (2001). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-620496051dcfd46fccdc478f725231ca3c9020ff8111bbe5c0a5a766de2e2e853</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1155290$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11486140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HUMPHRIS, G. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KANEY, S</creatorcontrib><title>The Liverpool brief Assessment system for Communication Skills in the making of doctors</title><title>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</title><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><description>The teaching of clinical communication skills is gaining importance in medical schools. There is a need to design feasible assessments that are credible to faculty, students and the profession.
To design, and assess the reliability and validity of a new communication skills assessment system (the Liverpool Communication Skills Assessment Scale-LCSAS, and the Global Simulated Patient Rating Scale-GSPRS) for employment in OSCEs.
The first three annual intakes of students to the new medical curriculum at Liverpool Medical School (n = 600). Two further sub samples of 1st year (n = 60) and 2nd year students (n = 80) were included for further validation purposes in separate studies.
Intra class correlation coefficients and generalisability coefficients were employed to assess reliability of the LCSAS and GSPRS. Validity was tested by examining predicted relationships using pearson product moment correlation coefficients.
The LCSAS and GSPRS showed reasonable evidence for their reliability and validity although further work is recommended.</description><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods</subject><subject>Education, Medical - standards</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical and paramedical education</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Skill Analysis</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1382-4996</issn><issn>1573-1677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E1LxDAQBuAgit9nbxJQvFVnkqZJvC2LX7DgQcVjyaaJRttmTVrBf2_BFUTm8M7h4WUYQo4QzhEYv5hdIoBWUjMGutQbZBeF5AVWUm5OO1esKLWudshezm8AwFGpbbKDWKoKS9glz4-vji7Cp0urGFu6TMF5OsvZ5dy5fqD5Kw-uoz4mOo9dN_bBmiHEnj68h7bNNPR0mBo68x76Fxo9baIdYsoHZMubNrvDde6Tp-urx_ltsbi_uZvPFoXlCENRMSh1BQIb65uy8tY2tpTKSyYYR2u41cDAe4WIy6UTFowwsqoax6ZRgu-Ts5_eVYofo8tD3YVsXdua3sUx1xJBoUA5wZN_8C2OqZ9uqxkTGgXXUk3qeK3GZeeaepVCZ9JX_fuwCZyugcnWtD6Z3ob8xwnBNPBv9c95DA</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>HUMPHRIS, G. M</creator><creator>KANEY, S</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>The Liverpool brief Assessment system for Communication Skills in the making of doctors</title><author>HUMPHRIS, G. M ; KANEY, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-620496051dcfd46fccdc478f725231ca3c9020ff8111bbe5c0a5a766de2e2e853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods</topic><topic>Education, Medical - standards</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical and paramedical education</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Skill Analysis</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HUMPHRIS, G. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KANEY, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HUMPHRIS, G. M</au><au>KANEY, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Liverpool brief Assessment system for Communication Skills in the making of doctors</atitle><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>69-80</pages><issn>1382-4996</issn><eissn>1573-1677</eissn><abstract>The teaching of clinical communication skills is gaining importance in medical schools. There is a need to design feasible assessments that are credible to faculty, students and the profession.
To design, and assess the reliability and validity of a new communication skills assessment system (the Liverpool Communication Skills Assessment Scale-LCSAS, and the Global Simulated Patient Rating Scale-GSPRS) for employment in OSCEs.
The first three annual intakes of students to the new medical curriculum at Liverpool Medical School (n = 600). Two further sub samples of 1st year (n = 60) and 2nd year students (n = 80) were included for further validation purposes in separate studies.
Intra class correlation coefficients and generalisability coefficients were employed to assess reliability of the LCSAS and GSPRS. Validity was tested by examining predicted relationships using pearson product moment correlation coefficients.
The LCSAS and GSPRS showed reasonable evidence for their reliability and validity although further work is recommended.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>11486140</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1009879220949</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1382-4996 |
| ispartof | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2001-01, Vol.6 (1), p.69-80 |
| issn | 1382-4996 1573-1677 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71081517 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Clinical Competence Communication Communication Skills Correlation Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods Education, Medical - standards Educational sciences Humans Medical and paramedical education Physician-Patient Relations Rating Scales Reproducibility of Results Skill Analysis Statistical Analysis Teaching methods United Kingdom Validity |
| title | The Liverpool brief Assessment system for Communication Skills in the making of doctors |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A17%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Liverpool%20brief%20Assessment%20system%20for%20Communication%20Skills%20in%20the%20making%20of%20doctors&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20health%20sciences%20education%20:%20theory%20and%20practice&rft.au=HUMPHRIS,%20G.%20M&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=69-80&rft.issn=1382-4996&rft.eissn=1573-1677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1009879220949&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71081517%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259153978&rft_id=info:pmid/11486140&rfr_iscdi=true |